On Friday 31 October 2003 09:38 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:17:50 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
The answer however, is not to reject everything out of hand and adopt
the position that no law can be useful.
Unless you recognize that laws *create disorder*
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:40:51 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Cute little sayings like this are relatively meaningless to me.
Anarchy would be far worse for all of us than even over-the-top
government. Laws are an absolute necessity without which there can be
no social
On Saturday 01 November 2003 09:55 am, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:40:51 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Cute little sayings like this are relatively meaningless to me.
Anarchy would be far worse for all of us than even over-the-top
government. Laws are an
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 11:19, Margot wrote:
HaywireMac wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:50:10 +
Graham Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
boys,
that should be singular. I didn't call anyone's opinion shrill,
silly, or other such things. Up to that point it was a fairly civil
Aronsmith wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 11:19, Margot wrote:
HaywireMac wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:50:10 +
Graham Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
boys,
that should be singular. I didn't call anyone's opinion shrill,
silly, or other such things. Up to that point it was a fairly civil
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 12:07, Margot wrote:
Aronsmith wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 11:19, Margot wrote:
HaywireMac wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:50:10 +
Graham Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
boys,
that should be singular. I didn't call anyone's opinion shrill,
silly,
On Friday 31 October 2003 09:17 am, Tango Echo wrote:
Ah! Here is the reference: http://www.hackbusters.net
While it's possible it may deal directly with his
LaBrea tar pit program, it appears to hinge around the
tar pit technology. Here's a quote from the site:
Quote:
This section of the
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:57:04 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
The fact is that tortured readings of laws and paranoid ravings about
the possible clueless applications of laws does not do the tech
community any service. It makes us all appear to be unreasonable and
unwilling to
Ah! Here is the reference:
http://www.hackbusters.net
While it's possible it may deal directly with his
LaBrea tar pit program, it appears to hinge around
the
tar pit technology. Here's a quote from the site:
Quote:
This section of the Illinois Criminal Code was
added
on
On Friday 31 October 2003 11:29 am, HaywireMac wrote:
Relying on politicians and lawyers to protect us has never served us
well in the past, I see no reason to expect anything different for the
future.
The answer however, is not to reject everything out of hand and adopt the
position that no
On Friday 31 October 2003 11:38 am, Tango Echo wrote:
Well, I am not a resident of Illinois, therefore,
this particular criminal
code does not apply to me.
Good, but you might want to check these states too:
http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/states/
I might check the laws, not someone's
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:57:04 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This response actually brings up something that has been bugging me of
late about some elements of the tech community. I realize that there
are a large number of clueless politicians and lawyers out there but
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:17:50 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
The answer however, is not to reject everything out of hand and adopt
the position that no law can be useful.
Unless you recognize that laws *create disorder* ;-)
The more laws and order are made prominent, the more
On Friday 31 October 2003 06:38 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:17:50 -0500
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
The answer however, is not to reject everything out of hand and
adopt the position that no law can be useful.
Unless you recognize that laws *create disorder*
14 matches
Mail list logo
