Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-06 Thread _nasturtium
Hi, On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:09 am, JoeHill wrote: On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:05:09 + Margot disseminated the following: If things carry on as they are currently going, many of those aspiring young lawyers at Harvard Law School will one day be participating in Darl's spurious lawsuits - now

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:06:21 -0800 aron Smith disseminated the following: Thanks joe the plot sickens Oh yeah? You better get a bucket, cuz this one's really gonna make you retch: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-sco5mar05,1,6898439.story?coll=la-headlines-business Quote: Darl McBride,

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread aron Smith
On Friday 05 March 2004 07:11 am, JoeHill wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:06:21 -0800 aron Smith disseminated the following: Thanks joe the plot sickens Oh yeah? You better get a bucket, cuz this one's really gonna make you retch:

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread Margot
JoeHill wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:06:21 -0800 aron Smith disseminated the following: Thanks joe the plot sickens Oh yeah? You better get a bucket, cuz this one's really gonna make you retch: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-sco5mar05,1,6898439.story?coll=la-headlines-business Quote:

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread aron Smith
On Friday 05 March 2004 11:05 am, Margot wrote: JoeHill wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:06:21 -0800 aron Smith disseminated the following: Thanks joe the plot sickens Quote: Darl McBride, chief executive of SCO Group Inc., says he sometimes carries a gun because his enemies are out

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:05:09 + Margot disseminated the following: If things carry on as they are currently going, many of those aspiring young lawyers at Harvard Law School will one day be participating in Darl's spurious lawsuits - now they've seen him in action, perhaps they will

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-05 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Friday 05 March 2004 06:09 pm, JoeHill wrote: Margot disseminated the following: If things carry on as they are currently going, many of those aspiring young lawyers at Harvard Law School will one day be participating in Darl's spurious lawsuits - now they've seen him in action,

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-04 Thread JoeHill
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:38:32 +1300 anton disseminated the following: I am about to block IE users from my website (using php) and wanted to get the maximum bang for buck. Please have a look at the following messages and give me your opinion on what is likely to have the most positive

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-04 Thread aron Smith
On Thursday 04 March 2004 01:27 pm, JoeHill wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:38:32 +1300 anton disseminated the following: I am about to block IE users from my website (using php) and wanted to get the maximum bang for buck. Please have a look at the following messages and give me your

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread JoeHill
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:38:32 +1300 anton disseminated the following: I am about to block IE users from my website (using php) and wanted to get the maximum bang for buck. Please have a look at the following messages and give me your opinion on what is likely to have the most positive

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 01:38 am, anton wrote: Hi, I am about to block IE users from my website (using php) and wanted to get the maximum bang for buck. Please have a look at the following messages and give me your opinion on what is likely to have the most positive (deliberately leaving

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread Mike Fehse
--- anton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am about to block IE users from my website (using php) and wanted to get the maximum bang for buck. Please have a look at the following messages and give me your opinion on what is likely to have the most positive (deliberately leaving that for

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread robin
anton wrote: If, on the other hand, the ultimate intent is to reduce traffic to your site -- and preventing IE users from accessing would /certainly/ do that in spades -- why not simply take the site down? ;-) Just so no one gets the wrong impression - this is a personal website that will

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread Mike Fehse
--- robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied: A better alternative might be to include HTML that is standards-compliant but comes out strangely in IE, then add a note explaining why. Incidentally, MS seems to be supporting the move alternative browsers by putting a bug in IE 6.0 that prevents it

Re: [newbie] OT - IE reject messages

2004-03-03 Thread frankieh
Mike Fehse wrote: --- robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied: A better alternative might be to include HTML that is standards-compliant but comes out strangely in IE, then add a note explaining why. Incidentally, MS seems to be supporting the move alternative browsers by putting a bug in IE 6.0 that