Hi all,
Am 11.12.13 21:28, schrieb Jim Klimov:
Also, that thread mentions that you may use this work around with
the read-only dataset with the pool to enable writes to the dataset
and keeping it read-only before exporting the pool. Still, yes,
budy mentions setting the dataset attribute while
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
If you manage to reproduce this trick in command-line and if it does
indeed help (and if you want to keep using this pool i.e. to help
the developers reproduce and fix the core problem) instead of just
remaking the pool, you might build on the (unbaked
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
So basically, I am still running with this work around of setting the
affected fs to read-only, before I export the zpool.
This server is under constant load and I just don't have the time and
resources to move all 370+ ZFS fs onto another storage.
On 2013-11-18 15:27, Jim Klimov wrote:
While testing my works on SMF inter-dependencies, I discovered
that if I run svcadm restart, then the dependency service stops
first, and only when its state changes to offline, the dependent
services begin to shut down. In the meanwhile, the dependency
Hello all,
While upgrading a system from SXCE to OI, one of the last roadblocks
that remains is the configuration of COMSTAR iSCSI exported volumes.
I believe that all the relevant parts are configured in the stmf SMF
service properties, but I can't really export or import them, not via
XML
Am 12.12.13 15:18, schrieb Jim Klimov:
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
So basically, I am still running with this work around of setting the
affected fs to read-only, before I export the zpool.
This server is under constant load and I just don't have the time and
resources to move
Thanks. Stephan,
What is the process or time frame of a bug fix in ZFS from Oracle
making it's way down to Illuminous and on to OI?
On 12/12/13, 6:38 AM, Stephan Budach wrote:
Hi all,
Am 11.12.13 21:28, schrieb Jim Klimov:
Also, that thread mentions that you may use this work around
On 12/12/2013 16:14, Stephan Budach wrote:
Am 12.12.13 15:18, schrieb Jim Klimov:
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
So basically, I am still running with this work around of setting the
affected fs to read-only, before I export the zpool.
This server is under constant load and I just
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:50 AM, CJ Keist cj.ke...@colostate.edu wrote:
Thanks. Stephan,
What is the process or time frame of a bug fix in ZFS from Oracle making
it's way down to Illuminous and on to OI?
From what I understand, there isn't one. The two are developed
independently. However,
Probably never, as a guaranteed figure. The two projects diverged out of
direct collaboration due to licensing and stuff. Someone would have to reinvent
this wheel in a clean-room environment for OpenZFD.
Typos courtesy of my Samsung Mobile
Исходное сообщение
От: CJ Keist
I not able to set any attributes on ZFS FS's when the pool has been
imported as readonly:
zpool import -o readonly=on data
Not sure that is different from your command: -o ro
zfs set readonly=on data/projects/ALP
cannot set property for 'data/projects/ALP': dataset is read-only
On
Am 12.12.13 17:14, schrieb Jan Owoc:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:50 AM, CJ Keist cj.ke...@colostate.edu wrote:
Thanks. Stephan,
What is the process or time frame of a bug fix in ZFS from Oracle making
it's way down to Illuminous and on to OI?
From what I understand, there isn't one. The
On 12/12/13, 9:06 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 12/12/2013 16:14, Stephan Budach wrote:
Am 12.12.13 15:18, schrieb Jim Klimov:
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
So basically, I am still running with this work around of setting the
affected fs to read-only, before I export the
Am 12.12.13 17:21, schrieb CJ Keist:
I not able to set any attributes on ZFS FS's when the pool has been
imported as readonly:
zpool import -o readonly=on data
Not sure that is different from your command: -o ro
zfs set readonly=on data/projects/ALP
cannot set property for
Am 12.12.13 17:36, schrieb CJ Keist:
On 12/12/13, 9:06 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 12/12/2013 16:14, Stephan Budach wrote:
Am 12.12.13 15:18, schrieb Jim Klimov:
On 2013-12-12 14:38, Stephan Budach wrote:
So basically, I am still running with this work around of setting the
affected
Hi folks anyone know if oi supports
Usb 3?
openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Send OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list submissions to
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
Hi
I tried to uninstall update manager and package manager , and then to upgrade
the system to the latest.
bash-4.2$ uname -a
SunOS openindiana 5.11 illumos-78f1710 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
bash-4.2$ pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS P LOCATION
sfe
Hi,
I guess https://www.illumos.org/issues/4387 can be answer.
Regards.
Am 12.12.2013 18:16, schrieb Paolo Marcheschi:
Hi
I tried to uninstall update manager and package manager , and then to
upgrade the system to the latest.
bash-4.2$ uname -a
SunOS openindiana 5.11 illumos-78f1710 i86pc
not at the moment, no.
On 12 December 2013 17:09, David Thistlethwaite
da...@thistlethwaites.comwrote:
Hi folks anyone know if oi supports
Usb 3?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
I've seen that Solaris 11.1 includes an USB 3 capable xhci module (see
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E29006/devusbover-9.html) . Could that
be recycled under OpenIndiana, just as Solaris 11 NIC drivers can be used
interchangably?
Cheers
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
On listbox, september 2013, the discussion is headed anyone seen wireless
USB in the wild?
There are developments afoot, but currently it is not shipped in any system
based on Illumos AFAIK
On 13-12-11 06:29 PM, Doug Hughes wrote:
On 12/11/2013 8:13 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana) wrote:
From: Gregory Youngblood [mailto:greg...@youngblood.me]
Check out owncloud. The open source components might be useful.
I personally, and two other IT guys that I've spoken with from
In order to get the closed USB 3 binaries from Solaris 11, you have to buy
a copy of Solaris 11 and have a support contract. You also need to agree to
the license terms which would basically stop you taking part of the
operating system and giving it away.
So there is a remote possibility that the
It's not that I would advise doing so - for the licensing issues only to start
with. As I said, it was more the possibility to do so that I wondered about.
You're absolutely right: I would never ever consider that for production server
use. But I havent't seen any requirement for USB 3 in that
FWIW My system just went down w/ a kernel panic caused by a null reference in
genunix. I'm running oi_151a8. I had just unmounted an SDHC card w/ a FAT
filesystem used in my Canon camera and when I came back from putting the
camera away found the system at the grub menu.
I didn't find
25 matches
Mail list logo
