Hi Dennis and all,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Do you have the message that came back with the rejected post?
Yes, I do.
It was like the following.
---
fromMail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@googlemail.com
to
Hi Pedro,
On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in the
bug report, but I admit the patch was too big to do a
review on it.
Thanks for comitting. I think - as i wrote - for someone knowing the
core it would have been possible
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself as the
OpenOffice.org project and defining how it will interact with
downstream projects. Is the community going to take ownership of this?
It
TODO: all podling committers that prefer to use their own personal email
address rather than their @apache.org address should update this:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/MailAlias.txt
The README nearby notes, among other useful things:
/MailAlias.txt
Place your
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself as the
OpenOffice.org project and defining how it will
On 10/12/2011 8:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself as the
OpenOffice.org
On 12 October 2011 13:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The
Hi;
--- On Wed, 10/12/11, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in
the bug report, but I admit the patch was too big to do
a review on it.
Thanks for comitting. I
On Oct 12, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report
--- On Tue, 10/11/11, Armin Le Grand wrote:
(Concerning AGG )
+1
Let's let it go for now.
I plan to:
0) Apply the existing SGA on it.
1) disconnect it from the build.
2) Update it.
3) Remove it.
Pedro.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi;
--- On Wed, 10/12/11, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in
the bug report, but I admit
It's great to see this coming together now. Thank you everyone.
Ross
On 12 October 2011 16:48, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:51 AM, Rob Weir
I confess that I am having trouble extracting concrete actionables from Ross's
request. I need to reread the thread from the beginning.
One thing, off-hand. I believe the commitment is to support mutual security
concerns via security@ OO.o or any successor, not via some special arrangement
Welcome Francis.
Very happy to see and your excellent contributions on behalf of the forums.
Thanks!
/don
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
Hello Francis. I noticed with enthusiasm the work that you did in cleaning
up
the proposal page on the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Other areas where we could use some volunteer leadership:
5) wiki master
6) bugzilla master
7) web master
IP master? Coordinating the re-licensing process, looking at external
packages linked to, and being the go-to for
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I confess that I am having trouble extracting concrete actionables from
Ross's request. I need to reread the thread from the beginning.
One thing, off-hand. I believe the commitment is to support mutual
Rob,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I think that we as the AOOo PPMC will need to find one or more PPMC
members to fulfill certain external roles.
I am emphasizing EXTERNALLY facing roles.
As of the end of day, 2011-10-11, there are 76 committers, with 54 on the
PPMC.
Since the previous, 2011-09-13 report, that is an increase of 4 committers,
and one leaving the PPMC.
The number of outstanding iCLAs from eligible Initial Committers remains at
11.
- Dennis
WHO'S ON BOARD
1
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Rob,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I think that we as the AOOo PPMC will need to find one or more PPMC
members to
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Rob,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I think that we as the AOOo PPMC
I have posted the PPMC Status ... and updated the October 2011 PMC Report.
In the report there is the following accomplishment:
New membership awareness, discussion on how to make members aware of their
candidacy for IPMC.
I don't recall any discussion about the IPMC. Is PPMC intended?
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I have posted the PPMC Status ... and updated the October 2011 PMC Report.
In the report there is the following accomplishment:
New membership awareness, discussion on how to make members aware of their
What's the best place to (quickly) learn just who was who and what
groups did what in the previous OOo life at Oracle?
I see things like Community council and Engineering steering council and
lots of projects, but it's not clear yet how they were supposed to be
related or helped to manage
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Rob,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM,
With regard to monthly reporting for another quarter, I believe it is a
structural device for keeping our eye on the ball. Structural devices are very
handy, like checklists, especially when developers are operating heads-down and
not watching the road ahead. (It is very difficult to be
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
With regard to monthly reporting for another quarter, I believe it is a
structural device for keeping our eye on the ball. Structural devices are
very handy, like checklists, especially when developers are
Just to be clear. I did not touch the report. I am sticking to my promise
about that (except for those stats I am the curator for).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:41
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Alexandro deserves credit for stepping up and starting this report.
I've added Dennis's language:
Discussion of criteria for bringing on new committers and PPMC members, and
whether or not there should be a separate criteria for each role, as well as
how these decisions should be communicated
On 12 October 2011 17:39, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I confess that I am having trouble extracting concrete actionables from
Ross's request. I need to reread the thread from the beginning.
Don't worry too much, time is short. I wanted to use this opportunity
to raise
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Rob,
On Oct
On 12 October 2011 18:44, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
We need someone explicitly building the relationships, becoming someone
that the press will know to ask when they want clarification before they
publish something negative or just plain wrong.
I will volunteer to
On 12 October 2011 20:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
We need someone explicitly building the relationships, becoming someone
that
Well, you can take a look at http://projects.openoffice.org/ ...and see the
structure of work division by project and the names of people who were
associated with those projects in the past.
There was an Engineering Steering Committee (ESC) where the Sun developer
staff met with volunteers, but
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I would hope that Don's first
activity will be to define a consistent message from AOOo. Once
defined any project member should, in theory, be able to contribute to
ensure the message gets out.
How about starting
On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 12 October 2011 20:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
We need someone
On 10/11/2011 03:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Shane, just to clarify a bit. As far as I know, the PPMC does not
have the keys, as it were, to the live OpenOffice.org site.
Apparently someone does, and some touch ups are made, but it is all
Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon?
type=application/atom+xml /
link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon
href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico /
link rel=icon type=image/x-icon
href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico /
rather than an OOo (or if
OK, so there was the Community Council and the ESC, as well as the
leads and participants on an array of Projects that worked on specific
areas of OOo code, websites, outreach, conferences, everything.
Since all these organizations effectively were tied to Sun/Oracle, has
Oracle officially
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Mailing+lists
Obviously any mailing lists hosted at Apache will use the normal
mail-archive.a.o
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Mailing+lists
This was
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
OK, so there was the Community Council and the ESC, as well as the leads
and participants on an array of Projects that worked on specific areas of
OOo code, websites, outreach, conferences, everything.
Since all these
On 10/12/2011 8:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
...snip...
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
I'm just trying to understand what some of the other previous expectations
around OOo governance and the brand were, so we can better explain what the
new governance
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
...snip...
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
I'm just trying to understand what some of the other previous
expectations
around OOo
On 10/12/2011 8:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
...snip...
That's fine, but just understand that you are touching on topics that
will be painful to some and could lead this list down paths I don't
think we want to go right now. I really think we want to avoid a
discussion of legacy OOo governance.
-Rob
Shane,
If you register on the openoffice.org site (recommended), and are logged in,
you will find something amazing at
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists.
Those are not all of the lists. There are, in addition, 15 pages of Projects
(146 total),
http://openoffice.org/projects. (Be
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Shane,
If you register on the openoffice.org site (recommended), and are logged in,
you will find something amazing at
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists.
Those are not all of the lists. There are, in
hi,
you can see it at http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193,
P.R.China
Dennis,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Shane,
If you register on the openoffice.org site (recommended), and are logged in,
you will find something amazing at
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists.
Those are not all of the lists. There are, in addition, 15
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:06 PM, F C. Costero fjcc.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
*C.* Forum admins must sign the ICLA. They will interact with the
Apache Infra group and should be official project members. At least
one Moderator, who will sign the ICLA, or Admin on every NL forum will
commit to
50 matches
Mail list logo
