Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-09 Thread Matthew Routley
The resolution to my problem was specific to Mac OS X and had nothing to do with the R module in particular. In case others have a similar problem, here is my solution. First, write18 must be enabled. As described by Aditya Mahajan, edit /usr/local/teTeX/texmf.cnf so that shell_escape = t.

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Matthew Routley
I can confirm that this works from the command line: R CMD BATCH -q --save --restore rsample-r-1.tmp rsample-r-1.tmp.out using the sample file from the r module. Running this command for each of the r segments will produce the desired output. What I haven't determined is how to modify the r

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Johan Sandblom
I think some quoting is required: \def\runR {\executesystemcommand{texmfstart --ifchanged=\Rfile\space --direct R CMD BATCH -q --save --restore \Rfile\space \Rfile.out}} works here, but then I am on Linux. I think eventually Mac expertise may be required. Johan 2006/7/5, Matthew

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Johan Sandblom
I now discovered a side effect of using the R CMD BATCH invocation instead of the piping. With the CMD R outputs the setting of options in the first line and the result of proc.time at the end. Perhaps not a problem, but it does require three more typed lines per R block. Johan 2006/7/5, Johan

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Johan Sandblom
I get no such output, either to stdout or in the log, in fact nothing even similar. Does the ...disabled indicate that it is not run, possibly because of something TeX/ConTeXt-related? Johan 2006/7/5, Matthew Routley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Johan Sandblom jsandblom at gmail.com writes: I think

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Matthew Routley wrote: Johan Sandblom jsandblom at gmail.com writes: I think some quoting is required: \def\runR {\executesystemcommand{texmfstart --ifchanged=\Rfile\space --direct R CMD BATCH -q --save --restore \Rfile\space \Rfile.out}} works here,

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-05 Thread Matthew Routley
Aditya Mahajan adityam at umich.edu writes: This means that write18 is disabled on your system, so tex cannot execute any system commands. This is a security feature and most intallation disable write18 by default. You need to edit your texmf.cnf file to enable it. Search for texmf.cnf

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-03 Thread Hans Hagen
Johan Sandblom wrote: \def\runR {\executesystemcommand{texmfstart --ifchanged=\Rfile\space --direct R CMD BATCH -q --save --restore \Rfile\space \Rfile.out}} or some such, I do not really understand the quoting. The invocation should change, options should not and redirectors should go away.

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-02 Thread Johan Sandblom
2006/7/2, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Johan Sandblom wrote: I can't really think why it wouldn't work then. Perhaps it is to do with \write18 and the right of TeX to run external programs? Or maybe R on the mac does not take the same command-line options? In that case the output of the

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-02 Thread Olaf Mersmann
Hi Hans, * Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060702 13:25]: one problem could be that R has this piping; i wonder why a program that takes a 50 meg installation does not support something --output or i must have missed something R does support redirecting output to a file. Use R CMD BATCH

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-02 Thread Hans Hagen
Olaf Mersmann wrote: Hi Hans, * Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060702 13:25]: one problem could be that R has this piping; i wonder why a program that takes a 50 meg installation does not support something --output or i must have missed something R does support redirecting

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-02 Thread Johan Sandblom
\def\runR {\executesystemcommand{texmfstart --ifchanged=\Rfile\space --direct R CMD BATCH -q --save --restore \Rfile\space \Rfile.out}} or some such, I do not really understand the quoting. The invocation should change, options should not and redirectors should go away. Not sure if this is better

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-07-01 Thread Johan Sandblom
I can't really think why it wouldn't work then. Perhaps it is to do with \write18 and the right of TeX to run external programs? Or maybe R on the mac does not take the same command-line options? In that case the output of the texexec run should be revealing. R takes more than a second to start up

[NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-06-28 Thread Matthew Routley
I spotted the announcement of the use of R in ConTeXt and was quite interested in trying it out. However, so far I haven't been able to get it to work. It appears that R is not being called by texexec and the .tmp.out are not being found, despite the fact that they are being produced. Are there

Re: [NTG-context] Difficulties using the r module

2006-06-28 Thread Johan Sandblom
It appears R is not found. Is it on the path? Does it have the same name on the Mac? Regards, Johan 2006/6/28, Matthew Routley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I spotted the announcement of the use of R in ConTeXt and was quite interested in trying it out. However, so far I haven't been able to get it to