[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Don Gould
 sorry discuss with who?-- Don Gould5 Cargill PlaceRichmondChristchurch, New ZealandMobile/Telegram: + 64 21 114 0699www.bowenvale.co.nz Original message From: Simon Allard Date: 23/11/20 9:49 am (GMT+12:00) To: Don Gould , nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: [nznog] 103.6

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Gavin Quayle
your computer. From: Don Gould Sent: Monday, 23 November 2020 10:31 AM To: Simon Allard ; nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch sorry discuss with who? -- Don Gould 5 Cargill Place Richmond Christchurch, New Zealand Mobile/Telegram: + 64 21 11

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Nathan Ward
Hi Don, I don’t think anybody really knows what you’re talking about. You’ve quoted a prefix claiming it’s in Christchurch. Whois and routing I can see shows it’s allocated to GPLHost and is advertised by their ASN (45887). Everything points toward Singapore location. It looks to me like GPLHo

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
A traceroute to an address in that /24 from Auckland ends thus: 817 ms15 ms16 ms v-cr1-alb.cr3.wlg.dtsanz.com [202.174.183.234] 920 ms21 ms23 ms 202.68.88.217 1022 ms21 ms23 ms 103.68.122.xxx so it is indeed ~180 ms closer than Singapore. Just shows how

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Pete Mundy
It's not that there is no feasible way for an operator to determine it's an NZ prefix - it's certainly determinable via existing means and the big players already do it with these tests (such as latency) built directly into their web apps. It's merely a side effect of Mediaworks using g a poor

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Jodi Thomson
IMO if you're operating an ISP/RSP in New Zealand and you want your customers to access NZ based GeoIP locked services then the onus is on you to ensure the relevant providers whitelist your prefixes. Maxmind and other GeoDBs are only as accurate as the data they're fed I've had to contact

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Simon Allard
Whois shows it’s a Singapore hosting company. Best to discuss with them. Simon Allard | Head of Architecture E: simon.all...@vocusgroup.co.nz M: +64 20 1000 790W: vocusgroup.co.nz A: Level 5, 34 Sale St, Auckland 1010 From: Don Gould Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2020 9:50 pm To: nznog@list.wa

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Michael Hallager
Hi Don, If you don't "own" the IP's your options are likely limited or none. You could try and contact the GeoIP DB's like Maxmind but chances are they will not accede. If, on the other hand, you have your own IP's or are in a position to join APNIC and obtain these - it's quite simple and j

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Don Gould
nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch IMO if you're operating an ISP/RSP in New Zealand and you want your customers to access NZ based GeoIP locked services then the onus is on you to ensure the relevant providers whitelist your prefixes. M

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Michael Hallager
I think if you want the geolocation to be accurate, you should make sure your APNIC data is correct. You should also contact MaxMind who operate the most popular IP geolocation service. I don’t know what evidence they will require, but it may be more than you’re currently offering with the APNIC

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Warren Shepherd
same). It’s probably more straightforward if you own the addresses – so assuming you don’t, maybe you should ask whoever does to resolve it. From: Don Gould Sent: Monday, 23 November 2020 2:55 PM To: Jodi Thomson ; nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

2020-11-22 Thread Jonathan Brewer
> > Didn't see MW or TVNZ chime in, or anyone offer a tech contact. > > > > Barry - agreed > > > > D > > > > > > > > -- > Don Gould > 5 Cargill Place > Richmond > Christchurch, New Zealand > Mobile/Telegram: + 64 21 114 0699 > www.bowe