he printer config in order
to get it to show up correctly (can't set it up ahead of time).
-Bonnie
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal
v4.7 and v4.8 were what was giving us problems. I've not tried anything
newer.
Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> I've got literally thousands of HP printers running the UPD (v5).
--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
Interesting.
I've got literally thousands of HP printers running the UPD (v5).
From: Phil Brutsche [p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Tried it. Don't recommend it unless you enjoy seeing the print spooler
crash on a regular basis.
The best "universal" drivers are the ones Microsoft ships.
Gene Giannamore wrote:
> What about the HP UPD? Has that worked for anyone?
--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com
~ Finally, powerful end
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Gene
Giannamore wrote:
> What about the HP UPD? Has that worked for anyone?
We tried it. It's as slow and bloated as their regular drivers.
Over-complicated for network configuration. Had trouble turning off
the "slice of toast" notification for every print jo
al Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 7:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Didn't you know? The LaserJet 4 is the most stable print driver ever produced!
Well, maybe not, but it's ama
Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Vicky
Spelshaus wrote:
> Coincidentally it (the LJ4) is the last stable printer HP produced as well
driver of whatever HP printer
> wouldn't. In my experience it's almost as versatile as the generic/text only
> one.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admi
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Vicky
Spelshaus wrote:
> Coincidentally it (the LJ4) is the last stable printer HP produced as well.
> I've still got a couple of these in use. The HP printers purchased since
> then have been replaced. It's sad what happened to that division.
A-yup. I've got
+1
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 9:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Didn't you know? The LaserJet 4 is the most stable print driver ever
produced! Well, mayb
s versatile as the generic/text
> only one.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
>
>
atile as the generic/text only one.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
I find that Microsoft's PS and PCL drivers *are*
e printers...
From: Phil Thompson [mailto:ph...@wpiinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Yes, It is the printer vender, BUT this business is like the video that was
going around where the cowboys we
I find that Microsoft's PS and PCL drivers *are* generic, Microsoft
simply ships printer definitions that specifies printer-specific
parameters such as the printer's printable area.
At my employer Microsoft's "HP LaserJet 4 PS" driver works marvelously
with most of what we have on hand ;)
Ben Sco
riandesmond.com/ad4/
Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian
From: Phil Thompson [mailto:ph...@wpiinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Yes, It is the printer vender, BUT this
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Everyone is claiming it is the other guy.
The Open Source fan in me is grinning. I thought Windows was better
because you had a company standing by the product. ;-)
> I spend 90% of my time coming up with work arounds.
You must be new
not the product.
Thanks for info I will keep trudging along.
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Spooler crashes are unlikely to be Microsofts
ry, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian
From: Phil Thompson [mailto:ph...@wpiinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
It is very hard
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Nothing but trouble, especially with HP printers shutting
> down the spooler.
Are you using HP's printer d
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Nothing but trouble, especially with HP printers shutting
> down the spooler.
Are you using HP's printer drivers? HP's printer drivers have been
getting steadily worse for the past few years. Slow, bloated,
over-complicated, unstable. Se
How are you printing? Do your users have shared printers on their
desktops, direct IP on desktop, or do they select shared/direct printers
installed on the terminal server?
If you have Desktop Experience (or something like that) installed, the
client will use Easy Print where possible. There ar
Don't hold back, Phil. Tell us what you really think. :-)
Did it do this from the get-go or after you loaded up the printer
drivers? I've had printer drivers cause problems on my '03 server.
I've never seen them lock up the server though. As long as you have the
'03 to fall back on, why not s
> *From:* Ben Nordlander [mailto:bennordlan...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:16 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
>
>
>
> heh was planning on migrating my 03 citrix to windows 08 with latest
&g
, June 25, 2009 4:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
heh was planning on migrating my 03 citrix to windows 08 with latest version of
XenApp (or whatever it is called now; previously metaframe/presentation). maybe
2008 R2 will be better fo
heh was planning on migrating my 03 citrix to windows 08 with latest version
of XenApp (or whatever it is called now; previously metaframe/presentation).
maybe 2008 R2 will be better for us? :)
-Ben
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Just wonder others experience with 08 t
Hi Phil
I run my TS08 in a Hyper V virtual machine. I've got Canons, Ricohs,
Pannys, Brothers and HP units. They all work fine (of couse you need to
install the printer on the server). I love the published apps, the remote
app web page, etc. No issues here. Works great for me.
Steve
On Thu, J
26 matches
Mail list logo
