Re: fetch_tarball.sh on FreeBSD

--- Mer 11/4/12, Maho NAKATA ha scritto: > Hi Pedro, > > Do you know some fix for following error message? > > /work/a/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/fetch_tarballs.sh: > line 54: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or > `until' loop > > It looks even though the error

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

Hi Drew; Not sure if I am the right person to answer this but I will try. --- Mar 10/4/12, drew ha scritto: ... > Hi Pedro, > > Thanks. > > OK, one more maybe stupid question. > > Is it correct that the API described for the report designer > extension at: > http://www.openoffice.org/api/doc

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/07/12 01:43, drew wrote: ... Ok For the MySQL connector and pdf filter however, use of a separate repository, a project at SF or GC, is not required or less so, is that correct? It is not required but I would recommend it, depending on what the maintainer wants to do. Ideally it would b

Re: Who can help modify the licese page?

On 04/06/12 09:17, Rob Weir wrote: Is there a reason why the page should mix together copyright statements on the website as well as license statements on the releases? Especially since this link appears on every page, it is confusing. Yes, we are still distributing the legacy code. That is n

Re: Who can help modify the licese page?

Hi Lily; --- Gio 5/4/12, xia zhao ha scritto: ... > Data: Giovedì 5 Aprile 2012, 22:03 > Hi all, > > On the lincese page, http://www.openoffice.org/license.html. It still > saying "developers could use the Creative Commons > Attribution License > ("Attribution-NoDerivs > 2.5"

Re: How to report a build breaker in BZ?

On 04/05/12 14:20, Herbert Duerr wrote: Hi Pedro, [...] You are warned that it's really ugly. The bug is in VCL or in STLport but we workaround it in Graphite: http://s.apache.org/HPl Have you tried if it works when you build with this patch? Hmm.. I think so but I don't use graphite fonts

Re: How to report a build breaker in BZ?

Hi Herbert; --- Gio 5/4/12, Herbert Duerr ha scritto: > > This looks like the compiler provided STL not STLport. > We are using STLport: the build just doesn't work disabling STLport. > Mixing these two template libraries is not a good idea, e.g. > when using the system silgraphite with syst

How to report a build breaker in BZ?

Hi; There is a build breaker on FreeBSD when building vcl with silgraphite. It's something related to STLport ... ___ ... [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvcl.so [ build CXX ] vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53, from /work/tinderbox-lig

Re: LGPL vs Apache 2.0 FAQ?

Ciao Gianluca; On 04/05/12 03:47, Gianluca Turconi wrote: Hello *, is there a page like "LGPL vs Apache 2.0" FAQ for Apache OpenOffice, in order to show explicitly to users and distributors what differences there are btw those licenses? Something like "Before you could do that, now you can

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/05/12 00:59, drew wrote: ... No not really. The problem are the dependent libs as already pointed out. There is no or no easy replacement for this external stuff that is license compatible. Not nice and we would love to have alternatives ... If volunteers will provide an alternative impl

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/05/12 00:15, Juergen Schmidt wrote: On Thursday, 5. April 2012 at 02:52, Pedro Giffuni wrote: FWIW, --- Mer 4/4/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto: ... In the discussion of CloudStack on general@i.a.o where there is significant GPL changes that need to occur, the Apache APR was suggested as

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

FWIW, --- Mer 4/4/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto: ... > > In the discussion of CloudStack on general@i.a.o where > there is significant GPL changes that need to occur, the > Apache APR was suggested as an alternative with a pointer to > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/README > >      

DicOOo Wizard ?? (+en_GB dictionary) (was Re: [RELEASE]: status update and plan)

On 04/04/12 14:37, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 04/04/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/4/12 7:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote: So it looks like we have the major languages covered well. Except British English? Do we have a separate translation there? Or at least a separate spell checking dictionary? I hav

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/04/12 11:14, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 03/04/12 22:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit : Hi All, That is, someone has to build them (and maintain them) as external projects. And that someone will find that, at least insofar as the MySQL connector extension is concerned, it will have to

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/04/12 00:14, Juergen Schmidt wrote: On Wednesday, 4. April 2012 at 01:08, drew wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 17:00 -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:20:58PM +0200, FR web forum wrote: One of the volunteers on the ES forum expressed concern about the Oracle Rep

Re: [EXTENSIONS]Alternative for Report Builder?

On 04/03/12 14:20, FR web forum wrote: - Mail original - On 4/3/12 8:01 PM, RGB ES wrote: One of the volunteers on the ES forum expressed concern about the Oracle Report Builder (ORB) extension not working on AOO builds: it seems that the extension installs, but reports previously creat

R: jdk version for building on Windows

--- Mar 3/4/12, Simon Brouwer ha scritto: > Hi, > > According to > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_OOo_with_Cygwin_on_Windows > > > JDK 1.6 is required for building. But the link is dead. > I could download it at Oracle (Java SE 6 Development Kit), > but does anyone know

Re: issue 116680

--- Mar 3/4/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto: ... > >> > > > > And big thanks ... it was indeed a fast answer! > > mmh, it comes very later and if we update we should update > to the latest version. I would recommend to do it after > the 3.4 > > Juergen > Yes, no surprise there, I agree its sim

Re: issue 116680

--- Mar 3/4/12, eric b ha scritto: > > > Your patches are very straightforward but .. heck, we > are so near the release I personally won't run risks. > > > > > Ok no problem.  Thanks for the attachment on the issue. > anyway. > Well, if it builds we should consider it. Your original patch

Re: issue 116680

On 04/02/12 16:32, Simon Brouwer wrote: Hi Pedro, Op 2-4-2012 22:43, Pedro Giffuni schreef: Hi Eric; I looked at the original patch for 1.3.1 in the Bugzilla issue and it seems broken or meant for an older version. Your patches are very straightforward but .. heck, we are so near the release

Re: issue 116680

Hi Eric; I looked at the original patch for 1.3.1 in the Bugzilla issue and it seems broken or meant for an older version. Your patches are very straightforward but .. heck, we are so near the release I personally won't run risks. --- Lun 2/4/12, eric b ha scritto: ... > > I replaced myself h

R: [WWW] Update french part

... --- Lun 2/4/12, FR web forum ha scritto: > Data: Lunedì 2 Aprile 2012, 11:29 > Hello all, > I would to update french website. > I use ToirtoiseSVN on > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/fr > I commit index.html but nothing happens. > The page don't updated. > What

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

--- Lun 2/4/12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann ha scritto: > > I have finished my rework on the LICENSE file and the NOTICE > file regarding the feedback we have got. > > Thx again to Pedro, who already did a great job on these > files. And sorry Pedro, that I have completely > restructured the files

R: Sal Shadow API on Solaris

Hmm... this sounds wrong:for Solaris you should be including  sal/osl/unx/system.hnot the OS2 header. Pedro. --- Lun 2/4/12, Jean-Louis 'Hans' Fuchs ha scritto: ... Hello main/sal/osl/os2/system.h 586 #ifdef OLD_SHADOW_API587                 if (getspnam_r(pszUserName, &spwdStruct, buffer, siz

Updates with bsdiff (was Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] redirection of update services to www.openoffice.org)

Hi, This is somewhat off topic so I changed the top subject. The one time I updated OpenOffice it took a long time so I am under the impression that we are doing the really dumb thing of downloading all the office suite again. At least for security updates, which are rather small, I think we sho

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

Hi Oliver; On 03/29/12 10:23, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: The advertisement clause is this one: " 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software must display the following acknowledgement: This product includes software developed by the ." It is somewhat inconv

Re: [RELEASE] Dictionary extensions

On 03/29/12 09:45, Yakov Reztsov wrote: ... Can be it is necessary to add the file th_ru_RU_v2.idx to SVN (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/dictionaries/ru_RU/?pathrev=1209016)? That branch doesn't exist anymore on our Apache SVN. I am of the opinion that we should resto

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

On 03/29/12 06:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi Pedro, On 28.03.2012 17:23, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; Excuse me I don't really want to be involved in this discussion. I am simply tired of looking those files! Thx again for your work on these files. However.. just my $0.02.

Re: After AOO 3.4, attracting new contributors

Hi; --- Gio 29/3/12, q...@imsoftwaresystems.com ha scritto: ... > > Hi Pedro Giffuni, > > You are absolutely right, i could not think the other side > it(exploiting & > making money inexchange of certificates). The certificates > are issyed by > Apache and

Re: After AOO 3.4, attracting new contributors

Hi Ram; We are strictly non-profit here so I am not sure how far we could go with such certifications. I think it's a delicate matter and sooner or later someone would likely complain about students being exploited or your company making money in exchange of ASF certificates. We certainly can hav

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

Hello; Excuse me I don't really want to be involved in this discussion. I am simply tired of looking those files! However.. just my $0.02. On 03/28/12 04:18, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi ... There is already feedback on legal-discuss regarding my post. A short summary: - It seems that LICE

Re: [RELEASE] Dictionary extensions

--- Mar 27/3/12, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: ... > > I downloaded the source from SVN. > > But did not find the file th_ru_RU_v2.idx > > Maybe it has to be generated during the build process? > > Checked that in the dictionary for the German > equivalent file is present (this thesaurus index fil

R: Re[3]: [RELEASE] Dictionary extensions

Hmm... According to the BZ issue, this extension should be the appropriate one: http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/dictru So I just added it to the Wiki. cheers, Pedro. --- Mar 27/3/12, Yakov Reztsov ha scritto: > > Hi Andre, > > Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:11:06 +0400 от Yakov Rez

Re: FishEye isn't updating the commit info.

On 03/26/12 16:13, Gavin McDonald wrote: -Original Message- From: Gavin McDonald [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au] Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2012 12:31 PM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Pedro Giffuni' Cc: infrastruct...@apache.org Subject: RE: FishEye isn't updating

Re: [PATCH]: nl landing page

On 03/25/12 21:30, Kevin Sisco wrote: It took a while do to technical issues but I believe I have what you are looking for. I sure hope I understood correctly what was required; don't all bite my head off at once if it isn't. :) Patches don't make it throught the list :(. Bugzilla is your frie

Re: [RELEASE,CODE]: Bug 119090 - Default Encryption Fails for Down-Level Implementations

Hmmm... We did say we would not depend on Category B software for default behaviour so I am with Dennis on this one. I also recall there are security issues with the two library versions of nss and xmlsec involved in this support. Pedro. --- Dom 25/3/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: ... > On Sat, Mar

Re: [CODE] Is main/filter/source/config/tools/merge/pyAltFCFGMerge really needed

On 03/23/12 10:46, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 23.03.2012 16:27, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 03/23/12 10:23, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On my work on the LICENSE and NOTICE files I stumble over file main/filter/source/config/tools/merge/pyAltFCFGMerge I am not sure, if we really

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

On 03/23/12 10:47, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 03/23/12 08:43, Rob Weir wrote: ... Further searching helps here ;-) I have found [4]: ... All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package should be included in the LICENSE

Re: FishEye isn't updating the commit info.

On 03/23/12 08:06, Nick Burch wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Dear infra@ guys; The fisheye instance is not updating the OpenOffice information since Feb 25: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ooo Based on the URL, it doesn't look like that server is one that the A

Re: [CODE] Is main/filter/source/config/tools/merge/pyAltFCFGMerge really needed

On 03/23/12 10:23, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On my work on the LICENSE and NOTICE files I stumble over file main/filter/source/config/tools/merge/pyAltFCFGMerge I am not sure, if we really need this file: - A look into its usage in main/filter/source/config/fragments/makefile.mk reveal

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

On 03/23/12 08:43, Rob Weir wrote: ... Further searching helps here ;-) I have found [4]: ... All the licenses on all the files to be included within a package should be included in the LICENSE document. This LICENSE (courtesy of Apache HTTPD) is a good example. The Apache License is at the t

Re: [RELEASE] NOTICE and LICENSE file

Hello Oliver; Thanks for working on this important issue, I surely welcome fresh eyes on it. On 03/23/12 06:47, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, ... Before starting to work on these files I had a look at the corresponding Apache policies/rules/... regarding these files - [1], [2], [3] I h

Re: [TRANSLATION]: Request for translation and effort estimations

Hi again; On 03/22/12 18:36, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi ... In any case, due to the setup that we have, a committer will have to take care of reviewing and making the contributions effective. All committers sign iCLAs: signing an iCLA should be seen as a step towards getting deeper involvement

FishEye isn't updating the commit info.

Dear infra@ guys; The fisheye instance is not updating the OpenOffice information since Feb 25: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ooo I have to say that I am not really surprised that no one else has noticed it stopped working. To be honest I never found out how to do some simple searches,

Re: Yet another Apache Logo

On 03/22/12 15:26, Juergen Schmidt wrote: Hmm.. MacOS ... you are already a FreeBSD user ... you just don't know it :-P. it's funny, we never met each other in person but I was sure that you tell me something like that ;-) My last sentence was initially longer "... to native BSD." Ugh .

Re: [TRANSLATION]: Request for translation and effort estimations

Hi Claudio; On 03/22/12 13:16, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi ... We could work in the same model, giving the chance for all in register in Pootle under this condition - he agree that all translation's contributions are licensed under Apache's License - giving the "translator" profile. If this volu

Re: After AOO 3.4, attracting new contributors

On 03/22/12 11:09, Herbert Duerr wrote: As a quick note, I'd *love* to dive in and start doing some coding on AOOo; it's just that I've no idea where in the heck to start... :) Additionally to what Pedro said I'd like to point to our Bugzilla at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ which is a founta

Re: Yet another Apache Logo

On 03/22/12 01:48, Risto Jääskeläinen wrote: Pedro Giffuni [p...@apache.org] kirjoitti: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/AOO-powered.png Doesn't it make you all want to use FreeBSD? ;). Pedro. Yes to FreeBSD. I find that this logo proposal differs from other by having transp

Re: Yet another Apache Logo

On 03/22/12 01:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 3/22/12 5:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/AOO-powered.png Doesn't it make you all want to use FreeBSD? ;). to be honest Pedro, I don't like it ;-) FWIW, I originally had the planet covered by

Re: After AOO 3.4, attracting new contributors

Hi Jim; On 03/22/12 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: As a quick note, I'd *love* to dive in and start doing some coding on AOOo; it's just that I've no idea where in the heck to start... :) It depends on your particular interests. The codebase is rather big and there's a lot to do. There are big ta

Yet another Apache Logo

http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/AOO-powered.png Doesn't it make you all want to use FreeBSD? ;). Pedro.

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

--- Mer 21/3/12, Joe Schaefer ha scritto: ... > Right now the ASF has roughly 250 > mirrors, > of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if > we start carrying AOO releases.  That means > we'd have about twice as many mirrors as > the mirrorbrain OOo service has, so we should > be in better shap

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

Hi Andrew; --- Mar 20/3/12, Andrew Rist ha scritto: ... > > > > hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h is funny because it has FSF > > notice so Rat probably thought it was GPLd but it is > > MIT licensed. > I'll look - if it's ok I'll add to the excludes list. Trust me, it's OK .. Ollivier and I brought t

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

Hi Yuri; Can you look at these two please? vcl/inc/os2/wingdi.h vcl/inc/os2/xwphook.h cheers, Pedro. On 03/20/12 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~a

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

Hi; On 03/20/12 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have unapproved licenses and which need

Re: IP clearance issues

On 03/19/12 11:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: ... That said ... if we had an updated OpenGrok or a real equivalent it would be a lot easier. of course a working OpenGrok would be nice. We have a local instance running that gets updated every night but that doesn't help you at the moment :-( I f

Re: IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))

Hi Dennis; On 03/19/12 11:55, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Apache releases handle the equivalent of the THIRDPARTYLICENSES by combined use of the NOTICE and LICENSE files. We are aware of that. The THIRDPARTYLICENSES thing is a left over from the LGPL days and is not relevant for our purposes. I

Re: GSoC 2012 is coming

On 03/19/12 05:28, eric b wrote: I just proposed to become a mentor for Apache. Waiting for the answer :-) If accepted, I'll propose several subjects. I think it's done the other way around: You propose ideas *now* (the students are already looking for projects) and in the same JIRA issu

Re: IP clearance issues

On 03/19/12 05:03, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: ... I see .. That testing is very important, thanks. I guess I am rather worried that our first reviewer actually thought he could trust us on the IP review. I suspect I have also been the only looking at the NOTICE and LICENSE files. you were not the

Re: IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))

Hello; --- Lun 19/3/12, Shenfeng Liu ha scritto: ... > Data: Lunedì 19 marzo 2012, 01:29 > Pedro, >   You can see from the test plan > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan > , that > the IP clearance testing that Lily performed is functional > verification > test f

IP clearance issues ( was Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19))

Hello; Despite its evident value, I think I find this QA testing report somewhat misguiding ... 100% IP clearance testing didnt find: ooo_custom_images/industrial/README and despite the website suggesting otherwise, the tango binaries have embedded GPL notices. We need some real testing on this

Re: GSoC 2012 is coming

Hello; --- Ven 16/3/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: > > It looks like Apache was accepted in GSoC 2012.: > > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/google/gsoc2012/apache > > Is anyone entering any proposals?  It looks like Pedro > had some good ideas here. I did offer some ideas but I am pretty ne

Re: Clarifying facts

On 03/16/12 10:03, Rob Weir wrote: FWIW, I suspended some rather cool but drastic updates that I was planning, including updating the internal python and Apache Commons, to ensure a softer landing of the release. Expect a lot of chaos afterwards ;). Would it help if we "branched for stabiliz

Re: Clarifying facts

Yes! On 03/16/12 03:19, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 3/13/12 6:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Yes it's looking pretty good now Ross. I am still concerned about the level of commit activity being on the low-side but I'm hoping post-release things will pick up as the project starts to push towards 4.0.

Re: AOO for Debian

On 03/15/12 10:40, eric b wrote: Hi Pedro, Le 15 mars 12 à 15:56, Pedro Giffuni a écrit : ... BTW, I am pretty sure that we would like to have OOoLight and OOoKids in FreeBSD and it shouldn't be difficult to use the current AOO port as a template. Not sure. I'll have to adap

Re: AOO for Debian

On 03/15/12 02:58, eric b wrote: ... But actually, for this to work, the discussion should be brought to the debian-openoff...@lists.debian.org list, not debian-u...@lists.debian.org. Also we need someone understand how to package .deb packages that follow the Debian policy in order to pa

Re: Let barking dogs bark

On 03/14/12 12:09, Joe Schaefer wrote: +1! - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 1:08 PM Subject: Let barking dogs bark I would recommend that no one respond to the following: http://standardsandfreedom.net

Re: Transliteration Font Support of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 and beyond...

On 03/14/12 00:29, Rob Weir wrote: It would be great if the community would focus some effort on academic publishing requirements such as this. There are other aspects to this space that we can attend to which could create some exciting value for scholars who have crappy tools today. For exampl

R: Transliteration Font Support of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 and beyond...

Hi Donald; --- Mar 13/3/12, Donald Harbison ha scritto: > Da: Donald Harbison > Oggetto: Transliteration Font Support of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 and beyond... > A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Data: Martedì 13 marzo 2012, 21:14 > I'm looking for advice on the current > state of transliteration

Re: [PROPOSAL] Request for french-language mailing lists

+1 On 03/13/12 16:50, eric b wrote: In this case, I think ooo-users...@incubator.apache.org could be the best : "users" means we have something to propose (and this is the case). And like you suggest, if discussions derivate, or too much of traffic occurs, then and only then create a secon

Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)

--- Mar 13/3/12, Joe Schaefer ha scritto: ... > > >If you are volunteering to mentor such a project just go > ahead. > > > Outside the scope of my interest level, but if you think the > subversion devs "punted" on svnrdump you really haven't > understood their mindset nor the scope of the actua

Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)

On 03/13/12 19:30, Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message - Still arguing from the what's best for the developers instead of what's best for the general public at this particular point in time. No I'm not saying that LO advocacy is essential in the interim, but denying their existence

Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)

On 03/13/12 18:45, Joe Schaefer wrote: No, It's really very simple: we have developer snapshots and we want people to test them. At this precise time we need testers and people reporting bugs in the release. Bug reports from someone running LibreOffice are not useful to us. The question isn't wh

Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)

On 03/13/12 18:00, Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message - ... On 03/13/12 17:36, Joe Schaefer wrote: At Apache we aren't in competition with other projects, we provide our work for the public benefit and leave discretion about adoption to the public. Please keep tha

Re: Competition (was: Clarifying facts)

Hi Joe; Iwas confused about Simon and his relationship to this project so now that it's clear he is not a committer or PPMC member, I do respect that he is entitled to his opinion and he is indeed welcome to express it here. That said ... On 03/13/12 17:36, Joe Schaefer wrote: At Apache we

Re: Clarifying facts

Apache we aren't in competition with other projects, > we provide our work for the public benefit and leave > discretion about adoption to the public.  Please keep > that in mind, and stick to providing resources that > benefit general members of the public. >

Re: Clarifying facts

t; Eric > > > > Le 13 mars 12 à 21:53, Pedro Giffuni a écrit : > > > > > > > --- Mar 13/3/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak > ha scritto: > > ... > >> > >> If YOU (the reader) disagree with a specific > statement in > >> the

Re: Clarifying facts

--- Mar 13/3/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak ha scritto: ... > > If YOU (the reader) disagree with a specific statement in > the original post (shown below if you really need to see > it), please be specific about which statement and how you > would fix the statement. As an example, some clarificat

Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?

On 03/13/12 14:47, Joe Schaefer wrote: The CMS is just a wrapper for several common svn commands- most of your everyday workflow with svn can be carried out with the CMS's webgui. Here's the list of supported modules (aka svn working copy actions): 808476 808206 joes WC

Re: Clarifying facts

On 03/13/12 14:45, Simon Phipps wrote: On 13 Mar 2012, at 19:02, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I really think this posting is very valuable though. I propose that you write them into a FAQ and that after fixing it according to the consensus in this list we publish it in the openoffice.org website

Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?

On 03/13/12 10:50, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Shane, On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: +1 to Pedro's point that the main end-user channel is crucially important. In one way, it feels like there are two discussions in this sub-thread: - Rob zeroing in on his infographic idea (and b

Re: Clarifying facts

On 03/13/12 12:42, Simon Phipps wrote: Thanks, Dave, very helpful. On 13 Mar 2012, at 17:17, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Simon, These are all "facts" - however they do have a certain "negative spin". You need to be "informed". :-) No better place to come. I'm sorry you found them spun; I felt t

Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?

On 03/12/12 14:48, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote: I'm not suggesting we argue with anyone. I'm suggesting we make truthful positive statements about this project and the experience level of its participan

Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?

On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote: I'm not suggesting we argue with anyone. I'm suggesting we make truthful positive statements about this project and the experience level of its participants. FWIW, and just my humble opinion ... I don't think we should spend time discussing such arguments

Re: [BUILD]: propose next developer snapshot based on revision 1293738

On 03/10/12 09:25, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 06/03/2012 Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 02/28/12 08:06, RGB ES wrote: It seems there is a naming problem on the icon sets for Spanish localization, were I have Galaxia Alto contraste Industrial Cristal< The problem Tango If I switch to English UI

R: [PROPOSAL] Request for a Spanish-language mailing list

+1 --- Mer 7/3/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto: ... > Hi all, > > With the legacy lists being shut down in just a few days, I > would like > to propose the creation of Spanish-language mailing list, > grouping the > three lists we currently have: > > http://openoffice.org/projects/es/lists

Re: GSoC 2012 is coming

Hi; --- Mar 6/3/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: ... > > Also, if anyone has a good idea but doesn't have time to > mentor, please post your ideas.  There might be someone > else who has time to mentor but could use some ideas. > Here are some ideas: Clang port. This is desirable to help keep the co

Re: [BUILD]: propose next developer snapshot based on revision 1293738

Hello; On 02/28/12 08:06, RGB ES wrote: It seems there is a naming problem on the icon sets for Spanish localization, were I have Galaxia Alto contraste Industrial Cristal< The problem Tango If I switch to English UI, I have Galaxy High Contrast Industrial Tango Classic On the Spanish lo

Re: GSoC 2012 is coming

--- Lun 5/3/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: > > Looking at the timeframe for this, it looks like the program > is mainly mid-May through mid-August. So this will be after > AOO 3.4 is out, but before AOO 4.0 is out. > I think we will likely start using branches for some projects by then. > Does it

GSoC 2012 is coming

Hi; As you know, once each year Google selects projects that they would like to fund by paying students for tasks. The Google Summer of Code program is a huge opportunity for projects like OpenOffice in order to achieve technical objectives and to get new blood into in the project. Being under t

Re: Building with system ICU

On 03/05/12 06:05, Yuri Dario wrote: Hi Pedro, ICU was the first real hairy monster I found when I started looking at the OpenOffice code here the same :-( can you check if vcl builds for you with --system-icu? thanks When I last tried there would be linking errors. I am glad it failed b

Re: Apache OpenOffice Templates Website restored at SourceForge

On 03/04/12 10:53, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Hi all, We migrated also the Templates website over to sourceforge hardware. We've restored authentication with the openoffice.org accounts, and make some minor updates (e.g. changing some wording, deleting some references to openoffice.org accounts,

Re: AOO Logo for FreeBSD

a replacement for intro.png, (that and about.png can be specified with "configure"). I am not yet considering this for smaller images. Thanks for the feedback! Pedro. On 2012-03-01 11:01 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I am giving a thought on a new logo for use with FreeBSD's port. Here

Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly calculated

On 03/03/12 17:34, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Amen on understanding the scope of the bug!! As promised, I built a smoke-test document and ran it. The bug does not appear at all in any Windows version of OpenOffice.org that I tested. In particular, it does not appear in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0, i

Re: Building with system ICU

On 03/03/12 16:30, Yuri Dario wrote: Hi, it seems to be that building with system ICU is not allowed. Also my linux bot does not build vcl, because gbuild wants icule library into solver/.../lib directory. I prefer to have a system icu under os2, but I can't find a way to fix above icule p

Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly calculated

On 03/03/12 16:26, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: --- Sab 3/3/12, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118999 The fix should definitely be integrated in 3.4. We already have more messages in

Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly calculated

On 03/03/12 13:25, Rob Weir wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 03/03/12 10:12, Rob Weir wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Pedro Giffuniwrote: Hello; --- Sab 3/3/12, Andrea Pescettiha scritto: Issue 118999 is about a bug in an integrated CWS, that

Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly calculated

On 03/03/12 10:12, Rob Weir wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; --- Sab 3/3/12, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: Issue 118999 is about a bug in an integrated CWS, that fails to understand 29/2/2000 correctly: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118999

Re: Nominate release blocker: 118999 - Leap year not correctly calculated

Hello; --- Sab 3/3/12, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: > Issue 118999 is about a bug in an > integrated CWS, that fails to understand 29/2/2000 > correctly: > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118999 > > It is a regression with respect to OOo 3.3.0 and has a > trivial fix, posted by Ped

Re: AOO Logo for FreeBSD

Hello Maho; On 03/02/12 02:18, Maho NAKATA wrote: Hi Pedro, Looks good, However, that's a little tough at this time. I also kept the small BSD daemon separated on purpose so that there is no for the BSD daemon picture, we need explict permission from Kirk McKusick. http://www.freebsd.org/cop

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >