On 12/01/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 10/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an
On 10/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an answer before the end
of 2011. This is
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an answer before the end
of 2011. This is reasonable, the issue is complex and
On 30/11/2011 Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org ha scritto:
That is worth a try. Someone would need to enter a JIRA issue for
this ... If we do that, we'll have an answer within a week or two.
Andrea Pescetti could have already done it. He should give more
details here.
This message, as Andre Fischer suggested in the thread GPL'd
dictionaries, is a separated discussion in order to find a final
consensus about how to provide Linguistic Tools replacements after the
removal of GPL'd modules.
The solutions that were suggested (though without volunteers' manpower
to
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Gianluca Turconi
gianl...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
This message, as Andre Fischer suggested in the thread GPL'd
dictionaries, is a separated discussion in order to find a final
consensus about how to provide Linguistic Tools replacements after the
removal
Il giorno Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:25:59 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
That is worth a try. Someone would need to enter a JIRA issue for
this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL
If we do that, we'll have an answer within a week or two.
Andrea Pescetti could have
On 30.11.2011 14:56, O.Felka wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 11:16, schrieb Gianluca Turconi:
This message, as Andre Fischer suggested in the thread GPL'd
dictionaries, is a separated discussion in order to find a final
consensus about how to provide Linguistic Tools replacements after the
removal of
