[oi-dev] [Fwd: [xwin-discuss] X build heads up: Bad symbols may occur]

-0700 From: Alan Coopersmith To: OpenSolaris X Window System List As mentioned in an earlier thread on xwin-discuss, xterm and several other binaries in the packages we generated for build 149 have bad symbol table data which causes bad data at runtime, and depending on the program a variety of

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installing VBox

r sysinfo() call to find out the OS > version? /bin/uname can be replaced by a simple shell script > or one could create a new sysinfo() in a library and LD_PRELOAD > that instead. http://blogs.sun.com/LetTheSunShineIn/entry/spoofing_solaris_version_using_dtrace --

Re: [oi-dev] oi_148 is pending

ed getting included in the main Solaris Express repo & clusters even the now-misnamed "redistributable", so you'll probably need to drop some packages that are in the clusters but not in your repos.) -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Or

Re: [oi-dev] oi_148 is pending

ges (or more likely, order them on media) to set up a repository for internal use - it's the act of making it available to others that's restricted. Just like older Solaris releases, where you could set up netinstall servers on your network, but not put them up for public use.

[oi-dev] Fwd: Re: [desktop-discuss] Poor text antialiasing behaviour in Firefox

but the license allowed others to redistribute in perpetuity. -alan- Original Message Subject: Re: [desktop-discuss] Poor text antialiasing behaviour in Firefox Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:36:06 -0800 From: Alan Coopersmith To: Dave Koelmeyer CC: desktop-disc...@opensolari

Re: [oi-dev] Fwd: Re: [desktop-discuss] Poor text antialiasing behaviour in Firefox

On 12/19/10 10:44 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > On 19 December 2010 16:42, Alan Coopersmith > wrote: >> BTW, OI may want to look into providing the Microsoft Web Fonts somehow, but >> you'd have to be careful putting them into your main pkg repo directly as the >&g

Re: [oi-dev] Fwd: Re: [desktop-discuss] Poor text antialiasing behaviour in Firefox

ese/Japanese/Korean) fonts often look much better in bitmaps than scaled, due to the difficulty of well hinting 20,000+ glyphs, but would have to defer to i18n folks to give a more authoritative answer. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform En

Re: [oi-dev] How to provide X/system debug info?

iver for i915 graphics yet. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] How to provide X/system debug info?

> changes > are modest, I'll pick them up. I'd feel better if I were working more closely > with one of the Xorg people. > > Note that this isn't a high priority item for me, so if someone else wants to > pick this up, that would be great too. > > - Garret

Re: [oi-dev] Security Work

Sun bug database has just a simple on/off toggle for security issue, and no way to distinguish between public & private issues.) You'll see many of the bugs are listed as fixed in snv_151a, since that was the supported release/build that customers could upgrade to for those fixes, b

Re: [oi-dev] SPARC Text Installer

dmittedly, those are from S11X, but I didn't think OI had changed the python packaging from upstream. BTW, if you are looking at python packaging, be aware it's being changed "upstream" on opensolaris.org: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/userland-discuss/2011-Feb

Re: [oi-dev] Fwd: [illumos-Developer] Google Summer of Code?

ount of time. Of course, the project suggestions are just to give students ideas - students will actually have to write up a proposal when they apply and can use something the project suggested or their own idea. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris

Re: [oi-dev] Distribution build system

s able to do "the right thing". This gives us pretty reproducible releases. Sounds very much like jhbuild, which is often used to build projects like GNOME & X.Org with dozens or hundreds of individual modules to checkout and build. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/jhbuild --

Re: [oi-dev] Osol bug id 5748

gt; at all. Unless someone more experienced than I can suggest alternatives > (dTrace?), it seems like debugging is the only practical way to, well, > debug this. The nvidia driver obfuscates its symbols, only the nvidia developers can do much if you're looping in there. -- -A

Re: [oi-dev] Osol bug id 5748

On 04/14/11 10:05 AM, Frank Middleton wrote: > On 04/08/11 19:43, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> The nvidia driver obfuscates its symbols, only the nvidia developers can >> do much if you're looping in there. > > It could be, but the loops seem to be in user space, and the b

Re: [oi-dev] nVidia GPU Driver Update for Upcoming Release??

probably Nouveau as well. Pathscale was working on a OpenSolaris port of nouveau at one point as well for their GPGPU compiler work. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System __

Re: [oi-dev] Fwd: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Documentation-Project

eets than the JDS consolidation currently packages. Personally, I just use emacs to edit docbook files, but I do the same for html too, never having found (or looked that hard for) a more user-friendly front end editor. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle

Re: [oi-dev] Git as a version control system for new OI projects

rial#Adoption (Yes, that does mention Symbian OS, but that's not really an actively developed open source OS any more.) -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___

Re: [oi-dev] Git as a version control system for new OI projects

On 06/22/11 01:49 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> On 06/22/11 12:04 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> Do you have hard data to support your comment that GIT is more used that >>> HG?. Moreover, in our arena? (OS development, di

Re: [oi-dev] An IPS publishing/permissions problem that I'm facing

telling you someone already made a link there in another package, it can't reuse that path for a directory as well. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System _

Re: [oi-dev] About package building under the Illumos umbrella

rent snv builds doesn't import JDS, but that happened post-151 if I recall correctly.) -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@

Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git

ific to the opensolaris project, such as webrev integration and checking project policy (nits, pbchk, etc.). -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ oi-dev mai

Re: [oi-dev] lx zone

On 02/13/12 08:24 AM, Alexander wrote: I think you can't grab 142 on-source, only if you're working in Oracle ;) opensolaris.org has onnv sources up to partway through build 148 - that's the sources illumos was based on. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopers

Re: [oi-dev] New BE every package update?

go back to. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] Resignation as OI Lead

ensure they don't break on your kernel. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] Desktop Illumos Still Matters

d/Project+pkg/files/ipsdevguide.pdf -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman

Re: [oi-dev] Desktop Illumos Still Matters

On 09/ 2/12 10:47 AM, Nick Zivkovic wrote: > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Magnus wrote: >> On Sep 2, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >>> On 09/ 2/12 07:00 AM, Adam Števko wrote: >>>> IPS is documented in the official IPS Developer Guide located some

Re: [oi-dev] Desktop Illumos Still Matters

On 09/ 5/12 11:49 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: > I asume that what you call "userland" is the successor for "sfw". Yes. > The buildsystem for sfw is a nightmare Which is why it was completely thrown out and Userland started with a new design from s

Re: [oi-dev] Desktop Illumos Still Matters

ly reached via /usr/lib since Solaris 2.6, and the rest of the X11 files moved to /usr/bin, /usr/share, /usr/lib, etc. in those Nevada builds. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc

Re: [oi-dev] Desktop Illumos Still Matters

On 09/ 5/12 01:09 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> On 09/ 5/12 11:49 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: >>> I asume that what you call "userland" is the successor for "sfw". >> >&g

Re: [oi-dev] Compiler migration #2

p://www.mentby.com/Group/gcc-discuss/c98c11-abi-compatibility-for-gcc-47.html (Just saw this today, don't really know much more about it, but figured it was worth passing on as you make your plans.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Sol

Re: [oi-dev] Compiler migration #2

s much easier to remember in Solaris 11 where it's simply "amd64" as the minimum to boot). uname still reports i386 for backwards compatibility, and because you can still run i386 binaries, even if you can't boot on an i386 processor. -- -Alan Coopersmith-

Re: [oi-dev] Compiler migration #2

in Google searches, but the actual arc.opensolaris.org URL's themselves no longer work directly. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi

Re: [oi-dev] OI project reboot required

use the Oracle code directly, as it picked up more and more dependencies on the closed Oracle code over time, that had to be worked around or patched out for OI builds. Any new plan should consider this and take it into account when figuring out what sources you build from where. --

Re: [oi-dev] OI project reboot required

track upstream as is or fork/patch as needed to continue to support 32-bit on i386. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list o

Re: [oi-dev] g++ 4.7 headers issue

eans you are compiling with the Sun/Solaris Studio compilers - you could be building on Solaris/illumos or on Linux. These names are trapped in history, based on the original names for these products and can't be changed without breaking compatibility. -- -Alan Coopersmith-

Re: [oi-dev] g++ 4.7 headers issue

On 05/29/13 11:46 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: "#ifdef __SUNPRO_C" means you are compiling with the Sun/Solaris Studio compilers - you could be building on Solaris/illumos or on Linux. Oh, and before I forget again (though this time I won't have to file bugs or submit patches l

Re: [oi-dev] g++ 4.7 headers issue

so documentation for an obsolete release. Unfortunately, it's repeated in the documentation for the current release, at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solarisstudio/documentation/cplusplus-faq-355066.html so I'll see if I can get them to fix it. -- -Alan Coo

Re: [oi-dev] SUNWlibm

ol/devpro/downloads/ -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] xchat, Firefox dumps core, OI logo xlock broken, last 2 hipster updates

On 07/17/13 10:47 AM, Nikola M. wrote: and X lock have no OI logo. That's likely xscreensaver - the much older xlock program doesn't display distro logos, just a solid white screen with the text prompts on. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com

Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility

libc function wrappers around the low level system calls in order to get binary compatibility across releases. (This is also one of the reasons Solaris always frowned on static linking of libc.a and eventually removed it so you couldn't make applications that couldn't be compatible across

Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility

around open source than is healthy.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility

ry license in any Solaris 10 backport. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailma

Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility

alter any copyright, patent or trademark notices contained within the Covered Software, or any notices of licensing or any descriptive text giving attribution to any Contributor or the Initial Developer. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com

Re: [oi-dev] Copyright for contributors - not in files, OI branded zones, binary compatibility

On 07/22/13 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 07/22/13 09:19 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Well, the CDDL does not mention unmodifyable parts, http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 section 3.3: You must include a notice in each of Your Modifications that

Re: [oi-dev] Notes on marking python-24 obsolete

laris. SunVTS is the hardware Validation Test Suite, now known as Oracle VTS: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19719-01/index.html -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/

Re: [oi-dev] sigcpp issue

s 755 root and don't care about the group because group perms=world perms, it's fine. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Studio future in OI (Re: )

future versions will similarly drop support for pre-C++98 libraries: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21986/ossrn.html#gljri So hopefully the ABI's will continue converging more as time goes on. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle

Re: [oi-dev] Enlightenment and XCB libraries

On 11/20/13 01:23 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: For instance, Ken Mays and/or Alan Coopersmith, do you possibly have an input on that ? Nope - I work upstream from OI, but not on the OI packaging. I know there has been work to move OI from the xnv gate to packaging the X11 components into OI&#

Re: [oi-dev] oi_151a9 roadmap & planning

today call "Minimum Viable Product" not the intended final state of features.) http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E21383/pkgcreate.html#gluem -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://bl

Re: [oi-dev] oi_151a9 roadmap & planning

On 02/12/14 11:42 PM, Jean-Pierre André wrote: Hi, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 02/12/14 12:41 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: (Ideally, you want other communities to build and distribute software for you. That's one area where IPS is a huge obstacle - all this repository stuff is an intole

Re: [oi-dev] [developer] GSoC? Decision time....

r "Port as many packages as you can in a summer" type projects. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] F*ck Yahoo, AOL get us back our mailing lists

7;Name username at password' Maybe one can replace 'at' with '@' and that's it. Or simply look in the Reply-To field, where the unmolested e-mail address appears. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solari

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] F*ck Yahoo, AOL get us back our mailing lists

On 05/24/14 08:05 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote: I see : from: Alan Coopersmith mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>> reply-to: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org>> to: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org>>

Re: [oi-dev] Resignation

ld show up to use it, and they saw more overhead than benefit and were turned off by it. That's left the OpenSolaris offshoots wary of governance and refusing to admit that some level is necessary for ensuring decisions get made, and thus left them floundering and directionless. -- -A

Re: [oi-dev] OpenSXCE It is illegal to sell without source code.

On 09/18/14 02:35 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: Just to note, part of the code is indeed still published, see: , which has a s12-57 just published yesterday (userland part). The code from the open source consolidations - Userland, JDS, X11, IPS - is

Re: [oi-dev] Miass OpenSolaris User Group

m until we went public in June 2005. And any decision in a project like this would not be "this can never happen", but just "this is not going to happen for now" - you can't restrict future leadership from changing their minds when circumstances change. -- -Alan Coop

Re: [oi-dev] Miass OpenSolaris User Group

unity participants from outside Sun never even came close to matching the amount Sun was assigning to do the work (and which Oracle then kept working on Solaris 11 instead). -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracl

Re: [oi-dev] Stats

ction, Debian sid is testing" - you're not testing what's going to be in production in the future, but something quite different. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___

Re: [oi-dev] Update/addition of XCB components

libxcb depends on the proto files from xcb-proto to generate the built code. xcb-util-* all depend on libxcb headers & link against it's library. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http:

Re: [oi-dev] Update/addition of XCB components

On 01/12/15 02:59 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: Hi Alan, Ken asked me to bump glproto to 1.4.17: do you see any difficulty or is it expected to be straightforward ? I'd expect it to be straightforward - I don't know of any incompatibilities there. -- -Alan C

Re: [oi-dev] Building pkg

meant openindiana.org. opensolaris.org never hosted "oi" 151a repos, even before it was shut down and replaced with redirects to html pages instead of hg repos. http://hg.openindiana.org/sustaining/oi_151a/pkg-gate/ on the other hand looks like a valid hg repo. -- -A

Re: [oi-dev] hack 5800

d the OI fork of the code to see if they kept this up or dropped it. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Personal announcement: update on donations and good News: Can directly continue with DRM/GEM/KMS without interruption due to having to serve pizza

their port (big thanks to Ken for bugging Alan Coopersmith long enough and hard enough, and to Mr. Alan Coopersmith for being once again on our side [after the same took already place with openXsun in summer 2010 ]). Thanks - but while I supported the publication of the DRM/KMS sources, I didn&#

Re: [oi-dev] Thunderbird 38.4.0 integration

On 11/29/15 05:45 AM, Мартин Бохниг wrote: good work, but is it correct that I can only see patches for 24.2 and 31.7.0 which are normaly highly (too much) Studio-specific becaus Oracle only uses Studio for everything now (while Sun at least maintained a status from 2006 to its end)? Not always

Re: [oi-dev] Thunderbird 38.4.0 integration

On 11/29/15 11:52 AM, Мартин Бохниг wrote: gcc was also supported by gate after gate, then almost all gates. Oracle broke with that design for no reason [Before reading the following, please remember the always present disclaimer that I am not an Oracle spokesman and cannot speak for Oracle, s

Re: [oi-dev] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sun/Oracle China's DRM//KMS Sol11.2 port backported to function on old-style gfxp_private from pre-2010 era but still immediatedly PANICS

e - it's like claiming to support all Intel CPU's & ISA extensions without knowing which CPU models. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engi

Re: [oi-dev] OI User documentation

On 12/26/15 01:36 AM, Nikola M wrote: I have just found this as the documentation reference. https://www.illumos.org/projects/documentation/wiki/Existing_OpenSolaris_documentation Which seems to need updates to point to http://illumos.org/books/ instead of the long dead hub.opensolaris.org.

Re: [oi-dev] OI User documentation

On 12/25/15 08:40 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: On the contrary since oi-userland, pkg and slim_source reside on Github, I do not see the point in reinventing the wheel or incur additional maintenance. Also https://github.com/rmustacc/illumos-docbooks since you're not the first to go there.

Re: [oi-dev] OI User documentation

On 12/31/15 02:36 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: On 12/26/2015 12:46 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 12/26/15 01:36 AM, Nikola M wrote: I have just found this as the documentation reference. https://www.illumos.org/projects/documentation/wiki/Existing_OpenSolaris_documentation Which seems to need

Re: [oi-dev] FAQ update

On 01/ 7/16 01:11 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: Hi, If someone wants to give it a shot, this page needs love: http://www.openindiana.org/documentation/faq/ because it is fairly outdated... Most of the OpenSolaris consolidation links pointing to hub.opensolaris.org can be replaced with links to

Re: [oi-dev] Update on XNV and JDS consolidation migrations

On 02/ 7/16 05:09 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: - there are 24 components left for packaging in x-S12, some of them not present in OI, I do not know if some of them are irrelevant: ./accessx This is a motif client for configuring accessibility settings - the GNOME preferences panel does a better

Re: [oi-dev] Update on XNV and JDS consolidation migrations

On 02/ 8/16 11:12 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 09/02/2016 02:13, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 02/ 7/16 05:09 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: - there are 24 components left for packaging in x-S12, some of them not present in OI, I do not know if some of them are irrelevant: and about 70

Re: [oi-dev] pkgdepend can not find existing file

. all the files in the package ...] # Second half of workaround for pkgdepend not handling libGL's magic properly depend type=require fmri=__TBD pkg.debug.depend.file=usr/lib/mesa/libGL.so.1 https://hg.java.net/hg/solaris-userland~gate/file/0416d82f7f55/components/desktop/xscreensav

Re: [oi-dev] issues with dir action in IPS

On 04/19/16 03:15 AM, Nikola M wrote: I would also like to hear more input from someone else regarding no-scripting philosophy in IPS. See the links in the "Background Reading" section on the bottom of https://java.net/projects/ips/pages/Home and the blogs at: https://timsfoster.wordpress.com

Re: [oi-dev] demonstration docs website

On 05/ 1/16 10:48 PM, Nikola M wrote: *You aether accept open documentation license including Contributor agreement to OI or you contribute your time at somewhere else.* Why don't you let the people who run the project decide whether or not to accept contributions before you chase everyone away

Re: [oi-dev] Specifying GCC as a compiler in a Makefile for simple library

On 05/15/16 05:32 PM, Reginald Beardsley via oi-dev wrote: FWIW I have NEVER ever seen a makefile that used a variable named COMPILER. Then you've never looked at any of the Userland makefiles that build with gcc. It's used by the userland shared-macros.mk to set CC, CXX, CFLAGS, etc. to approp

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/16 11:28 PM, Nikola M wrote: On 05/17/16 05:46 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: In regards to the PDL, to whom does one submit a signed contributor agreement? To Openindiana and illumos surely. Neither OI nor illumos have any legal entity to assign copyright to - no foundations or non-pro

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

On 07/19/16 02:57 AM, Nikola M wrote: What will not be tolerated: * Open hostility, and or abusive language. * Repeated complaining (rehashing) of closed (decided) issues. * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a pattern of behavior which could be con

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

On 07/21/16 07:47 PM, Nikola M wrote: Or someone really thinking that fascist autocracy is a good thing to try on OI people. Intentionally not seeing any problems in it induces the question of using a brain at all. So everyone who disagrees with you is a brainless fascist and that's why you'

Re: [oi-dev] Mate 1.14

On 08/ 1/16 01:43 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: BTW, does someone know why policykit wasn't ported? Was it considered needless in presence of proper RBAC? When HAL was integrated into ON, an implementation of the policykit API as a wrapper around RBAC was included, as you can see in: https://git

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

On 08/ 1/16 07:13 AM, WebDawg wrote: Do you really want a group of people assigned to disciplining people, in the dark? How about anonymous complaints, but on an open forum? There should be a POC to complain, but if you want the project to be 'open' should not every thing be open? Not necessa

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

On 08/ 1/16 03:01 PM, WebDawg wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Alan Coopersmith mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>> wrote: On 08/ 1/16 07:13 AM, WebDawg wrote: Do you really want a group of people assigned to disciplining people, in the dark? How about ano

Re: [oi-dev] X packages to deprecate

On 08/27/16 04:40 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: Are we able to simply and effectively deprecate these packages or are there issues to foresee? You can probably guess my opinion based on how many of them I've already obsoleted in https://hg.java.net/hg/solaris-x11~x-s12-clone/ but since others as

Re: [oi-dev] X packages to deprecate

On 8/28/2016 3:17 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: On 28/08/2016 12:15, Volker A. Brandt wrote: Udo Grabowski (IMK) writes: On 27/08/2016 20:30, Alan Coopersmith wrote: pkg:/x11/library/toolkit/libxaw4@0.5.11,5.11-2013.0.0.0 pkg:/x11/library/toolkit/libxaw5@0.5.11,5.11-2013.0.0.0 These

Re: [oi-dev] X packages to deprecate

instead of the EOL CDE. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Re: [oi-dev] sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Exception: CKR_STATE_UNSAVEABLE

On 08/30/16 02:34 PM, Franklin wrote: Hi team, I'm working on https://www.illumos.org/issues/7227 and now i need source code of libpkcs11.so (part of Solaris Cryptographic Framework). I not found in illumos-gate or oi-userland repository. Anyone know about that? Isn't it in https://github.com

Re: [oi-dev] vmware driver for xorg broken? (spaces replace much of what I type)

On 09/ 8/16 08:38 AM, Gordon Ross wrote: Next I guess I'll want instructions for building and debugging that. Any tips for that? If you want the latest from upstream, minus any OI patches & packaging, see: https://www.x.org/releases/individual/driver/xf86-video-vmware-13.1.0.tar.bz2 https://cg

Re: [oi-dev] vmware driver for xorg broken? (spaces replace much of what I type)

On 09/ 8/16 09:47 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: On 09/08/2016 11:38 AM, Gordon Ross wrote: I don't mean to highjack your thread, but am curious how you have managed to load the vmware driver. On a fresh install in VMware player, when I run the modinfo command, I only see the vga driver loaded. 92 f

Re: [oi-dev] Broken components

On 09/ 9/16 02:20 AM, Andrey Sokolov wrote: desktop/openoffice Just FYI: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201609.mbox/%3C008d01d204a9%24bd37caa0%2437a75fe0%24%40apache.org%3E https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/699755/fe3dd84135390d60/ -alan-

Re: [oi-dev] Apache OpenOffice retirement - all contributors fled to LibreOffice after Oracle Sun takeover Fwd: Broken components

On 09/ 9/16 01:24 PM, Lionel Cons wrote: Sigh. What should I say? Was this not the expected outcome? I could argue Oracle has to learn about managing communities, but I'd say no one there would listen. Or not? Oracle turned the whole thing over to Apache years ago, and Apache has been managing

Re: [oi-dev] Apache OpenOffice retirement - all contributors fled to LibreOffice after Oracle Sun takeover Fwd: Broken components

On 09/ 9/16 01:52 PM, Lionel Cons wrote: On 9 September 2016 at 22:45, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/ 9/16 01:24 PM, Lionel Cons wrote: Sigh. What should I say? Was this not the expected outcome? I could argue Oracle has to learn about managing communities, but I'd say no one there

Re: [oi-dev] libEGL library

--disable-egl we've not had a need to add it. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org https://openindian

Re: [oi-dev] libEGL library

On 09/13/16 08:36 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: On 09/13/16 06:31 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 09/13/16 04:55 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hi. Both mesa and nvidia driver can provide libEGL.so.1. Does somone know why libEGL.so.1 library is not managed using ogl-select service? Because

Re: [oi-dev] clang open source packages and nightly binaries

On 10/22/16 07:49 PM, C Bergström wrote: Thoughts -- I'd like to setup an official Solaris 11 or 12 (or someone can get me access) and I'll do my best to see if we can make 1 clang package which works across both and produces binaries that are portable by default. I beli

Re: [oi-dev] Gnome 3

On 11/ 4/16 07:49 PM, Franklin Ronald wrote: Hi team, Gnome 3 has been ported to Solaris (https://java.net/projects/solaris-userland/sources/gate/show/components/gnome). My question is: We can port it to OpenIndiana based on Oracle work? Everything we published to the solaris-userland gate sho

Re: [oi-dev] Problems with packages and drm

On 12/27/16 12:30 PM, ken mays via oi-dev wrote: Migrate your work to libdrm 2.4.74 and we'll scan it for our compliance review. Compliance with what? -alan- ___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/lis

Re: [oi-dev] x11 keyboard layouts

e to do it? :) Sorry - I never learned how multiple keyboard layout groups work in XKB. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ oi-dev m

Re: [oi-dev] x11 keyboard layouts

On 04/27/17 03:29 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: Sorry - I never learned how multiple keyboard layout groups work in XKB. Does this mean that you believe it should be possible to have more than one keyboard layout available at the same time? Yes - but being a simple

Re: [oi-dev] Can I still install older perl and python?

On 05/12/17 07:01 AM, Gordon Ross wrote: Admittedly, this one of the things about IPS that has long bother me. It's very "opinionated". IPS "knows better" than I do what packages should be installed, and in what versions, etc. and if I don't happen to agree (i.e. in this case, please don't just

  1   2   >