Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:23, Lord Storm wrote: > > > I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just > > > hope they anounce it on Distrowatch. > > > > Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table? > > > > stephen kuhn - proprietor > > No since I don

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Lord Storm
> > I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just > > hope they anounce it on Distrowatch. > > Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table? > > stephen kuhn - proprietor No since I dont think they make partition Magic for linux and I only have 1

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Ariestao1
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:43 am, Lord Storm wrote: > > > > Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no > > matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition > > tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation > > after mucking aroun

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 04:43, Carroll Grigsby wrote: > On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > >>> snip > > > > Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN > > EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're > > dependent on particula

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 00:43, Lord Storm wrote: > > > Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no > > matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition > > tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation > > after mucking around w

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: >>> snip > Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN > EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're > dependent on particular partion numberings, installing Windows AFTER > linux is going to b

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Lord Storm
> Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no > matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition > tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation > after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast > it a

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 22:58, Bryan Phinney wrote: > On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > > For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything - > > or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for > > that matter); by common practise, Windo

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything - > or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for > that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then > everything else after that. Can'

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 21:39, Lord Storm wrote: > Well I run the bellow system. I had windows 2k pro with NTFS and some how > mandrake purged Win2k from Partitions and windows would not reinstall. > Operating system error or something like that it was about 2 weeks ago. Not > that I realy care no

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
Try http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/. On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:55:05 -0600, Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it> won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current > kernel release (I think they

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Noah Swint
XP... NTFS 5.1 I went to the http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ site and downloaded the rpm but it still doesn't work. On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 00:55, Michael Viron wrote: > Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it > won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Michael Viron
Which version of Windows is it from? If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current kernel release (I think they support up to NTFS 4 read, and (very experimental) write). Michael -- Michael Viron Registered Linux User #81978 Senior

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 02 Jan 2002 21:45:56 -0500, Noah Swint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive > > I get the error: > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2, >or too many mounted file systems > > If it is a bad superblock

[newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Noah Swint
NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive I get the error: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2, or too many mounted file systems If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and just how many mounts are too many? W

[newbie] NTFS Partition and GRUB

2000-06-23 Thread Alan Carpenter
I am happy to say that I really like Mandrake 7.1. Finally it has the support for my video card "voodoo 3000", and some of my usb devices =). I only have one problem. I can't get to my windows 2000 partition anymore. When the boot loader install came up, I sat there for about 5 minutes thinking

Re: [newbie] ntfs partition

1999-08-30 Thread mas9483
On 30 Aug, Carl J. Bauman wrote: > I tried to mount my NTFS partition from the command line with the following result: > > [root@shiloh /]# mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dosc > mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel > > I was under the impression that Mandrake had NTFS support built in.

Re: [newbie] ntfs partition

1999-08-30 Thread Carl J. Bauman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 18 Aug, Toshiro Viera Stalker wrote: > > A little question: I want to mount a NTFS partition at boot time, can you tell me >syntax of the line I need to add in fstab? > > > > Toshiro. > > Sure- it's just like the other lines in /etc/fstab, except: fs type is > ntfs,

Re: [newbie] ntfs partition

1999-08-18 Thread mas9483
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Viera Stalker wrote: > A little question: I want to mount a NTFS partition at boot time, can you tell me >syntax of the line I need to add in fstab? > > Toshiro. Sure- it's just like the other lines in /etc/fstab, except: fs type is ntfs, and you'll probably want to specify y

Re: [newbie] NTFS partition access

1999-06-22 Thread Axalon
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Mark A. Walters wrote: > Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT > partitions. I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and > mount the NT partition. I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not > supported by kernel"

[newbie] NTFS partition access

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT partitions. I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and mount the NT partition. I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not supported by kernel" What is going on?