On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:23:28 +, Anne Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 03:37, David E. Fox wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
> >
> > Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> > >
>
On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 03:37, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> >
> > Please be aware of this.'
>
> It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
Possibly
On Friday 12 November 2004 10:37 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> >
> > Please be aware of this.'
>
> It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
>
> Please be aware of this.'
It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
--
--
On November 10, 2004 05:06, Anne Wilson wrote:
...
> There has been a long thread about this on Expert. It is agreed that it is
> 'unfixable' for the moment, and it was suggested that gmail users should
> have a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> Please be aware
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:01:50 +0700
Merlin Zener disseminated the following:
> "this feature is not supported at this time" type generic response back...
...they're too busy plugging the security holes ;-)
--
JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
09:32:40 up 98 days, 10:24, 7 users, l
On Wednesday 10 Nov 2004 12:01, Merlin Zener wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:48, Chris wrote:
> > On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
> > > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, bu
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:01:50 +0700, Merlin Zener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> > > able to set it to "".
> >
> > Nope, it doesn't work David.
>
> I c
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:48, Chris wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> > able to set it to "".
> >
>
> Nope, it d
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:49, Amy wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:41:20 -0800, David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -- Forwarded message --
> >
> >
> > From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:40:45 -
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:41:20 -0800, David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
>
>
> From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:40:45 -0800
> Subject: Re: [newbie] A short notice to gmail users
> To:
On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
>
> You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> able to set it to "".
>
Nope, it doesn't work David.
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:40:45 -0800
Subject: Re: [newbie] A short notice to gmail users
To: Amy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
Now, I can
Done and Done. ^_^ Thanks for the suggestion! Meanwhile, everyone who
missed my comment in the other thread I had going... please make a
point to submit a feature request to the gmail team for the option of
disabling the reply-to field if you haven't already! And bug your
gmail using friends to do
I know you can't get rid of your "reply-to" field in gmail, which
causes all our relplies to go to you instead of the list. This
severely handicaps you, as it hides replies from other list
members, including some who might know a better answer.
So, would it be very inconvenient to add a signat
15 matches
Mail list logo
