Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
I have been using Linux (Mandrake and Red Hat) sans MS Windows for almost a year now. We can do anything a windows user can do and more. I did need a book to learn basics, and everyday I am learning more, not just about Linux use, but about computers in general. It depends upon what your

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Dan Hamilton
So in other words, No, Linux isn't ready for the Average User, if I may be so bold as to claim that an Average User has only an average, and not above-average, interest in "getting under the hood". Sacrificing lexibility and money for ease of use is what rational consumers do - not everyone has

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
Exactly, and who needs an ultra powerful microwave to nuke a little tv dinner? The average user needs little more than entertainment and an office suit with little or no time wasted in learning how it works. For this, they are willing to pay big bucks. What's encouraging about Linux, is that

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (It does kind of baffle me that a company like Red Hat can go public and have their stock do well - who the heck would gamble on a company that takes something that everyone can get for free, slaps a name on it, and charges $80? Red Hat makes

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread James Schofield
Exactly, and who needs an ultra powerful microwave to nuke a little tv dinner? The average user needs little more than entertainment and an office suit with little or no time wasted in learning how it works. For this, they are willing to pay big bucks. My reply to this would be like buying

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
Red Hat makes most of its money by support contracts. That makes sense. I wonder if that will work in the long run, or if established big consultants will say "we do Linux too" and keep their old clients through any migration to Linux. I guess they'll find out.

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread chris
My reply to this would be like buying a NEW Car from the DEALER rather than a HOT ROD from a Mechanic. The Average user wants all the Warrenty and assurances - reliable service, documentation and FULL service support that a Microsoft can and will supply. If you want to own a HOTROD you have to

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, James Schofield wrote: The Average user wants all the Warrenty and assurances - reliable service, documentation and FULL service support that a Microsoft can and will supply. Have you ever tried calling Microsoft support for something? They really aren't much of a help.

Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was: Linux for home consumers?)

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry
I'm running release candidate 1 as we speak. In 1280x1024 at 24 bit color, by the way. Original Message Follows -- Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/ ___ Get Free Email