[newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread JoeHill
Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... -- JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org 09:45:09 up 3 days, 54 min, 9 users, load average: 0.36, 0.14, 0.10 +++ Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread Aron Smith
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 06:46 am, JoeHill wrote: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... We're trying to ignore you but :-D -- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread JoeHill
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:36 -0800 Aron Smith disseminated the following: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... We're trying to ignore you but :-D I'm on my way to setting up a dedicated mail and web server! Soon I will be all powerful and impossible to

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 01:46, JoeHill wrote: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... Always more than happy to ignore you JoeHill...(g) -- stephen kuhn mobile: 0410-728-389 illawarra and regional new south wales ---

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 06:09, JoeHill wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:36 -0800 Aron Smith disseminated the following: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... We're trying to ignore you but :-D I'm on my way to setting up a dedicated mail and web

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread Aron Smith
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 11:09 am, JoeHill wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:36 -0800 Aron Smith disseminated the following: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... We're trying to ignore you but :-D I'm on my way to setting up a

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:55:29 +1100 Stephen Kühn disseminated the following: Just makin' sure I'm still able to post with my new setup, pls ignore... We're trying to ignore you but :-D I'm on my way to setting up a dedicated mail and web server! Soon I will be all powerful

Re: [newbie] Testing Mail setup

2004-11-24 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 11:04, JoeHill wrote: Dang. Give a Canuck a millimetre and they take a kilometre. Oh, you bet. Someday, every server on the Web will be under my control, and they will all start like this: ?php if (eregi(MSIE,getenv(HTTP_USER_AGENT)) || eregi(Internet

[newbie] testing...no mail coming thru

2004-07-12 Thread Steve Jeppesen
sympa down again? -- Linux user #280097 Machines #162480 #191825 http://counter.li.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] testing...no mail coming thru

2004-07-12 Thread Justin Grote
On 7/11/2004 at 9:10 AM, Steve Jeppesen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: SJ sympa down again? Yep, it was down over the weekend. No Worries, unless you had a panicked question, in which case you should have bought the service contract :P __ Justin Grote Network

Re: [newbie] testing Stephen Kuhn.... 1,2,3....

2004-03-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 02:24, Trevor wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:27, Stephen Kuhn wrote: If anyone wants to spoof me, well, by all means, please do - I've been spoofing myself for 41 years now... Newbie huh? :^) Welcome back. Regards Trevor Rhodes Ta mate. And yeah, we're

[newbie] Testing... 1,2,3

2004-03-20 Thread Glenn
I'm getting a bounce message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each email I send to the list. Am I getting out to the list? (I see the posts coming back.) Should I trash these as they appear? Glenn -- 05:23:54 up 7:25, running Mandrake Linux release 10.0 (Community) for i586, kernel 2.6.3-4mdk

Re: [newbie] Testing... 1,2,3

2004-03-20 Thread Philip Cronje
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 05:39:23 -0700, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting a bounce message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each email I send to the list. Am I getting out to the list? (I see the posts coming back.) Should I trash these as they appear? Glenn You can safely show them

Re: [newbie] testing Stephen Kuhn.... 1,2,3....

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 15:04, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote: On Tuesday 16 March 2004 23:52, Stephen Kuhn wrote: I just can't believe Is some spoofing on S.Kuhn or is he really back? ;-))) Welcome again, mate! cheers from Sorocaba! Ricardo Castanho If anyone wants to

Re: [newbie] testing Stephen Kuhn.... 1,2,3....

2004-03-16 Thread Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 23:52, Stephen Kuhn wrote: I just can't believe Is some spoofing on S.Kuhn or is he really back? ;-))) Welcome again, mate! cheers from Sorocaba! Ricardo Castanho On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 13:48, Fajar Priyanto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Re: [newbie] Testing USB

2004-02-06 Thread robin
Paul Smith wrote: There's also a nice graphical tool, usbview, which shows the tree of USB devices currently connected. If not already installed, you can find it on disk1 of MDK9.2. Thanks, but I cannot install usbview. The installer complains about bad signatures. How to overcome the bad

[newbie] Testing USB

2004-02-05 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I would like to know how to learn whether the USB connection is working properly. I have a printer connected to there and it does not work. Could somebody here please help me? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [newbie] Testing USB

2004-02-05 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 05 February 2004 13:31, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All I would like to know how to learn whether the USB connection is working properly. I have a printer connected to there and it does not work. Could somebody here please help me? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul Open a terminal,

Re: [newbie] Testing USB

2004-02-05 Thread Raffaele Belardi
There's also a nice graphical tool, usbview, which shows the tree of USB devices currently connected. If not already installed, you can find it on disk1 of MDK9.2. raffaele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2004 13:31, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All I would like to know how to

Re: [newbie] Testing USB

2004-02-05 Thread Paul Smith
There's also a nice graphical tool, usbview, which shows the tree of USB devices currently connected. If not already installed, you can find it on disk1 of MDK9.2. Thanks, but I cannot install usbview. The installer complains about bad signatures. How to overcome the bad signatures problem?

[newbie] testing

2004-01-27 Thread RickS
-- RickS Linux user #338463 - Mdk 9.2 2.4.22-26mdk Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] testing

2004-01-27 Thread Dalton
testing Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread Margot
Todd Slater wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread John Richard Smith
Margot wrote: Todd Slater wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:41:05 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was filtered, didn't it? You have to change: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] to * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, the way I did it worked, but yes, yours would be more accurate. Thanks! -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:15:39 -0500 Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! ROTFLMAO! Thanks guys, really funny stuff. Jeez, what would I do without this list. The technical help is great, but the humour is still the best

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:38:39 + Margot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? LOL! What don't you get a chill watching video of a static object? It's the latest in porn... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 11:24, JoeHill wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! This may be where I need to start learning about locking as well. I got an error in pmlog at one point: procmail: Timeout, was waiting for /var/spool/mail/joehill

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:38:33 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should write that recipe as: :0 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/mail/joehill From man procmailrc: === A line starting with ':' marks the beginning of a recipe. It has the following format: :0

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 13:47, JoeHill wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:38:33 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should write that recipe as: :0 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/mail/joehill From man procmailrc: === A line starting with ':' marks the beginning

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-05 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Friday 05 December 2003 07:56 am, JoeHill wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:38:39 + Margot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? LOL! What don't you get a chill watching video of a static object? It's the latest in porn... I'll

[newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread JoeHill
Viagra! -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ Reality is what you can get away with. -- Robert Anton Wilson Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread JoeHill
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! It works! Woot! I's learnin', sorry to bombard like this... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ Where the state begins, individual

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread Adolfo Bello
It was filtered, didn't it? You have to change: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] to * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saludos, Adolfo Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis -- Collar points don't match, and you've trimmed all the seams -- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n°13 - Mandrake Linux 10.0 on PurpleDragon Kernel-2.6.0-0.2mdkenterprise

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 21:43, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis spamassassin Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:47:46 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: spamassassin not big enough -- Collar points don't match, and you've trimmed all the seams -- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n°13 - Mandrake Linux 10.0 on PurpleDragon

Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist

2003-12-04 Thread Todd Slater
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

[newbie] testing

2003-11-29 Thread David E. Fox
testing rdns to see if it works here, maybe it's kmail Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] testing

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Urwin
The best brains out there said send mail through your ISP or it will be ignored. So I sent mail through my ISP, and they misconfigured their DNS records and my mail is being ignored by newbie and expert. (No forward lookup.) I've reconfigured postfix to send directly. If this gets through it

Re: [newbie] testing

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Urwin
On Saturday 29 Nov 2003 9:44 pm, dfox wrote: Somebody scribbled about [newbie] testing So I sent mail through my ISP, and they misconfigured their DNS records and my mail is being ignored by newbie and expert. (No forward lookup.) Errm - not too bright. Were you getting bounce messages

Re: [newbie] testing

2003-11-23 Thread Phil Newcombe
Carroll Grigsby wrote: On Saturday 22 November 2003 07:04 pm, Phil Newcombe wrote: I haven't had any mail from this list since Nov 17. -- pn Phil: Sympa seems to have had a nervous breakdown and dumped a lot of us. Your best bet is to resubscribe with an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

[newbie] Testing (No Mail From List For 48 Hours)

2003-11-22 Thread Graham Watkins
Waits with bated breath ... -- Graham Watkins On the whole, I preferred cats to women because cats seldom if ever used the word relationship.(Kinky Friedman - Greenwich Killing Time) Registered Linux user number 265254 http://counter.li.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from

Re: [newbie] testing

2003-11-22 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Saturday 22 November 2003 07:04 pm, Phil Newcombe wrote: I haven't had any mail from this list since Nov 17. -- pn Phil: Sympa seems to have had a nervous breakdown and dumped a lot of us. Your best bet is to resubscribe with an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject subscribe

Re: [newbie] Testing, test test test!

2003-11-21 Thread Rocket
Yup...you're there. - Original Message - From: John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Newbie List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 3:43 AM Subject: [newbie] Testing, test test test! H..anyone seeing this? Is there anyone out there? :-) ttfn John (singing

Re: [newbie] Testing, test test test!

2003-11-21 Thread John Richard Smith
John Wilson wrote: H..anyone seeing this? Is there anyone out there? :-) ttfn John (singing the unsubbed blues!) This is an announcement from the resub club. Will all patrons please ensure that all resubs are done on a cron job once a day . John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL

[newbie] testing.

2003-11-12 Thread dfox
this is a test.. smtp.tsoft.com outbound gateway -- David E. Fox Thanks for letting me [EMAIL PROTECTED]change magnetic patterns [EMAIL PROTECTED] on

[newbie] testing postfix

2003-10-21 Thread newbie
testing postfix Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] testing postfix

2003-10-21 Thread Eric Huff
testing postfix Sorry for the multiple tests. Our list is very flaky. I am trying to test sending an automated mail to the list once a week to help out the newcomers. It seems that even though a mail does not go to sympa at whatever, the server still looks for commands in it. I noticed once

[newbie] testing pop filters - no message

2003-09-13 Thread Curt Tresenriter
-- Imagination is more important than knowledge. ~ Einstein Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] testing

2003-06-23 Thread Damian Gatabria
ignore me :o/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] testing

2003-06-23 Thread James R. McKenzie
did you say something? 8-{ - Original Message - From: Damian Gatabria [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:09 AM Subject: [newbie] testing ignore me :o

Re: [newbie] testing

2003-06-23 Thread FemmeFatale
At 03:09 AM 6/23/2003 -0300, you wrote: ignore me :o/ aw must we!? But you're so cute! - FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt Good Decisions Your boss Made: We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that character from Peanuts. - Source: Dilbert Want to buy your

Re: [newbie] testing mozilla mail for HTML.

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday May 28 2003 12:40 am, Franki wrote: Just checking if mozilla mail is sending in txt of html... ignore pls. Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--=_1054100310-881-2004 So no, it's not plain text. Suggestion tho, send your email to test to yourself, instead of

Re: [newbie] testing mozilla mail for HTML.

2003-05-29 Thread Charlie
quoting Franki's missive of Tuesday 27 May 2003 11:40 pm: Just checking if mozilla mail is sending in txt of html... ignore pls. rgds Franki Hi Frank; This one is plain text. Whatever you did it worked. g I suppose for anyone else that wants to use Mozilla Mail for their mail client;

Re: [newbie] testing mozilla mail for HTML.

2003-05-29 Thread g
Charlie wrote: but I have no knowledge whether it works with A.O.(Hel)L. or other ISPs or not. you are correct. ability to set 'text/plain' has been remove from aol email. it was there up thru 6.0. 7.0, do not know. 8.0 it is removed. seems aol wants to support bandwidth hogs. but, as said

Re: [newbie] testing mozilla mail for HTML.

2003-05-29 Thread g
Tom Brinkman wrote: Content-type: multipart/mixed; So no, it's not plain text. Suggestion tho, send your email to test to yourself, instead of the list. You'll be able to check the results a lot quicker ;) Usually within seconds. 'content-type: multipart/mixed;' in header is only to

[newbie] testing...... (bouncing msg!)

2003-03-29 Thread Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
Please DO ignore! -- == Linux user # 102240 = Machine # 96125 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] user == http://counter.li.org/ Get Counted! Sat, 29 Mar 2003 10:15:00 -0300 10:15am up 8:10, 3

[newbie] Testing that I can post again.

2003-03-24 Thread Keith Powell
Just over two weeks ago, for no apparent reason, I suddenly stopped receiving anything from either the newbie or the expert lists. After a lot of work and co-operation between Mandrake and my ISP, they appear to have sorted the problems and things now seem to be back to normal. At least, I am

[newbie] Testing

2002-10-12 Thread dfox
Testing... just (re)installed Mandrake 9.0... Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing

2002-10-12 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Saturday 12 October 2002 04:47 pm, dfox wrote: Testing... just (re)installed Mandrake 9.0... Got it. In view of your other post -- sorry, not sure if is before or after this one -- about not getting messages, you might want a reply. Hence, the cc: -- cmg Want to buy your Pack or Services

[newbie] testing

2002-08-27 Thread s
Hey I didn't get any mail from any of the mandrake lists this morning. That's kinda strange. Is it just me or did everyone suddenly quit finding things to discuss? :D -s Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] testing

2002-08-27 Thread John Richard Smith
s wrote: Hey I didn't get any mail from any of the mandrake lists this morning. That's kinda strange. Is it just me or did everyone suddenly quit finding things to discuss? :D -s I did get some, but I think they were left over from last night. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL

[newbie] Testing another Mail setup

2002-06-02 Thread Dennis Myers
Hoping this goes out to the list from another machine. Just a test. Dennis M. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing another Mail setup

2002-06-02 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 14:50, Dennis Myers wrote: Hoping this goes out to the list from another machine. Just a test. Dennis M. LOL Congrats again... a bleeding expert now. You won't be on this list anymore. -- Michael Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

[newbie] Testing for posting on this mailing list.

2002-01-07 Thread Amish K. Munshi
Sorry for the trouble but I wasn't able to post messages so I am testing. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Testing for posting on this mailing list.

2002-01-07 Thread Nick
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 4:47, you wrote: Sorry for the trouble but I wasn't able to post messages so I am testing. You have been received, cheers! Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] Testing mail transmit

2001-10-24 Thread Dennis Myers
Looking to see if my mail is getting to the list. My replies are not showing up here -- Dennis M. registered Linux user #180842 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] Testing tinyfirewall

2001-06-28 Thread Harry Giles
OK, I have set up my firewall. What do I need to test it? Also, should Bastille firewall be disabled at startup? Harry G

Re: [newbie] Testing tinyfirewall

2001-06-28 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 07:46 pm, Harry Giles wrote: OK, I have set up my firewall. What do I need to test it? Also, should Bastille firewall be disabled at startup? No, why would you wanna disable it? It should be run as a service from boot. Go to

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-03-01 Thread brk
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update It might have been just as easy for the tech to wave the RAM back and forth in the air a few times - lightly touch it to his forehead - chant "Ibeebeebeee

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Scott Faulkner
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM Naa, I can't believe this, I have a 256 stick that crashed three computers continuously

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Linux Tests
, February 22, 2001 8:45 AM ##To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ##Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## ##This is the funny thing about my situation, no crashes, no weird things ##going on, I just can't get linux to recognize my ram. The system doesn't ##even seem to run any slower, transfers of

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, you wrote: It might have been just as easy for the tech to wave the RAM back and forth in the air a few times - lightly touch it to his forehead - chant "Ibeebeebeeeboo" five times - blinking the lights off and on with the other hand while twirling about ... He'd have

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote: On Monday 26 February 2001 16:01, you wrote: I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote: On Monday 26 February 2001 16:01, you wrote: I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-27 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I took the suspect ram sticks back to the shop where I bought them and the tech put it in a windows box and booted it up. It booted right up, so they said the memory was tested ok. They gave me an exchange anyway, but I thought it interesting

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and update

2001-02-27 Thread Jose M. Sanchez
that even hardware testers and good test suites do not. -JMS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Myers, Dennis R NWO Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:01 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM-solved and updat

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-25 Thread abe
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this? Abe, Where does one fi

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-24 Thread Mark Weaver
2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this? Abe, Where does one find and buy a copy of this amazing program? -- Mark "If you don't share your conc

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Franki
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM well that is sort true,, if you bios is set to fast boot, the chances are that it is not doing a full test of the ram,,, You would be better of booting from a floppy with something like microscope or PCcheckit... and do a full test

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Mark Johnson
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM Naa, I can't believe this, I have a 256 stick that crashed three computers continuously and it counted up in the bios just fine in all three. This 128 stick isn't quite so ruthless on me but linux apps keep crashing on me left and right and weird

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM This is the funny thing about my situation, no crashes, no weird things going on, I just can't get linux to recognize my ram. The system doesn't even seem to run any slower, transfers of web pages and searches are as fast as ever. I am thinking

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread goldenpi
PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM On this subject of RAM incompatibility... I have a stick of RAM that someone gave me to boost me up past 64mb. When I first installed it it would do ok, but then it would get where sometimes it would show on boot up and others it wouldn't

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
rk Johnson ## Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM ## To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) ## Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I ## can ## confirm this?

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
Sorry, I respectfully disagree with some of this. A techs time is too expensive to go through BIOS settings. Always stick with the BIOS defaults. Period. DO NOT make changes to your BIOS. Plus simplify the testing process. Keep the BIOS at default. Use RST - and OS independent tester -

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread Linux Tests
and weird things like the logout won't work sometimes in X... ## ##-Original Message- ##From: Myers, Dennis R NWO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ##Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:20 PM ##To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ##Subject: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## ## ##I've been told by local

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread abe
lf Of Mark Johnson ## Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM ## To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) ## Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM ## ## I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I ## can ## confirm this?

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-22 Thread abe
I second this. Quick Tech is the program that I recommend. It is available from http://www.uxd.com as was mentioned below. It is amazing. Well worth the money. Worth its weight in gold actually. Although I do disagree with always keeping BIOS defaults. Definately keep them for ram timings

RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I've been told by local computer techs that if your bios sees the ram at bootup ,( in other words detects it and counts it off on the first screen that shows your primary and secondary IDE devices and you can hit del to get to bios) then the ram memory

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Scott Faulkner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:31 PM To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail) Subject: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can

Re: [newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-21 Thread Heather
On this subject of RAM incompatibility... I have a stick of RAM that someone gave me to boost me up past 64mb. When I first installed it it would do ok, but then it would get where sometimes it would show on boot up and others it wouldn't then (in evil windows since i haven't put it back after

[newbie] Testing for bad RAM

2001-02-20 Thread Mark Johnson
I am suspicious that my RAM is bad. Is there anyway in linux that I can confirm this?

[newbie] testing kernel

2001-01-25 Thread mike keener
I have a question for the list... is there a particular linux distro that Linus tests his kernel on before it is released..?? I just always wanted to know.. Regards Mike WB6IIK

[newbie] testing

2001-01-06 Thread jack dugas
i have a cable connection

Re: [newbie] testing

2001-01-06 Thread Aries
On Saturday 06 January 2001 13:53, you wrote: i have a cable connection That's nice So do I , If your wondering about the test project civileme wants us to send to his E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] not the the list Content-Type: text/html;

Re: [newbie] testing

2001-01-06 Thread var1x
wow... jack dugas wrote: i have a cable connection

[newbie] newbie testing

2000-11-25 Thread patrick
hi, i just mandrake 7.2 and am testing to see if im still here -- Love is all u need

Re: [newbie] Testing new versions of kernels with a floppy

2000-09-17 Thread Romanator
Anthony wrote: mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 the_linux_kernel_version I think that should work. Hi everybody, It's been a while. Does any one know the exact files or instructions for testing new kernels by copying them to a floppy? I'm using mdk7.1b. -- Roman Registered

Re: [newbie] Testing new versions of kernels with a floppy

2000-09-17 Thread pungki
Hi.. Im' trying to make a bootdisk. But when I try mkbootdisk --device/dev/fd0 2.2.15-4mdk, I get an error message : mount : /dev/fd0 already mounted on /tmp/mkbootdisk busy. Then I try to umount fd0 (umount -f /dev/fd0), and I get an error message like this : umount2 : Device or resource

  1   2   >