-
> From: Moritz Bunse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:09 AM
> To: Lundgren, Andrew
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] Production ready?
>
>
> Hi
>
> I'm using CentOS 5, a RHEL 5 rebuild. I
On 7/17/07, Harald Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
> not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
> several version newer than what has packages available.)
Yes. It takes a serious amount of man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Simmons wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
>
>> I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
>> . . .
>> I have been looking for a good printed book to read though to learn
>> more, but really can't fin
> Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
> not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
> several version newer than what has packages available.)
Yes. It takes a serious amount of manpower to keep up with the
zillions of Linux versions i
Hi
I'm using CentOS 5, a RHEL 5 rebuild. I just dowdnloaded the source rpm
and did
# rpmbuild --rebuild openafs-1.4.4-rhel4.2.src.rpm --define 'osvers
rhel5'
Then the rpms can be found in e.g. /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/. Works
fine for me. There are also prebuild rpms available in the inte
On 7/16/07, Lundgren, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suggest using a version of Linux that has pre-built
> binaries available for it unless you have some special requirements.
>
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as
I ordered the new book today. Thank you.
From: Steve Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Lundgren, Andrew; OpenAFS-Info AFS
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Production ready
>
> I suggest using a version of Linux that has pre-built
> binaries available for it unless you have some special requirements.
>
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
several version newer
On Jul 16, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
. . .
I have been looking for a good printed book to read though to
learn more, but really can't find much. Is there a good refe
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
. . .
I have been looking for a good printed book to read though to learn
more, but really can't find much. Is there a good reference/intro
book out there?
You can still find co
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
Which version should I consider using, the latest version that the
download link leads (1.4.x) to or the version that the windows download
leads to (1.5.x)?
I'd suggest using the version the windows download link leads to on
windows, and the latest
"Lundgren, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lost that information in a cut and paste. Opps. I was able to get the
> code to compile on suse by removing some extra ifdefs from the lines 115
> and 460 in the file:
> openafs-1.5.21/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.16.27-0.9-default-SP/osi_vfsops.c
> I
> > Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> > production environment?
>
> Yes, absolutely. The Windows client is, in fact, arguably
> the best of all of the clients at the moment in terms of
> stability, although it has some oddities of implementation
> that we ho
Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
> Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> production environment?
yes
> The windows machines will in turn be serving
> data to multiple clients. (A proprietary data server that only runs on
> windows will be feeding the data off box, but the da
"Lundgren, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now for the fun questions. Is the windows client suitable for a
> production environment?
Yes, absolutely. The Windows client is, in fact, arguably the best of all
of the clients at the moment in terms of stability, although it has some
oddities
I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
I learned about AFS about 10 years ago in college, but this is the first
time I have been able to try and use it.
I need to set up several linux servers that will provide data to both
linux and windows 2003 client platforms. I have read
16 matches
Mail list logo
