On 6 Nov 2018 David Pitt wrote:
> Richard Porter, on 6 Nov, wrote:
>> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses, for
>> example: http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>>
>> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name
On 06/11/2018, Richard Porter wrote:
> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses,
> for example:
> http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>
> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
> to be OK. What's more if I
Richard Porter, on 6 Nov, wrote:
> Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses, for
> example: http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
>
> gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
> to be OK. What's more if I delete
Anyone else getting this? I've had it from one or two addresses,
for example:
http://www.natwest.com/global/customer-charter/g1/ideas-bank.ashx
gives me the error "Couldn't resolve hostname" yet the host name appears
to be OK. What's more if I delete the last element NetSurf does resolve
the
I see this more and more often of late: large grey areas on a web page
as displayed by Netsurf. Drag a menu (or other window) over the grey,
and the trail goes white. You never know what content is never shown.
Example: http://www.cnet.com/products/hp-color-laserjet-cp2025/specs/
Is it
In article 7fed4f7354@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel
nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:
I see this more and more often of late: large grey areas on a web
page as displayed by Netsurf. Drag a menu (or other window) over
the grey, and the trail goes white. You never know what content
is never
I get the infamous NetSurf is running out of memory error when
clicking the following URL:
http://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/
NetSurf #417, ARMini/RISC OS 5.19. NS 2.9 works.
Typing in the .co.uk equivalent (which blogspot.com addresses now
redirect to) also fails, so it must be something in
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:07 +, Richard Porter wrote:
On 18 Feb 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
Let's stay on topic (NetSurf), please.
OK, what about Google maps?
It contained an unclosed comment. We reported it to Google and they've
fixed it. This is not a bug in NetSurf.
John.
In message 502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz
Keith Hopper asg...@inspire.net.nz wrote:
In article 502f456d69...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter
r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper
Keith Hopper asg...@inspire.net.nz wrote:
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and
'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what
On 18 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
In article 502f456d69...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter
r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element
On 18 Feb 2009 JJ van Poll wrote:
In message 502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz
Keith Hopper asg...@inspire.net.nz wrote:
In article 502f456d69...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter
r...@minijem.plus.com
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:21:08 +
David J. Ruck dr...@druck.org.uk wrote:
The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
you can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of
text
On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which you
can use to change the emphaisis. They actually read passages of text
superbly well with, and honestly, sometimes
In article 6553812f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 18 Feb 2009 David J. Ruck wrote:
The sort of modern natural voice synthesisers we are using in screen
readers for the visiually impared, have all sorts of parameters which
you can use to
Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
A friend of mine makes use of the Dolphin stuff; the synthesiser that
shipped with it was pretty dreadful.
We don't like to talk about that, it's utter sh*te, but we managed to ease
out the director responsible last year, and are rapidly elimating
Richard Porter wrote:
OK, what about Google maps?
You mean some of the most complex javascript ever written and
specifically tailored for each major browers it runs on?
Would you like to guess which side of hell freezing over
it will work on Netsurf?
Cheers
---Dave
--
Email:
On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
In article 920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com,
Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote:
On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
In article e45ef42650.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
[snip]
Yes, but
In article 4cd5fa2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com,
Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote:
On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
In article 920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com,
Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote:
On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
In article
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being deprecated
is a desire to separate styling from the reason that a content needs a
particular style - 'i' and 'b' imply a
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and
'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what
'strong' means in this context.
Neither do
In article 502f456d69...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
In article ca253e2f50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter
r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
the 'b' element,
On 16 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
In article ef3d6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com, Roger Darlington
roger...@freeuk.com wrote:
On 3 Feb 2009, Tim Hill wrote:
Just to follow-up this issue of Netsurf generating extra space, I
have found an even simpler case:
html.(iitalic/i
In article 920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com,
Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote:
On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote:
In article e45ef42650.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
[snip]
Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a space after an
In article 5026fac702asg...@inspire.net.nz, Keith Hopper
asg...@inspire.net.nz wrote:
In article e45ef42650.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter
r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
[Snip]
Netsurf still inserts a space after an end tag - so that
an end tag
On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
I thought browsers ignored white space and in no way thought that would
be the problem. Other browsers obviously must not translate white space
into an extra newline where none is needed. Sometimes Netsurf does.
Any white space should translate into a single
In article e45ef42650.r...@user.minijem.plus.com,
Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:
On 1 Feb 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
I thought browsers ignored white space and in no way thought that would
be the problem. Other browsers obviously must not translate white space
into an extra
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
It is definitely not mismatched and but I have narrowed down the
problem. One of the forms has an 'action' attribute which, including
encoded ampersands, quotes, etc. is 257 characters long. If I move the
closing
On 12 Aug 2008 Gavin Wraith wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
It is definitely not mismatched and but I have narrowed down the
problem. One of the forms has an 'action' attribute which, including
encoded ampersands, quotes, etc. is 257
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is at
http://www.archifishal.co.uk/software/riscos/tidy.shtml and a user guide
by Dave Raggett is at
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is at
http://www.archifishal.co.uk/software/riscos/tidy.shtml and a user guide
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
Try running the html through Tidy. The RISC OS port is at
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008 Tony Moore wrote:
On 12 Aug 2008, Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This fault is extremely sensitive to what else is on the page.
Try running the html through Tidy. The
I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
contains several forms I get a spurious character. I have made a
change but I can't see a missing or missing quote or anything that
would likely to cause it. When I stick in a /tabletable at any
point between table rows
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
contains several forms I get a spurious character. I have made a
change but I can't see a missing or missing quote or anything that
would
On 11 Aug 2008 Kevin Wells wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a very curious problem. At the bottom of a long table which
contains several forms I get a spurious character. I have made a
change but I can't see a missing or missing
36 matches
Mail list logo
