Greetings!
We have a big multi-location video conference coming (in two weeks
interrupted by a 4-day holiday weekend). Unfortunately, as some locations
are unable to access the video conferencing group, it seems we must use
WebEx. With WebEx connections, audio for all requires all attendees
Actually when I was creating the 'a' record in the zone board.imcu.com I
left the name blank (It said it would use the parent name if left blank.).
I did this because I have other imcu.com records that I do not maintain. My
web site provider hosts those records for www.imcu.com.
When I made the
Thanks again. I will look up the Open DNS part and check into it.
--
From: Richard Stovall richard.stov...@researchdata.com
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 4:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE:
I have an email mailer I am supposed to send out.
It is going to 12000 customers that have asked to be notified by email.
I got that script late last week and I have it set up to run from my machine,
relay off my exchange server, through my Ironport, and out my firewall.
I do not host the mail at
I found this on Google:
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?sourceid=navclientrlz=1T4EGLC_en
US345US346q=RJ-9um=1ie=UTF-8cid=795370652766964975ei=PaoCS7XqMdSlnQ
eGxIVqsa=Xoi=product_catalog_resultct=imageresnum=5ved=0CBgQ8gIwBA#
I'm not 100% sure it'll do what you want, but its
And this...
http://www.google.com/products/catalog?sourceid=navclientrlz=1T4EGLC_en
US345US346q=RJ-9um=1ie=UTF-8cid=3760576067343168249ei=PaoCS7XqMdSln
QeGxIVqsa=Xoi=product_catalog_resultct=imageresnum=8ved=0CCIQ8gIwBw
#
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org
The reverse lookup (PTR record) is created by the ISP that actually
assigns the ip address space you use. You'll need to ask them to create
one for you.
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Not wanting
No, your not, use constant contact. if we can afford it, you can too.
- Original Message -
From: David W. McSpadden
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:51 AM
Subject: Not wanting to be a spammer
I have an email mailer I am supposed to send out.
They either won't or don't know how but it is an avenue I can never get them to
understand.
From: Richard Stovall
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Not wanting to be a spammer
The reverse lookup (PTR record) is created by the ISP that actually
What is constant contact?
From: James Kerr
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Not wanting to be a spammer
No, your not, use constant contact. if we can afford it, you can too.
- Original Message -
From: David W. McSpadden
To: NT
Agreed. Let someone else take the hit, if there is one. Someone who's
business it is to do bulk emailing knows all the ways to do
permission-oriented bulk emailing without getting in trouble! Stay away from
the Millions CDs, though. that'll get you in hot water. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
Our ISP refused to set up a PTR. Many of them are ignorant about how it
works or don't want to take the chance you would get one of their IP's
blacklisted. Finally told them we were going else ware and they caved
with the stipulation if we get blacklisted they won't do anything to
help us.
www.constantcontact.com - they are a legitimate bulk emailer. I use quotes
around Legitimate because I am a rabid anti-spammer, but I do recognize that
bulk email is a fact of life these days and Constant Contact has the
grudging OK of one of the big anti-spam groups, SpamCop.net.
http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp
I cant recommend it enough, a great service. Use this to keep in touch with
your customers.
- Original Message -
From: David W. McSpadden
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: Not wanting to
Start hosting your own DNS and cut out that middleman.
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Not wanting to be a spammer
They either won't or don't know how but
That won't fix PTR issues if the IP's are owned by the ISP, they are
authoritative for the records on the IP address space.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Not wanting to be a spammer
Start
The reverse zone is almost certainly managed by the ISP.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Not wanting to be a spammer
Start hosting your own DNS and cut out that middleman.
Sounds like you will need to set people up as the primary user on each
machine. But, this really doesn't keep the other files from trying to
cache-just purges them at log off for anyone not listed, in conjunction with
the policy setting.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/811660
-Bonnie
From:
The PDF linked from this page has data from Google that their research shows
temperature and activity levels correlate less to drive failures than generally
thought. The data was gathered from more than 100,000 consumer-grade PATA and
SATA drives over a timeframe of Dec '05 and Aug 2006. A
Thanks - I'd forgotten about recorder taps. Seems like we have one of
those around here somewhere... Next trick (but more easily solved) - need
either a M-to-F gender changer or a 1/8 F-to-RCA plug. I seem to have a
drawer full of the M-to-RCA (things like this keep Radio Shack going!)...
Part of hosing your own DNS would be to get the forward and reverse
address space delegated to you, making you authoritative for those
records.
In my opinion, uncooperative ISPs should become former ISPs asap.
From: Kennedy, Jim
We're working on cloud computing initiatives (like everyone), and I'm
also doing a fair amount of research into the area. (Of course, the
whole idea of cloud computing is itself fairly silly, when it's just a
renaming of the concept of a network-connected computer. But whatever,
it's the hot
That can be difficult.
As an aside.. if anybody has FIOS business class (which you need for
static IP's), I have a contact in that division that is not only willing
to set up a PTR record, he's actually competent!
It might save you the 6 hours of call tree surfing I had to do...
-sc
Hey Webster, or anyone else.
I am still having some trouble grasping the point of streaming Applications
vs published applications. Do you have an article that shows the pros and
cons of each, or can you explain in semi-plain English?
Thanks..
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Ben: Via GPO: Lock down proxy settings, prevent installation of add-ons. Two
that come to mind.
Have to admit, never installed an MSI via GPO. Will that work under Vista,
standard user, with UAC enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Am I the only one that hates this feature? It seems like such a security
nightmare, where users will hover over a popup to read it ,and the
hover-click feature will automatically execute it. (Honest, I never
downloaded that porn, it just clicked itself! And they are right. )
How to disable it?
Our opinion here is that it is an acceptable solution for no- business-critical
applications (spam filtering being the biggest), but for anything that is
critical to operations it is not considered and never will be. Cloud
computing makes my business IT systems only as reliable as the skills of
That was an interesting read... thanks David.
-sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hard drisk failures and temperature, use, etc.
The PDF linked from this page has data from Google that their
10,000 foot view:
Published Applications: Installed on XenApp server and run from XenApp
Streamed Application Option 1: Application is streamed to server and run
from server (i.e. NEVER installed on the server)
Streamed Application Option 2: Application is streamed to client and run
from
Well, it's much more than just a network connected computer. That's part
of it, of course, but the idea of the cloud tends to focus much more on
the provisioning, scalability, high availability, and geographically
dispersed capabilities of such systems, among other things.
We are doing some
One of the models many are exploring is internal cloud... or hybrid,
which brings some of the benefit without exposing the issues related to
external reliability (or competence).
-sc
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:21 AM
To: NT
H my Win7 boxen don't do that.
Any chance this is a mouse/touchpad driver feature?
-sc
From: Steve Kelsay [mailto:kels...@sctax.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
Am I the only one that hates this
None of mine do either and I have over a dozen running Windows 7 that I use
regularly.
Tim
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SUSPECT: RE: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
H my Win7 boxen don't do
Cloud Computing is taking over where application service providers (ASP)
left off. ASP was ahead of its time and not ready for prime time.
I just got back from a conference where some executives told me cloud
computing is coming and get ready. Cost will drive this model whether we
like it or not.
It is on a Toshiba Satellite laptop with home premium. The web has a lot
of people complaining about the feature, so it must be there. The fact
that yours does not do it show me that there is a way to turn it off.
Maybe it is only on the home premium. I was just getting worried that
when we roll
Maybe that is it. I'm running Enterprise, so maybe it's home?
-sc
From: Steve Kelsay [mailto:kels...@sctax.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUSPECT: RE: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
It is on a Toshiba Satellite laptop with home
Aside from very fast roll out of additional XenApp Servers any thing else I
should consider when choosing which way I should deploy my apps?
I am inclined to go with published as it just sounds eaisier.
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:27 AM
On 14 Nov 2009 at 0:08, Sam Cayze wrote:
EZ Audit.
Tried it, uninstalled software is only listed by name and EXE size, no date-
time stamp nor any way that I could see to make EZAudit calculate some sort of
MD5 or other hash for identification. Is there some way to make EZAudit do
this?
--
Cloud Computing:
I've used it for email filtering, and you're right, for functions like that
it makes sense. After all, all external email has to travel the cloud
anyway.
Obviously, less so for mission critical functions like databases where the
Internet connection itself is the biggest single
Thanks Bonnie. I will look into this and give it a try.
Thanks,
Chris Blair
www.IdentiSys.com
chris_bl...@identisys.com
952-294-1200 x270
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Folder
Doesn't do it on by default on mine either (x64 Ultimate)
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUSPECT: RE: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
Maybe that is it.
Here's a fun one: we have this beast of a medical records system application
that I made available via our older Presentation Servers 4.5 farm on Windows
2003 server.
Come XenApp and Windows 2008 and the thing won't work. There are some
compatibility issues with 2008 and 64-bit.
Other
I have Enterprise running on a few dozen boxes already and have never seen this.
-Original Message-
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUSPECT: RE: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
You can me now or you can pay me later! Take the time to profile apps, save
them to a share (or web server) and publish them as streamed. This is done
one time (in theory at least). Or:
For Each XenApp Server Do
For Each Application Do
Install App
Install updates
Next
Next
Stream the app.
Webster
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Subject: Another Citrix ?
Here's a fun one: we have this beast of a medical records system
application that I made available via our older Presentation Servers 4.5
farm on Windows 2003 server.
Come XenApp and Windows
The app wouldn't happen to be MedForce Scan would it???
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Another Citrix ?
Here's a fun one: we have this beast of a medical records
You can run a mixed farm with XenApp 4.5 and 5.0. Unfortunetly application
virtualization won't fix this if it won't run on Windows 2008.
Mike
Original Message:
-
From: Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:04:28 -0500
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Ha! No, it's called CMHC. The thing is huge: runs on AIX, some users use
terminal emulation to get to it, some a very crappy web interface. The web
interface wants full access to system and there are painful work-arounds on
Citrix, and those don't work on the new version XenApp. If you
The security of the Cloud, is the real issue, can you really trust your
data and applications being co-mingled with others data and
applications, especially when you have to comply with PCI/HIPAA/GLBA/Sox
and other regulations ( especially PCI which has some stringent controls
and makes
Or how about adding an x86 2008 server to the mix? You can do like Citrix
does and run two farms. One x86 and the other x64. Then present them both
via Web Interface. Your users will never know there are two farms. They
only see the icons they are allowed to see and access. You can use the
LOL we have it, and yes it's a beast, java based, so there goes your
virtualization gain ( if there was one to be had). And Yes this
application is used in the healthcare space, IMHO its craptacular
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA,
Thanks for the warning!
If you ever come across MedForce, feel free to give me a call. Running
in over Citrix here.
I've got another one too... Mestamed ... ever deal with that piece of
crap?
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Tuesday,
Again, there are many different models. Cloud computing does not always
equal external hosting.
Internal cloud for larger organizations can be a compelling case.
We've been working some with David Linthicum to define NIH strategy.
I've not read his book, but he's got a lot of good, and
Others have already offered great input-things like vetting the cloud vendor to
ensure security is what it needs to be (both for internal needs and regulatory
purposes), and planning/maintaining an exit strategy from the start.
Our most mission-critical data as a school district is our
Thanks for the 10,000 foot view I was looking at that recently and was
getting lost in the terminology.
Jon
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
You can me now or you can pay me later! Take the time to profile apps,
save them to a share (or web server) and
There of course business concerns with cloud computing such as reliability,
security, and cost however after having spent significant time with EC2 and
goGrid over the last 6 months there are also very many drawbacks to each way of
implementing a cloud.
Examples such as, EC2 instances always
That's a good example of what may be a hybrid cloud: hosted by a larger
part of the org, yet accessed as a hosted service.
Are you provisioning your own apps or using a SOA in the true sense of
cloud, or is more along the lines of web-apps and databases... a more
traditional ISP model?
-sc
Very cool.
Are you using S3 too?
-sc
From: Adam Meixler [mailto:ad...@interlink1.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cloud computing... your opinions
There of course business concerns with cloud computing such as
reliability,
The thing is that when I control the facility myself, then I can build my own
redundant systems. For instance we have MPLS, MAN and satellite connections
between all of our facilities for redundancy on many levels. When you move to
the cloud I no longer have the ability to do that (Microsoft is
Statistically, do we have any reason to believe that cloud computing is less
secure than internal hosting of data? Assuming one is dealing with a reputable
service provider, are the odds really any greater of there being a security
breach in the cloud versus an internal breach?
For instance,
On 17 Nov 2009 at 10:32, Steven M. Caesare wrote:
One of the models many are exploring is internal cloud... or hybrid, which
brings some of the benefit without exposing the issues related to external
reliability (or competence). -sc
Nor exposing your company data to a legal attack on
On 17 Nov 2009 at 10:54, Steve Kelsay wrote:
It is on a Toshiba Satellite laptop with home premium. The web has a lot
of people complaining about the feature, so it must be there. The fact that
yours does not do it show me that there is a way to turn it off. Maybe it is
only on the home
Again, though, it comes down to economies of scale. If an organization is large
enough to produce its own, then the benefits of it using the cloud are
diminished. And if an organization has deep pockets, it can reproduce
internally what others can only experience by joining a larger community.
I heard of an instance recently where a bank inadvertently sent an email
to a customer that contained sensitive info. The bank got a court
injunction shutting down that users email account so they could purge
the email.
An apples-and-mineral comparison to be sure, but that innocent end user
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
But I don't understand how creating nothing but a zone named
board.imcu.com would successfully resolve back to an ip address the
browser could use.
board.imcu.com. SOA ns.example.com. whate...@example.com. [...]
Yup. We love S3 and CloudFront.
Though we admittedly don't have numbers to prove CloudFront's effectiveness S3
is brilliant for simple and cheap on line storage of assets, like jpgs or pdfs,
for a website.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009
I am working with MS clearinghouse to move a 2003 terminal license
server to a 2008 server.
I was able to deactivate the 2003 but I don't see a prompt to add the
2008 license server.
I clicked on ad tools, term services but I don't get an option for TS
License manger to activate one by phone.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
As an aside.. if anybody has FIOS business class ...
Likewise aside: I was fairly astounded recently when I called
Comcast to get a custom PTR record for our Comcast Workplace static
IP feed, and the first tech
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Kim Longenbaugh
k...@colonialsavings.com wrote:
Part of hosing your own DNS would be to get the forward and reverse address
space delegated to you, making you authoritative for those records.
Getting reverse space delegated is often damn-near impossible,
So, you right-click the server name, choose properties, and are not able to
choose telephone as a connection method?
-Bonnie
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: activating 2008 ts license server
I am
Forget it. I found it . I didn't add it when I installed the ts in the
first place.
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: activating 2008 ts license server
I am working with MS clearinghouse to
Thanks!!!
Jim Slattery
Systems Administrator
MEDEX Global Group
8501 LaSalle Road, Suite 200
Baltimore, MD 21286 USA
Direct: 1-410-308-7931
Main: 1-410-453-6300
Toll free: 1-800-537-2029
Fax: 1-410-308-7905
www.medexassist.com http://www.medexassist.com/
Perzactly... I just gave a similar example before I read your post.
That can be a big deal.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cloud computing... your opinions
Last place I was forced to look into this and due to the lack of perceived
security I was able to kill it before it got going. Keeping or editing
sensitive information where you do not control
where it is stored or who can or can not look at it just makes it too
dangerous to be used. How would
Ben is absolutely correct here...
DNS BIND by Crickett Lu is required reading if you are going to be
doing some significant DNS hosting for yourself. Or even if not, it's
great reference scan material...
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
In testing yesterday it seems that everyone will flag me
as a spammer because the email source can not be reverse looked up
properly.
You also have an SPF record. You'll have to set that properly, or
your message is
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare
scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
H my Win7 boxen don’t do that.
I don't have any Win 7 boxen yet, but I noticed on Vista that if you
enable the GPO item for Turn on Classic Shell, and then rename a
file, Windows Explorer will switch to
We looked at S3 pricing for a small startup I'm involved with, and it
actually seemed rather expensive compared to some competing models.
Admittedly we were looking at storing long-form video, so perhaps our
requirements were the more significant problem.
So are you using CloudFront as an
Egads.
Start buying lotto tickets.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Not wanting to be a spammer
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Steven M. Caesare
I found it . I had to add the license manager. L
thanks
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: activating 2008 ts license server
So, you right-click the server name, choose properties,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael D Faulkner
michael.faulk...@colorado.edu wrote:
Have to admit, never installed an MSI via GPO. Will that work
under Vista, standard user, with UAC enabled?
Yes. MSIs which are Assigned via GPO are installed using the NT
machine trust account during
Thanks for all the responses. It must be specific to this machine or
group of machines. If it is not an enterprise problem, I'll deal with it
locally.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I was talking to Steve Riley last week (he's working foe Amazon these days) and
he quoted me 12 cents an hour for a basic server on Amazon Web Services -
around $1000 a year. He also wasn't saying much about S3 indicating AWS was the
direction they were heading for the long haul. Pretty secure
Ø If an organization is large enough to produce its own, then the benefits of
it using the cloud are diminished
I don't think you can generalize that.
Here at NIH there are the resources for the scientific community to build their
own stuff... yet they may need a 500 node compute
Ya, that's not bad, factoring in space, cooling and power. We were
looking more at the storage costs tho, and the associated bandwidth
charge getting the data in and out. I think it was that xfer cost that
was gonna hurt us.
We may need to revisit... thanks for that.
-sc
From: John
He also said there was another pricing model that has you pay an up front
charge and less per hour, I think he referred to it as a reserved server
instance. I'm looking at it for a VAR I do some work for.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
If you find any specifics about it would you mind forwarding them (or
links) along?
Thanks.
-sc
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cloud computing... your opinions
He also said there was
i believe EC2 reserved instance pricing is only available for Linux instances
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cloud computing... your opinions
He also said there was another pricing model that has you
Umm, my copy is by Paul Albitz Cricket Liu, granted my book is ~12
years old but the last time I saw Cricket he had not changed his name.
But as you infer, it remains the bible of DNS.
His firm (infoblox) had some pretty nice educational type materials and
test software up on their website.
Lol... man I brain farted on that.
Right you are thanks for the correction.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: https and certs issues
Umm, my copy is by Paul Albitz Cricket
Not according to Steve, he pointed it out specifically since I was talking
about a 24/7 uptime server and I don't do 'nix (except for VMWare of course!)
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell
What about Zetta for storage?
http://www.zetta.net/
I'm giving them some serious consideration for our offsite backup storage
repository.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
Ya, that’s not bad, factoring in space, cooling and power. We were
looking
Gotta be. I have several Win 7 boxes and have never seen this.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 7 Mouse Hover to Click
H my Win7 boxen don't do that.
Any chance this is a
Interesting... cloud based NAS as opposed to SAN or object storage.
-sc
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cloud computing... your opinions
What about Zetta for storage?
We've written quite a bit on the subject of Cloud Computing and
potential issues on our blog:
http://www.rolandschorr.com/blogs/index.php?blog=1
One of the big issues for me, that doesn't seem to get much play, is the
issue of geolocation. When I control my data I control where on the
planet
I have a similar requirement at one site. Everything is resolavble to
company.com, inside and out.
They use checkpoint Fw's. Rulebase additions from inside network to
outside nat'd address pasthru the firewall just fine. I enter static
DNS entries on the AD-INT zone and all works like a charm.
I
Can anyone recommened what solution they would use if you have 50 CAT5 wires
that I need to attach to 50 other CAT5 wires? What would you use? Would this
work?
BTDT. 11:15 patch/reboot, forgot to make it PM. Oopsie17 servers
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:40 AM
To: NT System Admin
Good one,
Try when you do that to 5K in workstations, that is a BIG WHOOPSIE...
Z
Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505
From: David Lum
Ah, the good old 110 wiring block.
Yes, I would use that style of connector. I would actually use two of them, one
for each termination of a wire. Then I would connect them using these:
http://www.hometech.com/hts_images/uc/uc-e511c803_1.jpg
Hope that helps!
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
