On Wednesday 19 December 2001 03:11 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
civileme wrote:
Hmmm, where did this 80/15/5 rule come from? My experience is
that 93% of the time my computer has a problem, the problem has
its hands on my keyboard.
Civileme,
The 80/15/5 rule hails from the venerable Tom
Perhaps we need to remember that we are all on this list as USERS??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/17/01 11:45:00 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lets remember something here. it's the famous 80/15/5 % rule.
80% of computer problems are user
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 09:19 pm, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Perhaps we need to remember that we are all on this list as USERS??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/17/01 11:45:00 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lets remember something here.
civileme wrote:
Hmmm, where did this 80/15/5 rule come from? My experience is that 93% of
the time my computer has a problem, the problem has its hands on my keyboard.
Civileme,
The 80/15/5 rule hails from the venerable Tom Brinkman of Texas. But
I'll by yours too. Tom's is a bit more
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:19:14 +0200
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to
ponder:
Perhaps we need to remember that we are all on this list as USERS??
Not me! I'm god of my network. I own the joint.
--
daRcmaTTeR
Registered Linux User 182496
Mandrake 8.1
When is this damn useless compiler going to work?
I have Mdk 8.1 and the default compiler is useless,
2.96 is a piece of trash, so I took it off and put on
gcc3, again TRASH, so I try to put on 2.95 and
all it can give me is the same bullshit over and
over WHEN IS THIS STUPID ASS THING going to
I Strongly recomend theat you, (not anyone else, just you) go BACK TO
REDHAT!!! typos and all. then any problems you have will not be the fault of
MAndrake, it will be REDHAT's. not yours, not mine, but Redhat's. so you are
right, a lot better than RTFM, go to redhat.
and after you get there,
Why not boot up the ML CD's and selection the option for UPGRADe then select
the Developer packages.
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] I have HAD IT!
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:42:47 -0500
you know...at this point I
On Monday 17 December 2001 01:50 pm, Ed Tharp wrote:
I Strongly recomend theat you, (not anyone else, just you) go BACK TO
REDHAT!!! typos and all. then any problems you have will not be the
fault of MAndrake, it will be REDHAT's. not yours, not mine, but
Redhat's. so you are right, a lot
you know...at this point I think I would go back and reinstall the
system and this time I would do the developer install if you didn't
happen to do that the first time. I'm really sorry you're having such a
hard time with it, but I've never experienced any of the troubles you're
having with the
yep, I did recognize the kittypuss address. not really a problem, heck if I
had better stuff going on in MY life, I would not have bothered to reply, my
delete key works GREAT!!!
On Monday 17 December 2001 14:36, you wrote:
Ed,
Don't you recognize Vic? I didn't realize at first it was him
Isn't kittypuss the name of Bill Gates machine? ;) Maybe he's just trolling
cause he knows people are losing interest in Windoze. hehe
At 02:51 PM 12/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
yep, I did recognize the kittypuss address. not really a problem, heck if I
had better stuff going on in MY life, I would
Roflmao
On Monday 17 December 2001 14:58, you wrote:
Isn't kittypuss the name of Bill Gates machine? ;) Maybe he's just trolling
cause he knows people are losing interest in Windoze. hehe
At 02:51 PM 12/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
yep, I did recognize the kittypuss address. not really a
nah, its poor Vic and I think he's really got his pickle in a tight spot
this time.
ooops...pardon the pun.
Mark
Ivan Offalich wrote:
Isn't kittypuss the name of Bill Gates machine? ;) Maybe he's just trolling
cause he knows people are losing interest in Windoze. hehe
At 02:51 PM
On Monday 17 December 2001 02:04 pm, you wrote:
nah, its poor Vic and I think he's really got his pickle in a tight spot
this time.
ooops...pardon the pun.
I have to agree, Linux is very fustrating at times and people need a way to
vent, I think Vic is only asking for an ear to listen.
On Monday 17 December 2001 11:31, you wrote:
When is this damn useless compiler going to work?
I have Mdk 8.1 and the default compiler is useless,
2.96 is a piece of trash, so I took it off and put on
gcc3, again TRASH, so I try to put on 2.95 and
all it can give me is the same bullshit
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Newbie wrote:
When is this damn useless compiler going to work?
I have Mdk 8.1 and the default compiler is useless,
2.96 is a piece of trash, so I took it off and put on
gcc3, again TRASH, so I try to put on 2.95 and
all it can give me is the same bullshit over and
In a message dated 12/17/01 11:45:00 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lets remember something here. it's the famous 80/15/5 % rule.
80% of computer problems are user
15% are software and...
5% are hardware problems.
I know that that isn't something
bubba, it IS the user, if it installs 7.2, but not 8.1, it is something that
is different between they way the 2.2.x kernel handles stuff and the 2.4.x
kernels handles the same stuff, so if the USER could PROPERLY cofigure the
machine, it would not be a software problem would it?
did that guy
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:39:07 -0500
Ed Tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
bubba, it IS the user, if it installs 7.2, but not 8.1, it is something that
is different between they way the 2.2.x kernel handles stuff and the 2.4.x
kernels handles the same stuff, so
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:33:16 -0600
David McGlone [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
On Monday 17 December 2001 02:04 pm, you wrote:
nah, its poor Vic and I think he's really got his pickle in a tight spot
this time.
ooops...pardon the pun.
I have to agree,
: Re: [newbie] I have HAD IT!
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:39:07 -0500
Ed Tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
bubba, it IS the user, if it installs 7.2, but not 8.1, it is something
that
is different between they way the 2.2.x kernel handles stuff and the 2.4.x
22 matches
Mail list logo
