Hi,
I just uploaded version 1.3.2 of the fpl package to the release tracker.
Before the release is made official, I'd be grateful if someone with an
older
version of Octave installed could confirm thatwith the latest changes
compatibility
with Octave 3.2.* has been recovered.
To test, please
I agree with JuanPi's point, abandoning the forge name abruptly might
cause some confusion. So I'd say let's use forge as a collective name for
all modules, we could refer to the section of the site containing the
source repository documentation and released downloads of modules as
'forge'.
What
2012/4/24 Lukas Reichlin lukas.reichlin.li...@gmail.com
I think we should group OF packages into different classes as the
long list on
http://octave.sourceforge.net/packages.php is rather confusing. For
example, we could use three classes:
- main: only about a dozen of packages. The most
Hi,
I uploaded to the forum a new release of the ocs package v0.1.3
the main new feature in this release is the new parser for circuit
files in a (subset of) the spice language contributed by Marco Merlin
checksums:
4ae221230cae58b4f12614f957101927 ocs-1.0.3.tar.gz
On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:25, c. wrote:
On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Marco Merlin wrote:
I see, but... I had tested against
ocs-0.1.1
that i got from here:
http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
in the documentation of that package I see:
On 18 Nov 2011, at 13:55, c. wrote:
On 18 Nov 2011, at 00:00, Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
Let's see... Is there a function to get the package name of a certain
function?
miguel
You don't need that because you run generate_package_html on one package at a
time.
so whene you are
On 13 Nov 2011, at 09:42, c. wrote:
On 13 Nov 2011, at 00:25, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
That's a tiny sparse matrix. I'm curious about how the algorithm
scales. Can you try a couple of orders of magnitude larger?
yes I will.
Hi,
This example solves a Laplace equation on a 3d
On 13 Nov 2011, at 10:55, Carlo de Falco wrote:
How can I check whether the system is being actually handled in parallel?
well, top reports about 130% cpu usage for Octave while solving with librsb
and 99% when using libsparse so this might be a hint ...
c
On 13 Nov 2011, at 23:02, c. wrote:
On 13 Nov 2011, at 22:20, Alexander Barth wrote:
Dear Michele,
I would like to try the suggestion of Filippone, but I sumbled upon a
a segmentation fault for the following matrix multiplication:
load test.mat %
On 13 Nov 2011, at 23:09, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 13 Nov 2011, at 23:02, c. wrote:
On 13 Nov 2011, at 22:20, Alexander Barth wrote:
Dear Michele,
I would like to try the suggestion of Filippone, but I sumbled upon a
a segmentation fault for the following matrix multiplication
On 12 Nov 2011, at 14:17, Michele Martone wrote:
On 2008@15:41, Michele Martone wrote:
On 2008@15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
...
There is an example of the correct way to create a new octave matrix class
in the package triangular:
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave
On 12 Nov 2011, at 14:17, Michele Martone wrote:
On 2008@15:41, Michele Martone wrote:
On 2008@15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
...
There is an example of the correct way to create a new octave matrix class
in the package triangular:
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave
On 12 Nov 2011, at 16:04, c. wrote:
On 12 Nov 2011, at 12:17, Alexander Barth wrote:
Dear Filippone,
Also an iterative parallel solver would be very useful for me.
Currently, I'm using either a direct solver (the \ operator) or the
conjugate gradient alogorithm.
I tried to find our
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
Michele,
This sounds indeed like a nice contribution!
I might try to help check the code but currently
I really have very little spare time, so if someone else
jumps in it would defenitely make things happen faster.
Anyway here
Michele,
This sounds indeed like a nice contribution!
I might try to help check the code but currently
I really have very little spare time, so if someone else
jumps in it would defenitely make things happen faster.
Anyway here is a few quick comments:
I see in the DESCRIPTION file:
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:41, Michele Martone wrote:
As far as I know, LGPL is more appropriate for libraries, while GPL for full
programs.
For this reason, the librsb source archives can be distributed separately
under the LGPL (it's slightly more permissive than GPL, as far as I
understand).
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #34010 (project octave):
This has been already moved to the OF bug tracker.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3391328group_id=2888atid=102888
c.
___
Reply to this item at:
Hi,
I am posting this to both Octave and Octave-Forge as I think this
problem encountered while running a function from the 'optim' package
actually exposes some bug in Octave itself.
If others can confirm this behaviour 'll try to better identify the bug
and report it to the bug tracker.
I'm
2011/2/21 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org:
Hi,
I would like to remove all mark_as_command entries from the packages in
SVN. It was deprecated in 3.2 already. However, this might mean that
people using 3.0 may have problems (I didn't check this, though).
Objections?
Thomas
I think
On 7 Feb 2011, at 13:26, c. wrote:
OK, thanks anyway for the hint, I'll try to learn a bit more about rsync
myself and see if I can use it.
I used the following:
rsync -avP -e ssh --chmod=Du=rwx,Fu=rw,Dg=rwx,Fg=rw,Do=rx,Fo=r .
cdf,oct...@web.sourceforge.net:htdocs/fl-core
and it seems to
2010/11/5 Philip Nienhuis pr.nienh...@hccnet.nl:
Hi Levente (is that your first name or family name?)
please cc the octave-forge developers mailing list too (now added)
Read on...
Levente Torok wrote:
Dear Philip Nienhuis,
I am searching for you as a maintainer of io package on
On 5 Sep 2010, at 16:14, c. wrote:
In case anyone wants to check the results shown in that paper I
prepared a script performing (what is my interpretetion of)
the benchmarks listed in the tables, this could be helpful for
keeping the discussion with the authors on technical grounds
On 2 Aug 2010, at 10:42, Carlo de Falco wrote:
I am re-opening this very old thread as I just came across a
possible solution/workaround to the trailing garbage issue.
I just noticed that if .tar.gz files are run through uuencode befor
uploading, the forum does not modify them so
On 12 Apr 2010, at 11:42, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 11 Apr 2010, at 23:58, Søren Hauberg wrote:
søn, 11 04 2010 kl. 16:43 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
On 11 Apr 2010, at 13:51, Arno Onken wrote:
I filed a bug report and got a reply:
Thanks
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge
On 7 Jun 2010, at 12:04, Michael Goffioul wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jaroslav Hajek high...@gmail.com
wrote:
3. Obviously, I'll be glad if others can check my code and possibly
improve it.
Just a small improvement suggestion, for anybody's willing to do it,
it would be
On 7 Jun 2010, at 12:57, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 7 Jun 2010, at 12:04, Michael Goffioul wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jaroslav Hajek high...@gmail.com
wrote:
3. Obviously, I'll be glad if others
On 7 Jun 2010, at 18:27, Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 07 06 2010 kl. 11:41 +0200, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
I made some more adjustments (particularly docs), and I also removed
GramSchmidt because it is now replaced by mgorth (which is better). I
think the linear-algebra package is ready for the
On 31 May 2010, at 08:35, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
I improved mgorth using a template to compute in single/double
real/complex. 3.3.51+ has even more powerful tools to reduce the
amount of boilerplate code for such tasks, but I tried to avoid those,
so I hope the file is compilable by 3.2.x
On 31 May 2010, at 09:45, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 31 May 2010, at 08:35, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
I improved mgorth using a template to compute in single/double
real/complex. 3.3.51+ has even more powerful tools to reduce the
amount of boilerplate code for such tasks, but I tried to avoid
On 26 May 2010, at 09:10, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
OK. Please note that your C++ version only works in real doubles,
whereas a properly written m-file function will probably work well in
both single and double (that is typically automatic, one only needs to
be careful about eps() and
Jaroslav,
With the following change you applied to pgmres.cc
@@ -234,7 +235,7 @@
ColumnVector matrixfreematrixmat::operator * (ColumnVector b)
{
- return (mat * b).column_vector_value ();
+ return mat * Matrix (b);
}
it does no compile for me anymore with 3.2.3, is it OK if I change it
On 25 May 2010, at 13:16, Alois Schlögl wrote:
No, its not possible to have a general purpose solution for the (...)
(:)
issue. Lets look at the following example [F (x-y)(:)].
If F is a function, it should be converted to [vec(F(x-y))], but if
F is
a variable, the correct translation
On 25 May 2010, at 14:59, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
unless anyone objects, I'll become the maintainer of this package.
oh, well.. as now linear algebra has a maintainer I finally have
someone to direct my complaints to ;)
comments, further suggestions?
well yes, some time ago an initial
On 25 May 2010, at 16:17, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25 May 2010, at 14:59, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
unless anyone objects, I'll become the maintainer of this package.
oh, well.. as now linear algebra has
On 25 May 2010, at 21:01, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25 May 2010, at 16:17, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25 May 2010, at 14:59
On 25 May 2010, at 23:24, Alois Schlögl wrote:
Within Octave-forge, there are two files with the same name
[1] extra/secs1d/inst/Utilities/Uscharfettergummel.m
[2] extra/secs2d/inst/Utilities/Uscharfettergummel.m
However, the content is different, [1] has a size of 2075 bytes, [2]
is
2010/5/23 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org:
Hi,
I'm currently faced with a bug report against ocs in Debian (basically,
the PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL file assume they are in the same directory as all
the directories containing the .m files)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582750
On 17 May 2010, at 08:07, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
To allow auto-expansion of singleton cells, like Octave's cellfun
does. This bug has already been fixed in SVN. I'm requesting the
release of 1.2.1 now.
thanks
It should be online now, please check that everything works,
c.
On 17 May 2010, at 09:00, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 17 May 2010, at 08:07, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
To allow auto-expansion of singleton cells, like Octave's cellfun
does. This bug has already been fixed in SVN
On 16 May 2010, at 20:08, Alois Schlögl wrote:
What is your point here ? Some people are not as good in coding as
others, the function this student wrote is still useful. What does it
say about the performance of Octave vs. M ? Zero, Nil, Nothing.
Matlab has a feature called JIT (short for
On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available
and
Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options
about the setup. (and i do not want to say it loud, but M is still
faster, [1]. Admittingly, Octave has improved
On 29 Apr 2010, at 09:01, Alexander Barth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Carlo de Falco carlo.defa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 16:01, Alexander Barth wrote:
Hi all,
I released a new version of octcdf which should fix the cs-list bug
(invalid assignment to cs-list
On 28 Apr 2010, at 20:10, Alois Schlögl wrote:
Concerning these functions for Matlab users - I'm not sure were else
they should go. If you have a suggestion, let me know.
I don't use much matlab myself, so I am not sure the suggestion makes
sense,
but what about an octave_compatibiliy
On 29 Apr 2010, at 16:28, Riccardo Corradini wrote:
Hi all,
I have just posted a new release of openmpi_ext (1.0.1). There was a
little bug in a text description. It will also be available an html
description .
Enjoy parallel computing with GNU Octave and MPI.
Bests regards
Riccardo
On 28 Apr 2010, at 20:55, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Hi Carlo
... this is what you wrote to me ( the octave-dev list) at 14 april
2010 18:38, retrieved from my own mail archive:
On 13 Apr 2010, at 22:17, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
I just uploaded version 1.0.12 of the io package to the package
On 26 Apr 2010, at 09:04, Javier Enciso wrote:
Hi All,
A new version of the Spanish package has been released. Main features
include:
- Support for special characters via UTF-8.
- There are 1246 commands translated into Spanish so far.
Problems: Nothing to report, although feedback is
On 28 Apr 2010, at 05:36, Søren Hauberg wrote:
Hi
It seems like the web pages for the latest version of the io package
has
been uploaded, but that the actual package has not.
There was some discussion about two weeks ago regarding this release,
but I am not sure how things ended.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 20:30, mds_mailli...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi all,
that's the second try to release the modified nnet-package with
version number 0.1.12.
news:==
- the progress messages appears now while training is in progress
- since version 3.0.0 nnet doesn't work
correctly,
On 14 Apr 2010, at 20:43, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Hi Carlo
snip
BTW I'd rather use Tortoise svn, I use that for regular commits too.
There's probably a similar option there, I'll have a look.
I am sure you can perform the same actions with tortoise svn, but
unfortunately I am not
On 11 Apr 2010, at 21:38, mds_mailli...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi all,
I uploaded the two files, created with help of the octave-forge
developer page, to the
forum.
The new version
is nnet-0.1.12.
Following things changed:
1.) The progress message is shwon without delay now
2.) Since
On 11 Apr 2010, at 13:51, Arno Onken wrote:
Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 29 03 2010 kl. 18:21 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
On 29 Mar 2010, at 17:55, Arno Onken wrote:
Did you upload the files to the forum and afterwards download them?
no, I uploaded directly to the sourceforge release system
On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:05, Arno Onken wrote:
Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 29 03 2010 kl. 18:21 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
On 29 Mar 2010, at 17:55, Arno Onken wrote:
Did you upload the files to the forum and afterwards download them?
no, I uploaded directly to the sourceforge release system
On 29 Mar 2010, at 11:30, Arno Onken wrote:
Carlo de Falco wrote:
furthermore, I get an error when decompressing the package archive:
gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored
statistics-1.0.10/inst/tblwrite.m
statistics-1.0.10/inst/nanmax.m
statistics-1.0.10/COPYING
On 29 Mar 2010, at 17:55, Arno Onken wrote:
Did you upload the files to the forum and afterwards download them?
no, I uploaded directly to the sourceforge release system,
I'll try with the forum as well. If forum attachments get garbled by
the upload system
we need to find some other way for
On 28 Mar 2010, at 17:59, Arno Onken wrote:
Hi,
The statistics-1.0.10 package is released in the package release
forum.
Arno
Arno,
The file index.html in the statistics-html.tar.gz refers to version
1.0.9 released on 2009-05-03.
Have you updated the DESCRIPTION file in the package
On 19 Mar 2010, at 14:58, Rafael Vázquez wrote:
Hi all,
I have prepared an update for the nurbs package in Octave, to make
it compatible with Matlab. I attach the patch I have prepared. I'd
like to get an account to update the package myself, since I think I
will add some functions in
On 18 Mar 2010, at 10:35, Michael Creel wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible for a package to have subdirectories within the
package/inst directory? Would .m files in subdirectories be found
automatically? The reason I ask is because I would like to expand
the econometrics package to include
Hi all,
Probably due to the new licence restrictions at matlab central, the
nurbs toolbox has been removed
from the mathworks site. So I have been asked to keep the current
nurbs package from octave-forge
(which originated as a fork) compatible with matlab.
As I don't want to spend time
Hi All,
I have just uploaded new releases of packages io-1.11 and
opempi_ext-1.0.0
below finf release notes by the maintainers.
best regards,
c.
openmpi_ext:
Hi,
I have just released the first version of openmpi_ext package.
Could you please post it on the server?
Thanks a lot
R. Corradini
On 12 Mar 2010, at 15:43, Riccardo Corradini wrote:
Hi,
on the web page openmpi_ext is not listed.
Is it possible to update the web page of octave-forge accordingly.
Thanks a lot
Riccardo Corradini
it's probably just because you are viewing a cashed version of the web
page, try hitting
On 9 Mar 2010, at 09:17, Mike Croucher wrote:
Hi all
I recently converted a few octave-forge files to allow them to work on
MATLAB. The work was fairly trivial but might be useful to someone
else and so I was planning on releasing them publicly. Does anyone
have any comments/advice
On 8 Mar 2010, at 13:45, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Hi,
Motivated by comments from Benjamin and Michael, I've uploaded a newer
version of the io package to the package release forum last week.
I haven't explicitly asked to put it up; my bad :-)
generally thi shouldn't be needed the fact that I
On 5 Mar 2010, at 04:07, Imranullah Syed wrote:
Hi all,
Are there functions or a package that implements the finite volume
method for PDE solution?
Yes, there is the BIM package.
If not, would it be useful to have?
If it will be useful, I will write some code for it.
Any
On 26 Feb 2010, at 14:59, Olaf Till wrote:
Ok, but I just submitted it though I forgot to use the latest version
of generate_html --- please do not use it, I'll repeat submission (and
will take version number 1.0.13 than).
Olaf
Olaf,
I think 1.0.13 got messed up a bit somehow...
the file
On 26 Feb 2010, at 09:39, Olaf Till wrote:
With optim-1.0.10.tar.gz from the Octave Forge website I get this
warning, but not with the optim-1.0.10.tar.gz still on my disk (which
is the one uploaded to Octave Forge). Seems to have happened something
during data transmission. Since this also
On 22 Feb 2010, at 10:05, Paul Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
I created release 1.0.6 of the octave sockets package at 16:th nov
2009
and uploaded the package file.
where (and how) have you uploaded the file? The version I currently
see online is 1.0.5...
The html reference and links are however
On 17 Feb 2010, at 15:41, Olaf Till wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:26:23PM +0100, Olaf Till wrote:
Hi all,
since the optim package has no single maintainer, I would like to
make
a release to make current leasqr.m available.
Done. Though the help displayed by Octave and therefore the
On 15 Feb 2010, at 09:44, José Luis García Pallero wrote:
By the moment, the package is posted in the package relese forum
https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/octave/viewtopic.php?f=1t=11
Thanks
I have uploaded the release and the docs to OF,
Thans!
c.
On 15 Feb 2010, at 12:40, Esteban Cervetto wrote:
Hello!
I ve seen that some packages was published this month.
What happened with my contribution (actuarial package)?
Regards
Esteban
Esteban,
With the new release system, each package maintainer is responsible
for releases of his/her
On 12 Feb 2010, at 17:46, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Hi Carlo:
Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 11 Feb 2010, at 22:48, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Although I manually corrected the relevant files before uploading, I
still see truncated short descriptions in the io package
overview on
the web site
On 11 Feb 2010, at 22:48, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Although I manually corrected the relevant files before uploading, I
still see truncated short descriptions in the io package overview on
the web site. The truncation occurs at the dot in OpenOffice.org.
Did you re-generate the package html
Jaroslav,
Hi Carlo and Soren,
I tried to follow the procedure and make a release of the general
package but noticed that classes and class methods are ignored by
generate_html.
I beleive you just found the first shortcoming in the system.
generate_html was developed before classes/methods
On 21 Jan 2010, at 05:22, Joe Strout wrote:
I'm downloading and attempting to build/install gnuplot now, but to
avoid tripping up future Mac users, it'd be great if you could include
it with Octave.app.
Gnuplot.app is included in the same .dmg file as Octave.app
Best wishes,
- Joe
c.
On 12 Dec 2009, at 22:13, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Carlo de Falco wrote:
Hi,
Il giorno Dec 11, 2009, alle ore 11:10 PM, Thomas Weber
thomas.weber.m...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hi,
the test suite of nrbnumbasisfun.m fails with Octave 3.2:
octave:1 test
Hi,
Il giorno Dec 11, 2009, alle ore 11:10 PM, Thomas Weber
thomas.weber.m...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Hi,
the test suite of nrbnumbasisfun.m fails with Octave 3.2:
octave:1 test nrbnumbasisfun
* test
p = 2;
q = 3;
mcp = 2; ncp = 3;
knots = {[zeros(1,p), linspace(0,1,mcp-p+2),
On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:46, Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 23 11 2009 kl. 10:20 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco:
Here I referred to the static part of the web pages, currently to
modify them
one connects to the SF server and modifies or replaces them in place
with a text editor.
I see many ways
On 25 Nov 2009, at 09:52, Søren Hauberg wrote:
Hmm, I guess this is possible. This requires that we can determine
which
packages have changed most recently. Do you think it is enough to
simple
check the dates of the directories containing the html for the
packages?
more simply, we
On 25 Nov 2009, at 08:58, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:48, Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 23 11 2009 kl. 10:12 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco:
Yeah, I've been thinking a bit about this. I guess we would like to
have
a whole bunch of maintainers, meaning we would have many people
On 25 Nov 2009, at 14:38, Søren Hauberg wrote:
We have quite a lot of packages, so I think we would have to only put
the most recent announcement on the front page, otherwise there
would be
way too much information on the front page.
so the php code would sort by date and then only
On 25 Nov 2009, at 14:35, Søren Hauberg wrote:
I must admit that I quickly give up on the SF documentation, so I just
might be missing the obvious. To me, it seems like files can be copied
to the server using
Rsync over SSH
SFTP
SCP
I don't see any web tools for uploading html files
On 22 Nov 2009, at 22:20, Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 16 11 2009 kl. 14:13 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco:
well, the current procedure looks a bit complicated and un-secure
(manually deleting the contents of the directories directly on the
web-
server could lead to messy mistakes).
Agreed. I
On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:28, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 17 Oct 2009, at 23:58, Søren Hauberg wrote:
Hi All
...
For a long time essential parts of this code has been incomplete, but
I've recently been taking a stab at this once more. You can check out
the results at
http://octave.sf.net/test
On 15 Nov 2009, at 14:04, Søren Hauberg wrote:
søn, 15 11 2009 kl. 11:08 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco:
After a lng time I finally got a chance to try doing this,
the patch to add the upload procedure to the developers webpage is
attached.
I would have applied it myself but I did
On 12 Nov 2009, at 07:41, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 11 Nov 2009, at 23:22, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
the tests in MSH2Mgmsh.m check for isempty(tmp), with a variable tmp.
For me, the variable is not empty, but has a value of 13 when
running
the test.
I've tried the latest version from
On 13 Nov 2009, at 10:46, Massimiliano Culpo wrote:
I was able to reproduce the error and I committed a bug-fix to the svn
repository.
octave:1 system(gmsh --version);
2.4.2
octave:2 test MSH2Mgmsh
Generating mesh...
Processing gmsh data...
Creating PDE-tool like mesh...
Check for
On 11 Nov 2009, at 23:22, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
the tests in MSH2Mgmsh.m check for isempty(tmp), with a variable tmp.
For me, the variable is not empty, but has a value of 13 when
running
the test.
I've tried the latest version from SVN, but I still get this error.
Octave 3.2.3,
On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Thomas Treichl wrote:
Then (again my opinion) whatever reason it is (I'm a bad guy, isn't
it), the
Doxygen documentation then should also be part of octave.org because
it's an GNU
Octave issue and not an OF issue.
Well, that's not completely true in my
On 17 Oct 2009, at 23:58, Søren Hauberg wrote:
Hi All
For waaay too long I've been working on changing the release system.
Well, working isn't really the right word as I haven't actually done
much work due to lack of time.
To those that don't remember, the reason why we don't allow
On 19 Oct 2009, at 11:12, Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 19 10 2009 kl. 10:48 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
While thinking about the release procedure I realized that, as the
release of all packages will not be done all at once anymore, it will
not be possible to track down the SVN release
number
On 31 Aug 2009, at 15:52, Carlo de Falco wrote:
Hi,
Some time ago I wrote a simple implementation of the Preconditioned
GMRES linear sover (see attachment).
I did not share it at the time because I beleive the best place to
put it is in octave-proper where other
iterative solvers
Hi,
Some time ago I wrote a simple implementation of the Preconditioned
GMRES linear sover (see attachment).
I did not share it at the time because I beleive the best place to put
it is in octave-proper where other
iterative solvers are, so I was holding it until I would find the time
to
On 25 Jul 2009, at 04:50, Søren Hauberg wrote:
fre, 24 07 2009 kl. 22:20 +0200, skrev Thomas Weber:
I wouldn't object to having a 'inst/data' directory, but is that
easier
to locate from within the code?
I find
fopen('data/filename');
simpler than
fopen('../data/filename');
On 24 Jul 2009, at 15:20, Thomas Weber wrote:
I find
fopen('data/filename');
simpler than
fopen('../data/filename');
Okay, I admit it: a weak argument :)
Thomas
actually the location of the files will change once a package is
installed,
all m-file functions will end
On 24 Jul 2009, at 20:43, Carlo de Falco wrote:
On 24 Jul 2009, at 19:34, Esteban Cervetto wrote:
I spend 1 hour installing
$ svn co https://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/octave octave
but it continues!
It was correct install the whole project in my computer? I only want
develop
On 24 Jul 2009, at 21:43, Esteban Cervetto wrote:
I am using UBUNTU 9.04,
and Octave 3.2
I ve never used subversion, buy i already installed
Finally, I am already installed the whole svn version
But something is wrong
I pass you the console
On 23 Jul 2009, at 11:37, Richardson, Anthony wrote:
Pressing 'u' unzooms, 'p' and 'n' go to the previous and next zoom
level.
More importantly, pressing 'h' while the plot window is active
displays
all options in the gnuplot terminal window. (Pressing 'h' does not
display help when
On 19 Jul 2009, at 15:23, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote:
søn, 19 07 2009 kl. 19:44 +0200, skrev Thomas Weber:
are there objections against moving lauchli.m from special-matrix
into
miscellaneous and eliminating the (then empty)
On 20 Jul 2009, at 15:00, Thomas Weber wrote:
The reality is that most small packages are maintained by nobody.
That's
the reason why they stay small.
I don't object reorganizing orphaned functions in a way that is more
easy to maintain,
I just don't think it is a good idea to put
On 17 Jun 2009, at 16:13, Søren Hauberg wrote:
Yes, I believe so. You can also simply make sure they don't load when
you start Octave. I can't remember the syntax for that though. Perhaps
someone else on the list does.
pkg rebuild -noauto package name
I guess it would be nice if these
On 17 Jun 2009, at 20:02, Thomas L. Scofield wrote:
I will be teaching introductory pdes in the fall at my institution
(Calvin College). I have done so before, about 3 years ago, and
used Octave as the software package for the course. At that time,
there was a package (don't recall
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
