On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 15:31 +0200, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
>> 2011.08.14. 15:07 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:
>> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:26 AM, drew wrote:
>> >> The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and has for a over a
>> >> day now
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
> including some that are not open source. Is that correct?
Yes.
> Another option, which I brought up the last time this topic was
> discussed on the list, is that
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
> > including some that are not open source. Is that correct?
>
> Yes.
I for one agree with this ex
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> > IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
>> > including some that are not open source. Is
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 12:35 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> >> Hi Rob,
> >>
> >> On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> > IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variet
stability ( was Extensions and
templates site down )
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
> > including some
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
> [from out of left field]
> Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
> hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
> specifically to take this over, and then working with them to create the
> indirect re
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
specifically to take this over, and then working with them to create the
in
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>>>
>>> [from out of left field]
>>> Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
>>> hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
>>
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
> > [from out of left field]
> > Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
> > hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
> > specifically to take this
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewwrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
s
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>>> [from out of left field]
>>> Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
>>> hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>> > [from out of left field]
>> > Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
>> > hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>
> [from out of left field]
> Would members consider transferring ownersh
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
> >
> > Just hit the templates site and it's back, I would rather we ask the
> > current
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> Just hit the templates site a
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, drew wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
> >> > [from out of left field]
> >> > Would members consider transferring ownership of the cu
2011/8/15 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, drew wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew wrote:
>> >> > [from out of left field]
>> >> > Would members consid
19 matches
Mail list logo
