Re: [newbie] dependency tree

2001-12-25 Thread Mark Weaver
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 18:53:06 -0600 Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > >just like that? but what if "it" can't find them? then what? you're still > the same place you were before. In the dark without a clue as to why. > > > >no thanks. I'd rather "know" wh

Re: [newbie] dependency tree

2001-12-24 Thread Michael Viron
>just like that? but what if "it" can't find them? then what? you're still the same place you were before. In the dark without a clue as to why. > >no thanks. I'd rather "know" why something isn't working and then learn and know how to fix it rather then let the software do all my thinking for me.

Re: [newbie] dependency tree

2001-12-24 Thread Mark Weaver
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 06:51:01 +1100 "Richardson, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > try man urpm. urpmi is a bit like apt-get for Debian, it will install your > application and any dependancies as well. I think all rpm tools just tell > you the dependancies, bu

RE: [newbie] dependency tree

2001-12-24 Thread Richardson, Martin
try man urpm. urpmi is a bit like apt-get for Debian, it will install your application and any dependancies as well. I think all rpm tools just tell you the dependancies, but urpmi will install the for you as well. HTH Martin > -Original Message- > From: Mohammed Arafa [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [newbie] dependency tree

2001-12-23 Thread Mark Weaver
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 14:22:30 +0200 "Mohammed Arafa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > greetings > i was just reading my backlog of mail from the list and i m sorry to say > that i have to agree (not totally but somewhat) with wendy on something. > > say u d/l abc.rpm