On Sunday 21 March 2004 12:49, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Sunday 21 March 2004 15:39, JRH wrote:
> Yes, thank you very much, JRH. I just finished installing
> RealPlayer8 - and some 9-codecs as well - Flashplayer and Acrobat
> Reader 5.0.8. Everything without a hiccup.
>
> Have all the commercial ve
On Sunday 21 March 2004 15:39, JRH wrote:
> For RealPlayer and Acrobat, I suggest you take a look at the
> vendors websites.
>
> I have just been to adobe.com for acrobat for Winsucks, and there
> was a whole list I had to choose from. Linux, MAC, FreeBSD
> etc... as for realplayer, I'm sure I
Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Although I'm a Club Silver Member, I haven't been able to get my
hands on Acrobat Reader or RealPlayer, but I can live with that.
The old versions of commercial software should work on 10.0 - certainly
RealPlayer does, as I've just installed it. One exception is the nVidia
dr
day, March 21, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Re: Some positive reviews for 10.0 Community
> On Sunday 21 March 2004 09:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
>
> > That's my feeling, too. As for comparing releases, it's just
> > about impossible. What is brilliant on one ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 March 2004 13:22, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> Like you Anne, I was reluctant to install 10.0 what with having
> spent weeks to get 9.2 running well. But surprise : yesterday I
> shuffled the CD2 into the cupholder and lo and behold, one hour
> l
On Sunday 21 March 2004 09:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
> That's my feeling, too. As for comparing releases, it's just
> about impossible. What is brilliant on one machine is a total
> disaster on others. 8.2 is lauded by most, but was a disaster
> for me. 9.0 worked, more or less and 9.1 was brill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 March 2004 13:48, robin wrote:
>
> It's hard to judge on just one release, since there's always
> variation between releases anyway (9.1 was a PITA for me, as was
> 8.1 - if I were superstitious, I'd definitely give 10.1 a skip).
> For me,
Asa Rossoff wrote:
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> exclaimed,
I haven't forgotten, Charlie. As has happened once or twice before,
you got the backlash when I'm feeling fed up about people who know
very little about the os installing what is still, really, cooker,
then complaining. Sorry. You di
On Friday 19 March 2004 04:02 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Friday 19 March 2004 03:26 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > On Friday 19 March 2004 19:36, Charlie Mahan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I've kicked this dead horse long enough. I'm dropping it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Just to let you know, Charlie : You hav
On Friday 19 March 2004 03:26 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Friday 19 March 2004 19:36, Charlie Mahan wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've kicked this dead horse long enough. I'm dropping it.
>
>
>
> Just to let you know, Charlie : You have been a tremendous help
> here on the list, and I would be very sorry ind
Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2004 19:36, Charlie Mahan wrote:
I've kicked this dead horse long enough. I'm dropping it.
Just to let you know, Charlie : You have been a tremendous help here
on the list, and I would be very sorry indeed if you decide to
leave.
Kaj Haulrich.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 19, 2004 10:45 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 19 March 2004 16:10, Charlie Mahan wrote:
> > It makes me feel and look stupid, and it doesn't do a Hell of a lot
> > for MandrakeSoft's reputation either.
>
> MandrakeSoft can't do right, what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 March 2004 16:10, Charlie Mahan wrote:
>
> It makes me feel and look stupid, and it doesn't do a Hell of a lot
> for MandrakeSoft's reputation either.
>
MandrakeSoft can't do right, whatever they do. With recent versions
they've been bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 18, 2004 02:32 pm, John Zoetebier wrote:
>
> Mandrake web site mentiones explicitly that people who want a rock solid
> release should wait for Mandrake Official,
> which is relase 2 - 3 months after Community edition.
> Mandrake Community Ed
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:53:12 +1100
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> I'll wait for the 9.2 ISO's or the 10c ISO's to get sent...patiently...
If yer gonna be in one place awhile, I'll make good on that commitment to mail
'em to ya, plus all that other shite.
--
JoeHill
Registered Linux
On Thursday 18 March 2004 02:53 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:46, JoeHill wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:53:49 +1100
> >
> > Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> > > ...dang - and I'm still running 9.1+
> >
> > well, if you would sit still for awhile, maybe someone wou
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:46, JoeHill wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:53:49 +1100
> Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
>
> > ...dang - and I'm still running 9.1+
>
> well, if you would sit still for awhile, maybe someone would mail you the 9.2
> ISO's ;-)
>
> ...unless you've finally got br
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:53:49 +1100
Stephen Kuhn disseminated the following:
> ...dang - and I'm still running 9.1+
well, if you would sit still for awhile, maybe someone would mail you the 9.2
ISO's ;-)
...unless you've finally got broadband...?
--
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepag
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 21:32, John Zoetebier wrote:
> Mandrake web site mentiones explicitly that people who want a rock solid
> release should wait for Mandrake Official,
> which is relase 2 - 3 months after Community edition.
> Mandrake Community Edition is for the explorers under us.
> I recent
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:33:54 -0700, Charlie Mahan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 18, 2004 12:31 pm, JoeHill wrote:
" Despite the problems above, I must say that I have re-affirmed my
trust
to Mandrake Linux. All previous Mandrakes were filled wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
