Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 8/23/12 2:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-23 Thread Andre Fischer
On 23.08.2012 02:43, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-23 Thread Andrew Rist
On 8/22/2012 5:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 21.08.2012 14:34, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.08.2012 11:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 22.08.2012 11:29, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-21 Thread Andre Fischer
On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-21 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 8/21/12 12:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-21 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 21.08.2012 00:05, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the

Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release. I looked again at the rat-excludes and we should look into a small

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. Not really. It is not like issues like this are going to be found by sitting here and not pushing the code our further. Every new class of testers will find a new

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; - Original Message - ...  Ditto.  This is our code, the source is there, with Apache headers. The pre-built JAR at worst is redundant.  I don't see a policy issue here. ./stax/download/README_stax-1.2.0.jar Need to ask Pedro about that one:

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: Hi; - Original Message - ... Ditto. This is our code, the source is there, with Apache headers. The pre-built JAR at worst is redundant. I don't see a policy issue here.

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
  - Original Message -  ... Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. I think so too :(. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official SOURCE release.

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: - Original Message - ... Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. I think so too :(. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Dave Fisher
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: - Original Message - ... Hi Folks, We are really getting ahead of ourselves. I think so too :(. We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
  - Original Message -   Marvin's intervention is very far reaching indeed. It pretty much supports the position that there is no such thing as a binary release, and it involves some issues that have to be solved before graduation. Now I think you are getting ahead of

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: - Original Message - Marvin's intervention is very far reaching indeed. It pretty much supports the position that there is no such thing as a binary release, and it involves some issues that have to be

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Dave; - Original Message -  ... The particular concern of how the official packages are generated and distributed  is also interesting. At this time  I would say the FreeBSD port is as legitimate and worthy of being tagged Apache OpenOffice as the Windows packages in