In addition to what you have noted, you may also want to note that Adobe is
one of the leading culprits for zero day, and probably have the most .'s
after their version numbers due to the number of times they have had to
release security updates.
http://secunia.com/advisories/vendor/4/
Might save some time if you check the new features list on the release you just
put in. It might have been added on purpose.
From: Donald Bittenbender [mailto:donald.bittenben...@gfi.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Posts taking longer to
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
How about Safari?
How about Netscape?
NCSA Mosiac.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions
I'm ashamed to admit it, but despite being a University of Illinois grad,
I no longer seem to be able to find NCSA Mosaic...
Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com
11/04/2011 02:22 PM
Please respond to
NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
To
NT System Admin Issues
I've noticed that for a while, getting replies before the original posts. Just
learned to live with it. At least if the original post is included you don't
miss the thrust of the message
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
-Original Message-
From: Donald Bittenbender
Adobe's main products, and Java, are the biggest attack surfaces in an IT
environment at the moment IMO. The days of Windows and/or the browser being the
weak link are gone, but these threats adapt themselves to the user landscape.
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
-Original Message-
From:
An interesting add-on to the conversation earlier this week...
http://gigaom.com/cloud/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/
I have no idea about the ARM compatibility to x86. If they are compatible, I
guess this could run Server 2008 x86.
If not, well I guess a Linux
Does it still require you to go to MSDN and obtain an activation key?
I haven't played with win8 but that's how other packages worked in my experience
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How much processing
NCSA Mosiac.
With a dose of Trumpet Winsock thrown in :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Friday
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My company is looking to custom develop (I am a developer on the team) a
solution that I think has to have been developed already. From a very
high overview we basically need to do two things. Create AD accounts
with groups etc, or manage AD accounts. From there we have some third
party
Take note bottom posters. I'm looking at you Ben Scott ;)
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Posts taking longer to appear after the Lyris upgrade?
I've noticed that for a while, getting replies
Right - ran beautifully on Win 3.11! (Didn't do too badly on Win 3.1 with
WinTrump and Clarkson packet drivers, either.)
Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote on 11/04/2011 02:29:10 PM:
Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
11/04/2011 02:41 PM
Please respond to
NT System Admin Issues
No key required, but you do still need to activate if you want to play with
the toys.
it's up and running in Hyper V already. interesting what they've done with
server mangler, etc.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Does it still require you to go to MSDN and
Check out:
http://www.ithicos.com/
http://www.netwrix.com
http://www.quest.com
...in approximate order of cost and feature content.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Bonner, John
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Take note bottom posters. I’m looking at you Ben Scott ;)
I will limit my commentary on this issue to the following:
A: Because it reverses the order in which people normally read.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad
Didn't work for me...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not a MSDN subscriber and it let me grab it...YMMV
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:55 PM,
I'm guessing this is very pricey, but may be what you are looking for.
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/beat/02012011.html
Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP
Technical Support III
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email:
Sh*tbull. ;-)
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu
wrote:
Take note bottom posters. I’m looking at you Ben Scott ;)
I will limit my commentary on this issue to the following:
A:
http://www.namescape.com/ = might have what you're looking for.
-Original Message-
From: Bonner, John [mailto:johnbon...@centura.org]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 12:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AD Account Management Tool
Hello,
My company is looking to custom develop
I don't read the bottom of a post unless I'm unfamiliar. I do however
reference a post if I'm lost in the conversation. Bottom posting, since so
few do it, actually wastes my time.
Ben, bless your heart, I think those who continue to do it, do it as an
affectation to illustrate their
Heretic!
On Friday, November 4, 2011, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Some subject lines from the Mac Enterprise list, they sure look familiar!
Extending AD Schema
Good system monitoring tool
Profile Manager tool
Just needing to vent
Login window delay
Backup NAS to USB disk
+1.
especially if you HSS with automatic preview in outlook, bottom posting is very
annoying
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 1:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Posts taking longer to appear after the Lyris upgrade?
I don't read
Of course the standard answer it depends applies but I would place it at the
very bottom of the list MBS provided along with the Oracle solution (the old
SUN IdM). Thank deity we are in the process of dumping it.
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Friday,
Heretic, theretic, everywhereatictic
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 3:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sorry, but
Thanks Rod.
Clicking on Receive alerts on this product takes me to a Secunia
Vulnerability Intelligence Manager page. Grrr..
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: So...I need to pitch the Adobe upgrade
Doh!
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 5:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: So...I need to pitch the Adobe upgrade
Thanks Rod.
Clicking on Receive alerts on this product takes me to a Secunia
Vulnerability Intelligence Manager
Hey guys,
How do you patch a client only install to sp1 unattended?
setup.exe /quietsimple /allinstances /indicateprogress
/IAcceptSQLServerLicenseTerms
works for a full install, but when only install /FEATURES=CONN,SSMS how do you
patch this?
I cant seem to figure this out?
Thanks,
jlc
~
Have you tried this page?
http://rbl.att.net/cgi-bin/rbl/block_admin.cgi
I've had to use it twice in the past few months and they unblocked the
IP in question within 24 hours each time.
Kevin
On 11/4/2011 9:58 AM, HELP_PC wrote:
Does anybody know how to get rid of them ?
They block ranges
Well the Oracle solution is the pre-merger Oracle product. They've killed the
(IMO superior) Sun product. I'm not sure who would lose the race between TIM
and OIM. I've never really compared them - just ripped them both out many times.
Microsoft Forefront Identity Manager (FIM) is the heavy
SQLServer2008R2SP1-KB2528583-x64-ENU.exe /Action=Patch
/IAcceptSQLServerLicenseTerms /InstanceName=MSSQLSERVER /QuietSimple
For your scenario, change /InstanceName=MSSQLSERVER to /AllInstances.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
ARM hardware will not execute x86/x64 binaries. However Windows 8 will
support ARM, just as Windows currently supports Itanium. Will there be a
Server 8 that runs on ARM hardware? Big TBD there. Will producers of
classic Windows apps port them to run on the ARM version of Windows? Another
I _suspect_ that if only a recompile is required - then yes, many producers
will produce an ARM version.
Otherwise - not so much.
But that is only one man's opinion (mine).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I _suspect_ that if only a recompile is required - then yes,
many producers will produce an ARM version.
One thing I've discovered over the years is that programmers have an
apparently limitless supply of new and
shudder
From: Free, Bob [r...@pge.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Friday
NCSA Mosiac.
With a dose of Trumpet Winsock thrown in :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
It used to be available from this Gopher server here:
http://quux.org:70/
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Friday
I'm ashamed to admit it, but despite being a University of
This did not work for us in our MD1000,3000 or PS 6000 if I recall . they
need to have Dell flashed firmware. You can get these drives from other
retailers however.
From: Mark Boeck [mailto:netadmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 11:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
Check that the kind of SSD, there is MFC and SLC I think are the acronyms,
one is single layer or multi layer. The single layer are much faster and
more reliable. They don't really announce if they are single or multi, you
have to do a little digging .
We just did a nice Nexenta SAN with
It doesn't work at all. Would you like to sell your old arrays cheap? :)
Just kidding, it seems to work fine.
I've got an old PS50 array, I think. Whatever model came with 14 250GB drives.
I've upgraded it to the latest firmware and I was able to put in 8 1TB drives
and it recognized them
I guess if you're doused in gasoline and you're running around in a machine
shop, it would be beneficial to ban smoking, but either way you're prolly toast.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Adobe
Nice.
I really don't mind it at all. Just sometimes it'd be nice to see the entire
previous message, but copying the specific parts you're referring to definitely
improves readability.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011
Many thanks. They match almost exactly :)
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How much processing power do you need? (WAS: So, my Mac Mini
server arrived today...)
On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.eduwrote:
I guess if you’re doused in gasoline and you’re running around in a
machine shop, it would be beneficial to ban smoking, but either way you’re
Uhhh...
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.eduwrote:
Many thanks. They match almost exactly :)
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How
Gosh, that's great! I'd accept 0 to zero bits difference. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:48 PM
To: NT System Admin
ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Mosaic/ ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Mosaic/
Alex Eckelberry
www.eckelberry.com http://www.eckelberry.com/
c 727 644 8830
Skype: alexeckelberry
From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 6:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I could have worded the Oracle part better, thanks for clarifying.
We are presently ripping out TIM and integrating the *NIX processes it was
managing to AD and the enterprise with the Quest stack.
Still have the old Sun product doing some provisioning and gag MIIS doing a
number of tasks.
MLC is the TLA you're looking for. Multi Level Cell SSDs provide higher
density at a lower cost. SLC provide fast performance and endurance, but at
a higher cost. I like the comparison covered in the following paper.
http://www.supertalent.com/datasheets/SLC_vs_MLC%20whitepaper.pdf
- Sean
On
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
To be fair, only the case was different. But, that's lots of bits. :)
How do you type an upper-case 5, anyway?
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Might also want to check the Tom's Hardware site for this week's
review of the new Intel 710 offering.
Kurt
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 19:20, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
MLC is the TLA you're looking for. Multi Level Cell SSDs provide higher
density at a lower cost. SLC provide fast
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
