On Oct 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:57 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu
mailto:efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
I haven't been following the
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Travis Oliphant
oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
Here are my needs:
1) How NAs are implemented cannot be end user visible. Having to pass
maskna=True is a problem. I suppose a solution is to set the flag to
true on every array inside of pandas so the user
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Travis Oliphant
oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
Thanks again for your email, I'm sure I'm not the only one who
breathes a deep sigh of relief when I see your posts.
I appreciate Nathaniel's idea to pull the changes and I can respect his
desire to do that.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36
Hi, instead of putting up a pull request that reverts all the 25000
lines of code than have been written to support an NA mask, why won't
you set up a pull request that uses the current code base to implement
your own ideas on how it should work?
___
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14
On 10/29/2011 12:26 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
The history of this discussion doesn't suggest it straightforward to get
a design right first time. It's a complex subject.
The second part of your statement, and then implement, sounds so
simple. The reality is that there are only a handful of
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Matt,
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget about rudeness or decision processes.
No, that's a common mistake, which is to assume that any conversation
about things which
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37
On Saturday, October 29, 2011, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who is counted in building a consensus? I tend to pay attention to those
who have made consistent contributions over the years, reviewed code, fixed
bugs, and have generally been active in numpy development. In any
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, October 29, 2011, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who is counted in building a consensus? I tend to pay attention to those
who have made consistent contributions over the years, reviewed
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:04
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, October 29, 2011, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Who is counted in building a consensus? I tend
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48
2011/10/29 Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
2011/10/29 Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wouldn't it be instead:
a.mask[0:2] = True?
That would be consistent with numpy.ma and the opposite of Mark's
implementation.
I can live with either, but I much prefer the numpy.ma version
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wouldn't it be
instead:
a.mask[0:2] = True?
That would be consistent with numpy.ma and the opposite of Mark's
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wouldn't it be instead:
a.mask[0:2] = True?
That would be consistent with numpy.ma and the opposite of Mark's
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48
On Saturday, October 29, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ralf
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55
To be honest, you have been slandering a lot, also in previous
discussions, to get what you wanted. This is not a healthy way of
discussion, nor does it help in any way.
There have been many people willing to listen and agree with you on
points; and this is exactly what discussion is all about,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Han Genuit hangen...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, you have been slandering a lot, also in previous
discussions, to get what you wanted. This is not a healthy way of
discussion, nor does it help in any way.
That's a severe accusation. Please quote
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root
On 10/29/2011 12:57 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu
mailto:efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 10/29/2011 12:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wouldn't it
be
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:48 PM,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:59
Here are my needs:
1) How NAs are implemented cannot be end user visible. Having to pass
maskna=True is a problem. I suppose a solution is to set the flag to
true on every array inside of pandas so the user never knows (you
mentioned someone else had some other solution, i could go back
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
I think Nathaniel and Matthew provided very
specific feedback that was helpful in understanding other perspectives of a
difficult problem. In particular, I really wanted bit-patterns
implemented. However, I
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
I think Nathaniel and Matthew provided very
specific feedback that was helpful in understanding other perspectives of a
difficult
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
I think Nathaniel and Matthew provided very
specific
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
I think Nathaniel and Matthew provided very
specific feedback that was helpful in understanding other perspectives of
a
difficult problem.
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
I think Nathaniel and Matthew provided very
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:41
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
The space issues was never ignored and Mark left room for that to be
addressed. Parameterized dtypes can still be added (and isn't all that
different from multi-na). Perhaps I could be convinced of a having np.MA
2011/10/28 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
The space issues was never ignored and Mark left room for that to be
addressed. Parameterized dtypes can still be added (and isn't all that
different from multi-na).
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
The space issues was never ignored and Mark left room for that to be
addressed.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
The
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:43
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Stéfan van der Walt
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:56
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Charles R
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Matthew Brett
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthew, the problem I have is that it seems that you and Nathaniel won't be
satisfied unless things are done *your* way.
Hi Charles,
I'm sorry if I've given this impression, and I know it's easy to feel
this
Matt,
On Friday, October 28, 2011, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget about rudeness or decision processes.
No, that's a common mistake, which is to assume that any conversation
about things which aren't technical, is not important. Nathaniel's
point is important.
65 matches
Mail list logo
