Hi -
My recollection is that part of the motivation for the use of
zero-length strings as sentinel values in situations like this
in MIB modules (rather than skipping the object instance) was
to permit a clear distinction between "information not available"
and "access denied".
Randy
On 12/15/2
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Dean Bogdanovic mailto:ivand...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Authors,
>>
>> Need some clarification about applied data store
>>
>> In the draft, applied data store can contain data from
>>
>> This data can come from several source
Hi,
Here is a summary of the proposed solutions so far:
* The solution with introduction of YANG statement "diagnostics true;",
additional datastore and NETCONF protocol change. IMO that sounds heavy
but valid solution.
* The solution with RPC returning the data as output. IMO has the
limitat
Yes/support.
I have read this draft and believe it would be very useful for enabling many
Layer 2 and Layer 3 services.
However, I do have few comments and that I would like the authors to address
once the document is a WG document.
a) Suggest to replace this text:
"These modules allow IE
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your review. My comments are inline as [clyde]…
On 12/13/16, 8:16 PM, "netmod on behalf of Alex Campbell"
wrote:
I am considering to implement the data model in this draft.
I have reviewed this draft and found the following issues. In approximately
decreasing
The current draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01 defines ietf-hardware and iana-entity
modules. Is it intended that iana-entity will become iana-hardware? Thanks, W.
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 05:26:09PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:15:00PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/13
> > >
> > > Should the model support pre-configuratio
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:15:00PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/13
> >
> > Should the model support pre-configuration of hardware components?
> > The current model supports pre-configuration of
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:15:00PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/13
>
> Should the model support pre-configuration of hardware components?
> The current model supports pre-configuration of components provided
> the operator knows t
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:03:40PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/12
> >
> > entConfigChange is useful but maybe covered by netconf-config-change
> > notification, or pub/sub. it is also a bad nam
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:03:40PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/12
>
> entConfigChange is useful but maybe covered by netconf-config-change
> notification, or pub/sub. it is also a bad name, since it fires when
> the opstate chang
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Looking at the YANG fragment, I am also not sure how useful it is to
> > carry the 32 'something' restriction forward. Note that 32 means
> > unicode characters in YANG but space of the UTF-8 encoding of
> > characters for SMIv
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I do not think the goal should be to emulate SMIv2 compliance levels
> using features. So I propose to do nothing about entity4CRCompliance.
Ok.
> The other question (which should perhaps have been a separate issue)
> is whether non-existing values are indicated by
Hi,
Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
> Authors,
>
> Need some clarification about applied data store
>
> In the draft, applied data store can contain data from
>
> This data can come from several sources; from , from dynamic
> configuration protocols (e.g., DHCP), or from control-plane datastore.
>
>
I do not think the goal should be to emulate SMIv2 compliance levels
using features. So I propose to do nothing about entity4CRCompliance.
The other question (which should perhaps have been a separate issue)
is whether non-existing values are indicated by zero-length strings or
non-existing object
Hi,
Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/13
Should the model support pre-configuration of hardware components?
The current model supports pre-configuration of components provided
the operator knows the name of the component to be installed. A more
useful model would use the pa
Hi,
Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/12
entConfigChange is useful but maybe covered by netconf-config-change
notification, or pub/sub. it is also a bad name, since it fires when
the opstate changes... Need to think about which notifs to define.
Currently we have three noti
Hi,
Issue https://github.com/netmod-wg/entity/issues/11
RFC 6933 introduced a new compliance level for constrained resources
- entity4CRCompliance. Do we need a corresponding feature?
In YANG, we cannot to the equivalent of compliance levels, so we would
need to mark all nodes with some opti
Authors,
Need some clarification about applied data store
In the draft, applied data store can contain data from
This data can come from several sources; from , from dynamic
configuration protocols (e.g., DHCP), or from control-plane datastore.
The control-plane stores are not well clarified
On 12/15/2016 2:57 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Benoit Claise wrote:
Dear draft-ietf-netmod-entity authors,
As mentioned by Tim Carey during the last IETF meeting, BBF work
depends on the draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01.
Message from BBF:
We are now in the final stages of reviewing “TR-383” “
Benoit Claise wrote:
> Dear draft-ietf-netmod-entity authors,
>
> As mentioned by Tim Carey during the last IETF meeting, BBF work
> depends on the draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01.
>
> Message from BBF:
>
>We are now in the final stages of reviewing “TR-383” “Common YANG”
>modules that have
Dear draft-ietf-netmod-entity authors,
As mentioned by Tim Carey during the last IETF meeting, BBF work depends
on the draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01.
Message from BBF:
We are now in the final stages of reviewing “TR-383” “Common YANG”
modules that have the following dependencies:
*
22 matches
Mail list logo
