1. After reading this article ...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001436280_linuxgroup08.html
Please put that back. :) I couldn't access it. :)
I am left wondering; where does Intel stand in the debate? Are they
officially on the M$ side of things are are they
11 2003 20:39, / Miark :
Manolis
LX said:
clockspeed == performance propaganda has been one of the greatest lies
foisted on the gullible computer user public that I've seen.
I am tired to read from many people the there is only one way propaganda
between two companies.
Maybe
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 10:26:20AM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
I can sum up the SCO effort in 2 words: unjust enrichment.
I read an article talking about the $CO CEO or whatever his title is; he's
made a career of enriching himself and his employers through litigation.
He's been very successful
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:43:33AM +0800, Frankie wrote:
I personally think that anyone buying Intel CPU's are nuts...
You pay at least 40% more usually, and for office apps, they are marginally
slower then the much cheaper AMD..
snip
How about the centrino? Looking into tablet pc's and
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 08:06, Haywiremac wrote:
On 13 Aug 2003 06:38:32 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OMG - they musta had that naked dinner meeting!
nah, i'm *just barely* mature enough to give credit where credit is due,
and to keep the two lists seperate insofar as
I know that , you know that... but...
Tell that to a newbie in the world of computers that wants to buy
a PC for
internet and games, and thinks that is a complicated TV. You must
convince me
that this user will NOT take acount of the big number of
phenomenal speed in
the advertising pamphlet.
Manolis
LX said:
clockspeed == performance propaganda has been one of the greatest lies
foisted on the gullible computer user public that I've seen.
I am tired to read from many people the there is only one way propaganda
between two companies.
Maybe because you don't get it? While
On 13 Aug 2003 06:38:32 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OMG - they musta had that naked dinner meeting!
nah, i'm *just barely* mature enough to give credit where credit is due,
and to keep the two lists seperate insofar as personal feelings.
just barely...
--
HaywireMac
The
11 2003 04:06, / Lyvim Xaphir :
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 13:26, David E. Fox wrote:
The
clockspeed == performance propaganda has been one of the greatest lies
foisted on the gullible computer user public that I've seen.
I am tired to read from many people the there is only one way
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 13:26, David E. Fox wrote:
1. After reading this article ...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001436280_linuxgroup08.html
Please put that back. :) I couldn't access it. :)
I am left wondering; where does Intel stand in the debate? Are
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 20:13, Haywiremac wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 03:14:02 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I can disagree in the main concept of the above though...
Despite how LX and I get along on the OT list, he knows his shit
OMG - they musta had that naked dinner meeting!
On Sunday 10 August 2003 01:43 pm, Frankie wrote:
I personally think that anyone buying Intel CPU's are nuts...
You pay at least 40% more usually, and for office apps, they are marginally
slower then the much cheaper AMD..
Of course your upside is that you will get a bit faster framerate
I personally think that anyone buying Intel CPU's are nuts...
You pay at least 40% more usually, and for office apps, they are marginally
slower then the much cheaper AMD..
Of course your upside is that you will get a bit faster framerate running
Quake3 with the Intel, but since both are totally
On Sunday 10 August 2003 12:26 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
1. After reading this article ...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001436280_linux
group08.html
Please put that back. :) I couldn't access it. :)
I am left wondering; where does Intel stand in the debate? Are
14 matches
Mail list logo
