Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
Op 18 mrt. 2012 om 15:15 heeft Thomas Beale thomas.beale at
oceaninformatics.com het volgende geschreven:
I still think Quantities should be computable as such - if we don't know how
many mcg of substance 3 puffs is, we can't compute with it.
Although i tend to
I asume there is no subscription fee for openEHR members.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 15 dec. 2011, om 11:33 heeft Gerard Freriks het volgende geschreven:
For more information about the EN13606 Association and the Seville meeting I
refer to:
www.en13606.org
Non-members that want to participate in
Congratulations to all who made this possible and to ourselves
This is a crucial 'breaktrough' which will pave the way towards future proof
health records which will be widely accepted and used.
Cheers,
Stef
Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
Van: Thomas Beale thomas.beale at
+1
Cheers,
Stef
Op 6 dec. 2011, om 12:44 heeft Seref Arikan het volgende geschreven:
Please do not get me wrong, all the discussion we are having here is useful,
it is just that in my humble opinion, some discussions are more useful than
others if this standard into which I am heavily
Op 7 sep 2011, om 09:55 heeft Erik Sundvall het volgende geschreven:
Do read that wikipage and follow the links there to the mail
discussions. What is it that you think is missing or unclear in the
arguments against SA?
That they're hidden in a lot of text form which one has to follow
Very good news indeed. This is exactly what is needed to bring openEHR to where
it belongs, at the center of the healthcare.
Just out of curiosity, who are these Associates, will they raise sufficient
money and how long will it take before these become plans effective. The sooner
the better is
Hi Eric,
Good that you bring up the SA + or - discussion again. In order to make the
best decision can you please provide us with these arguments and, if possible,
with the names of those companies/organisations.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 6 sep 2011, om 16:51 heeft Erik Sundvall het volgende
Just to add to this. Another great aspect of openEHR is the separation of the
technical and medical (content) aspect.
In the clinical knowlegde manager (which Thomas already referred to) clinicians
can cooperate to create archetype without have to think about the technical
aspects. As for the
And it's to simplistic too. In that case one also would like to know allergic
to which specific type(s) and/or components of penicillin. In that case I also
would like to know how that was tested, when and who did that etc., etc.
So I guess what's I'm trying to say is: What's the value of such
To make thing even more complicated (we discussed this already some years ago)
the question should be: Does the patient have diabetes according to the
definition used commonly in this practice/ hospital/ county/ country/ part of
the world.
Don't remember it exactly but back then I could easily
Dear Rene,
This is good news. Great blog too.
I really like the initiative to start a joint feasability project. I'm
confident that there will be a outcome that will not only work for all parties
involved but also creates synergy.
Is it an idea that based on the presumed positive outcome of
Dear Grahame,
Op 23 nov 2010, om 14:24 heeft Grahame Grieve het volgende geschreven:
It appears that Tom and I may jointly develop a variant
of ISO 21090, that features the same basic semantic
content, but in a format that is suitable for use in systems
rather than for exchange. It will
Dear all,
As Ed Hammond said it somewhere earlier in this discussion: It's like World
Peace - a great idea but probably not achievable.
I agree with Ed if we think along the line of ?one solution should fit all? and
I also think that if we create different solutions for different purposes
Great, do you have a link where they can be found/seen.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 8 nov 2010, om 21:02 heeft Williamtfgoossen at cs.com het volgende
geschreven:
In a message dated 8-11-2010 15:38:26 W. Europe Standard Time, thomas.beale
at oceaninformatics.com writes:
I have been asking HL7 since
Dear Ed,
Thanks for your clear and frank contribution to this discussion. Although I
don't always agree with the boldness of Tom's remarks and I'm one of those
people with 'little competence' (although I tent to think that I understand
what is being engineered), I can understand his
It looks like we're getting to the heart of the matter here.
What I really would like to know from the others what their opinion's on these
subjects are?
If it indeed turns out to be true that Tom don't understand how datatypes, RIM
or data types are working, we, as the openEHR community,
For those of you interested in the 'problems' within Snomed as an ontology,
here (http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3465/version/1) you can find a
good and recent article describing them. This doesn't mean we shouldn't use
Snomed, but knowing where the problems are is helpful to find
Op 10 feb 2010, om 11:37 heeft Gerard Freriks het volgende geschreven:
It is imperative that DCM's are absolutely free to use and in the public
domain. CEN/ISO and ANSI assure that with the standardisation IP rules in
general.
DCM's must be absolutely free from IP problems, well maintained
over sudden openEHR seems to
have become the 'enemy'.
I hope it shows up correctly this time. Does anybody know why/how this
'mesh-up' happens?
Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
Van: Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl
Datum: 10 februari 2010 13:05:01 GMT+01:00
Aan: For openEHR technical
Op 10 feb 2010, om 14:07 heeft Bert Verhees het volgende geschreven:
It is not the juridical status of a company that makes the difference for the
IP-status of something. If an organization is not-for-profit or for-profit,
both can issue all kinds of IP-licenses.
The company form has
Op 1 feb 2010, om 10:33 heeft Charlie McCay het volgende geschreven:
More is needed to ensure that information can be safely reused and combined.
Dear Alberto,
Can you please explain what this 'more' is and provide some examples for a
non-technical person like myself.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 1
Is anybody following the current discussion in the US about the meaningful use
citeri and/or is anybody actively involved?
The published criteria can be found here:
http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=467405454267+0+2+0WAISaction=retrieve
Is just scanned it very
Hi Erik,
I see your point and agree. My call for the -SA extension was based on
the idea of reciprocity. So let's go for CC-BY.
Cheers,
Stef
(I sended this reaction earlier but for an unknown reason only to
Eric. So now for the whole group. Although I still believe in the idea
of
+2
Stef
Op 26 sep 2009, om 08:13 heeft Grahame Grieve het volgende geschreven:
+1
Grahame
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Koray Atalag koray at cs.auckland.ac.nz
wrote:
Hi All,
I really appreciate the mental exercise to achieve a better
documentation; however I
Hi Heath,
I complety agree with you. Let's all do what we're best at. What I
would like to add to your proposal is some feedback (both ways) so
doctors and technicians can learn from eachother. Rather than de-
empowering the one or the other I think we should team up to create a
properly
Dear Tony, David and Seref,
Congratulations to you (and to the openEHR community).
This is truly very good news, great work and a major milestone for the
openEHR community.
I'm confident that this will boost many efforts that are out there a
helps to focus our energy as well as to show the
I've been working through the demographic AT's that were provided by
Sergio. It's probably due to my lack of technical knowlegde but I
can't find where reverse_relationships are defined in these
archetypes. Or it must be in openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-
ROLE.health_consumer.v1 under:
relationships
Dear Tony,
You're the new chair now for almost 6 months. Can you provide us with
some views/ outlooks of what is going to happen in 2009 and beyond.
Are there any plans/ ideas to set up an official (top level?)
archetype repository so that one unified set of archetypes is being
created. If
working now
Ian
On 1/11/09, Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl wrote:
It seems down indeed.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 11 jan 2009, om 14:34 heeft Seref Arikan het volgende geschreven:
Hi there,
I can not access to openehr.org from Turkey at the moment, and I've
also tried a proxy in USA
It seems down indeed.
Cheers,
Stef
Op 11 jan 2009, om 14:34 heeft Seref Arikan het volgende geschreven:
Hi there,
I can not access to openehr.org from Turkey at the moment, and I've
also tried a proxy in USA. Is it me only, or is the site down?
Kind Regards
Seref
Thomas.
Op 7-okt-2008, om 17:10 heeft Thomas Beale het volgende geschreven:
Governments need to understand these realities, or they will
continue to find it difficult to see how to apply any of the
competing standards available today. I have to say that I don't
find this report
could have known that.
Luckely the Istanbul meeting is in 2 weeks so there is plenty of time
to come up with an alternative document in which al of your brilliant
analyses are put togehter. I really encourage you to do so.
Cheers,
Stef
regards,
eric browne
On 08/10/2008, at 7:05 PM, Stef
Dear Georg,
Op 24-jun-2008, om 12:16 heeft Georg Duftschmid het volgende geschreven:
I am now wondering why an EHR reference model is seen to be
REQUIRED for achieving functional interoperability. If I exchange
bare PDF-documents (without any describing metadata) between two
EHR
Hi Ian and Gerard,
Could you please explain what post-coordination is and maybe provide
an example of post- (and pre-?) coordination?
Cheers,
Stef
Op 5-jun-2008, om 0:48 heeft Ian McNicoll het volgende geschreven:
most
post-coordination (using modifiers in Snomed-space instead of
I'm not a technical person but to me it seems very cumbersome if such
'differences' could exist between 2 versions of the same archetypes.
This would mean that for every query one has to go into detail of
every version of that AT which could mean al lot of work.
To my understanding versions
Op 4-jun-2008, om 10:23 heeft Thomas Beale het volgende geschreven:
I hope this clarifies things
Absolutely, thanks.
Stef
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
Hi all,
Here's my positive reaction:-).
We started some discussion around this topic back in November. One of
the other items we discussed then was a place for 'openEHR'
presentations that could be used by others under a common creative
(or other) license. Although I can find several
Dear all,
Recently an article by Bernd Blobel was published in the Dutch HL7
magazine (Dec 07 issue) in which he compares the different EHR
models: openEHR, HL7v3, EN/ISO 13606 and CCR. Robert Stegwee, the
chair of HL7.nl, kindly translates this article in Dutch, which
unfortunately makes
Op 24-nov-2007, om 7:45 heeft Williamtfgoossen at cs.com het volgende
geschreven:
V3 has no various implementations,
Can you, in this light explain what Barry Smith is talking about in
his HL7-watch blog (http://hl7-watch.blogspot.com/, the text is also
underneath). Probably I don't
Op 24-nov-2007, om 17:14 heeft b.cohen het volgende geschreven:
No. A good standard should ensure that all implementations that
satisfy it are
mutually interoperable (see, for example, the Whitworth stanard for
nuts and
bolts!). This requires that:
1. the standard include the the tests
ah - 'data quality' in other words - i.e. markers / meta-data relating
to the data capture from the source, not the integrity of the data as
represented on the openEHR system?
I would like to expand that to data quality assurance. How can one
objectively and according to locally accepted
Hi Thio,
Thanks for this excellent explanation. Although it remains a steep
learning curve for a 'non-technical' person, it certainly provides a
better insight in this 'tough' material.
One last remark to explain my question. I while ago Thomas Beale
demonstrated the OI template builder,
Maybe this question should be asked on the technical mailing list,
since there's no reaction on the clinical list:-)
Cheers,
Stef
Begin doorgestuurd bericht:
Van: Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl
Datum: 24 mei 2007 12:00:43 GMT+02:00
Aan: For openEHR clinical discussions openehr-clinical
43 matches
Mail list logo
