Upgraded ConTeXt and it works just as for you.
Thanks for the reply, and apologies for the noise.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 7:23 PM Julius Ross wrote:
> I get the attached. Perhaps I did something weird to my ConTexT: will
> try reinstalling later and see if that fixes it.
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 20
I get the attached. Perhaps I did something weird to my ConTexT: will
try reinstalling later and see if that fixes it.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:10 PM Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get (with the latest) the attached image. Looks about the same to
> me. (I do not see what you get, so I do
Hi,
I get (with the latest) the attached image. Looks about the same to
me. (I do not see what you get, so I don't know what you expect.)
/Mikael
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:00 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in the
> right position)
>
>
Hi,
With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in the
right position)
\starttext
\switchtobodyfont[concrete]
\startformula
\overbrace{a+a}
\underbrace{a+a}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Would appreciate if somebody can tell me if they see the same, or if this is a
bug. The v
Hi, Mikael—
In answer to your question: I am one of two editors of *Aestimatio:
Sources and Studies in the History of Science*, where the science in
question is premodern. As it turns out, our publications tend to the
history of mathematics and astronomy (Babylonian, Egyptian, Greco-Roman,
Arabic
PM wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if there is a (good) way to have a specific font for
> sub/superscripts in mathematics that is different from the main font?
> >
> > I ask because I am working on a variable opentype math font, and it
wondering if there is a (good) way to have a specific font for
> sub/superscripts in mathematics that is different from the main font?
>
> I ask because I am working on a variable opentype math font, and it can be
> made to look a better if the superscripts are made a little bolder.
>
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a (good) way to have a specific font for
sub/superscripts in mathematics that is different from the main font?
I ask because I am working on a variable opentype math font, and it can be made
to look a better if the superscripts are made a little bolder.
Thanks
default] [protrusion=quality,...]
> >>
> >> which adds additional settings to the default set.
> >>
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][roman][xcharter]
> >>> \definefontfamily [myfont][sansserif][overpass][rscale=0.93]
> >>> \definefo
]
\definefontfamily [myfont][sansserif][overpass][rscale=0.93]
\definefontfamily [myfont][teletype][overpass][rscale=0.93]
\definefontfamily [myfont][mono][overpassmono][rscale=0.93]
\definetypeface [myfont][mathematics][math] [xcharter]
\setupbodyfont[myfont, 11pt]
\startTEXpage
\showfontkerns
ty,...]
>
> which adds additional settings to the default set.
>
> > \definefontfamily [myfont][roman][xcharter]
> > \definefontfamily [myfont][sansserif][overpass][rscale=0.93]
> > \definefontfamily [myfont][teletype][overpass][rscale=0.93]
> > \definefontfamily [my
]
\definefontfamily [myfont][mono][overpassmono][rscale=0.93]
\definetypeface [myfont][mathematics][math] [xcharter]
\setupbodyfont[myfont, 11pt]
\startTEXpage
\showfontkerns
Vitae, Vase, LT, VA, Y., Effizient, abcdel™, \italic{effi
abcdel™}, \slanted{effi abcdel™}\\
\style[sans]{Vitae
][rscale=0.93]
\definefontfamily [myfont][mono][overpassmono][rscale=0.93]
\definetypeface [myfont][mathematics][math] [xcharter]
\setupbodyfont[myfont, 11pt]
\startTEXpage
\showfontkerns
Vitae, Vase, LT, VA, Y., Effizient, abcdel™, \italic{effi
abcdel™}, \slanted{effi abcdel™
On 7/16/2024 1:50 AM, Rogers, Michael K wrote:
Hi,
Braces around the comma, $10{,}000$, works for me. It’s the plain TeX
way. If there’s a way to set up mathematics in ConTeXt to do this,
perhaps someone else will fill us in.
in lmtx { } in math is just grouping, so no ordinary math atom is
Hi,
Braces around the comma, $10{,}000$, works for me. It’s the plain TeX way. If
there’s a way to set up mathematics in ConTeXt to do this, perhaps someone else
will fill us in.
Michael
On Jul 15, 2024, at 10:01 PM, Shiv Shankar Dayal
wrote:
Suppose I have $10,000$ then in the output
[CustomFontSelection] [mm] [math] [CustomFontSelection]
[default] [rscale=0.97]
\stoptypescript
\stoptypescriptcollection
\setupbodyfont[CustomFontSelection]
\starttext
We use $X$, $Y$, $Z$ and $n$, $m$, etc. $\sin(x) \to \limsup x_n$ whatever.
\mathematics{%
\delta_{ij} =
\startmathc
le=0.97]
\stoptypescript
\stoptypescriptcollection
\setupbodyfont[CustomFontSelection]
\starttext
We use $X$, $Y$, $Z$ and $n$, $m$, etc. $\sin(x) \to \limsup x_n$ whatever.
\mathematics{%
\delta_{ij} =
\startmathcases
\NC 1 \NC \text{if } i = j \NR
\NC 0 \NC \text{othe
On 17 May 2024, at 21:40, garu...@azules.eu wrote:
>
> I have tested on 2 pages :
> - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Sciences (only mathematics part)
> - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Fonts
>
> After these tests, I think this may help users to find their way around the
&g
I have tested on 2 pages :
- https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Sciences (only mathematics part)
- https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Fonts
After these tests, I think this may help users to find their way around the
various sources of documentation :
In one small table he/she has an overview of the
od.nl
-
outlines-003.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\continuewhenlmtxmode
\starttext
\startMPpage[offset=10pt]
draw lmt_outline [
text = "\mathematics{\sqrt{2}-1}"
] ;
draw lmt_outline [
text = "\mathe
As for the current ConTeXt, the example above still produces the wrong
output. Can anyone reproduce this case? Thank you in advance.
Jairo
El sáb, 4 may 2024 a la(s) 7:23 p.m., Jairo A. del Rio (
jairoadelr...@gmail.com) escribió:
> Hi, list
>
> \startMPpage
> draw outlinetext.d(&
Hi, list
\startMPpage
draw outlinetext.d("\mathematics{\sqrt{2}-1}")(withcolor black withpen
currentpen) scaled 1;
\stopMPpage
fails (radicals are not drawn at all). As for context --version,
mtx-context | ConTeXt Process Management 1.06
mtx-context |
mtx-context | ma
nhere= h + i
\stopformula
\samplefile{knuth}
\stoptext
\unprotect
\newbox\hightlight_tmp_box
\definemathframed[_highlight][
location=mathematics,
frame=off,
background=color,
backgroundcolor=lightred,
backgroundoffset=0.25ex,
]
\tolerant\def\highlighthere#1\alignhere#2
. Changing the test in the .lfg file fixes
the error, but that is not a long-term solution.
The exact message I get in the log is:
mathematics > tweak > 'LibertinusMath-Regular', size 10, math
size 0, version 'Version, 7.040;RELEASE' found, version 'Version
the error, but that is not a long-term solution.
The exact message I get in the log is:
mathematics > tweak > 'LibertinusMath-Regular', size 10, math
size 0, version 'Version, 7.040;RELEASE' found, version 'Version
7.040' expected
This is not a
ith a clear distinction between the objectives sought: writing
documentation with figures, writing a thesis in mathematics and physics,
how to construct figures, or a bibliography. Not to mention the handling
of photographs in an aesthetically demanding layout; all this with the
possibility of s
Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 09.02.2024 um 20:07:
On 2/8/24 22:37, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED
On 2/8/24 22:37, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Ursula,
>
> I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
> Demonstrandum). You can use this:
>
> \definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
> \def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
> \starttext
> This is
:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
\starttext
This is the end of our proof. \qed
\stoptext
In principle it is included in ConTeXt, but it seems that in the latest version
I have (2024.01.23), the command \qed is broken.
Best regards: Otared
On 8 Feb 2024
2024 22:37:08
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: [NTG-context] Re: Square right aligned
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED
Hi Ursula,
I think you mean the so-called end of the proof sign, or QED (Quod Erat
Demonstrandum). You can use this:
\definesymbol[QED][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\wordright{\symbol[QED]}}
\starttext
This is the end of our proof. \qed
\stoptext
In principle it is included in ConTeXt, but
I thought I read that you had written a document on the
> use of mathematics with ConTeXt, true or false?
>
It is in the writing, but it takes some time (working on it tonight). I
hope to have it out in some form in a not t
Perhaps the size should be even smaller because I personally find it still
a little large.
PS : In a thread, I thought I read that you had written a document on the
use of mathematics with ConTeXt, true or false?
Le ven. 29 déc. 2023 à 16:14, Mikael Sundqvist a écrit :
> Great, all is g
What do you expect here to pass as argument to the oldfact command?
>
I will pass something like n, 5, 10 etc.
>
> This works here:
>
> \defineenumeration
> [proof]
> [closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}}]
>
> \starttext
>
> \startproof
> \samplefile{lorem}
/maps/36/09.pdf page no. 28 then proof is
defined as
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[ text=Proof,
number=no,
headstyle=italic,
title=no, %this is the default
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
But the closessymbol does not work.
I will create a minimum working example and post it as
, %this is the default
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
But the closessymbol does not work.
I will create a minimum working example and post it as soon as possible.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 5:44 PM Wolfgang Schuster <
wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shi
b am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
>>>
>>> Very clear !
>>> In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the
>>> best possible result ?
>>>
>>> A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
>> Thank you for your trust, Wo
Am 09.12.23 um 23:30 schrieb Mikael Sundqvist:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 4:39 PM Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
Very clear !
In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the best
possible result ?
A question better
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
Very clear !
In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for
the best possible result ?
A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
Wolfgang
em > files > jobname './test', input './test.tex', result './test'
fonts > latin modern fonts are not preloaded
languages > language 'en' is active
open source > level 1, order 2, name './test.tex'
font
On 10/30/2023 8:05 AM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Yes well of course no issue arises if I just change the whole font.
But I wanted to keep using the mono font thus reporting issues with it.
In that case you have to go for flushleft
\setupalign[verytolerant,nothyphenated,flushleft]
because otherwise tex
On 10/29/2023 1:33 PM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
how about just using this
\setupbodyfont[concrete]
\starttext
When $a, b, c
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[10pt, mono]
This is how it should
or context dev without any restriction of usage
because we might want to show them in manuals or articles or
presentations and there is no reason to spend time on them unlees we're
paid for it.
I think that my version is/will be more complete - except for mathematics. Once
some
yours and Mathias' minion.lfg (and associated
type-imp-minion) until just now, had to figure it all out from scratch from
demo.lfg and lm.lfg templates -)
(OTOH, had previously seen yours and Mikael's sophisticated minion-math.lfg)
I think that my version is/will be more complete -
startitem
> $7(x + \dfrac{5}{14})^2 + \dfrac{199}{28}$
> \stopitem
> \startitem
> $-\dfrac{1}{2}(x + 2)^2 + \dfrac{9}{2}$
> \stopitem
> \stopitemize
> }
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
> Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
>
>
\stopitemize
> >
> > \stoptext
> >
> > > Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
> > > > Dear ConTeXt users,
> > > >
> > > > Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue.
> > > > When
\startitem
> $-\dfrac{1}{2}(x + 2)^2 + \dfrac{9}{2}$
> \stopitem
> \stopitemize
> }
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
> Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
>>
>> Dear ConTeXt users,
>>
>> Time goes by but I haven't yet fou
gt;
> > Alexandre Christe 於 2023年8月22日 週二 上午2:58寫道：
> > > Dear ConTeXt users,
> > >
> > > Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue. When
> > > having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of
> > > \linewi
ce solution to this issue. When
> having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of \linewidth
> for the \godown command.
>
> Here's a MWE
>
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize[n][style=\bf]
> \item \godown[-\lineheight] \startitemize
> [a,
Dear ConTeXt users,
Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue. When
having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of \linewidth
for the \godown command.
Here's a MWE
\starttext
\startitemize[n][style=\bf]
\item \godown[-\lineheight] \
distribution
> local/texlive-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
> local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Typesetting for mathematics, natural and computer sciences
>
>
> Any hints?
The ConT
pacman -Qs texlive
local/texlive-bin 2023.66539-1
TeX Live binaries
local/texlive-core 2023.66587-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live core distribution
local/texlive-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
[Neo Euler]
\setupbodyfont[mypalatinoeuler]
\starttext
$x=1$
\stoptext
Result:
mathematics > tweak > 'Neo-Euler', size 7, math size 3, version
'Version 000.002' found, version 'Version 000.002 ' expected
tex error > tex error on line 5 in file ./euler_problem.t
on: 2023.03.10 12:15
>
> My packages are:
>
> $ pacman -Qs texlive
> local/texlive-bibtexextra 2023.66579-1 (texlive-most)
> TeX Live - Additional BibTeX styles and bibliography databases
> local/texlive-bin 2023.66539-1
> TeX Live binaries
> local/texlive-core 2023.
live-pictures 2023.66549-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Packages for drawings graphics
local/texlive-publishers 2023.66550-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - LaTeX classes and packages for specific publishers
local/texlive-science 2023.66461-1 (texlive-most)
TeX Live - Typesetting for mathematic
put
'./atestinlucida-context-55.mkiv', result './atestinlucida-context-55'
fonts > latin modern fonts are not preloaded
languages > language 'en' is active
open source > level 1, order 2, name './atestinlucida-context-55.mkiv'
fo
Hi Hans,
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 2:15 AM, Hans Hagen via ntg-context
> wrote:
> On 12/6/2022 12:39 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
>> 1) Is there a mathematics version of \hpos? The contents of \hpos are set as
>> text, even when \hpos is in mathematics, so I wrote an
On 12/6/2022 12:39 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hello List,
I am working on a project which combines graphics with formulas, like this:
My code for creating this formula is attached. It works well, but I have a
couple of questions that could make it work better.
1) Is there a mathematics
Hello List,
I am working on a project which combines graphics with formulas, like this:
hposQuestion.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
My code for creating this formula is attached. It works well, but I have a
couple of questions that could make it work better.
1) Is there a mathematics
ntg-context wrote:
>> Hello Mikael,
>> Thanks for your solution; it works just fine. I am not familiar with how you
>> defined the pmatrix. Any links to manuals to learn such definitions? Also,
>> this is the second thing I have tried to adapt from typesetting mathematics
mathematics in plain TeX that didn’t work. I tried to draw commutative
diagrams some time back using \diagram{…} which didn’t work(Got the idea
from the book “A beginner’s book of TeX” pg. 161 by Seroul et al ).
I guess what I am asking is that, what are the limits of what I can use
out-of-the-box
Hello Mikael,
Thanks for your solution; it works just fine. I am not familiar with how you
defined the pmatrix. Any links to manuals to learn such definitions? Also, this
is the second thing I have tried to adapt from typesetting mathematics in plain
TeX that didn’t work. I tried to draw
e I compile my file, I get the warnings I
don't like:
====
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Regular', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.200' found, version 'Version 1.302' expected
mathematics > tw
my file, I get the warnings I
don't like:
====
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Regular', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.200' found, version 'Version 1.302' expected
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Bold', size 6pt, math s
nals/corr/abs-1102-2684},
volume= {abs/1102.2684},
year = {2011},
}
@book{vaart1998_asymptoticstatistics,
author = {Vaart, A. W. van der},
collection = {Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics},
doi= {10.1017/CBO9780511802256},
localfile = {
ld up with some college
assignments and work, so sorry for that... I just updated today]
I have tested out most of my documents (some with many MetaFun diagrams) and
all work well!
I have several documents which are very mathematics-heavy and all of those work
great as well. In fact, I also noticed so
d up with some college
assignments and work, so sorry for that... I just updated today]
I have tested out most of my documents (some with many MetaFun diagrams) and
all work well!
I have several documents which are very mathematics-heavy and all of those work
great as well. In fact, I also no
On 1/26/2022 10:07 PM, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
Just be careful, though (writing as a native English speaker), because
the word 'polymath' for English speaker is not a reference to
mathematicians at all. (Greek/mathē/ means 'learning' not mathematics).
Translators a
Just be careful, though (writing as a native English speaker), because
the word 'polymath' for English speaker is not a reference to
mathematicians at all. (Greek/mathē/ means 'learning' not mathematics).
Translators are well aware of the danger of homonyms, and if you
Oh, that is nice!
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European
history of mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do
with units and measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691135267/the-crest-of-the-pe
n-ancient-india
Oh, that is nice!
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do with units and
measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691135267/the-
/mathematicsmiscellany/time-measurement-in-ancient-india
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do with units and
measurements but more importantly, calculations):
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback
But it got more complicated than that (particularly for time). See, for example:
https://sites.google.com/site/mathematicsmiscellany/time-measurement-in-ancient-india
There is also this fascinating book which covers the non-European history of
mathematics (a lot of which in ancient times was to do
ome amount, which tends to depend on what kind of mathematics are in
between, so it's not constant.
Has anyone else noticed this too?
It can depend on the ht/dp ratio of the font, so maybe you need to adapt
that (when setting up lines
Dear list,
I've noticed that in my document the linespacing (verified
with \the\baselineskip) is not consistent across the whole document.
In the first section, it's fine (no maths). Later on, it gets increased by
some amount, which tends to depend on what kind of mathematics are in
b
Thank you Luigi !
"Quite old" doesn't matter. The date of the wiki page from Thomas is
2010... And my own contribution to first steps with ConTeXt (in French
and not for mathematics) through a Wikibook is no more valuable, full of
errors and obsolete on many aspects
(https://f
ce the .tex files containing Unicode are no longer
> sanitary. However, ConTeXt has so many remarkable features that the
> very thought of having to go back to (Xe)LaTeX (just for harfbuzz
> rendering) causes me immense pain. As far as I am concerned, in every
> other way ConTeXt simply
atures that the very thought of having to go back to (Xe)LaTeX
(just for harfbuzz rendering) causes me immense pain. As far as I am
concerned, in every other way ConTeXt simply has no match in the (Xe)LaTeX
world. In my usage of ConTeXt for my academic work (in English with lots of
mathematic
On 12/13/2021 6:57 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
which indeed makes
\starttext
\mathematics{$text$}
\stoptext
a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which prevents the $$ lookup.
Indeed, you solv
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> which indeed makes
>
> \starttext
> \mathematics{$text$}
> \stoptext
>
> a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which preven
math-mkiv manual, so I'm
asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
I would say that this is unsupported expected behaviour ;)
It is better not to use $ at all (except when using it as a dollar sign when
\asciimode is active).
\starttext
% All the same
\mathematics{math
> I'm asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
I would say that this is unsupported expected behaviour ;)
It is better not to use $ at all (except when using it as a dollar sign when
\asciimode is active).
>
> \starttext
> % All the same
> \mathematics{math $
Dear list,
I was playing around and found that nesting $$s inside of \m blocks
typesets the code as text.
I can't find anything about this on the wiki or in the math-mkiv manual, so
I'm asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
Jack
\starttext
% All the same
\mathem
:
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\definemathstackers[MySymbol]
[voffset=-1.4\mathexheight, % -.8\mathexheight
hoffset=\zeropoint,
mathclass=ord,
topoffset=.3\mathemwidth, % poor man's italic correction
middlecommand=\mathematics]
\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MyS
:
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\definemathstackers[MySymbol]
[voffset=-1.4\mathexheight, % -.8\mathexheight
hoffset=\zeropoint,
mathclass=ord,
topoffset=.3\mathemwidth, % poor man's italic correction
middlecommand=\mathematics]
\define[1]\interior{\mathover[MyS
be seen which I'd need to typeset a genealogical table.
> >
> > Now, the commands \downbracefill and \upbracefill are no context commands.
> > Please, are there correspondings to them?
> $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
>
>
ext commands.
Please, are there correspondings to them?
$\overbrace{\hbox{xxxx}}$
\mathematics{\overbrace{\hbox{}}}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8
On 10/10/2021 5:45 AM, Jason Ross via ntg-context wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to provide more support for LaTeX math for an Org Mode
exporter for ConTeXt. LaTeX is the de facto standard for mathematics in
Org Mode. However, the syntax is quite different between LaTeX and
ConTeXt. I have
Hello,
I'm trying to provide more support for LaTeX math for an Org Mode
exporter for ConTeXt. LaTeX is the de facto standard for mathematics in
Org Mode. However, the syntax is quite different between LaTeX and
ConTeXt. I have a few ideas, but none that I'm happy about.
1. Expor
0B. Unfortunately, this quickly
> becomes very untenable in large documents. Since I was new to ConTeXt I did
> not venture
> to ask earlier on since I had not read much of the documentaion. Now, after
> having read quite a bit, I have mustered up the courage to ask here. As a
> stop-gap
other font alternative with
\definefontalternative[rk]
and used that with a font synonym using 'devanagari-two' where necessary.
I have completely migrated (away from (Xe)LaTeX )to ConTeXt for all my
university work which is in English with lots of mathematics. I am by no means
an expert but
astermind_ x
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 13:36
An: ntg-context@ntg.nl<mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Betreff: [NTG-context] Project structure: Specifying environment in component
Hello everyone,
I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the st
d_ x
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 13:36
> An: ntg-context@ntg.nl
> Betreff: [NTG-context] Project structure: Specifying environment in component
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
> studying and t
across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the structure looks like this:
env_notes.tex
project_notes.tex
geogroups/groups-prd_geometry-groups.tex
geogroups/groups-c_chapter1.tex
I am following this wiki: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Project_structure
My question is: Why do I need to
Hello everyone,
I am creating a project of notes across different areas of mathematics I am
studying and the structure looks like this:
env_notes.tex
project_notes.tex
geogroups/groups-prd_geometry-groups.tex
geogroups/groups-c_chapter1.tex
I am following this wiki: https
t that doesn't
> work (even inside a formula), since \in is used for references in ConTeXt.
> And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
> explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
>
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wante
for "is an element of" a set).
…
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
> the recommended way to type this character? (I'm hoping to avoid having to
> cut and paste the character into the document every time I want to use it.
> And I don&#x
t that doesn't
> work (even inside a formula), since \in is used for references in ConTeXt.
> And in fact the link on the Basic Math page for \in takes you to the
> explanation of \in as used for ConTeXt references.
>
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted
an epsilon, and
> which is the mathematical symbol for "is an element of" a set).
…
> This is a very common character in mathematics, so I wanted to ask: what is
> the recommended way to type this character? (I'm hoping to avoid having to
> cut and paste the character into the d
1 - 100 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
