Is it worth it? Do we really want to pay $35 for something we
already get for free? Do we want closed source when there's a big pile
of Netscape code sitting there for the taking? I just don't know...
Actually, I think it is worth it. And from my understanding, after reading
the posts on
LYNX?
But i think in time you will see a decent non-bloated browser (maybe) on
linux..
i certainly hope so.
Fish.
LYNX?
But i think in time you will see a decent non-bloated browser (maybe)
on
linux..
i certainly hope so.
Fish.
You should check out opera.
I ran it on BeOS for a while.. Was OK..
( until it expired.
Alan
"Alan N." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LYNX?
But i think in time you will see a decent non-bloated browser (maybe)
on
linux..
i certainly hope so.
Fish.
You should check out opera.
I ran it on BeOS for a while.. Was OK..
( until it expired.
Alan
==
I don't believe
Michael Scottaline wrote:
"Alan N." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LYNX?
But i think in time you will see a decent non-bloated browser (maybe)
on
linux..
i certainly hope so.
Fish.
You should check out opera.
I ran it on BeOS for a while.. Was OK..
( until it expired.
Alan
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Art Rowe wrote:
Microsoft bashing is fun, as it was when I was trying OS2, but MS Explorer is a
good program.
Until an attachment (aka e-mail virus) or some Active-X control on
a website destroys the content of your harddisk, maybe.
Even if you're on Windoze, using a
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Art Rowe wrote:
Microsoft bashing is fun, as it was when I was trying OS2, but MS Explorer is a
good program.
Yes i agree, MS did do a decent job on their browser from a functionality
standpoint. This is a major
I dont know about you guys, but using Netscape 4.61 and using MS IE5 I would take
Netscape any day of the week. I always get invalad JavaScript errors on it, and the
Ffunny thing is that Netscape and Sun did JavaScript. MS didnt. That tells me, IE is an
inferior browser. it is telling you that it
I didn't say Outlook Express is evil. All I am saying is that most of the
time I use PINE to read e-mail and its very hard to read HTML mail. [Okay,
it possible to export it to a file, load it up in LYNX but that's a hassle
for a lot of messages]. Of couse, when I'm at home I can use Netscape
I can remember lusting after as Sinclair Timex computer with 2K memory. That
computer lasted about a week before becoming obsolete. However, I got on well
with a Commodore 64 and with the top of the line monitor I had much better
screen graphics than the IBM PC's of that day.
There is a trucking
- Original Message -
From: Art Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 6:37 PM
Subject: [newbie] Evil Empire
Microsoft bashing is fun, as it was when I was trying OS2, but MS Explorer
is a
good program.
When I was dual booting Win 98 and Linux, I
Art Rowe wrote:
Microsoft bashing is fun, as it was when I was trying OS2, but MS Explorer is a
good program.
When I was dual booting Win 98 and Linux, I was using it. When I
realized, from mail lists, that html was a problem for some people, I changed
my settings so that I sent text only
Steve Philp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not so much the pretty backgrounds and cool fonts we care about,
it's the amount of bloat that comes with it that bothers most of us.
Those tags for fonts, packaged backgrounds and everything else blooms
the message size tremendously. Posting in HTML
13 matches
Mail list logo
