RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Is it WebScale? These sigs are, after all, destined for the web, no? -sc From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? I'm installing a 35 TB Lefthand (now HP

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I'm not gonna sleep well knowing those extra ports might rust. -sc From: Anders Blomgren [mailto:chanks...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Are you ok with paying $3000 more for 24 ports

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

o multiple outgoing SIG queues, each with a QoS profile that would allow the SIG to be more quickly displayed to important clients? -sc From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Ken Schaefer wrote: >> I thought Real Networks was in contention in that it was a “neutral” codec >> with no affiliation with either MS or Apple? > > What SAN are we going to store the signature on? Would we use a Cisco or HP > switch? LOL!! (L3+) -- Ben ~ Fi

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

gt; >> What SAN are we going to store the signature on? Would we use a Cisco or >> HP switch? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Ken >> >> >> >> *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 Sept

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

; *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:53 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > > > I thought Real Networks was in contention in that it was a “neutral” codec > with no affil

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

n Schaefer mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com>> wrote: What SAN are we going to store the signature on? Would we use a Cisco or HP switch? Cheers Ken From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com<mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>] Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:53 AM To: NT System A

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

witch? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Ken >> >> >> >> *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:53 AM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: Cheap/F

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

gt; Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:53 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > > > I thought Real Networks was in contention in tha

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

What SAN are we going to store the signature on? Would we use a Cisco or HP switch? Cheers Ken From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? I thought Real Networks was in

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I have used Mercury Mail in the past for small installs and it is easy to setup and works well. http://www.pmail.com/ Mark From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: 20 September 2010 16:04 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? We have a few doz

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I thought Real Networks was in contention in that it was a "neutral" codec with no affiliation with either MS or Apple? -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/S

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

We live in a disposable society. -sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? I do so hate to be discarded. - WJR On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:43, Richard

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Where? -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? I am positive he still wants to insert them! On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

: > >> You're joking, right? You had me going for a second there. >> >> >> - Original Message - From: "Doug Hampshire" > > >> To: "NT System Admin Issues" >> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:40 AM >> >>

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

uot;NT System Admin Issues" > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:40 AM > > Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > > Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large >> eMails signatures into them automatically? I'm still looking for a &g

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I do so hate to be discarded. - WJR On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:43, Richard Stovall wrote: > Wait a minute. Didn't we decide that a Flash-only solution was > incompatible with your mission of broad availability across multiple > platforms? Wasn't it discerned that a combination of Flash / Wi

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Wait a minute. Didn't we decide that a Flash-only solution was incompatible with your mission of broad availability across multiple platforms? Wasn't it discerned that a combination of Flash / Windows Media / Quicktime / Silverlight / MP4 would best serve the interests and needs of all your poten

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? I am positive he still wants to insert them! On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com>> wrote: Still looking to insert th

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

amp; Associates, PA > jra...@eaglemds.com > www.eaglemds.com > > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:41 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > >

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

r 21, 2010 9:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large eMails signatures into them automatically? I'm still looking for a solution that will attach a Flash based video to every eMail we sen

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

control over email, and the other OP > wants to insert a Quicktime video on every email, it's best to have > something on-site and something like Kerio Connect or something similar. > > > > From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 20

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I love the sense of humor. From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large eMails signatures into them

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

have something on-site and something like Kerio Connect or something similar. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? That is a mail CLIENT, to wit http://ema

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

rsonal email, and for my personal email > I mostly use my Kmail on my Linux box. > > > > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:41 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > Do any of thes

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large eMails signatures into them automatically? I'm still looking for a solution that will attach a Flash based video to every eMail we send. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM,

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

I was going to suggest Kerio as well. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Gmail? Xmail? IceWarp's Merak and Kerio are cheap and include a L

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large eMails signatures into them automatically? I'm still looking for a solution that will attach a Flash based video to every eMail we send. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM, John Aldrich wrote: > How about HotPop.com? Or Google?

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Xmail: http://www.xmailserver.org/ hmailServer http://www.hmailserver.com/ -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Thanks Ben and sorry

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

gt; > -Original Message- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 September 2010 16:08 > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings > wrote: >> Any sug

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

ber 20, 2010 11:29 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > > > Don't bring your facts into these discussions Ben. :) > > - WJR > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:24, Ben Scott wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

many web-based management frontends that you can install on a Linux server. - Original Message - From: "Paul Hutchings" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:13 AM Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Thanks Ben and sorry, I should

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

SmarterMail is the one I know in this space. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? We have a few dozen dom

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Tbh it's not really worth the hassle of Google Apps or some third party host, though I did think about it. We have various boxes in our DMZ so it&

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: >> Don't bring your facts into these discussions Ben. :) > > They’re HIS now? Nobody else will take 'em... -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

They're HIS now? Ooof. -sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Don't bring your facts into these discussions Ben. :) - WJR On Mon, Sep 2

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

..@domain1 going to one person and i...@domain2 going to another person. From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: 20 September 2010 17:33 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? How about HotPop.com? Or Google? Google will host your domain e

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

On 20 Sep 2010 at 11:17, Daniel Rodriguez wrote: > I have used XAMPP and installed Mecury Mail on several boxes with no > issues. Was real easy to setup and configure. Note that XAMPP is using an unlicensed copy of Mercury Mail. Mercury Mail is only free to home users and non-profits. That

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

How about HotPop.com? Or Google? Google will host your domain emails for you, I believe. Also, SpamCop.Net (webmail.spamcop.net) will host your email for about $25/year/mailbox, I think. including spam / virus filtering and spam reporting, if you like. John-AldrichPerception_2 From: Paul Hu

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings wrote: > Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to configure? Linux? :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

L1 - WJR On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:50, Crawford, Scott wrote: > http://erlegreer.com/L0L/ > > > > *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > *Sent:* Monday, September 20, 2010 10:14 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Cheap/Free POP3/S

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Awesome...wait, I meant L2+ Shook From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? http://erlegreer.com/L0L/ From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Monday

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

http://erlegreer.com/L0L/ From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? Are you *really* rolling on the floor? Shook From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Don't bring your facts into these discussions Ben. :) - WJR On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:24, Ben Scott wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings > wrote: > >>> Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to > configure? > >> > > > Linux? :) > > > > He said "e

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings wrote: >>> Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to configure? >> > > Linux? :) > > He said "easy to configure". In all seriousness, Linux has come a long way. For simple stuff like setting up user accounts and a POP serve

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

> > > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, September 20, 2010 11:13 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? > > > > ROFL!! > > *ASB* > * * > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Be

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

onfigure". > > Regards, > > Michael B. Smith > Consultant and Exchange MVP > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:08 AM > To: NT System Admin

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

onday, September 20, 2010 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings wrote: > Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to configure? Linux? :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security th

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Are you *really* rolling on the floor? Shook From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:13 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server? ROFL!! ASB On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ben Scott mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

Gmail? Xmail? IceWarp's Merak and Kerio are cheap and include a LOT of functionality. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issu

RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

He said "easy to configure". Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Cheap/Free

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

ROFL!! *ASB* * * On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings > wrote: > > Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to > configure? > > Linux? :) > > -- Ben > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a re

Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Paul Hutchings wrote: > Any suggestions on anything else that is cheap/free and easy to configure? Linux? :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To ma