Also: please use the new mailing list. This one will be dead in a couple
of days.
v.
On 03/18/13 14:23, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 03/18/13 11:21, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
I Have opengrok running in a production environment.
Unfortunately I have only this setup and so I have to perform the
On 03/18/13 11:21, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
I Have opengrok running in a production environment.
Unfortunately I have only this setup and so I have to perform the following
test on this itself making sure I don't hurt the running setup.
Use Virtual Box or any virtualization solution as a cheap s
On 02/11/13 18:06, Lubos Kosco wrote:
Hi guys
this project will move to a new project hosting - you probably noted the
red info on http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/
we started archiving the project pages / mailing list / bugs / etc.
We will recreate most of stuff , I will t
On 01/16/13 09:45, Lubos Kosco wrote:
Get to 0.11.1 , I think no reindex needed, it should contain some fixes
we use 0.11.1 inhouse (not with perforce, but with 4 other scms) and
don't see any of this afaik (Vlada, any comments from your side?)
It's been very solid. We run 0.11.1 under 64-bi
On 11/27/12 05:22, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote:
Hi,
Would you please add an item to the 'Comparison with Similar Tools'
of OpenGrok site (http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/)?
GLOBAL
--
Client/server Y
Additionally, could you please change the
On 11/26/12 15:27, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 24.11.2012 0:53, Nikita Abdullin wrote:
Dear all,
Has anyone considered adding a generic code graph (call graph) support
to OpenGrok?
No, but a LOT of people would love this
The bug reference for this is:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.
On 10/04/12 17:50, Jacobo de Vera wrote:
- having another way to select text for searching would be very handy,
e.g. like cscope search - say if the cursor is at the first '(' character on
line with 'if (mdb_vread(&vn, sizeof (vnode_t), wsp->walk_addr) == -1) {' it
would search for 'mdb_vre
On 10/04/12 02:12, Jacobo de Vera wrote:
Hi All,
I recently wrote a simple Vim plugin to launch different types of
OpenGrok searches with the word under the cursor or the currently
selected text from Vim.
You are welcome to check it out if you think you might find it useful,
any feedback is app
On 10/04/12 05:32, Appu Mathew wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
I had the opengrok0.11 source and was tinkering around with it just before
your mail came. After i saw the mail, i removed the suspicious "-" from the
version and added a normal hyphen, and built a new opengrok.jar. And ran
index again after rem
On 10/03/12 16:24, Petr Sobotka wrote:
Cau Vlado,
Yes, I confirm that "cleartool -version" does the trick and return zero.
Thanks, the fix has been pushed to the gate.
Appu, please retry with the latest opengrok-0.12 development version
built from the gate.
The build instructions are here
On 10/03/12 10:51, Appu Mathew wrote:
Hi
First of all, thank you for all the help you are providing here. For all
the patience, and replies :)
When i create the empty file in my snapshot view and i run the index command
./OpenGrok index/apjoseph-snapsht/ it produces the following
warnings... Th
Repository.**java#83<http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/src/org/opensolaris/opengrok/history/ClearCaseRepository.java#83>
v.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Vladimir Kotal
**wrote:
On 09/21/12 08:52, Petr Sobotka wrote:
Hello Appu,
I think there is necessar
, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Vladimir Kotal
wrote:
On 09/21/12 08:52, Petr Sobotka wrote:
Hello Appu,
I think there is necessary (or used to be ;-) to provide path to cleartool
binary via following property, when you run indexer:
-Dorg.opensolaris.opengrok.**history.ClearCase=/opt/**
rational/clearcase
On 09/21/12 08:52, Petr Sobotka wrote:
Hello Appu,
I think there is necessary (or used to be ;-) to provide path to cleartool
binary via following property, when you run indexer:
-Dorg.opensolaris.opengrok.history.ClearCase=/opt/rational/clearcase/linux_x86/bin/cleartool
It is sufficient to ru
On 08/23/12 13:41, Jones, Dan wrote:
I see that the opensolaris website is run on an instance of xwiki...
Is there any chance that you guys have integrated the two?
I'd like to have a private developer xwiki that you can search source code in.
:-D
This seems to be more of a generic question
On 08/21/12 09:14, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:28:48AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote:
javascript is nice, but Sunrays are Sunrays
Hmmm, sunrays are history. Everybody I know has already replaced or will
replace them very soon with Wyse clients. I guess, Oracle will EOL
sunrays
On 08/09/12 08:37, Trond Norbye wrote:
I believe most of the contributors to OpenGrok use NetBeans as their IDE
(and the project opens without any problems there)
Some of us actually use just vim + ant :-)
v.
___
opengrok-discuss mailing list
opengr
On 07/24/12 09:40 PM, Chingis Dugarzhapov wrote:
Hello,
We are using OpenGrok to browse/search code in some mercurial
repositories (regularly refreshed via background cron job).
I would like to know if it is possible to display hidden .hg folders in
xref/ view.
Sometimes we have repos with qui
Please see the archives, this has been discussed in the past. There are
knobs to tune both on server/Java level and HTTP level.
v.
On 07/17/12 15:36, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
Hi
We have a huge database of 1600 projects in our list of projects on opengrok
0.11 rc 1 .
Our source code reposit
On 04/24/12 16:43, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
Does opengrok provide a way to clean the Repository for non active projects
after a while?
No, OpenGrok does not manipulate the repositories in any way, similarly
it does not perform the initial clone/bringover of the repository. This
has to be done
This has been discussed quite recently, see the 'Bug? Searching across
all projects gives a 400 response (bad request, bad query string)'
thread for details.
v.
On 04/23/12 09:39, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
I have installed opengrok0.11
Searching with ALL projects selected fails on Firefox F a
On 03/30/12 16:59, Bruce Furber wrote:
try strcpy AND NOT "void strcpy"
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=strcpy+AND+NOT+%22void+strcpy%22&project=onnv&defs=&refs=&path=&hist
= - Original Message -
I wonder if it is possible to do negative proximity search - e.g. I'd
like to
I wonder if it is possible to do negative proximity search - e.g. I'd
like to search for all calls to strcpy() which do not have the (void)
cast before them. Tried things like:
"void strcpy"~NOT 1
in the full search but it does not seem to do the trick.
v.
___
On 03/28/12 13:47, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
clicked on second/third/... page of the results. The Referer (which
contained long URL with all projects listed) made the HTTP headers too
long for Tomcat which as a result returned error 400. We fixed that
I should probably add that we are not
On 03/22/12 11:28, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
That's very interesting. I've been observing the same problem (combined
with Tomcat/Java running out of heap space) just yesterday on our
internal server which has cca 250 projects so this is definitely an
issue. Some all-project queries were
On 03/22/12 11:28, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
The other thing is that the Tomcat process was burning the CPUs for a
long time (might be minutes, did not do proper measurements); it would
be handy to have an upper limit for how long a query can take.
When thinking about how to solve this, I&#x
On 03/21/12 20:38, Conrad Dean wrote:
Not sure if this is the right place for this, but I wanted to start a
discussion about how the OpenGrok webapp deals with placing search queries
and navigates through results.
It's not possible to use OpenGrok with a large (200+) number of projects.
Because
On 03/21/12 16:02, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 03/20/12 11:19, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 03/20/12 10:19, Lubos Kosco wrote:
I also think this should be in some config var
see http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17849
which deals with similar problem
I see that this bug is already
On 03/20/12 11:19, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 03/20/12 10:19, Lubos Kosco wrote:
I also think this should be in some config var
see http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17849
which deals with similar problem
I see that this bug is already fixed in source, closed it as such and
artin can pick it up I will be only
happy, can do the mentoring for him
(it's a low hanging bug, so easy to pick up ;) )
hmm?
L
On 19.3.2012 16:10, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Hi all,
I just realized most of the assembler function definitions in a code
base we are indexing are not detected b
On 03/20/12 04:43, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Hi,
/opt/ctags\-5.8/ctags --language-force=asm --language-force=asm
--regex-asm='/(ENTRY_NP|ENTRY)+\(([^ ]*)\)/\2/f/' ./test\-whitespace.c
...
Now, how to pass this extra argumen
Hi all,
I just realized most of the assembler function definitions in a code
base we are indexing are not detected by OpenGrok because of the macros
used to define these functions.
They look like this (including the whitespace):
ENTRY_NP(foo)
/* some assembly code */
On 03/14/12 17:06, Francois de Beauregard wrote:
Hello !
I deployed opengrok 0.11 to index a project with about 400k files.
I used the nice paths.tsv feature.
The content of the TSV file is right, however the "description" field
of some files in the web interface is wrong.
Interestingly, I
One more:
19191 (copy and paste not preserving whitespace)
On 02/20/12 02:24 PM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
As discussed with Lubos off-line here's the list of things for 0.11.1:
19180 (ignored list) + split the ignore list to file/directory lists
(can't find the bug number now)
19175
+ 19184
On 02/20/12 14:24, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
As discussed with Lubos off-line here's the list of things for 0.11.1:
19180 (ignored list) + split the ignore list to file/directory lists
(can't find the bug number now)
19175 (OpenGrok shell script)
1326:9ff4d6f2f0c3 (clear but
On 02/21/12 20:25, Lubos Kosco wrote:
All protected opengrok instances I know are internal, so I unfortunately cannot
share their setup, but basically it's just SSO that was plugged in front of
tomcat and doing mod_proxy, so there was no big change(if any) in opengrok
Yep.
There are couple
On 02/20/12 14:24, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
As discussed with Lubos off-line here's the list of things for 0.11.1:
19180 (ignored list) + split the ignore list to file/directory lists
(can't find the bug number now)
Actually, this one is probably too much changes, should go with 1918
As discussed with Lubos off-line here's the list of things for 0.11.1:
19180 (ignored list) + split the ignore list to file/directory lists
(can't find the bug number now)
19175 (OpenGrok shell script)
1326:9ff4d6f2f0c3 (clear button)
19178 (dtags.eftar fd leak)
Anyone please pile up :-)
v.
On 02/13/12 05:16 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
I'm not sure what problem you've run into. This still works in my
environment.
I tracked this down to a nasty issue with caching of web pages.
Sorry for the noise,
v.
___
opengrok-di
I found out that the links which used to select a project no longer work
in 0.11.
For example clicking on the following link selected the project in the menu:
http://opengrok:8080/source/search?q=&project=jdk6
One could construct even project groups with links like this:
http://opengrok
Hi all,
I created a group called 'OpenGrok users' on Linked-in
(http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=4276806&trk=anet_ug_grppro).
It's not meant to replace this mailing list but rather serve as
alternative place for sharing experience with OpenGrok and maybe some
less technical talk.
On 01/17/12 16:43, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 01/16/12 15:52, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Plus, we found one more in opensearch URL handling which impacts our
internal deployment (mod_proxy environment). Lubos said he will fix it
before 0.11 ships.
I filed http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz
On 01/18/12 14:13, Lubos Kosco wrote:
same here
I suffer too ... I'll probably switch to chrome :-D
I'll try to revisit for next release, it's too late to workaround / fix now
I can try and convince all our internal users to vote the FF bug up. If
all voted it would go up with rocket speed :
On 01/18/12 10:55, Lubos Kosco wrote:
Oh and this brings me to the history anchor bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565008
I filed it a LONG time ago ... and it's still not fixed in latest FF
back then Chrome and Safari got it right (maybe even IE), but not FF
Oh, this one. It
On 01/17/12 16:16, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
I've changed the style sheets so that the browser's default fonts are
used, which seems to fix the issue with too big fonts. (Not sure it
fixed the related issue with too small fonts mentioned in the bug
report. Vlad, you might want to double-check
On 01/16/12 15:52, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Plus, we found one more in opensearch URL handling which impacts our
internal deployment (mod_proxy environment). Lubos said he will fix it
before 0.11 ships.
I filed http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=19141 to track
this. This is a
On 01/16/12 16:18, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Trond Norbye writes:
Or is anyone working on fixing this?
I guess the lack of response answers this question...
As to the question about reverting the changes, does anyone know what
would be the minimum to back out in order to get the old behavio
On 01/11/12 15:52, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 01/11/12 10:08, Trond Norbye wrote:
It was tagged so that I could upload another version people could play
around with..
If you can generate SVR5 package for Solaris from the current head that
would be cool. We can then deploy it on our internal
27;re still waiting for the UI regression bugs to be fixed..
Yep.
v.
Trond
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Vladimir Kotal
wrote:
I see that Trond has tagged 0.11-rc2 [*], is there a chance to get a fix for
bug 19105 integrated before the release ? (which I suspect is anxiously
waiting behin
ncere apologies for that, it won't happen
again.
On 12/23/11 16:53, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:13:27PM +0100, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 12/14/11 11:04, Trond Norbye wrote:
Sure.. just let me know when you're done..
Can we get rc2 with at least some of the &quo
On 12/14/11 11:04, Trond Norbye wrote:
Sure.. just let me know when you're done..
Can we get rc2 with at least some of the "visual" (bug 19105) fixes ?
(and the opensearch fix which Lubos integrated after rc1 went out)
v.
Trond
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Vladimi
On 12/15/11 12:12, Lubos Kosco wrote:
;)
I know I need to rewrite css frames (because those numbers are not made
up, check analytics, you have access after all ;) ) ... but since the
workaround (F5 , Shift+CTRL+R) for anchor bug is easy enough (but
comparable to pressing Home to get to top menu
Also, Lubos has setup internal instance of 0.11rc so please hold the
release for couple of days to allow the users to give it some testing.
v.
On 12/13/11 17:39, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 12/13/11 12:42, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 12/08/11 13:36, Trond Norbye wrote:
> Or should we rele
On 12/13/11 12:42, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 12/08/11 13:36, Trond Norbye wrote:
> Or should we release it?
>
For internal purposes I'd like these 2 to be fixed in 0.11:
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18755
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=187
On 12/08/11 13:36, Trond Norbye wrote:
> Or should we release it?
>
For internal purposes I'd like these 2 to be fixed in 0.11:
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18755
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=18754
v.
___
ope
On 11/29/11 18:07, Trond Norbye wrote:
It's been 10 months since the previous release, so to get the release
train going I've just uploaded 0.11rc1 to the website.
Does this require reindexing when going from 0.10 ?
v.
___
opengrok-discuss mailing l
On 11/29/11 14:17, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 11/17/11 08:41, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
Thanks for the earlier response.
I have 2 more questions:
1. Where can I find a list of supported file formats. Does it support
.jsp and .xml?
I think this is very valid request, we should create a page which
On 11/17/11 08:41, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
Thanks for the earlier response.
I have 2 more questions:
1. Where can I find a list of supported file formats. Does it support .jsp and
.xml?
I think this is very valid request, we should create a page which
contains this list along with OpenGrok v
On 11/16/11 11:58, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
I see 3 log files, as follows :
drwxrwxr-x 2 ccm_root ccm_root 3864 Nov 14 07:49 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 ccm_root ccm_root 3864 Nov 8 09:07 ..
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ccm_root ccm_root 129593 Nov 14 07:49 opengrok0.0.log
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ccm_root ccm_root 294210 Nov 14 06:
On 11/29/11 09:44, Gandhi, Shailey wrote:
So , do I also need to install Mercurial?
In order to get the latest code from the trunk ? There does not seem to
be any source code snapshots at
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ except when
official release is made so I think y
+1
cool stuff, be sure to lure some new contributors ! :)
v.
On 11/01/11 17:14, Lubos Kosco wrote:
way to go Trond!
send links to slides, I am curious
--
L
On 1.11.2011 17:05, Trond Norbye wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for spamming the list, but I thought this might interest someone..
I'll be talk
On 07/21/11 10:55 PM, Fitz Fitzpatrick wrote:
Where do I find the manual, or how do I manify the man page?
On Solaris, the OSOLopengrok package installs the man page to
/usr/opengrok/man/man1/opengrok.1 but it's not in the expected format
(v0.10) since it's in XML. I wonder if this is a bug i
On 03/30/11 10:51 AM, gaurav kochhar wrote:
We are planning to use it for some 3000 projects. We wanted some logical
grouping of te sources (which would make it easier for us to manage).
Then what you are after are project groups:
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17189
I ha
On 03/29/11 10:27 AM, gaurav kochhar wrote:
Thanks Pietro for quick response.
Our requirement is to manage sources around 250-300GB. Although we are planning
for indexing partially every day. But still thought it would be good to know if
anyone has used OpenGrok for source data of that range.
On 02/ 9/11 10:57 AM, opengrok-user wrote:
hi,
is it expected that the zip/bzip/tar and gzip file analyser only
produces file listings and that it doesn't expand the contents of these
files and indexes them as per jar files?
is this road mapped?
It's certainly filed as feature request:
http
On 01/12/11 10:45 PM, Don Fike wrote:
I added an export PATH to my Tomcat6.sh startup script.
For the CVS repository both History and Annotate are now
links, but don't work. History returns;
Problem: Failed to get history for: "/path/file.c" Exit code: 1
The SVN repositories now have Annotate
Hi Lubos,
This looks like a great step forward.
Couple of highlights from our experience with 0.10 deployment:
- JVM on OSOL 0906 crashed during reindexing (probably cannot do much
about it but negative experience anyway)
- SVN indexing adds lots (thousands for our repos) of messages to
o
On 12/ 2/10 10:51 AM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
- svn mirroring hangs our reindexing because of interactive prompt when
accessing remote repositories over HTTPS. This is a show-stopper for us.
I filed this as https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17507
v
Hi Lubos,
This looks like a great step forward.
Couple of highlights from our experience with 0.10 deployment:
- JVM on OSOL 0906 crashed during reindexing (probably cannot do much
about it but negative experience anyway)
- SVN indexing adds lots (thousands for our repos) of messages to
o
On 06/21/10 10:31 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 06/21/10 04:46, anand bibhuti wrote:
Is there any code browser available for python . I need to study the
source code of IPS . In absence of any tool like Cscope or Ctags it is
vey tedious to understand the flow of code.
Please let me know if any s
On 06/17/10 08:14 AM, seadog wrote:
Quick update. I didn't have much time to spend on this today but here are my
observations. It hung on the same file. It is a C# file. It uses the CAnalyzer. The Java
process had 1 ctags process under it. Even though it can run up to 4 ctags at one time,
only
On 04/14/10 12:03 AM, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 04/ 8/10 09:05 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi all,
We've just posted the first release candidate for OpenGrok 0.9. Please
try it out and report any problems you find with it. Source and binaries
I deployed the 0.9R
Hi all,
I was thinking about the best way to get usage data of OpenGrok server
with many projects, ideally producing a graph with time/requests axes.
At a high level it would be useful to know the usage patterns (say
number of requests per hour), lower level would include the breakdown
per p
Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 04/ 8/10 09:05 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi all,
We've just posted the first release candidate for OpenGrok 0.9. Please
try it out and report any problems you find with it. Source and binaries
I deployed the 0.9RC1 on internal server running OpenSolaris and
On 04/ 8/10 09:05 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi all,
We've just posted the first release candidate for OpenGrok 0.9. Please
try it out and report any problems you find with it. Source and binaries
I deployed the 0.9RC1 on internal server running OpenSolaris and here
are the gotchas I found
75 matches
Mail list logo
