Re: OpenPKG Tools and Binary RPMs

2004-10-21 Thread David M. Fetter
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:44, Michael van Elst wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:29:41PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote: Well, in our last example problem, the installed instance of gcc was simply a vanilla version with no additional options other than the default. However we needed the f77

OpenPKG Tools and Binary RPMs

2004-10-19 Thread David M. Fetter
It seems that openpkg build doesn't recognize or handle properly rpms that have been updated only with a new option. If I'm doing a full rebuild from a source rpm then the specified options in the build file are recongized and the various package along with dependencies are rebuilt. However,

Re: OpenPKG Tools and Binary RPMs

2004-10-19 Thread Michael van Elst
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:20:35AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote: rebuilt. However, once we deploy the newly built binary rpms into our repository to be pushed out to client systems the openpkg build doesn't acknowledge such changes. What do you mean with doesn't acknowledge such changes ?

Re: OpenPKG Tools and Binary RPMs

2004-10-19 Thread David M. Fetter
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 13:59, Michael van Elst wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:20:35AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote: rebuilt. However, once we deploy the newly built binary rpms into our repository to be pushed out to client systems the openpkg build doesn't acknowledge such changes.

Re: OpenPKG Tools and Binary RPMs

2004-10-19 Thread Michael van Elst
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:29:41PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote: Well, in our last example problem, the installed instance of gcc was simply a vanilla version with no additional options other than the default. However we needed the f77 option so we rebuilt the package on our build server,