>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Huff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:38 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] 9.2 good now?
>
>
>> Is there something wrong with the USA 9.2 contrib
>> mirrors? I can't
> Is there something wrong with the USA 9.2 contrib
> mirrors? I can't seem to get them to work =/
Did you remove the bad ones before adding a different one?
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http
>I think you'll find that if you do a fresh install of
9.2 and
>immediately
>apply all the bugfixes and updates before doing
anything else,
>that you will
>find it to be a very sweet distro.
Indeed! The basic overview has been very impressive so
far. However, I have yet to really put it to th
On Monday 05 January 2004 07:43 am, Tango Echo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2? I
> recently purchased a new hard drive and was debating
> if I should put 9.1 (my current one) or 9.2. I know
> lots of people had complained about 9.2 initially, but
> perhaps
i just ran tuxracer to check and it was fine, though i did think that the
screen seemed a litle flickery, as though the refresh rate went down,
i'm using the driver installed using the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run
package from nvidia,
bascule
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, Tango Echo wrot
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:58, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 12:12 pm, Paul Harrison wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Tango Echo wrote:
> > | Hi all,
> > |
> > | What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2?
> >
> > For me, 9.2 worked much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
E. Hines wrote:
| Just My Opinion, which probably isn't worth much. I've installed 9.2
on two
| different laptops and on my experimental machine at home. For me, the
| "updated rpm packages fix" was a necessity due to menu problems after I
| installe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carroll Grigsby wrote:
| Paul:
| How much updating was necessary? Yeah, I'm still on dialup (at 44K), and
| downloading massive files is not a pleasant task.
| -- cmg
'Fraid I did a clean install in the end, getting Mdk 9.2 off a magazine CD.
Paul
---
On Monday 05 January 2004 09:32 pm, julie wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 02:58 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > Tango Echo wrote:
> > > | Hi all,
> > > |
> > > | What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2?
> > >
> > > For me, 9.2 worked much more "out of the box" than 9.1. Sound, digita
Overall good. I had initially a lot of freezing which i found out being
related to APIC and ACPI. Finally i disabled APIC (while running ACPI) and
i haven had any freezing for two days. Other than this the system seems
super fast (other than booting time) in particular Konqueror seems the fastest
Overall good. I had initially a lot of freezing which i found out being
related to APIC and ACPI. Finally i disabled APIC (while running ACPI) and
i haven had any freezing for two days. Other than this the system seems
super fast (other than booting time) in particular Konqueror seems the fastest
hmm, not to be a party pooper but some folk still have problems that we didn't
have with 9.1
i get random xmms freezes where it just stops, i cant use the mouse to change
desktops but i can use ctrl-f1 etc. i alt-f2 and issue 'killall -9 xmms' and
i'm back in action, the freeze was almost instan
On Monday 05 January 2004 02:58 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > Tango Echo wrote:
> > | Hi all,
> > |
> > | What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2?
> >
> > For me, 9.2 worked much more "out of the box" than 9.1. Sound, digital
> > camera, printer all worked more or less straight away, w
On Monday 05 January 2004 12:12 pm, Paul Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tango Echo wrote:
> | Hi all,
> |
> | What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2?
>
> For me, 9.2 worked much more "out of the box" than 9.1. Sound, digital
> camera, printer all w
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 07:43, Tango Echo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2? I
> recently purchased a new hard drive and was debating
> if I should put 9.1 (my current one) or 9.2. I know
> lots of people had complained about 9.2 initially, but
> perhaps most o
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 H:12, Paul Harrison wrote:
9.2 is a bit too much AOL-user-ish with way too much control removed
so far its messed up some of my hardware settings eg at this time 9.2 cant
seem to tell the diff. between a (usb)scanner.. (pci)tvcard.. and (usb)webcam
?!?!?!
otherwise its been
Hi all,
What have your experiences been with Mandrake 9.2? I
recently purchased a new hard drive and was debating
if I should put 9.1 (my current one) or 9.2. I know
lots of people had complained about 9.2 initially, but
perhaps most of the bugs have been worked out? Are
there any common bugs I
17 matches
Mail list logo
