On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > The question is why do we need this? I would think
> > all supported platforms have standard conformant
> > C/C++ libs.
>
> Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions, apparently.
> See external/glibc/makefile.mk. Apparently wh
;
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 22:39
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
&g
chive.apache.org/dist/apr/apr-1.4.5.tar.bz2>
>
> <http://archive.apache.org/dist/apr/apr-util-1.3.12.tar.bz2>
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 22:39
> To: ooo-d
ist/apr/apr-1.4.5.tar.bz2>
<http://archive.apache.org/dist/apr/apr-util-1.3.12.tar.bz2>
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 22:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
/dist/apr/apr-util-1.3.12.tar.bz2>
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 22:39
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
>
>
r.bz2>
<http://archive.apache.org/dist/apr/apr-util-1.3.12.tar.bz2>
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 22:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
On Thu, 15 S
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:06:40 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
For command line options I think the normal char is enough
I don't know what the OOo code actually uses getopt() for (I am
pretty
sure it is just some build-time tools that actually use it...), but
you can be assured that the actual OO
> For command line options I think the normal char is enough
I don't know what the OOo code actually uses getopt() for (I am pretty
sure it is just some build-time tools that actually use it...), but
you can be assured that the actual OOo executable(s), for Windows
(which presumably *is* the OS yo
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
..
> Backing up a little. I don't
> know if the original BSD license is a problem for Apache,
> but it becomes a problem downstream, so it is good to avoid
> having to carry that license and a NOTICE file about it
> around in Apache OOo.
>
Well, h
these days? Just curious.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 14:37
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Apparently the getopt.h has been cleaned up in lat
, September 14, 2011 14:09
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:43:09 -0700, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
wrote:
> Most stock implementations on Windows seem to have the original BSD
> license.
>
i
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:23
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org;
Cc: 'Michael Stahl'
Subject: RE: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
...
If you list the functions you have in
mind, and the names of the headers
eptember 14, 2011 11:23
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: 'Michael Stahl'
Subject: RE: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> If you list the functions you have in
> mind, and the names o
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
> If you list the functions you have in
> mind, and the names of the headers normally used to
> introduce their signatures, I will double-check the VC++
> 2008 and VC++ 2010 libraries to see what the status
> is.
>
We are far f
]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 08:43
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
On 14.09.2011 17:23, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
>
> --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist
> wrote:
>>> The quest
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
> >
> > In FreeBSD we were using an independent library in
> some ports to
> > support getopt_long but the regular library now
> supports the GNU
> > extensions. If it's needed it can be taken from
> there.
>
> if it's not in a C standard at least 20
On 14.09.2011 17:23, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
>
> --- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist
> wrote:
>>> The question is why do we need
>> this? I would think
>>> all supported platforms have standard conformant C/C++ libs.
>>
>> Yeah, but the code uses non-s
Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
...
> > The question is why do we need
> this? I would think
> > all supported platforms have standard conformant
> > C/C++ libs.
>
> Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions,
> apparently.
Both of the
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote:
> From: Pavel Janík
> Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200
>
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,op
> The question is why do we need this? I would think
> all supported platforms have standard conformant
> C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions, apparently.
See external/glibc/makefile.mk. Apparently what's needed is getopt()
and readdir_r().
> In the same line of que
From: Pavel Janík
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200
>
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
>
>> unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
>
> Where you have got this file?
http://ftp.gnu.org
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200, Pavel Janík wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
Where you have got this file?
It appears listed as "external source tarball" in the
ApacheMigration wiki.
The question is why do we nee
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
> unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
Where you have got this file?
--
Pavel Janík
hi,
unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
here is a clip of the content:
"
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
"
(See attached file: COPYING)
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
tel:54747
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong
On Sep 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
> glibc-2.1.3 is under GNU GPL 2
Really? I think it is
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Copying.html#Copying GNU LGPL
2.1.
--
Pavel Janík
hi, all
glibc-2.1.3 is under GNU GPL 2, and GPL 2 licenses may NOT be included
within Apache products.
How to do with glibc-2.1.3? remove it or replace it with others?
refer to : http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
The copyright:
(See attached file: COPYING)
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.
26 matches
Mail list logo