On 23-7-2010 9:23, Armin Varmaz wrote:
Hi guys
is there a way to put the size fonts in formulas and the size of symbols in
\mathematics to the local size font, e.g. used in a text box? I found that
ConTeXt does not use the appropriate font size in {\tfxx } or in \tfx. below a
mini example
to be italic or
upright in mathematics.
That is already there
\setupmathematics
[lcgreek=italic,
ucgreek=normal]
(normal, italic, none)
I've added sygreek so that one can also influence the nable and
differential (default normal). I tested with:
\starttext
\startTEXpage
are set in italic. Otherwise \nabla and all such
>> symbols should be upright.
>> Would it be possible to make this optional in math italics, something
>> like
>> \setupmathematics[mathsymbols=italic]
>> or
>> \setupmathematics[mathsymbols=upright]
>> Ma
trick how to produce diamond
(\diamond). But there is no \dash symbol defined.
From symb-mis.tex:
\definesymbol [bullet][\mathematics{\bullet}]
\definesymbol [dash] [\mathematics{-}]
\definesymbol [star] [\mathematics{\star}]
\definesymbol [triangle] [\mathematics{\tri
Hi guys
is there a way to put the size fonts in formulas and the size of symbols in \mathematics to the local size font, e.g. used in a text box? I found that ConTeXt does not use the appropriate font size in {\tfxx } or in \tfx. below a mini example.
what am I doing wrong? maybe I damaged
satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths
represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some
mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across
borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for
typesetting of mathematics.
I
Hi.When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my math operators with \mathematics, e.g.\def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm running into problems in MPgraphics:
Texexec compiles the following file fine until I ad
Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my
> math operators with \mathematics, e.g.
> \def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.
> So far I was using this like I use \EnsureMath in LaTeX, but now I'm
> running into problem
\def\gobble#1{}
\defineconversion[starred][\mathematics{*}\gobble]
\setupfootnotes[conversion=starred]
However, that's somewhat of a hack; better is to set up the footnotes to
reset the counter on each page, and then use one of ConTeXt's predefined
conversion sets that starts with an asterisk
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
The following has to be added to nath for spacing to work correctly:
\def\mathematics#1{\relax\ifmmode#1\else$#1$\fi}
adding it anywhere after
\def$#1${\@@dollar{#1}}
seems to work fine. The problem is that $ is redefined, but
\mathematics doesn't catch on so the sp
Hi,
I begin to migrate slowly to ConTeXt, and I think it works very well for
writing mathematics.
I have a question : what is the most complete Math Font to write mathematics
with ConteXt course ?
thank you,
Fabrice
2014-02-10 9:45 GMT+01:00 Keith J. Schultz :
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> Math s
Cool, it works nicely here, too.Thanks,Boris.On 8/14/06, taco hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:> Hi.>> When writing math I like avoiding $ whenever possible by defining my
> math operators with \mathematics, e.g.> \def\grp{\mathematics{G}}.>
ConTeXt way of doing this?
\mathematics{...},
nikolai
Replacing \ensuremath above with \mathematics gives an error (both
attempts):
\newcommand{\bit}[2]{\mathematics{\hbox{\tf #1}_\hbox{\tf #2}}}
\newcommand{\bit}[2]{\mathematics{{\hbox{\tf #1}_\hbox{\tf #2
! Missing { inserted
; Already a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I
> am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths
> represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some
> mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across
}}}
but is there a ConTeXt way of doing this?
\mathematics{...},
nikolai
Replacing \ensuremath above with \mathematics gives an error (both
attempts):
\newcommand{\bit}[2]{\mathematics{\hbox{\tf #1}_\hbox{\tf #2}}}
\newcommand{\bit}[2]{\mathematics{{\hbox{\tf #1}_\hbox{\tf #2
you now say
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research
using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my
collaborators dont know ConTeXt).
It certainly works OK to
From:Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Replacing $...$ with \mathematics{...} works without errors.
Good suggestion -- also works here.
Shouldn't $...$ be equivalent to \mathematics{...}?
$$...$$ is deprecated relative to \startformula...\stopformula, so I
wrote a Py
Hi,
I do use ConTeXt for typesetting mathematics, and actually I began to use
ConTeXt several years ago for my work as a mathematician: up to now I haven’t
encountered a single instance in which ConTeXt would not give the expected
result, and as a matter of fact the out-of-the-box capabilities
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my
Brooks Moses wrote:
At 01:40 PM 8/2/2004, you wrote:
ah ... the alignment lookahead problem, i think we can safely patch
\mathematics to catch lookahead as well as make frac more robust for
unwanted expansion
\usemodule[newmat]
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1
erminalstop
=, \c!nonterminalstart =\mathematics
\syst_helpers_get_parameters ...cess_comma_item #1
,],\_e_o_p_
l.157\c!indentnext=\v!no]
147 \def\setupbnfgrammar%
148 {\dosingleargument\dosetupbnfgrammar}
149
150 \setu
so, the
> asterisk needs to be in math mode to get positioned correctly, I
> think. Correcting for both of those gives this, which works:
>
> \def\gobble#1{}
> \defineconversion[starred][\mathematics{*}\gobble]
> \setupfootnotes[conversion=starred]
>
>
te:
> It is much easier to treat the first element as special:
>
> \def\doSEQ[#1][#2]%
> {\ifsecondargument
> \donefalse
> \mathematics{\processcommalist[#2]{\dodoSEQ{#1}}}
> \else \mathematics{\bold{#1}}\fi}
>
> \def\dodoSEQ#1#2%
> {\ifdo
·······
> \defineframed[crampy][height=\ht\strutbox,frame=off]
> \starttext
> before
> \thinrule
> \startitemize[columns,two,joinedup]
> \item abc \mathematics{\frac{x^2-x+3}{x^2+x-3}};
> \item xyz \mathematics{\frac{x^5-3}{x^3+x-2}}.
> \stopitem
ll in this list for your advice and help.
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Dne 9.2.2014 23:31, Otared Kavian napsal(a):
Hi,
I do use ConTeXt for typesetting mathematics, and actually I began to use
ConTeXt several years ago for my work as a mathematician: up to now I haven’t
encountered a single in
The following has to be added to nath for spacing to work correctly:
\def\mathematics#1{\relax\ifmmode#1\else$#1$\fi}
adding it anywhere after
\def$#1${\@@dollar{#1}}
seems to work fine. The problem is that $ is redefined, but
\mathematics doesn't catch on so the spacing gets all mess
e desperate to
get around it, maybe put the content in a box of fixed height.
·· demo ·
\defineframed[crampy][height=\ht\strutbox,frame=off]
\starttext
before
\thinrule
\startitemize[columns,two,joinedup]
\item abc \mathematics{\frac{x^2-x+3}{x^2+x-3}};
\
Dear gang,
I need to convert a document from TeX-style to Unicode mathematics. For
example:
\starttext
\def\ANTI{{^{\rm nt}}}
\def\CATCA{$\cal \bf C\ANTI$}
\CATCA
\stoptext
Issues:
1. I need calligraphic characters, but the relevant characters in
latinmodern-math.otf are not encoded in
can safely patch
\mathematics to catch lookahead as well as make frac more robust for
unwanted expansion
\usemodule[newmat]
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1}{#2}}}
\def\mathematics#1{\relax\ifmmode#1\else$#1$\fi}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\eqalign
On 2/10/2014 10:08 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
Hi,
I begin to migrate slowly to ConTeXt, and I think it works very well for
writing mathematics.
I have a question : what is the most complete Math Font to write
mathematics with ConteXt course?
thank you,
cambria is the reference font
xits
At 01:40 PM 8/2/2004, you wrote:
ah ... the alignment lookahead problem, i think we can safely patch
\mathematics to catch lookahead as well as make frac more robust for
unwanted expansion
\usemodule[newmat]
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1}{#2}}}
\def
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
>> worked just fine.
>>
>> At the moment I write some exams an
All, does this look right? Seems like I ought to have some closing
stuff, but it compiles with texexec just nicely.
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
Intermediate Algebra Text
Chapter 2
Figures for Section 1
section2figs-mpgraph.1
sec1onea
College of the Redwoods
> Hello ConTeXist.
>
> 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or
> it is a general problem of ConTeXt?
> 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of
> non-elementary mathematics?
> 2. Are you satisfied with the results, w
od.nl
-
outlines-003.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\continuewhenlmtxmode
\starttext
\startMPpage[offset=10pt]
draw lmt_outline [
text = "\mathematics{\sqrt{2}-1}"
] ;
draw lmt_outline [
text = "\mathe
height. The behavior is not
>> restricted to math mode, though I can’t say if there is an
>> official way to prevent or customize it. If you are desperate to
>> get around it, maybe put the content in a box of fixed height.
>>
>> ·· demo ···
whether I think it's
> > a good idea to support using math constructs such as \frac
>
> do they need patching? they don't use \mathematics afaik
They don't need patching in the sense of fixing a bug, no -- it's more a
matter of consistency in behavior.
What I
\mathematics\Delta, Greek \greekDelta\par
Palatino? Normal \delta, Maths \mathematics\delta, Greek \greekdelta\par
{\ss Helvetica? Normal \Delta, Maths \mathematics\Delta, Greek
\greekDelta\par
Helvetica? Normal \delta, Maths \mathematics\delta, Greek \greekdelta\par}
\stoptext
With the line
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
I was refering to what \mathematics works and $$ does not.
there are only a few cases where $$ (in the sense of empty inline
math) works ok so best use $ $ then; \mathematics does this automatically
You should go back in the thread a bit
-02-11 9:57 GMT+01:00 Mikael P. Sundqvist :
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
>>>
On 2013–10–08 Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> Is something gone funny with mathematics?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/84607/focus=84616
It was a bug which has been fixed in the current beta.
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we know that Sanjoy uses ConTeXt)
--
Xan wrote:
Xan wrote:
/ Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
/>>/ instead of $$ \index works.
/>>/ />>/ Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just
curious.
/
there will no new tuc file made when you have a 'fatal'
t;> would like to process:
>>>
>> keep in mind that this is still somewhat experimental
>
> Sure :)
> That's why I'm sending files for testing :) :) :)
- i'll make a table mapper (need it anyway), cals tables are already
provided
- idem for preformatte
]%
{\externalfigure [sharp turn sign]}%
}%
#1}% It goes wrong if you replace #1 with \box0
If I type something like
\hazard{…paragraph text…}
this produces what I want. But it breaks down with mathematics.
\hazard{%
\startformula
…mathematics…
\stopformula
}
produces the
\def\doSEQ[#1][#2]%
{\ifsecondargument
\donefalse
\mathematics{\processcommalist[#2]{\dodoSEQ{#1}}}
\else \mathematics{\bold{#1}}\fi}
\def\dodoSEQ#1#2%
{\ifdone ,\else \donetrue\fi#1_{#2}}
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-contex
Dear gang,
Ok, I've made some progress:
1. tex-gyre etc. *do* support Unicode mathematics, but the version of
ConTeXt I was using had produced the wrong encoding in the pdf output. For
example, U+1D4D2 (𝓒) in the input was being mapped to U+2D4D2 in the
output.
Updating to the l
Hi Hans, hi guys,
thanks for the explanation!
Does this mean that each time I want to change the font size of the text (e.g.
for a floating object or framed text) I must do this manually for mathematics?
or is there a way to adopt the font size of the text to mathematics? see below
for an
ting :) :) :)
>
> - i'll make a table mapper (need it anyway), cals tables are already
> provided
>
> - idem for preformatted and verbatim
Thanks a lot. I'm waiting patiently :)
> - your code:
>
> d[k] = dk:gsub(" ",' ')
> dk = d[k
scriptfont0 appears to be undefined.
This error occurs under certain circumstances
that I have not fully understood.
Alan
-- ! \scriptfont0 is undefined (character 54).
\mathematics ... #1\else \Ustartmath #1\Ustopmath
\fi
l.1 \mathematics{1
2033, double prime? Or - in TeX dialect -
\mathematics{^{\prime\prime}} or simply \mathematics{''} (twice the
apostrophe) unless it already exists in the font under the name
"second" (according to the Adobe Glyph List).
In unicode reference Ux2033 is des
Hello,
I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for writing
Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
mathematical formulas. What do you recommend ?
Thank you.
Fabrice
David Arnold wrote:
> All, does this look right? Seems like I ought to have some closing
> stuff, but it compiles with texexec just nicely.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department organization>
> Intermediate Algebra T
t differently?
>
> It is much easier to treat the first element as special:
>
> \def\doSEQ[#1][#2]%
> {\ifsecondargument
> \donefalse
> \mathematics{\processcommalist[#2]{\dodoSEQ{#1}}}
> \else \mathematics{\bold{#1}}\fi}
>
> \def\dodoSEQ#1#2%
>
All,
I have a file figlibSection3.xml which starts like this:
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
Intermediate Algebra Text
Chapter 1
Figures for Section 3
section3figs-mpgraph.1
xeqy2a
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
...
When I used to run texexec
At 11:59 29/05/2004, you wrote:
* in enco-def.tex this is
\definecharacter textbraceleft{\mathematics{\{}}
which means wrapping {\tt ...} around it doesn't give a teletyped brace
but a nice mathematics one.
> \type-{-
the problem is in (1) not all fonts having all chars [esp
Hi Idris,
please read this: https://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/#Superscripts
Wolfgang
Hamid,Idris schrieb am 03.05.2019 um 21:40:
Dear gang,
Ok, I've made some progress:
1. tex-gyre etc. *do* support Unicode mathematics, but the version of
ConTeXt I was using had produced the wrong enc
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb:
> I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
> it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for
> writing
> Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
> mathematical formul
Hi Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
I was refering to what \mathematics works and $$ does not.
there are only a few cases where $$ (in the sense of empty inline math)
works ok so best use $ $ then; \mathematics does this automatically
You should go back in the thread a bit. It looks like Xan&#
\par \fi }
l.343 \processXMLfilegrouped{\jobfilename.xml}
?
I checked that section5figs-mpgraph.14 compile with mptopdf.
This is the first time I've experienced any difficulty with the
figure library.
Any ideas or suggestions?
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
In
Hi,
I am trying to write a macro so that
\SEQ X[1,2,3] expands to $X_1, X_2, X_3$
\SEQ X[1-N] expands to $X_1, \dots, X_N$
and
\SEQ X expands to ${\bf X}$.
So far I have
\def\SEQ#1%
{\dodoubleempty\doSEQ[#1]}
\def\doSEQ[#1][#2]%
{\ifsecondargument \mathematics{\processcommalist[#2
All,
In my figure library, I had:
section5figs-mpgraph.6
sec5scaling5
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
In my source, I had:
\startbuffer[table]
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[column][each][align={middle,lohi}]
\setupTABLE[row][first][topframe=on,bottomframe=on
Hans et al,
Running:
figures $ texmfstart texexec --version
TeXExec | version 6.2.0 - 1997-2006 - PRAGMA ADE/POD
I have a figure library figlibLogic.xml, the first few lines of which
are:
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Departmentorganization>
Intermediate Algebra T
\RightMarginWidth{\hss #1 \hss}\vss}}
\setuppagenumbering[location={margin},alternative=doublesided,command={\PageNumber}]
\newbox\ContinueNextPage \setbox\ContinueNextPage=\vbox{\strut\hbox
to\textwidth{\hfill\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\quad}}
\starttext
\dorecurse{20
text from the pdf, e.g., \CATCA becomes 𝓒nt.
OTOH, issues 4.i and 4.ii below are still perplexing. Are there any
workarounds?
Thanks again.
Best wishes
Idris
> Hamid,Idris schrieb am 03.05.2019 um 21:40:
>> Dear gang,
>>
>> Ok, I've made some progress:
>>
>&g
t's _Artis Analyticae
Praxis_ from 1631 or so, and it (of course) uses old style figures
exclusively, pre-dating them, as would any mathematics (or other) text
before the latter part of the 19th century.
Old-style figures are named thusly since the now standard alternative
lining figures are
Is something gone funny with mathematics?
\starttext
$\lim_1^2$
$\int_1^2$
\stoptext
Undefined control sequence ...
1 \starttext
2 >> $\lim_1^2$
3
4 $\int_1^2$
5 \stoptext
6
\lim_
l.2 $\lim_
1^2$
?
! Undefined control sequence.
1 \start
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-5-2011 12:32, luigi scarso wrote:
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, becau
MKIV fmt: 2012.2.19)
\defineenumeration[myproof][text=Proof,closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}}]
\starttext
\startmyproof
This is a proof
\stopmyproof
\stoptext
% ###
% ### ERROR MESSAGE
\normalstartimath
\mathematics ...ifmmode #1\else \normal
{\mathframedparameter\c!location}%
\ifx\m_framed_location\v!mathematics
\let\normalstrut\pack_framed_math_pos
\else\ifx\m_framed_location\v!low\else
\let\normalstrut\pack_framed_math_strut
\fi\fi
\inheritedmathframedframed{\Ustartmath\triggermathstyle\c_framed_mstyle#2\Ustopmath
}%It goes wrong if
you replace #1 with \box0
If I type something like
\hazard{
paragraph text
}
this produces what I want. But it breaks down with mathematics.
\hazard{%
\startformula
mathematics
\stopformula
}
produces the picture aligned with the
On Sun 22 May 2011, luigi scarso wrote:
> Street-Fighting Mathematics
> The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
> Sanjoy Mahajan
> Foreword by Carver A. Mead
>
> The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
> (so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we kno
On 22-5-2011 12:32, luigi scarso wrote:
Street-Fighting Mathematics
The Art of Educated Guessing and Opportunistic Problem Solving
Sanjoy Mahajan
Foreword by Carver A. Mead
The book is made with ConTeXt mkii
(so it's not a 100% off-topic, because we know that Sanjoy uses ConTeXt)
}{#8}{#9}
}\else \mathrel
{\math_arr...
\mathematics ...mmode #1\else \normalstartimath #1
\normalstopimath \fi
\445>i:gives ...e \mathematics {\xrightar
Xan wrote:
/ Yes, Taco. With all files except source file deleted, and \mathematics
/>>/ instead of $$ \index works.
/>>/
/>>/ Is it any know bug or so? Why is the reason of that?. Just curious.
/
there will no new tuc file made when you have a 'fatal' error;
David Arnold wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a file figlibSection3.xml which starts like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department organization>
> Intermediate Algebra Text
> Chapter 1
> Figures for Section 3
>
&
But it breaks down with mathematics.
\hazard{%
\startformula
…mathematics…
\stopformula
}
produces the picture aligned with the bottom of the mathematics.
A solution to this problem escapes me. Can anyone suggest an improved
macro?
Here is my 10 minute solution
finetypeface[boldmath][mm][boldmath][modern][default]
\usemodule[cmscbf]
\usemodule[unicode-math]
\setupbodyfont[11pt]
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR{}\bTD{}Parcel \eTD\bTD{} \eTD\bTD Area
\eTD\eTR%
\bTR{}\bTD{} \eTD\bTD{}\mathematics{\lbraceuend} \eTD\bTD 1 \eTD\eTR%
\bTR
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:53 -0500
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math
> and regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use
> \math{..} or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua
> code:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention. However the following doesn’t result in what is
expected:
%% begin proof-qed.tex
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\mathortext\eqno\wordright]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a simple proof
On 11/10/2014 10:31 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention. However the following doesn’t result in what is
expected:
%% begin proof-qed.tex
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\mathortext\eqno\wordright
\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\quad}}
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}%
{\framed[width=\textwidth,height=3em,align={middle,lohi}]{\hfil
\CONTEXT --\recurselevel \hfil}}%
\stoptext
I would like to put \copy
Otared Kavian writes:
> The \triangle operator is used for instance in the « symmetric
> difference » of two subsets
Ah, good to learn something about pure mathematics. In my mathematics
degree, my tutor said, "You are very good at the applied material,"
which was not meant
ent #1->\xmlflush {#1}
\par
l.1 \xmlsetup{292}{xml:content}
\xmlfirst #1#2->\ctxlua {lxml.first("#1","#2")}
...
or
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\crampedscriptscriptstyle is not set.
\mathematics #1->\relax \ifmmode #1\else $#1
have the commands \mathematics{} that can be used in place of
the TeX shorthand $...$, and this also has the shortcut \m{...}.
I thought that it might be useful to have an equivalent escape, to be
used as $t = \t{time}$. What do other users think?
OK, \m{t = \t{time}} might be a bit funky...
Alan
Hello list,
As a new user of ConTeXt, I have some trouble on trying out various
mathematics modules.
I tried to use the nath module by directly including `\usemodule[nath]`
in my source file. It seems that the module is not loaded. I read
through the wiki page and found that nath is not
]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
the \ifmmode is not honoured, and the change must have happened quite earlier
than a few weeks.
Maybe we should open a new thread as a bug in closecommand?
it probably has to do
}\vss}}
\setuppagenumbering[location={margin},alternative=doublesided,command={\PageNumber}]
\newbox\ContinueNextPage \setbox\ContinueNextPage=\vbox{\strut\hbox
to\textwidth{\hfill\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\mathematics{\blacktriangleright}\quad}}
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}%
{\framed[width
Hi Brooks,
Then, a couple of lines after that, there's the second definition for
\frac, which is the one that needed patching. This one, unlike the
first definition, is wrapped in \mathematics so that it can work outside
math mode.
So I'm wondering why only \frac has this second defin
an abundant need
to include words (text) in mathematics, and using \mathtext{} or \mbox{}
or whatever is unwieldy.
Readable subscripts, self-explanatory variable names, etc. might be
text and not symbols. These situations can be very common. This is why I
asked (1) what is the right method, and (2
Hi list,
I tried something similar to (Mk IV version 2011.11.18 19:34):
Am 06.08.10 15:46, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
\setupdescriptions
[proof]
[width=broad,
distance=0.5em,
location=serried,
headstyle=it,
indentnext=yes,
indenting=yes,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode
;> a certain degree I'm able to fake mathematics with
>>
>> ax2 +> class="letter">bx +c = 0
>>
>> where signals TeX to use \mathematics{...} and
>> signals web browser that the letter has to be
>> displayed in italic (I could use class
]
\usefigurebase[figures/figlibSection2]
\section[section:graph]{The Graph of a Function}
In chapter1/figures/figlibSection2.xml, there is:
sec2foura.png
foura
College of the Redwoods Mathematics Department
section4.tex starts with:
\startcomponent section4
\project book
\product chapter1
* Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 01, 2004 21:20]:
> \definestartstop[BNF][before=\startlines\setups{myBNF},after=\stoplines]
>
> \startsetups[myBNF]
> \defineactivecharacter "
> {\bgroup\tttf\setupinlineverbatim\defineactivecharacter " {\egroup}}
> \def
te for math mode. The various heights, etc. make more
work for the brain in complicated mathematics expressions. I can't recall ever
seeing good mathematics/physics done in old style figures. OS numerals are
actually _text_ figures, as Bringhurst points out. In my own academic journal
there is li
e I compile my file, I get the warnings I
don't like:
====
mathematics > tweak > 'XITSMath-Regular', size 6pt, math size 3,
version 'Version 1.200' found, version 'Version 1.302' expected
mathematics > tw
Hello Mikael,
Thanks for your solution; it works just fine. I am not familiar with how you
defined the pmatrix. Any links to manuals to learn such definitions? Also, this
is the second thing I have tried to adapt from typesetting mathematics in plain
TeX that didn’t work. I tried to draw
/maps/36/09.pdf page no. 28 then proof is
defined as
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[ text=Proof,
number=no,
headstyle=italic,
title=no, %this is the default
closesymbol={\mathematics{\square}},
style=normal]
But the closessymbol does not work.
I will create a minimum working example and post it as
Parchd.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:27:40PM +0200, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> Hello,
> I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find that
> it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for writing
> Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font f
; I use for the documents of my students the font DejaVu because I find
> that
> > it is very readable on paper. Unfortunately, this is not a font for
> > writing
> > Mathematics. I would like to use DejaVu font for text and a font to write
> > mathematical formulas. What do you r
1 - 100 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
