system and;
2b Use the %l_cc macro on the command line (see URL above)
Regards,
Michael
--
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe
Cable Wireless Telecommunications Services
Tel +49-89-92699-227, Fax +49-89-92699-808
pgpjKX0LovfGa.pgp
--
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe
Cable Wireless Telecommunications Services
Tel +49-89-92699-227, Fax +49-89-92699-808
pgpJn7LxuBTnG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
instance. Please see my other email which should clarify.
--
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe
Cable Wireless Telecommunications Services
Tel +49-89-92699-227, Fax +49-89-92699-808
pgpnk3V659UNL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that lots of people use/like it) and
have to convert (don't know how) my existing mailboxes from +- 50 domains.
Good reason to stick with courier, although I can't speak from experience as
to which brand more efficient is.
--
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Citando Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill CAMPBELL graciously offered you the Courier IMAP package before,
and you'll even find a OpenPKG 2.1 version if you look around a little.
Yes, but at that time it allready was a bit
Hello Steffen,
On Mon, May 24, 2004, Steffen Hansen wrote:
/kolab/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -o clamscan output.o getopt.o memory.o
cfgparser.o clamscan.o options.o others.o manager.o treewalk.o
-L/kolab/lib
-L/kolab/RPM/TMP/clamav-0.71/libclamav /kolab/lib/libclamav.a
-lz /usr/lib/libbz2.so
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004, Vinod Kutty wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
GNU textutils is now part of GNU coreutils, so replace the textutils
package with coreutils and you get gmd5sum. If you build
with with_legacy=yes, you get md5sum.
OK. Thanks. That did it. I missed it
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004, Matthias Kurz wrote:
[...]
Though, i tried it under Solaris-8/x86. So i gave up.
Oh, where do the parameters --no-print-directory -j4 come from in
your case ? Or why are they missing in my case ?
The make argument -j4 causes make to fork four times. OpenPKG will supply
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Yes, i thought that modified config files are saved as *.rpmsave by rpm
when a package is removed, but i was not sure. Most of the time it is
still unessesary work to move them back after reinstallation. And it is
error prone because you may forget it
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004, Mike's List wrote:
I've installed OpenPKG 2.0 and some of the rpm binary successfully,
such as: apache, openssh, perl, and many more, but when attempt to
connect to these services, it's not available. I've ran nmap locally
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
Hello, all. I wrote a quick and easy step-by-step document on how to
bootstrap openpkg and then proceed with installing a slew of packages
using openpkg-tool. I also wrote a script that will automate that
process as if it wasn't slick enough
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how efeciently search for avaible packages. I looked at the
ftp from OpenPKG 1.3 and could only identify imapd.
The best way to navigate available OpenPKG packages is currently with ftp.
Look in the directories in the following order,
Hello Alex,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found in the doc that you use th rc script to manage things like that,
but I could not understand how I set up a service to start at runlevel N
and how do I check if a service is active (equivalent of:
/etc/init.d/named status).
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if someone have an idea when the CURRENT release will
become the stable one ?
Yes, that is the general idea. In most cases it is safe to immediately
install (1.3) and then upgrade to the next release (2.0) when it becomes
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found in the doc that you use th rc script to manage things like that,
but I could not understand how I set up a service to start at runlevel N
and how do I check if a service is active
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in a package that is only avaiable in CURRENT and I was hoping
that it becomes stable sooner as earlier it was intended to Q4/2003 ;-(
I'm sorry to hear that. I just hope that this CURRENT package is even
scheduled for release. As
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
That means that if the package you wish to install is not in any release
distribution but you find it in CURRENT, it will be released in the next
version only if it says 'Distribution: OpenPKG [BASE]' in the spec file (or
use the 'rpm
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004, Christopher Chan wrote:
Is there any man page or other documentation for shtool other then the script
itself?
Yes. If you:
o Installed the OpenPKG shtool package,
then shtool.1 is found in /yourprefix/man/man1/shtool.1
o Installed OSSP shtool (without OpenPKG),
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the name of the Cyrus IMAP OpenPKG ?
I couldend find nothing like cyrus... either in releas-1.3 or current ?
Try
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.3/SRC/PLUS/imapd-2.1.14-1.3.0.src.rpm
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It expands to a tree under courier-imap-2.2.1, bup instaling source rpms
normaly seams to install under a directory just for the main name, as also
does courier-imap-1.5.3 from Bill Campbell. Is this done by the rpm tool
or do I need to repackage
Hello Frank,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, F. Even wrote:
I'm looking to build Apache with some of the options turned on. Do I need
to specify --define on the --rebuild of the .src.rpm step, or can I specify
that after the binary RPM has been built? ...or, is it when the binary RPM
is built, there
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realised that there is no package for Courier-IMAP avaiable in
OpenPKG-1.3.
That's right. We just have the Cyrus IMAP server. It's very good.
Can I just execute the courier-imap I build for my OpenPKG hosting
distro and integrate with
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I have build courier-imap for RH7.3 based strictly on the source
downlowded from the developer site. This source comes with a redy .spec
What I don't know is what should be better for me to do:
option a) (simpler) Just run the package I
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cantt get a list for avaiable compile optons. If someone could show
me for example how to get the avaiable compile (--with_xxx) options for
purftpd. I know that at least ther should be something to enable ldap
authentication.
Here's how it
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cantt get a list for avaiable compile optons. If someone could show
me for example how to get the avaiable compile (--with_xxx) options for
purftpd. I know that at least ther should
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the source of pureftpd and issuing ./configure --help I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pure-ftpd-1.1.0]# ./configure --help
`configure' configures this package to adapt to many kinds of systems.
Usage: ./configure [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
OpenPKG doesn't use anything called 'pam-devel'. If you want to install
pureftpd with the PAM option turned on then:
$ rpm --rebuild pam-20030715-1.3.0.src.rpm
$ rpm --rebuild --define 'with_pam yes' pureftpd-1.1.0-1.3.0.src.rpm
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand enouth of rpm build .spec file, but I took a look
at pure-ftpd.spec where I got:
%build
if [ ! -f configure ]; then
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./autogen.sh --prefix=%{prefix} \
%if %{con_pam}
--with-pam \
%endif
[...]
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a lot of lines similar to:
/cw/RPM/TMP/ccgvzdjC.s:205945: Warning: .stabs: description field '10ce6' too
big, try a different debug format
while issuing oenpkg build gcc | sh
Should I worry about this ?
Although I haven't seen and don't
Hello Helmut,
The bug you reported PR#293 is now fixed, and you weren't doing anything
wrong before. Now to install the new package just do as you always do when
building. For information on update packages like this one:
http://www.openpkg.org/faq.html#update-where
Good luck,
Michael
Hallo Birger,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003, Birger Krägelin wrote:
I try to install an armored, minimal Solaris 9 environment with
OpenPKG (built for /opt/local).
If you are talking about a new Solaris installation with only 'core' or 'end
user' solaris packages, then please publish your results. Most
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003, Birger Krägelin wrote:
As I'm new to OpenPKG, I haven't found out how to read the 00INDEX.rdf
files on the distribution site.
Which tool is best and how do I configure it, to have a better
overview of the packages with their description and dependencies?
Hello Birger,
Hi Anshuman,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003, Anshuman Kanwar wrote:
I've read through the handbook and other docs on the openpkg site. From what
I understand, openpkg will install all packages under its own installroot ?
Is this true ? Is there a way to install these packages in the system path ?
After
Hello Ansh,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003, Anshuman Kanwar wrote:
What if I build openpkg with :
$ sh openpkg-***-***.src.sh --prefix=/ --user=here --group=here
Will that break anything ?
Probably yes. The bootstrap script lays out its file hierarchy according to
the prefix you provide. In the event
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Bernd Dammann wrote:
The bootstrap process adds /lib/openpkg/bash to /etc/shells,
without checking if this files exists or not. Since there is default
/etc/shells under Solaris 9, the file gets created with a single line
only, rendering the system useless to e.g. login
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Hi.
During the bootstrap (openpkg*.sh) /usr/local/bin/python is picked
up, even when /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH. This causes the build
of rpm to fail.
This is strange and doesn't happen on any of our test platforms. Nevertheless,
I believe you.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003, Vinod Kutty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Vinod Kutty wrote:
Ah, then the mod_wm.so certainly was also built with the Sun Workshop
compiler and your problems are related to some strange incompatibilties
here.
I thought so
Just a heads up, but a new openssh package was rolled today.
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.2/UPD/openssh-3.5p1-1.2.1.src.rpm
The changed specification corrected building from source when using the
'with_chroot yes' option.
If using the aforementioned option, the original OpenPKG 1.2 package
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
I'm a linux user currently stuck on a Solaris machine at a customer. I'm
looking into using OpenPKG. I'd like to be able to build packages in my
homedirectory, like I do in Linux. Is it possible to use a ~/.rpmmacros
file like this:
$ less
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002, Vinod Kutty wrote:
As I play with openpkg towards the goal of deploying it on production
systems, one issue that's come up is what the bootstrap touches outside
the openpkg root dir. I built the
openpkg-1.1.1-1.1.1.sparc64-solaris2.8-oo.sh and corresponding .rpm from
Hello Gregory,
Thanks for this tip. Actually, we have seen this problem and I thought it was
fixed through a homemade RPM patch in which BUFSIZ is replaced with 8192. It
now looks like our patch did not completeley solve the problem however, so
I'll look into it.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Miles Egan wrote:
It's still getting power macintosh from somewhere. The bootstrap script dies
trying to run this command:
uuencode openpkg-20020904-20020904.power macintosh-darwin6.0-pd.tar.Z
Tracing it back it looks like it gets this string by running:
rpm --eval
Hello Tadashi,
I like your idea of OpenPKG on cygwin, and admire your effort of porting it.
Unfortunately, because I have little cygwin experience, I don't know what the
results will be. I don't even have a microsoft software platform to try out
your port. Can you tell me exactly how far you've
43 matches
Mail list logo
