Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-04-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 05:45:01 +1200, Walter Logeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Walter Logeman, (thats me :-) > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:47, in [newbie] Publishing in Linux, > > wrote: > > I have a brochure i need to produce and the printing place will > > accept Publ

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-25 Thread Miark
Before OS X, Adobe would likely have sold Linux versions of FrameMaker, but they wouldn't have made any money because the development costs would have far outweighed the revenues. With the advent of OS X, though, Adobe is finally forced to develop software in a unix-type environment. Granted, it'

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-24 Thread shipahoy
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:00:37 +0200 Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, anyone here used TeXmacs? It claims to be much better than LyX > and totally WYSIWYG (if recent /. posts are anything to go by) but > I'm skeptical. TeXmacs is very, very impressive, but it is aimed squarely

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-24 Thread shipahoy
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 00:48:47 -0500 sda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://web2.altmuehlnet.de/fschmid/index.html > > I don't think it's intended to be anything but well, Scribus. You're not > kidding about being in the early stages - have you actually tried it? > It's quite `rough', and if it

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-23 Thread Chris Keelan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dateline: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:48:02 +0200: laying low until the bleeding stops, Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> transmits: > I don't think Adobe (or any software house) will ever be convinced they can > make $ out of Linux (hardware firms have wok

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-23 Thread shipahoy
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:48:02 +0200 Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think Adobe (or any software house) will ever be convinced they > can make $ out of Linux (hardware firms have woken up to the potential, > but that's a qualitativey different situation). However, we will > prob

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-23 Thread Robin Turner
On Saturday 23 March 2002 01:19, sda wrote: > > Ghostscript doesn't create the best PDF's, [for publishing], remember > `portable document format' is a creation of Adobe - they own it. So > obviously the postscript level three systems that Adobe licenses work best > for Acrobat files. Additonally

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-22 Thread shipahoy
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:31:36 +0200 Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, LyX is a bit of a brainteaser at first, because it's so > different. However, for most purposes you only really need to learn > a small subset of what is possible with the program (actually, the > same goes fo

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-22 Thread Robin Turner
On Friday 22 March 2002 13:12, John Richard Smith wrote: > And the really frustrating thing is having spent hours setting it > all up and writing some long paper at the end of it all you go to > print it off and get told "LaTeX error" better fix it. > No thanks. Well, at least LaTeX errors are us

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-22 Thread John Richard Smith
And the really frustrating thing is having spent hours setting it all up and writing some long paper at the end of it all you go to print it off and get told "LaTeX error" better fix it. No thanks. John On Friday 22 March 2002 12:28 am, you wrote: > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 01:03:32 +0200 > > Robi

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-22 Thread Robin Turner
On Friday 22 March 2002 09:15, sda wrote: > As someone involved in publishing - not many pre-press shops will > accept raw .ps files from a client. Pre-press systems are so > complicated now days, that usually files should be in the accepted > publishing standard apps, FrameMaker, Quark, InDesig

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-21 Thread Michael
Robin Turner wrote: > > > As for double-spacing after a sentence, you're right. LyX (or rather LaTeX, > to which it is a front-end) does not double-space. It uses an algorithm which > takes into account the length of the line and the number of words, > multiplying whitespace between words, be

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-21 Thread civileme
Randy Kramer wrote: >Just a comment (without trying to start a flamewar) -- the key to using >a WYSIWYG word processor like Word is to learn to use styles. And, Word >will allow two spaces after punctuation ending a sentence (period, >question mark, explanation point), a trick that LyX, et.al.,

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-21 Thread shipahoy
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 01:03:32 +0200 Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did my MA dissertation on Word and spent so long setting up styles to > do what I wanted, it would have been quicker to have formatted > everything by hand (and this was something very, very simple - I just > wanted de

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-21 Thread Randy Kramer
Just a comment (without trying to start a flamewar) -- the key to using a WYSIWYG word processor like Word is to learn to use styles. And, Word will allow two spaces after punctuation ending a sentence (period, question mark, explanation point), a trick that LyX, et.al., cannot manange, AFAIK. R

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-21 Thread Robin Turner
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 22:09, civileme wrote: > Robin Turner wrote: > > If they accept postscript files, you might benefit by learning to use > LyX. Most who do or who learn LaTeX just don't return to standard > inflexible, do-everything-with-the-spacebar, WYSIWYG type of word > processor.

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-20 Thread civileme
Robin Turner wrote: >On Thursday 21 March 2002 03:47, Walter Logeman wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I have a brochure i need to produce and the printing place will >>accept Publisher, Photoshop, or Pagemaker files. >> >>Is there a way of generating cmpatable files in some way - we may >>need to pass the fil

Re: [newbie] Publishing in Linux

2002-03-20 Thread Robin Turner
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 16:30, Derek Jennings wrote: > Well it is easy enough to convert a postscript file generated by a Linux > application to Pagemaker pdf format. Just use ps2pdf > Any KDE application can print directly to pdf using it. For other apps > print to a postscript file then conve