Open 2 bugs track below 2 issues
120109 Failed save (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password
120110 Can't open (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password even password is
correct.
> From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove pa
Hi all,
I found there is one ooobasis3.4-testtool_3.4.0-1_i386.deb in
distribution package. It's the old vcl testtool. For users, it's
totally useless and doesn't work. I suggest to remove it.
--
Best Regards
>From aliu...@gmail.com
Now there are 2 issues here
1. Failed save (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password.
2. Can't open (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password even password is correct.
After those 2 issues get fixed then we can back to verify remove
(.ods/.odt/.odp) file password.
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:28 +0800
>
I verfity the bug 119366 on build version 1354384 on Win7 OS
I save .ods .odt .odp without password successfully ,but save .ods .odt
.odp with password ,the error message pop up
I verify this bug on build version r1351960 on Win7 OS
I save .ods .odt .odp without password or password ,which i
The 5th batch for memory leak issue. Please help to review them. Thanks!
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120098 fixed
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120105
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120106
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
The VCLAuto code had copy from symphony to the trunk and re-factory as
design[1].
Also the license for these files had updated to ASF 2.0.
Thanks Liu Zhe's great work, everyone can enjoy the new automation GUI test
framework now !
[1] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
2012/6/
I can saved .ods file without password successfully, also can save .xls
successfully.
Only when i saved our format (like .ods) file with password, this error pop up.
Also failed to open our format file with password.
So it should not be related with build without moz package.
> Date: Thu,
And I my local, (WinXP env), seems such issues can not be reproduced.
2012/6/28 Fan Zheng
> The error message "General Error: Generral input/output error" looks so
> farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside, such
> dialog will show up.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/6/28 YangTerry
The error message "General Error: Generral input/output error" looks so
farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside, such
dialog will show up.
2012/6/28 YangTerry
>
> Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
> If we saved with our format(.ods)
> Failed to saved with passwo
Hi,
Since we have weekly AOO branch build and daily trunk build, I want to do
build verification test to make sure the main functions are OK. After this
test we can do further general function test.
I noticed there is smoketest in the AOO which can do some verification
test. But it is based on
Not the updated patch is already uploaded into bugzilla. For you review.
thanks.
2012/6/28 Fan Zheng
> Hi, See my answer below in blue
>
> 2012/6/27 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 14.06.2012 13:58, chengjh wrote:
Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
If we saved with our format(.ods)
Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is "General Error:
Generral input/output error", also failed open the password protect .ods file,
it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct password. Re
Add a new patch per Rob's information to replace the old one, please review.
Just changed the Attributes for font files in the component table
to msidbComponentAttributesSharedDllRefCount, the font will be deinstallled
when the ref count of the files down to 0, so other apps can use those
fonts as
Hi Kevin;
--- Mer 27/6/12, Kevin Grignon ha scritto:
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry for top post.
>
> Where are we at? Have we summarized the discussion? Have all
> expressed their views?
>
> How might we crystallized our position and move forward?
>
There is indeed a big problem. I think we all ag
Hey Vasavi,
Thanks for your offer of support.
There are many high value project documentation tasks which could use your
support.
For example, AOO user experience is looking to document the key usage
scenarios.
A collection of key usage scenarios are key inputs to downstream activities
includin
Hello All,
Sorry for top post.
Where are we at? Have we summarized the discussion? Have all expressed
their views?
How might we crystallized our position and move forward?
Regards,
Kevin
On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
> Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it
Hi, See my answer below in blue
2012/6/27 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> Hi,
>
>
> On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14.06.2012 13:58, chengjh wrote:
>>
>>> This is the I implementation of the proposal described in thread
>>> "Propose
>>> to Implement the Loading of
+1
Crash issue should be treat as release blocker. And it's not regression
issue, it's also can be reproduced against OO3.3
2012/6/27 Jürgen Schmidt
> On 6/27/12 3:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> >> Also requesting that the fix f
+1
With the the auto mail roll out, everyone will be able to commentate on the
bug. and we wont miss any defect which requested as release blocker.
2012/6/27 Herbert Duerr
> With the new round of hand-written request-for-blocker-flag mails I'd like
> to reintroduce the automatism I had suggested
Now I've got Bobby Weir singing "One More Saturday Night" in my head.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>
>> It's really disappointing to see uninformed people give
>> opinions about things they evidently
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> It's really disappointing to see uninformed people give
> opinions about things they evidently don't understand.
I can't resist :-)
http://xkcd.com/386/
- Sam Ruby
--- Mer 27/6/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
...
> Top posting as a comment on the
> entire post, and what it is and what it isn't.
>
> In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2],
> a LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some
> erroneous statements regarding Apache OpenOffi
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it is and what it
> isn't.
>
> In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2], a
> LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some erroneous
> statements regarding Apache Op
Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it is and what it isn't.
In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2], a
LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some erroneous
statements regarding Apache OpenOffice and Symphony:
"[W]e are looking forward the interest
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
>>
>> This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
>> this project moved to Apache in June 2011. The only thing
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
>
> This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
> this project moved to Apache in June 2011. The only thing I removed
> was "Re:", since that would have dominated the cl
2012/6/27 Rob Weir :
>
> What time period are these counts for? All time?
All time. Those numbers are a sort of "snapshot" of today situation.
>> Some quick observations:
>>
>> - The most used forums are Writer, then Setup and Troubleshooting,
>> then Calc, then a big gap, then the rest
>> - T
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
this project moved to Apache in June 2011. The only thing I removed
was "Re:", since that would have dominated the cloud and is machine,
not user written
In this particular cl
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, RGB ES wrote:
> A really quick "study" based on number of post on the EN forums that
> shows, IMO, some interesting information.
>
> Fist the numbers, then some "analysis" on those numbers. Note, long
> post below...
>
>
>
>
A really quick "study" based on number of post on the EN forums that
shows, IMO, some interesting information.
Fist the numbers, then some "analysis" on those numbers. Note, long
post below...
Number of Topics: T
Number of Posts: P
Ratio Posts/Topics: R
hi,
I am Vasavi and I completed my Masters in Computer application and
currently doing Masters in Networking and System administration , I am very
much intrested in opensource technologies and currently I want to work on "
help wanted " for any documentation as I know its importance as a sytem
adm
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 15:20 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM, drew jensen
> > wrote:
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use
> >> as swag, part of individual support
Hi Ariel,
> and the bug should be fixed with revision 1354260. Verify by opening the
ok, this is fixed now, thanks.
> I cannot reproduce the missing resource here, nor can find something
> wrong in the source code. Try setting a conditional break point in
> dp_misc::getResourceString for id==30
On 27 June 2012 14:50, Donald Harbison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
> wrote:
>
>> Don,
>>
>> I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
>>
>> Question: is the conference focused on opensource methods and process, or
>> on the actual products, or both?
>>
KG01 - See comments inline
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Donald Harbison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
> wrote:
>
> > Don,
> >
> > I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
> >
> > Question: is the conference focused on opensource methods and process,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 7:05 PM, drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 18:08 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> Maybe beveled edges or something would make it look more "button-like"
>> so it was clearer that the user is supposed to click it?
>
> Maybe - here it is with text a little smaller and a beve
On 6/27/12 3:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> Also requesting that the fix for issue
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
>> gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
>>
>
> The fix is only a one-liner. Seems to be of low-risk, b
Hi Andre,
> Fixed.
still buggy: scp2\source\ooo\makefile.mk uses SYSTEM_APR_UTIL while
setsoenv.in uses SYSTEM_APRUTIL.
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
/*
* OS/2 open source software
* http://web.os2power.com/yuri
* http://www.netlabs.org
*/
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:47:00 -0400
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I took all the tweets from June that mentioned 'OpenOffice' and then
>> removed the word 'OpenOffice' as well as the string 'RT/. (If they
>> were left in they would dominate over t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
wrote:
> Don,
>
> I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
>
> Question: is the conference focused on opensource methods and process, or
> on the actual products, or both?
>
To be honest, it is our to make it be what we envision. Th
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Also requesting that the fix for issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
The fix is only a one-liner. Seems to be of low-risk, but I do not know its
side-effects. Are there more information alrea
Hello,
Unable to report a spam comment
See : http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/PhotoAlbum
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 13:58, chengjh wrote:
This is the I implementation of the proposal described in thread "Propose
to Implement the Loading of TOC and Improve TOC Fidelity with MS Word
Binary Document"..review comments expected...
On Thu,
With the new round of hand-written request-for-blocker-flag mails I'd
like to reintroduce the automatism I had suggested a while ago [1]:
When someone requests a release blocker flag in bugzilla then an
automatic mail to either this or to the ooo-issues list should be generated.
A couple of m
Also requesting that the fix for issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
Herbert
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
>
> As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there
> for which we can activate the update service.
>
> Thus, I am proposing to activate
Hi all,
I have a fix to for bug 120039, please review the patch attached to:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120039
Regards - Zuojun
Merge done.
On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details). The fix
reduces the used disk space by 50%. It does so by removing unused
temporary files.
The probability o
On 27/giu/2012, at 11:30, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
>
> As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there
> for which we can activate the update service.
>
> Thus, I am proposing to activat
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 11:58, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26.06.2012 10:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 6/26/12 10:24 AM, YangTerry wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to make this issue a release blocker
>>
>> I tend to agree, do we have a volunteer who want to work on this?
>>
>
> It looks like that t
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 10:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/26/12 10:24 AM, YangTerry wrote:
>>
>> +1 to make this issue a release blocker
>
> I tend to agree, do we have a volunteer who want to work on this?
>
It looks like that the crash only occurs on Linux.
Ariel has provided a patch and tested i
I support this suggestion too. This memory leak is in fundamental vcl
module and frequently happens when drawing text strings, it's severity
is far enough for 3.4.1.
zhangjf
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> In my opinion only controversial issues should to be discussed on
Hi,
I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there for
which we can activate the update service.
Thus, I am proposing to activate the update service for installed OOo 3.2 and
OOo 3.2.1 instances for whi
Fixed.
On 27.06.2012 08:51, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 26.06.2012 22:56, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi Andre,
There may be minor problems with the OS/2 port. I don't have that
I did a preliminary test on my existing tree. I regenerated configure
script and I ran it again adding the new switches.
But
On 6/27/12 3:23 AM, Lin Yuan wrote:
> Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is locked and can
> not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows Server 2008, AOO
> will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really support one user
> to launch multiple instances on m
On 6/27/12 10:44 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
rev
Thanks to the reminder from Juergen and Petter.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Peter Junge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Allison will not get this reply, the message was moderated as the header
> "Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" indicates.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 6/27/2012 4:27 PM, che
Hi,
Allison will not get this reply, the message was moderated as the header
"Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" indicates.
Peter
On 6/27/2012 4:27 PM, chengjh wrote:
Hi Allison,
I have to say sorry for that..Could you please provide more details of your
problems to
On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
reviewed I thought following three defects are not really blocker
Allison is not subscribed to this list so I forward the message.
Allison,
it would be really helpful if you can give us some more details. The
crash report feature should be disabled at the moment.
Which platform are you using?
Do you have a test document that you can share with us to reproduc
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 09:17, Herbert Duerr wrote:
In my opinion only controversial issues should to be discussed on this mailing
list to increase the signal to noise ratio. Not everyone agrees with this
pragmatic approach so here is my request:
The fix for issue 119997 should be merged into AOO 3.4
Hi Allison,
I have to say sorry for that..Could you please provide more details of your
problems to us? Thus, we can solve them in time and make AOO better to
satisfy you in next release,and also benefit other end users.Thanks in
advance.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Allison Barnes wrote:
Thanks a lot!
2012/6/26 Herbert Duerr
> On 26.06.2012 12:05, shzh zhao wrote:
>
>> 2012/6/18 shzh zhao
>> [...]
>>
>> LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__JAWT_GetAWT@8 referenced in
>>>
>>
> This could be this problem discussed in this Java forum:
> https://forums.oracle.com/**forums/th
Hi Lily,
On 27.06.2012 09:13, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 4:05 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new position to
face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on AOO. But I will surely
keep one eye on this project and continuous contr
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 26.06.2012 08:57, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
>> Hi lou ql
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:30:12PM +0800, lou ql wrote:
>>
>>>Today I tested RPM build r1351960:
>>>Apache_OpenOffi
OpenOffice has always been easy to use and very reliable. However this Open
Office Apache is a piece of crap. I’ve only used word, and it’s shut down on me
numerous times. And whenever I’ve clicked to see/send an error report...it just
reopens my document. I’m tired of dealing with this crap, an
Hi,
just some nit picking...
Am 27.06.2012 03:23, schrieb Lin Yuan:
Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is locked and can
not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows Server 2008, AOO
will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really support one user
to la
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 16:07, Lin Yuan wrote:
In cws vmiklos01, the field export for rtf filter and ms word filter is
integrated into AttributeOutputBase::TextField() in
sw\source\filter\ww8\ww8atr.cxx . However, the processing for user field
and db field is different for rtf and ms word filter. And
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1].
Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three
defects are not really blocker issue.
Bug 119272 https://issues.apache
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 08:57, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi lou ql
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:30:12PM +0800, lou ql wrote:
Today I tested RPM build r1351960:
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
There are no desktop-integration rpm packages...
In my opinion only controversial issues should to be discussed on this
mailing list to increase the signal to noise ratio. Not everyone agrees
with this pragmatic approach so here is my request:
The fix for issue 119997 should be merged into AOO 3.4.1
Herbert
On 6/27/12 4:05 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new position to
> face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on AOO. But I will surely
> keep one eye on this project and continuous contribute my effort on it.
>
> For weekly QA repo
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 08:44, Jianyuan Li wrote:
Hi, all,
In ../sc/inc/tabprotection.hxx, a macro is defined as below:
#define ENABLE_SHEET_PROTECTION 0
So all blocks controlled by it will not be executed:
1. Import/export Sheet/Doc protection password for a protected xls file.
2. Import a protecte
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
> I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1].
> Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three
> defects are not really blocker issue.
>
> Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
I
Simon,
I agree too add the new platform to the list. As the test I did before
against Win 8 dev preview release, I don't see any risk to support Windows
8.
2012/6/26 Shenfeng Liu
> Yan Ji,
> Sorry for the late response. While I saw some people are working on the
> Windows 8 support. If we wa
75 matches
Mail list logo
