Yeah yeah yeah... :) yuck it up. If I get this working though, (not
holding my breath - I might pass out) it would be cool!
Mark
Roger Sherman wrote:
Hey Mark, my email client uses Procmail just fine! ;-) Pine, by the
way...;-p
peace,
Rog
http://www.slammingrooves.com
Registered
Mark Hillary wrote:
Does anyone here know why a background cann't be desplayed on KDM. Also is
there a fix for it. I am useing the KDE that came with the downloaded
version of Mandrake 7.2
Cheers to anyon that can help. And happy new year to you all.
Mark Hillary
Mark,
Right click on
Hey Mark, my email client uses Procmail just fine! ;-) Pine, by the
way...;-p
peace,
Rog
http://www.slammingrooves.com
Registered Linux user #19071
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Mark Weaver wrote:
Nope...you are correct and this fact leaves me wondering how in the world I
can filter duplicate
Does anyone here know why a background cann't be desplayed on KDM. Also is
there a fix for it. I am useing the KDE that came with the downloaded
version of Mandrake 7.2
Cheers to anyon that can help. And happy new year to you all.
Mark Hillary
I thought I am the only person to receive multiple copies! There were (13)
copies of this posting
At 28-12-2000 +1100, you wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:04, ZER0 FREQUENCY wrote:
John Arkoulis wrote:
Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the new
Nope...you are correct and this fact leaves me wondering how in the world I
can filter duplicate messages with Kmail filtering technology.
How about it MandrakeSoft? Any ideas? That, or a good solid method of using
Procmail filtering with Kmail as one would use with Pine.
--
Mark
"If you
I totally agree...I first started using Linux about 4 months ago, and
started out with KDE, as it provided a familiar environment. However,
after a while, I started to notice it did take up some resources that
could have been put to better use (and this was while I still only had 64
meg RAM).
John Arkoulis wrote:
Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the new
fast CPUs (P4 1.4, Dual G4, Athlon)
Yes I know G4 is a MAC.
Which one do you think is best for Linux???
Thanks
http://www.tomshardware.com is pretty good. Doesn't cover the Mac,
but of the other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that http://www.gamepc.com usually has a pretty unbiased view
point on procs. Personally I'm really happy with my athlon 900.
Mandrake 7.2 is fast as hell after I recompiled everything I use for
my processors architecture.
SNIP
How do you recompile for an
Revenant wrote:
John Arkoulis wrote:
Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the new
fast CPUs (P4 1.4, Dual G4, Athlon)
Yes I know G4 is a MAC.
Which one do you think is best for Linux???
Thanks
http://www.tomshardware.com is pretty good. Doesn't cover
I think he's refering to recompiling the kernel for his family of processor.
On Thursday 28 December 2000 05:32, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that http://www.gamepc.com usually has a pretty unbiased view
point on procs. Personally I'm really happy with my athlon 900.
Hi Roger
I totally agree...I first started using Linux about 4 months ago, and
started out with KDE, as it provided a familiar environment. However,
after a while, I started to notice it did take up some resources that
could have been put to better use (and this was while I still only had
Just so you know, I'm not trying to say one is better than the other, or
trying to sell you, or anything...just stating my preference...which could
change in the next twenty minutes ;-)
peace,
Rog
http://www.slammingrooves.com
Registered Linux user #19071
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Penndragon
I did the same thing. I started with KDE because I could understand it
with my leaving-windows-mentality. Eventually I started playing around
with the different window managers looking for something that was
faster, used less resources, was more customizable and pleased my
aesthetic sense more
yes I am. With the 2.2.17 kernel the option is PPro (pentium pro) but I
noticed with the 2.4 kernel that there is one more level of optimization
called K7. I juist haven't been able to build a 2.4 kernel that works
yet ;-(
Abe
Mark Weaver wrote:
I think he's refering to recompiling the
Dual G4's kick butt. Butt you really don't
even need Linux on a G4. MacOS X can do all that linux will.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 3:37
AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Fast CPU
i think p4 is good
i think p4 is good, my desktop is a p4 1.4ghz, but i read somewhere that 1.4 ghz arent too compatible with linux unless you have the latest kernel...so get the latest version of the distrobution you prefer so you'll be less likely to not have an incompatible computer, so either go with the amd or
sorry we in india only prefer intel chipsOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, John
Arkoulis wrote:
Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the new
fast CPUs (P4 1.4, Dual G4, Athlon)
Yes I know G4 is a MAC.
Which one do you think is best for Linux???
Thanks
--
S.Ganesan
John Arkoulis wrote:
Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the new
fast CPUs (P4 1.4, Dual G4, Athlon)
Yes I know G4 is a MAC.
Which one do you think is best for Linux???
Thanks
I personally like AMD. Although linux mostly supports intel. Not much change since
I find that http://www.gamepc.com usually has a pretty unbiased view point on procs.
Personally I'm really happy with my athlon 900. Mandrake 7.2 is fast as hell after I
recompiled everything I use for my processors architecture. windowmaker opens from
startx (enter) to finished in about 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that http://www.gamepc.com usually has a pretty unbiased view point
on procs. Personally I'm really happy with my athlon 900. Mandrake 7.2 is
fast as hell after I recompiled everything I use for my processors
architecture. windowmaker opens from startx (enter)
21 matches
Mail list logo
