On 15 October 2011 22:27, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/14/2011 01:32 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
The real point to this discussion is that the AOOo podling PPC needs
a clear Marketing Team.
hmmm...an obvious choice for a lead might be one of the former marketing
folks like
On 15.10.2011 19:49, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Fri, 10/14/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
I want to make sure we're not duplicating effort here.
I've been working with Pedro to take the legacy OOo SVN
repository
Hi Simon,
2011/10/15 Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
I just passed on your words here to the conference attendees in the closing
address and the audience responded with spontaneous applause.
Great news!
I've read this release on the Web :
--- On Sun, 10/16/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
The sync has died. Stuck on this error:
:(
The next revision has a huge memo, over 1MB long:
svn log -r 49548 http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/
I wonder if that is the problem.
I can't fix this on my end, at
Hi Dennis,
This is an interesting approach. In the Wikis we have accumulated many of the
properties for the multitude of sub-domains for OOo. I like that this approach
is open-ended and properties can be added to the parts as these make sense.
The approach taken so far fits this idea. I think
Jürgen,
On Oct 15, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 00:04:59 +0200:
I don't wanted to be arrogant or presumptuous but i really don't care here
about other projects.
Infra won't install your stuff without considering the effect on the 100
I like your breakdown. I don't think that each of us is looking at the same
thing, and my use of property has apparently confused matters.
But I like your breakdown. I would like some practice on a wiki organization
before automating though. I'd prefer something that grounds our
+1
It is important to understand the responsibility of the AOOo project to support
its infrastructural needs beyond the basics that are available to all projects.
And even then, the project has curation and administration responsibility for
aspects of the SVN (e.g., how it is used to deploy
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Just to check ... The Croatian dictionary has been re-submitted
under an Apache License 2 (bug 96705), however the zip file
submitted still contains the LGPL in the makefile.
We should try to get the author to
Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 15:33:36 -0400:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Sun, 10/16/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
The sync has died. Stuck on this error:
:(
The next revision has a huge memo, over 1MB
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200:
svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS 1
ed 1
svnrdump load $TARGET_REPOS 1
svn pl --revprop -r0 $TARGET_REPOS
[ edit the svn:sync-* revprops ]
I like this idiom :-)
svnrdump is available in Subversion 1.7 and newer.
I think we discussed this before but it would be excellent
if Robert can further clarify it once and for all.
I think that since the code is being clearly contributed
to us through bugzilla we can apply section 5 Submission
of Contributions. of the AL2. Of course we still have
to make sure the
Hi Armin,
Armin Le Grand schrieb:
Hi *,
I took some days to fix that long missing OLE-Attribute feature/bug. It
is on one hand a missing feature (no reason to not apply attributes and
transformations to OLE which contains the same as graphical object, a
MetaFile) and on the other a
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
Thanks!
-Rob
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
So far moderating ooo-users hasn't been burdensome, so I'd be happy to
volunteer to moderate this one too. As for timezone, I am mostly in the UK or
elsewhere in europe.
S.
Just a meta-observation. Generally it is better to define things
that need to be done rather than the roles that will be responsible. The
problem with defining specific roles that individuals fill is that those
people are then seen to be responsible and others do not step up to help
write as
While attention is on the topic of rendering control for OLE objects,
I have questions:
How does this modification show up in the ODF XML surrounding the
OLE object (element draw:ole-object)?
In addition Also, one problem that has been a source of complaint is
failure to preserve cropping of
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
So far moderating ooo-users hasn't been burdensome, so I'd be happy to
volunteer to moderate this
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
Just a meta-observation. Generally it is better to define things
that need to be done rather than the roles that will be responsible. The
problem with defining specific roles that individuals fill is that those
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as
well.
So far moderating
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as
well.
So far moderating
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Paul paul.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators,
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
While attention is on the topic of rendering control for OLE objects,
I have questions:
How does this modification show up in the ODF XML surrounding the
OLE object (elementdraw:ole-object)?
In addition Also, one problem that has been a source of
Paul,
Are you no longer able to moderate users@ OO.o ? Has something changed?
Also, do you know if the moderators @ OO.o is operating and who is *that*
moderator?
It would be good to have a broader conversation on what is happening with lists
at OO.o.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
Original Message
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:07:29 -0400
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
Thanks!
-Rob
I will put my hand up for this. Currently located in
On 10/15/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
While discussing this month's PPMC Board Report we discussed making
volunteers from the PPMC responsible for certain roles. We quickly proceeded
with a Press Liaison due to the immediate need. Before settling on a larger
set of roles let's
I'm making a proposal now to shut down the legacy OOo mailing lists
and direct the existing subscribers to one of the AOOo mailing lists.
I realize that this is not the solution that many of us would prefer,
but I believe that it is the best way forward that anyone is willing
to volunteer to lead.
On 16 Oct 2011, at 23:08, Graham Lauder wrote:
Looks like we have globe covered, I'm in Dave's timezone so excess ,to
requirements ATM but will happily jump in if needed.
I think two per TZ (actually timezone block) is a good goal, it means we
don't all have to be available all the time.
S.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200:
svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS 1
ed 1
svnrdump load $TARGET_REPOS 1
svn pl --revprop -r0 $TARGET_REPOS
[ edit the svn:sync-* revprops ]
I like
Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 18:34:33 -0400:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200:
svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS 1
ed 1
svnrdump load $TARGET_REPOS 1
svn pl --revprop
On 10/13/2011 9:26 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
This is a specific issue that is important to understand:
On 10/16/2011 5:25 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 16 October 2011 21:42, Alexandro Coloradoj...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Just a meta-observation. Generally it is
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Paul,
Are you no longer able to moderate users@ OO.o ? Has something changed?
I received a bunch of emails over the weekend advising that I've been
removed as owner of most of the OOo lists... I assumed
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
Subject: Legacy OOo SVN
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:32:44 -0400
I want to make sure we're not duplicating effort here. I've been
working with Pedro to take the legacy OOo SVN repository (pre Hg) and
get it onto Apache-Extras. I'm doing this via svnsync, a slow
Hi
just FYI, my Linux (Ubuntu 10.04/i386) build was successful.
cf. http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/e/5ea36fa8cd22d8f559b0ffb041c43a9e
thanks!
Hello;
I think this is very important. unfortunately I do not
think we can use Apache servers/mirrors for this until
we have gone through the IP clearance process.
BTW, Perhaps we could consider putting up torrents?
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Sun, 10/16/11, Maho NAKATA m...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Hello;
As you might have noticed I have been updating some headers
and libraries we use internally. I think it is just logical
to want to start working with modern APIs.
In the case of TWAIN, this is something that has evolved
quite a bit, the new versions add support for UNIX/linux
and Win64.
Shane,
I am guessing that earning from advertising is meant to be having revenue by
permitting ad placements on OpenOffice.org web properties.
I would be happy to learn that this is not intended.
It occurs to me that some thinking about the marketing posture needs to be
considered before
Let's not jiggle anything just yet. The options have not been explored and it
may be better to have some preparatory assistance of current-list moderators
and administrators. There are a ton of mailing lists under the live OO.o
site.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk
Thanks Paul, that is very helpful.
There's no information here about a change in OO.o list ownerships and who did
it. It may have been to provide one of the Oracle members on the Apache OOo
project a means to prepare for movement. I don't believe any precipitate
action is forthcoming.
In
Regina,
That looks good. Is the draw:ole-object the only child of the draw:frame?
I'm asking because I wonder what is needed in the ODF specification with
regard to draw:frame attributes when there are alternative images among the
draw:frame children. E.g., if there were a draw:ole-object
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Good-Day site is gone...
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
I think this is very important. unfortunately I do not
think we can use Apache servers/mirrors for this until
we have gone through the IP clearance process.
Arrgh.
BTW,
42 matches
Mail list logo
