I can support up to 10. Please send me your Twitter account name.
Also follow the account here: https://twitter.com/#!/apacheoo
I'll give you access to the account and send you instructions for how
to use it. (Group accounts work a little differently than normal
Twitter accounts).
Ideally we'd
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 201
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On 4/18/12, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:15 -0500,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 07:22:55 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> Have you ever thought of getting others involved in maintaining the
> software? For example, it could be an Apache project, to maintain
> and further develop the software?
Of course: even before I started, I made the decision that this be
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:12:09 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Personally Peter I would *love* to see the
> ASF adopt mirrorbrain somehow, and encourage
> you to work with Henk on something along those
> lines. We know it's good, we just have a lot
> of legacy infra that we need to keep supporting.
The extension installed and worked without any issue in my AOO3.4 build. I
am using the following JVM.
java version "1.6.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build
pwa6460sr9ifix-20110211_02(SR9+IZ94423))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows 7 amd64-64
jvmwa6460sr9-20101
124_69295 (JI
Jin Hua have no problem in his machine with IBM JRE recognized.
I will try to install a new version to check if it works.
- Simon
2012/4/19 Dennis E. Hamilton
> In a different context, there was found to be code that verifies a vendor
> string in determining detection of the Java installation.
I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
several requests :-(
I think that it has slipped your attention that I've made lot of tests
with the old vcl testtool.
Groetjes,
Olaf
In a different context, there was found to be code that verifies a vendor
string in determining detection of the Java installation. It was necessary to
adjust code to accept Oracle corporation as well as Sun Microsystems, a change
that occurs in Java 7 distributions.
Simon is using an IBM-pr
Hi,
I would like to inform you about the current status for our RC.
Andrew has updated the NOTICE file and we will rebuild the office now. I
have also updated the version number string for the src package.
Building, signing and update will take some time. And once the bits are
available I wil
Hi Simon,
on my machine it looks like this:
after opening Tools->Options->OpenOffice.org->Java it takes a short time
to populate the list of available JREs. From these I can select the one
to use, no need to enter a path manually.
The paths of some available JREs (all are 32 bit) are
c:\
On 4/18/12, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:15 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>> >> My point is that we are going to be
On 4/18/12 10:16 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
when providing an OOo snapshot as a release candidate binaries were
signed. Will this be the case with the first RC provided for AOO ?
Kind regards, Joost
when you mean if we can sign the windows binary with an official Apache
certificate to avoi
Peter Poeml:
> anyone, including ASF infra, is free to use MirrorBrain. My
> recommendation is that ASF infra upgrades from closer.cgi to MirrorBrain,
> because then they can integrate the existing OOo/AOo mirrors into Apache
> mirroring easily.
I would also like that we take advantage of MirrorBr
On 04/18/2012 03:51 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir:
we want to be
testing much earlier in the project cycle. That is why Lily sent
several notes to the list, months ago, asking for help testing AOO dev
snapshots. I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
several requests :-(
Rob Weir:
> we want to be
> testing much earlier in the project cycle. That is why Lily sent
> several notes to the list, months ago, asking for help testing AOO dev
> snapshots. I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
> several requests :-(
Around 20 volunteers from the Italian comm
Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Michael, I am cu
Hi,
Am 13.04.2012 um 01:59 schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Pöml wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>> We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
>>> infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the up
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> wrote:
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availabilit
Hi,
when providing an OOo snapshot as a release candidate binaries were
signed. Will this be the case with the first RC provided for AOO ?
Kind regards, Joost
Hi Mark,
thank you for bringing up some details about sf.net's infrastructure. It
is indeed very interesting. On the other hand I'm still a friend of
including the reliable bandwidth provided by the OOo mirrors as they
still provide additional entry points for downloaders worldwide.
MirrorBra
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 18:53 +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
> >>> > On T
Am 18.04.2012 19:38, schrieb Christoph Jopp:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> wrote:
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
>>
Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>> wrote:
>>> Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
>> an AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
>>>
>>> 1. What does it s
Hi Joost,
> the download numbers are impressive and they reflect mostly the activity we
> had between releases. Directly after a release the numbers will have peak
> values. I'm not sure if sf.net's load balancers will be able to handle this
> kind of load alone. MirrorBrain was quite stable and t
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
> > Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
> an AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
> >
> > 1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:15 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>> >> My point is that
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of an
> AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
>
> 1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a "Release
> Candidate"?
>
> 2. What use would you make of
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of an AOO
3.4 Release Candidate.
1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a "Release
Candidate"?
2. What use would you make of such a designated build different from a
developer snapshot and an actu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have been testing AOO downloads for about 10 days, below our findings:
>
> - downloads per day ( http://goo.gl/jKbnC )
> - info about geographies (
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map )
>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:15 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>> >> My point is that we are going to be bombarded with support questions,
>> >>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:24 AM, drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:34 -0400, drew wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:43 +0200, Rob Weir wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:51 PM, drew wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 00:50 -0400, drew wrote:
>> > >> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 18:25 -0400, Ro
Hi all,
I get crashes on the multi-language version r1303653, which makes the
version not usable for me. But I need German and English UI. Is it
possible to use the language pack r1303653 with the program version
r1325589?
Kind regards
Regina
On 4/18/12 2:45 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Hi all,
we have been testing AOO downloads for about 10 days, below our findings:
- downloads per day ( http://goo.gl/jKbnC )
- info about geographies (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map )
- operating systems (
http
Hi Eric and all,
Sorry but I couldn't join the meeting.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Eric Otchet wrote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Conference+Call+Meeting+Minutes
Thanks for the minutes.
On the list I would like to further discuss on:
- Why should I upgrade to AO
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On 4/17/12, drew wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:15 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >> My point is that we are going to be bombarded with support questions,
> >> regardless if we choose not to, is not up to us.
> >>
> >> Sure yo
Hi Roberto,
the download numbers are impressive and they reflect mostly the activity
we had between releases. Directly after a release the numbers will have
peak values. I'm not sure if sf.net's load balancers will be able to
handle this kind of load alone. MirrorBrain was quite stable and the
Sorry, that I clicked "Send" in mistake before I finish. So let me rewrite:
I installed the latest build successfully, and want to try the IBM
Connection extension. Since it is Java based, I need to config the JRE
firstly.
In the Options dialog, Use a JRE check box was already on, but there is no
I installed the latest build successfully, and want to try the IBM
Connection extension. Since it is Java based, I need to config the JRE
firstly.
In the Options dialog, Use a JRE check box was already on, but there is no
JRE listed available. Then I clicked Add button to browse to my JRE
Hi all,
we have been testing AOO downloads for about 10 days, below our findings:
- downloads per day ( http://goo.gl/jKbnC )
- info about geographies (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map )
- operating systems (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirro
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Is there any reason why the developer snapshots, r1325589, the same files as
> currently linked as RC1 candidates, can't simply be used under the condition
> that they are not yet releases but are essentially feature-frozen and stable
41 matches
Mail list logo
