It is SCSI with the Zip zoom scsi card.
00:11.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-7850 (rev 03)
Subsystem: Adaptec AHA-2904/Integrated AIC-7850
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF-
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 06:39:21 -0400
etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
with Tom's permission, I would like to use his line as my sig.txt file
for a
while.
It's also important to understand that there's no answers available from
this
list, only opinions. Some of them just
On Monday 13 August 2001 05:39 am, etharp wrote:
with Tom's permission, I would like to use his line as my sig.txt
file for a while.
It's also important to understand that there's no answers available
from this list, only opinions. Some of them just happen to be, or are
intended to be
Well, is it USB or parallel (external and plugging into the computer) or mounted within
and attached to a SCSI Card? Or is it IDE?
IDE is attached by a 40 pin cable to a plug on the motherboard
SCSI is attached by a 50 pin cable (or 68 pin cable or 80 pin cable with adaptors)
Parallel
Sorry for the intrusion, I received a complaint about a user
on our local system, is it your wish that I pull this user's
acct?
On Sunday 12 August 2001 08:09 pm, so spoke poogle:
On Sunday 12 August 2001 14:16, you wrote:
OK I guess no one cares about helping, I tried to
put in as much
we do care about helping, or we would not have wasted the time to read your
mail, much less respond, but I would suggest that quite possibly you DID
sound Me-AN, and still do, and sound as if what ever curve balls life has
thrown you, should be cause to elevate your problems above the rest of
]
Subject: Re: [newbie] zip250 way too slow
On Saturday 11 August 2001 14:13, Jose M. Sanchez wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Linux
Newbie
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] zip250 way
I don't think there has been the sort of abuse that one would wish to have an
acct pulled for. At least not that I have seen.
Of course the only thing that would justify pulling an acct. (for me) would
be spam or M$ viruses comming from or through the domain. Heck this does not
look like
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] zip250 way too slow
I don't think there has been the sort of abuse that one would wish to
have an
acct pulled for. At least not that I have seen.
Of course the only thing that would justify pulling an acct. (for me)
would
be spam or M$ viruses comming from
To: Abuse Spam control Department; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] zip250 way too slow
I don't think there has been the sort of abuse that one would wish to
have an
acct pulled for. At least not that I have seen.
Of course the only thing that would justify pulling an acct. (for me)
would
On Sunday 12 August 2001 01:16 pm, Linux Newbie wrote:
OK I guess no one cares about helping, I tried to
put in as much as I knew, but no one was willing
to even lift a finger, I'm sick of this elitist attitude
I know alot but I'm not telling you
What do you expect me to do just pull it out
11 matches
Mail list logo
