Am Dienstag, 13. Dezember 2005 23:16 schrieb David M. Fetter:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 19:42 +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:08 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Does anybody read me?
We read. Not much to say when all there is are complaints, some of
which you admit
[Spawning issues that I feel are seperate enough.]
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
a) Bugtracker link not working; Status: Still unfixed, no feedback
aafter three ttempts or so.
Accepted. It is a shame that we
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
I believe that it has other reasons that the feedback form was not used
as planned. E.g. I saw the form, but I dislike forms like it so much,
that I did not use it, though
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
In some ways the system can be seen as being more restrictive
as what some commercial distributors of operating systems do
(free and non-free).
Restrictive? Hmmm. Everything
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
c) Long term maintenance ideas regarding GNU/Linux Enterprise
distributions. Status: I probably will have to resend
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 08:59 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Just to give you an idea what I tried to get feedback for
b) Berkeley DB stability decision for OpenPKG 2.4
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be possibilities to help.
I have experiences with running Request-Tracker(1), gforge and Roundup.
For Intevation,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
No, I see no real reason why your Kolab users _HAVE_ to register as
OpenPKG users, although it would great for us. But you are using just
a subset of OpenPKG for Kolab and for your users OpenPKG is just a
sub-technology. Your users feel
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Note that there is some competition between OpenPKG and the operating
system vendors. This is a problem for customers. They want to have
a tested Linux (the kernel) and core technologies (like libc,
filesystem) with certification for a
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 15:55 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be possibilities to help.
I have experiences with running
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Since OpenPKG 2.4, db 4.3 is used for OpenLDAP.
We had stability problems in the past and until August the recommendations
were clear to stay with db 4.2.
How stable is OpenLDAP with db 4.3.29
(in general and with OpenPKG in particular)?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 15:55 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Now to the technical point: If you are in search of a tracker system,
(which I did not know before) there might be
Hi all
I have just installed a bare bone debian sarge on my test box just to
learn about openpkg and kolab.
I have then installed openssl and bind9 with openpkg to see if
everything works fine, and it does.
Now I am trying to install kolab 2
I have downloaded all the rpm's
here is what I
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, gruessle wrote:
I have just installed a bare bone debian sarge on my test box just to
learn about openpkg and kolab.
I have then installed openssl and bind9 with openpkg to see if
everything works fine, and it does.
Now I am trying to install kolab 2
I have
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
...
Note that there is some competition between OpenPKG and the operating system
vendors. This is a problem for customers.
They want to have a tested Linux (the kernel) and core technologies (like
libc, filesystem) with certification for a hardware.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:55:34PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
[snip]
[ Email originally send (but might be stuck in moderation)
From: Bernhard Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, gruessle wrote:
I have just installed a bare bone debian sarge on my test box just to
learn about openpkg and kolab.
I have then installed openssl and bind9 with openpkg to see if
everything works fine, and it does.
Now I am trying to install
Adam D. Morley wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:55:34PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 13:06 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
[snip]
[ Email originally send (but might be stuck in moderation)
From: Bernhard Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Using RHEL 3.0 w/NIS (compat mode for use with netgroups)...
I use a combination of NIS (/etc/passwd, not /etc/shadow) and OpenAFS
(authentication). The openpkg ID's I use are passed through NIS. I was
able to get ProFTPD to see my NIS UID's but the daemon won't start with
an UID that's not
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
Using RHEL 3.0 w/NIS (compat mode for use with netgroups)...
I use a combination of NIS (/etc/passwd, not /etc/shadow) and OpenAFS
(authentication). The openpkg ID's I use are passed through NIS. I was
able to get ProFTPD to see my NIS UID's but the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
[...]
Ralph - since I have access to so many different platforms I could
probably dedicate some CPU cycles to development on OS's you don't have
access to.
This would help us a lot. But we have to figure out the details how
we can link your hardware
21 matches
Mail list logo
