When I try to deactivate my current TS License server, I get the following
error, using the automatic connection. It attempts to connect to the
Microsoft Clearinghouse but fails with The License Server Activtion Wizard
encountered an internal error from the license server. Message Number:
I need to move a current TS license server to a new server. I have found
many websites that explain the move however I have not found one that tells
me if it will affect my users and if I will need to do anything to the
desktops that connect to the TS.
I have the old TS license server still
You need to de-activate the current server then activate the new server, using
the same authorization codes you used on the current server:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/814593
Also don't forget to update your GPOs or whatever you do to point your terminal
servers to the new server.
Tom
Are the remote desktop cals able to be bought as user CALS or device CALS
as was with the 2003 CALS?
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Buying more CALs than absolutely required is not going to be an option
- the money just isn't there for it.
On Fri, Feb
I didn't see it mentioned, but don't forget you'll need to run a 2008 TS
Licensing server to hand out 2008 CALs-they won't install on 2003.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Kurt Buff
kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Buying more CALs than absolutely required is not going
Yes
On 2/21/2010 4:40 AM, Dean Cunningham wrote:
Are the remote desktop cals able to be bought as user CALS or device
CALS as was with the 2003 CALS?
--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Probably user CALs, unless there's some compelling reason otherwise.
I anticipate the largest set of users will be people who are using our
Sonciwall SSL VPN remotely.
Kurt
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:40, Dean Cunningham
dean.cunning...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the remote desktop cals able to be
Good to know. Can the licensing server be the TS machine itself?
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:16, Miller Bonnie L.
mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu wrote:
I didn’t see it mentioned, but don’t forget you’ll need to run a 2008 TS
Licensing server to hand out 2008 CALs—they won’t install on 2003
Mine is. I moved our ts licensing from an 03 to 08 to do just this.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 11:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS licensing question
Good to know. Can the licensing server be the TS
That's very nice. Thanks.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:20, Eldridge, Dave d...@parkviewmc.com wrote:
Mine is. I moved our ts licensing from an 03 to 08 to do just this.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 11:16 AM
To: NT
All,
We're currently a Win2k3 R2 shop, and I need to retire a Win2k TS server.
I've gotten a quote for a new Win2k8 OS and client licenses.
The specific MSFT part numbers quoted are:
MBL-P73-04982 - OS Win2k8 R2
MBL-R18-02709 - User CAL
MBL-6VC-01164 - Remote Desktop Services CAL
These are
#1 - Those part numbers are specific to the reseller you're talking to.
Strip off the MBL- and you will get Microsoft's SKUs.
#2 - I would find a way to work the user CALs for Server 08 R2 into your
overall CAL scheme.
My experience is that terminal servers work fine in ESX.
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:51, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
#1 - Those part numbers are specific to the reseller you're talking to.
Strip off the MBL- and you will get Microsoft's SKUs.
That's good to know. Thanks - I wondered why my google searches
weren't working the way I
In other words, I would make sure you get the CALs to cover everyone in
your org., rather than just those that will be using the new TS.
Volume licensing covers older operating systems, so you may be
over-licensed on your 2k3 R2 machines.
Kurt Buff wrote:
#2 - I would find a way to work the
Buying more CALs than absolutely required is not going to be an option
- the money just isn't there for it.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:33, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
In other words, I would make sure you get the CALs to cover everyone in
your org., rather than just those that
]
*Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2009 4:53 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We have 70 TS CAL's and have had trouble running short on
those. Up to this point we have purchased
in the licensing
server.
Hope that makes sense.
Art
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We
.
Art
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't
use
computers at all. We have 70 TS CAL's and have had
TS Licensing is not a stateful system, a license is either used or it isn't.
There is no notion of concurrent licensing like Citrix
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS
how they are assigned other than when they are entered in the licensing
server.
Hope that makes sense.
Art
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively
Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS Licensing
Oh, yah. That's correct.
My bad.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 08
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency.
To amplify what Bob is saying:
Every client using your server must have a CAL. CALs are *not*
assigned to servers, they're assigned to clients.
The client
, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency.
To amplify what Bob is saying:
Every client using your server must have a CAL. CALs are *not*
assigned to servers, they're assigned to clients.
The client that gets the CAL assigned to it can
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com
mailto:r...@pge.com wrote:
Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency.
To amplify what Bob is saying:
Every client using your server must have a CAL. CALs
One caveat to keep in mind is you need to be current on your SA to be
able to change from device to user CALs (or vice versa).
wjh wrote:
I have successfully (after hours of being bounced around on the phone)
successfully gotten CALs transferred from device to user CALs. It was
frustrating
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:50, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Still won't help. TS Licensing still has no notion of concurrency.
To amplify what Bob is saying:
Every client using your server must have a CAL. CALs
I think you meant to say As long as you have 2000 Pro or XP Pro, no
separate TS license needed.
If you have a home-user Windows OS (Win9x, XP Home, Vista Home, Win7
Home), you need TS CALs.
If you have a non-Windows OS (Mac OS X or *NIX through any of the really
sucky open source RDP clients),
for the existence
of a Licensing Service and that's it. At that point they (per-user) are not
truly accounted for.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS Licensing
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10
We don't do no home at work. That is of course as opposed to work at home...
Yes, we've run into the issues with Linux using RDP for our TS server.
We don't have any Vista, either, so hadn't run into that.
I'm leaning more towards thin clients and virtual desktops all the
time. Solves *so* many
I believe you can have multiple license servers, and set the TS app server to
specifically use one or the other.
Klint
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS Licensing
Thanks for all the input
I did that trip one night, from US to India to Ireland in less than ½ an hour J
From: wjh [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: TS Licensing
I have successfully (after hours of being bounced around on the phone
I do not remember how they are assigned
They are assigned according to how you configure the Terminal Server,
per-seat or per-user
From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS Licensing
I go by how
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We have 70 TS CAL's and have had trouble running short on
those. Up to this point we have purchased device CAL's and are thinking
we might be better off adding user CAL's? Nothing fancy, all our
You don't need separate licensing servers for per-device and per-user
CALs. A single licensing server can serve both.
However, teach terminal server needs to be configured to use either
per-device or per-user licensing.
Jeff Brown wrote:
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees,
and again.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2009 7:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We have 70 TS CAL's and have had trouble running short on
those
do not remember
how they are assigned other than when they are entered in the licensing
server.
Hope that makes sense.
Art
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we
server.
Hope that makes sense.
Art
*From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2009 2:53 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We have
[mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS Licensing
We use TS extensively, we have less than 200 employees, 50+ that don't use
computers at all. We have 70 TS CAL's and have had trouble running short on
those. Up to this point we have
38 matches
Mail list logo
