Brian Morrison wrote:
> The fix was to paste my WPA key into the entry field after using the
> edit menu for my home SSID and then going to the advanced tab (at least
> I think that's it, don't have it in front of me just now). There is only
> an SSID stored, no BSSID.
I
Has anyone else suffered from a problem where on occasion F12 will boot
and then be unable to connect to a previously usable AP because the WPA
key is no longer stored? My home network has two APs with the same SSID
but different BSSIDs on each channel.
I have now had this happen twice, the first
I have not forgotten about this and will gather the needed data. Just
happen to be life-busy for the current time.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Dan Williams wrote:>
> Can you grab /var/log/messages from a successful run (cert+peap0) and a
> failed run so I can look at what NM is sending to th
> network={
> ssid="networkname"
> scan_ssid=1
> key_mgmt=WPA-EAP
> eap=PEAP
> identity="username"
> password="mypassword"
> phase1="peaplabel=PEAPTYPE"
> phase2="auth=MSCHAPV2&quo
ventually *did* get connected, your connection
would quite likely be unstable and every time a WPA rekey occurred,
you'd probably fail the rekey too in the same way that the initial
connection fails. And while that rekeying was going on, you wouldn't be
able to send any traffic eith
11 (kernel 2.6.30.9). I
>>>>>> > tried setting iwlagn parameters (disable_hw_scan, sw_crypto ... almost
>>>>>> > every combination possible) but nothing changed.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Is it possible to increase th
gt;>?>?I?am?using?networkmanager?v?0.7.1?on?fedora?11?(kernel?2.6.30.9).?I
>>>>>?>?tried?setting?iwlagn?parameters?(disable_hw_scan,?sw_crypto?...?almost
>>>>>?>?every?combination?possible)?but?nothing?changed.
>>>>>?>?
>>>>>
g?changed.
>>>?>?
>>>?>?Is?it?possible?to?increase?the?authentication?timeout??Maybe?this?is?a
>>>?>?dumb?question?but?I?wasn't?able?to?find?any?documentation?about
>>>?>?timeouts.
>
>>?The?full?WPA?connection?timeout?for?NM?is?about?30?se
tion possible) but nothing changed.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to increase the authentication timeout? Maybe this is a
>> > dumb question but I wasn't able to find any documentation about
>> > timeouts.
> The full WPA connection timeout for NM is about 30 seconds
sn't able to find any documentation about
> timeouts.
The full WPA connection timeout for NM is about 30 seconds. That's
usually plenty of time for the supplicant to scan, find the AP, initiate
the 4-way handshake, and finish it, *especially* for WPA. I'm very
curious about why
I'm back. I've run into something.
First, I stopped NetworkManager service, and then tried creating a
simple wpa_supplicant configuration file, like so...
-
ap_scan=1
fast_reauth=1
network={
ssid="networkname"
scan_ssid=1
key_mgmt=WPA-
Hello again.
After a fresh (and now updated) install of Fedora 12 Beta, I'm having
a huge problem getting my university's wifi connection to work with
networkmanager. I've been trying for hours and I can't make it
happen.
It's one of those WPA2/enterprise/certificate type connections, and
I've t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Espy wrote:
> On 10/15/2009 02:32 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:57 -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME
On 10/15/2009 02:32 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:57 -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a document someplace that tells me what information wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:57 -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Is there a document someplace that tells me what information would be
>> helpful to troubleshoot a connection lik
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:57 -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a document someplace that tells me what information would be
> helpful to troubleshoot a connection like this that will not work? I'm
> trying to connect via the plasma Network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a document someplace that tells me what information would be
helpful to troubleshoot a connection like this that will not work? I'm
trying to connect via the plasma NetworkManager applet... have not tried
other means. Would love to have this w
t; NM sends a permissive config to the supplicant, and will allow
> the
> supplicant to connect with either WPA or WPA2. What you
> probably want
> to do here to debug the supplicant is to add "-dddt" to the
> end of teh
>
supplicant to connect with either WPA or WPA2. What you probably want
to do here to debug the supplicant is to add "-dddt" to the end of teh
Exec= line
in /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.service,
then 'sudo killall -TERM wpa_supplicant
nager to any network
> > with
> > wpa/wpa2 that doesn't broadcast its name. Once the name is
> > revealed
> > there are no problems. This is on Fedora 11 and there's a bug
> > about it
> > here: https://bugzil
> 2009/2/27 Joshua C.
> I cannot connect with the latest Networkmanager to any network
> with
> wpa/wpa2 that doesn't broadcast its name. Once the name is
> revealed
> there are no problems. This is on Fedora 11 and there
Hi all,
I also have this problem. I try with NetworkManager-0.7.0. I am not
familiar with wpa_supplicant. I try below conf with wpa_supplicant.
Conf 1:
ap_scan=1
network={
ssid="HIDE"
scan_ssid=1
proto=WPA
pairwise=TKIP
group=TKIP
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
psk="12345678"
}
This
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:09 +0200, ivo1...@free.fr wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> How to have exactly this Menu with JAUNTY JACKALOPE when i want to connect wpa
> enterprise tls ...
If you select the AP you're trying to connect to from the wireless
networks menu, then you'll get
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 09:05 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> >>
> >> Instructions of the hotel are the following
> >>
> >> SSID: STI WiFi
> >> key: a531bc531d
> >> PC: Network Key
> >> MAC: WPA 10 digits
> >
> > Could
>>
>> Instructions of the hotel are the following
>>
>> SSID: STI WiFi
>> key: a531bc531d
>> PC: Network Key
>> MAC: WPA 10 digits
>
> Could you try turning off NM, killing wpa_supplicant, and using
> 'iwconfig' to association with
>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm in a hotel currently and the wifi uses WPA encryption and password
> >>>> is a 10 digit hexadecimal number. When I use this number in Windows it
> >>>> works fine. However if I use NetworkManager it d
Frequency:2.462 GHz (Channel 11)
> Quality=100/100 Signal level:-37 dBm Noise level=-94 dBm
> Encryption key:on
> IE: WPA Version 1
> Group Cipher : TKIP
>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 17:29, Larry Finger wrote:
> Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 03:07, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:06 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm in a hotel currently
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:06 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in a hotel currently and the wifi uses WPA encryption and password
> is a 10 digit hexadecimal number. When I use this number in Windows it
> works fine. However if I use NetworkManager it doesn't. If
Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 03:07, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:06 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm in a hotel currently and the wifi uses WPA encryption and password
>>> is a 10 digit hex
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 03:07, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:06 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in a hotel currently and the wifi uses WPA encryption and password
>> is a 10 digit hexadecimal number. When I use this number in Window
John Mahoney wrote:
WPA-psk is the basic method which uses any passphrase of 8 to 63
chars. As far as 10 digit hex, are you
sure it is not a WEP 64 hex key because that would fit the description
better.
As far as I know, a WPA-PSK setup can also use a full 256 byte key
specified via 64 ASCII
WPA-psk is the basic method which uses any passphrase of 8 to 63 chars. As
far as 10 digit hex, are you
sure it is not a WEP 64 hex key because that would fit the description
better.
--
John
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in a hotel currentl
Hi,
I'm in a hotel currently and the wifi uses WPA encryption and password
is a 10 digit hexadecimal number. When I use this number in Windows it
works fine. However if I use NetworkManager it doesn't. If I look at
the password that's actually being stored by NetworkManager I a
hex
I cannot connect with the latest Networkmanager to any network with
wpa/wpa2 that doesn't broadcast its name. Once the name is revealed
there are no problems. This is on Fedora 11 and there's a bug about it
here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486877
Installed are:
Netw
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:59 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 with Atheros ath9k driver on a Thinkpad T60p.
>
> Sorry for the mundane question, but I'm visiting family and they have
> an older Linksys Wireless-B router (AP).
>
>
> The AP h
I'm running Ubuntu 8.10 with Atheros ath9k driver on a Thinkpad T60p.
Sorry for the mundane question, but I'm visiting family and they have
an older Linksys Wireless-B router (AP).
The AP has WPA Pre-Shared Key with TKIP (other options are WPA
RADIUS, RADIUS, and WEP option).
Whe
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 14:50 -0700, Jacob Oursland wrote:
> Failing lately for many: WPA Enterprise, WPA2 Enterprise, 802.1X WEP and
> more!
>
> Fedora Core 9, Fedora Core 10, Ubuntu 8.10 and most likely other
> distributions are distributing a version of wpa_supplicant that breaks
Failing lately for many: WPA Enterprise, WPA2 Enterprise, 802.1X WEP and
more!
Fedora Core 9, Fedora Core 10, Ubuntu 8.10 and most likely other
distributions are distributing a version of wpa_supplicant that breaks
access to the aforementioned networks. This means no connectivity to
Business
ager-dialogfab.cpp (727634)
+++ knetworkmanager/src/knetworkmanager-devicestore.cpp (beso)
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@
cryptoWidget->EAPurlClient->setEnabled(method == EAP_TLS);
cryptoWidget->EAPurlPrivate->setEnabled(method == EAP_TLS);
cryptoWidget->EAPleditPrivatePassword
'1'
Jan 14 09:54:16 linux-im9r NetworkManager: Config: added 'key_mgmt'
value 'WPA-EAP'
Jan 14 09:54:16 linux-im9r NetworkManager: Config: added 'pairwise'
value 'TKIP CCMP'
Jan 14 09:54:16 linux-im9r NetworkManager: Config: added &#
'ssid'
> > value 'eduroam'
> > Jan 14 09:54:16 linux-im9r NetworkManager: Config: added 'scan_ssid'
> > value '1'
> > Jan 14 09:54:16 linux-im9r NetworkManager: Config: added 'key_mgmt'
> > value 'WPA-EAP&#x
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 13:46 +0100, Thomas Rix wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having trouble to connect to the wireless network at my university.
>
> It uses WPA Enterprise with PEAP authentication, TKIP encryption and a
> CA-certificate.
>
> This is what I enter in KNe
Hi.
I'm having trouble to connect to the wireless network at my university.
It uses WPA Enterprise with PEAP authentication, TKIP encryption and a
CA-certificate.
This is what I enter in KNetworkManager:
Security: WPA Enterprise
EAP method: PEAP
Identity: my username
Password: my passwo
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2009/1/2 Darren Albers :
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to connect to a
>>> wireless network either WPA(2) Enterprise TTLS/PAP or WPA(2)
>>&
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to connect to a
> wireless network either WPA(2) Enterprise TTLS/PAP or WPA(2)
> Enterprise(2) PEAP/MSCHAPv2. I could connect using NetworkManager. But
> AFAIK NetworkManager lacks the capability of check
Hi,
I want to connect to a
wireless network either WPA(2) Enterprise TTLS/PAP or WPA(2)
Enterprise(2) PEAP/MSCHAPv2. I could connect using NetworkManager. But
AFAIK NetworkManager lacks the capability of check server radius name,
so there is somewhat insecure. I'd like provide a workaround
ore testing today, this time using
version 0.7.0-1 from http://debs.michaelbiebl.de/network-manager/.
Settings used in nm-connection-editor:
SSID: dd-wrt
Wireless security:
Security: WPA and WPA2 enterprise
Authentication: TLS
Identity: omni
User Certificate: client_cert.pem
CA Certificate: cacert.pem
wrong
> > > >ec5f180a24cd31ba9d3d7f2abc9dc557fd16602f
> > > >
> > > >* the supplicant wasn't waiting long enough for IBSS creation
> > > >1d3c75b3b6663ed9f3a9a8dea8d47056cce2680f
> > > >
> > > I install it
on.
> >
> > > Then, see if you can set up a supplicant config that works for
> you, and
> > > if the supplicant can do it correctly, then we have a chance of
> getting
> > > NM to do it correctly.
> > >
> > Just curios, what I understand is that wp
> > Then, see if you can set up a supplicant config that works for you, and
> > if the supplicant can do it correctly, then we have a chance of getting
> > NM to do it correctly.
> >
> Just curios, what I understand is that wpa_supplicant deals with
> periodic key up
ic key update, but I have seen that it also scans the network,
implements roaming, etc..
Does NM use wpa_supplicant as a wrapper for most its operations, like
scanning, setting interface settings, like essid ?
Does nm call wpa_supplicant even while connecting/using to non wpa
network?
I assume that nm
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 04:00 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> I am testing now the connection sharing feature of NM.
> It mostly works, but I found out that I can't create an ad hoc wpa2
> protected network.
> Is this possible (nm creates it, but it doesn't work)?
It should be possible, yes, but the
I am testing now the connection sharing feature of NM.
It mostly works, but I found out that I can't create an ad hoc wpa2
protected network.
Is this possible (nm creates it, but it doesn't work)?
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
___
NetworkManager
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 15:11 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:34 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 21:33 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> > > I know it's a minor thing, but by breaking convention, it makes
> writing
> > > an automated build just that little bit mor
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:34 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 21:33 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:58 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > That's mostly the problem. I fixed the issue in the applet svn this
> > > morning. We're planning on doing a 0.7.1 pretty
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 21:33 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:58 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > That's mostly the problem. I fixed the issue in the applet svn this
> > morning. We're planning on doing a 0.7.1 pretty soon which will contain
> > this fix.
>
> Any chance that whe
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 16:58 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> That's mostly the problem. I fixed the issue in the applet svn this
> morning. We're planning on doing a 0.7.1 pretty soon which will contain
> this fix.
Any chance that when you do, you can make the tarball name consistent
with the conten
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:25 +0100, Rafał Lichwała wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below some details and updates about EAP-TLS wired connection problems
> in Network Manager.
>
> I was looking into source code for a while and that's what I found:
>
> When I fill in all the certs (client cert, CA cert, client
Hi,
Below some details and updates about EAP-TLS wired connection problems
in Network Manager.
I was looking into source code for a while and that's what I found:
When I fill in all the certs (client cert, CA cert, client key - all in
PEM format) and then click "Apply" I have the following i
Sorry for the confusion...
Some dependency packages were missing... :/
I remembered about "apt-get build-dep network-manager", but forgot about
"apt-get build-dep network-manager-applet" :/
I've installed them and network-manager-applet build is fine now! :)
So now I have NetworkManager svn436
Dan Williams skrev:
> Once you have a connection set up in the connection editor, and you have
> the keyfile plugin enabled, you should be able to check the "make
> available to all users" checkbox, hit apply, and it'll be a keyfile.
>
> It's quite likely you'll want to be using the final 0.7 Netw
Dan Williams wrote:
Compile error should be fixed in svn4361 on both trunk and 0.7 stable
branches.
Thanks for this quick fix Dan! :)
NetworkManager build is fine now.
But network-manager-applet build is failing... :(
So I'm still not able to build "nm-connection-editor" (which is a part
o
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:52 +0100, John S. Skogtvedt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> currently it doesn't seem possible to use either EAP-TLS or other WPA
> Enterprise system connections.
> (I'm using network-manager 0.7 packages from Debian Experimental.)
>
> The connectio
tring literal and no
> format arguments
> make[4]: *** [NetworkManager-nm-netlink-monitor.o] Error 1
> #######
>
> What's the problem?
Compile error should be fixed in svn4361 on both trunk and 0.7 stable
branches.
Dan
> In my company I'm able to use EAP-TLS based wire
> John S. Skogtvedt wrote:
>> currently it doesn't seem possible to use either EAP-TLS or other WPA
>> Enterprise system connections.
>> (I'm using network-manager 0.7 packages from Debian Experimental.)
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:38:38PM +0100, Rafał Lichwała wr
no
format arguments
make[4]: *** [NetworkManager-nm-netlink-monitor.o] Error 1
###
What's the problem?
In my company I'm able to use EAP-TLS based wired connection only, so I
must say that unfortunately NetworkManager is now completely useless for
me :( I have to setup this
Hello,
currently it doesn't seem possible to use either EAP-TLS or other WPA
Enterprise system connections.
(I'm using network-manager 0.7 packages from Debian Experimental.)
The connection editor doesn't allow adding a EAP-TLS connection
("Invalid connection: NMSettin
tried again, here some results:
start nm
* auto to home network
* create new adhoc
* from list
* message to be connected, crash
* same name, same pass, but re-entered it
* message to be connected, crash
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 09:26 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 08:26 +0200, Björn Martensen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried the adhoc wpa fixes from yesterday and found some issues:
>
> Can you try with svn r4200? There were a few unrelated issues tha
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 08:26 +0200, Björn Martensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the adhoc wpa fixes from yesterday and found some issues:
Can you try with svn r4200? There were a few unrelated issues that I
fixed last night/this morning that could help out some of the issues
here.
A
Hi,
I tried the adhoc wpa fixes from yesterday and found some issues:
- i am connected to my wpa2 wifi network
- i create a new wpa/wpa2 adhoc connection
> when the connection should be established, nm dies and i have to
restart /etc/rc.d/networkmanager.
- when it has restarted, i connect to
keyring so nm can store the passkey there.
in the configuration settings for the connection, the security mode is
correct (wpa/wpa2) but there is no password entered. when i enter one,
it's not in there when i re-open that connection editor after closing
it.
greets,
Björn
signature.asc
Descr
x27;s the
> > problem here.
>
> Why? Why would it succeed later if it failed initially? When the
> keyfile configuration changes, it's re-read automatically, including
> all the secrets. If reading WPA-EAP secrets does not work, that needs
> to be fixed, just providing anot
initially? When the
keyfile configuration changes, it's re-read automatically, including
all the secrets. If reading WPA-EAP secrets does not work, that needs
to be fixed, just providing another function that will fail the same
way wo
Thanks for the reply Dan.
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 00:54 +0100, Simon Handy wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>> I just wanted to confirm, under the above conditions, wpa will not work
>> with either the keyfile plugin or ifcfg-fedora plugin.
>
> WPA should work with keyfile, but cert
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 00:54 +0100, Simon Handy wrote:
> Hi guys.
> I just wanted to confirm, under the above conditions, wpa will not work
> with either the keyfile plugin or ifcfg-fedora plugin.
WPA should work with keyfile, but certainly won't work with ifcfg files
because Fe
Hi guys.
I just wanted to confirm, under the above conditions, wpa will not work
with either the keyfile plugin or ifcfg-fedora plugin.
With the keyfile plugin I get...
NetworkManager: get_secrets_cb(): Couldn't get connection
secrets: nm-settings.c.307 - Missing implementatio
Hello everyone,
An interesting laptop with an interesting inbuilt BCM4328 using the
ndiswrapper driver. It will always connect to unsecured networks and
about 1 in 20 times connect to wpa networks, usually after I've
plugged in a usb ethernet device and unplugged it. It will then
continue
ight
> (like ap_scan=1)?
It makes NM able to figure out whether the driver wants ap_scan=1
+scan_ssid=1 or ap_scan=2 when NM configures the supplicant for the
connection.
> Reason I ask, is I can't get my card to connect to a WPA network with
> any settings anymore, even the same exact
can't be manually worked around with wpa_supplicant, right
> (like ap_scan=1)?
>
> Reason I ask, is I can't get my card to connect to a WPA network with
> any settings anymore, even the same exact settings I used for ipw3945,
> and then with every iteration of ap_scan set.
that can't be manually worked around with wpa_supplicant, right
(like ap_scan=1)?
Reason I ask, is I can't get my card to connect to a WPA network with
any settings anymore, even the same exact settings I used for ipw3945,
and then with every iteration of ap_scan set. Any advice from anyon
ts run on a T61 running a fully updated Windows XP, fully updated
> Fedora 8 with update kernel-2.6.24.3-34.fc8.x86_64,
> NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8.x86_64, and
> wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-21.fc8.x86_64.
>
> WPA Enterprise/PEAP/MSCHAPv2: PEAP is the second most widely support
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Bill Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.entrust.net/developer/index.cfm --> Download Root
> Certificates --> Personal Use --> Download Certificates --> download
> entrust_ssl_ca.der
>
> Convert to pem format
>
> # openssl x509 -inform der -in entrust
I would congratulate you but I am still annoyed by SC losing to
Clemson this year! ;-)
Your instructions can be used for anyone connecting to a wireless
access point using PEAP and WPA except for the certificate which needs
to be changed to match what the back-end radius server offers. So
update kernel-2.6.24.3-34.fc8.x86_64,
NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8.x86_64, and
wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-21.fc8.x86_64.
WPA Enterprise/PEAP/MSCHAPv2: PEAP is the second most widely supported
EAP after EAP-TLS. It is similar to EAP-TTLS, however, it requires only
a server-side CA certificate
Notes: Testing tigernet 3-18-08. Bill Moss
Tests run on a T61 running a fully updated Windows XP, fully updated
Fedora 8 with update kernel-2.6.24.3-34.fc8.x86_64, and
NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8.x86_64.
WPA Enterprise/PEAP/MSCHAPv2: PEAP is the second most widely supported
EAP
The Holy ettlz wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
>
>> My home network runs WPA-PSK (yeah, I know the risks, I wrote the attack
>> paper, but my Radius server is currently down). I frequently run into
>> the situation where NetworkManager is not succeeding in authenticatin
click
> "Connect to other wireless network" and input the authenticating
> information again. It didn't work if I just select the network name I
> wanted. I am not sure why. I also found that on the network list,
> NetworkManager sometimes didn't display a WPA-enable
x27;t work if I
just select the network name I wanted. I am not sure why. I also found that
on the network list, NetworkManager sometimes didn't display a WPA-enabled
network as security enabled, without a shield icon.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wrote:
> >
> > John Stowers wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 00:05 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can
> > help.
> >
> >>> My University uses this WPA+TKIP and PEAP-MSCH
I tried on two computers. One is using Linksys WUSB54GC. Another one is
using Atheros Super AG wireless. Neither works.
It's very wired that NetworkManager even sometimes detects the Wifi is a
non-secured network. And it said "Wireless network connection to " It's
impossible. Because that Wi-F
need to know how to configure this.
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> John Stowers wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 00:05 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> AFAIK, it should "j
ECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Stowers wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 00:05 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> > AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can help.
> >
> >> My Univer
On 06/03/2008, Forrest Sheng Bao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am tired trying wpa_supplicant and xsupplicant. Does current svn version
> networkmanager support WPA? I mean, I want a GUI to configure the connection
> to PEAP-MSCHAPv2-enabled Wi-fi.
It seems to depen
> >
>
> > AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can help.
>
>
> My University uses this WPA+TKIP and PEAP-MSCHAP v2 and I have never got
> it to work with Network Manager.
>
> Let me know if you have any success
>
>
> John
>
De: Forrest Sheng Bao
Enviado el: jue 06/03/2008 5:04
Para: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Asunto: does current svn version networkmanager support WPA (PEAP-MSCHAPV2)?
>Hi,
>I am tired trying wpa_supplicant and xsupplicant. Does current svn version
>networkmanager support WPA? I mean,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Stowers wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 00:05 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can help.
>
>> My University uses this WPA+TKIP and PEAP-MSCHAP v2 and I hav
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 00:05 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can help.
My University uses this WPA+TKIP and PEAP-MSCHAP v2 and I have never got
it to wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AFAIK, it should "just work." Perhaps someone else on the list can help.
Forrest Sheng Bao wrote:
> Hi, I am using Knetworkmanager now. I have found those options you
> mentioned. But later there is a popup balloon said "Could not connect to
> the net
101 - 200 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
