Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > > I think this is O.K and does not require an ARC case since it
> > > is an update in the minor version. So it would be possible to
> > > integrate 2.7STABLE6 instead.
> >
> > 2.7.* to 2.7.* is only bug fixes correct?
>
> No.
Can you elaborate? What is incompatible from
+1. This seems like it could have been self-review to me, based on the
answers to the questions.
-- Garrett
James Walker wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Lily Li. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
> materials directory.
>
> Templ
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Lily Li. The requested
release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Wor
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Jeffrey Huang. The requested
release binding is minor. The man pages have been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Compo
> >1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
> > Update Squid Proxy Server to 2.7STABLE5
> >1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
> > Author: Rahul Nair
> >1.3 Date of This Document:
> > 23 February, 2009
This case timed out last Friday, there are no open issues and had a
rahul wrote:
>
> | There is a security bug in 2.7STABLE5 -
> | http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2009_1.txt
> |
> | Will you now target 2.7STABLE6 instead?
>
> I think this is O.K and does not require an ARC case since it
> is an update in the minor version. So it would be possible to
>
>Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
>> Specify disk (enter its number): 0
>> selecting c1t0d0
>> [disk formatted]
>> Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
>> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /a. Please see umount(1M).
>> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s1 is currently used by swap. Please see swap(1M).
>> If you port it to Solaris, do you also use libdiskmgmt?
>>
>
>I am not using libdiskmgmt.
The reason I ask this is:
Specify disk (enter its number): 0
selecting c1t0d0
[disk formatted]
Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /a. Please see um
I've not got time to spend on this right now... I'm very sorry. I'm
leaving town for a week on Friday, and I am buried under my other work.
If you can wait until after March 15 (I know, that's hard), you'll get a
lot better response from me.
-- Garrett
Randy Fishel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb
>Mark Logan writes:
>> I only buried ntfsprogs because I thought it would be easier to make it
>> through PSARC that way. I guess I miscalculated. I did not hack
>> ntfsprogs at all, it was the easiest thing to port. I have no problem
>> delivering ntfsprogs in its entirety and in /usr/bin, if
Hi, silverh7:
can you tell me what happens when try to format or access the disk?
i am not familiar with zfs, but run 'format -e' without 'label' will not
destroy the data. can you put your 'format -e' result into here? i am not sure
the problem is caused by the RD1000.
--
This message post
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:56 -0800, Mark Logan wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Garrett D'Amore writes:
> >
> > > I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
> > > public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
> > > are less likely to find them
James Carlson wrote:
> What's the point?
>
> tcpdump is enough like snoop that it seems to me that there's not a
> great reason to do this. Instead, it'd be much nicer to see wireshark
> integrated (which includes a command line tool that's more powerful
> than either tcpdump *or* snoop), and als
Are we supporting a particular version of clisp? The community appears
to be very
active.
--
Rick
James Walker wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Charles He. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
> materials directory.
>
> Template Version: @
Shawn M Emery wrote:
> Rick Matthews wrote:
>> Shawn,
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were going to do an
>> umbrella clarifying this case.
>
> Yes, I'll file the umbrella case after I finish the prototype. By then
> I will have a better understanding of resource requirements (mem
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> Liu, Jiang wrote:
> > Hi Randy, Garrent and Artem,
> > I have made some changes/enhancements to CPU idle notification PSARC
> > onepager according to kindly feedbacks from PSARC/Tesla review. Could you
> > please
> > help to review it again? T
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Looking at the schedules, either today or Thursday would be a much
>> better time for this, as PSARC's weekly meeting is scheduled for
>> Wednesday at 18:00 UTC (10AM PST). Cutting out access during that
>> time may break the open review of (at least) "Boomer," which I e
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:43:29AM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> Perhaps I said this before, but when you implement CCAPI, you also
> need to make sure that Java is able to use CCAPI ccaches. (Apple
> didn't do that. ;-)
Done, because JGSS now has a JNI bridge to libgss.
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
> Specify disk (enter its number): 0
> selecting c1t0d0
> [disk formatted]
> Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /a. Please see umount(1M).
> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s1 is currently used by swap. Please see swap(1M).
> /dev/
Rick Matthews wrote:
> Shawn,
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were going to do an
> umbrella clarifying this case.
Yes, I'll file the umbrella case after I finish the prototype. By then
I will have a better understanding of resource requirements (memory foot
print, restart timers,
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> Perhaps I said this before, but when you implement CCAPI, you also
> need to make sure that Java is able to use CCAPI ccaches. (Apple
> didn't do that. ;-)
Yes, I've already contacted the Java security group and the contact
there is aware of these changes and had said th
I am sponsoring this fast-track on behalf of the X11 Engineering Team.
The timeout is set for Monday, March 10, 2009.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:39:24PM -0500, James Carlson wrote:
> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
> > Specify disk (enter its number): 0
> > selecting c1t0d0
> > [disk formatted]
> > Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
> > /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /a. Please see umount(1M).
Scott Rotondo wrote:
> Phi Tran wrote:
>> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>>> The open question I have is: "do we really a new profile". There's
>>> already a "File System Management". (includes commands like format,
>>> fsck, newfs, mkfs). Hm, not fdisk, though
>>>
>>
>> I agree that the "File
Based on current discussion here, the specification is updated.
-Cecilia
Based on current discussion here, the specification and documents are
updated.
-Cecilia
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
>>
>>> Specify disk (enter its number): 0
>>> selecting c1t0d0
>>> [disk formatted]
>>> Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
>>> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /a. Please see umount(1M).
>>> /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s1 is
Phi Tran wrote:
> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> The open question I have is: "do we really a new profile". There's
>> already a "File System Management". (includes commands like format,
>> fsck, newfs, mkfs). Hm, not fdisk, though
>>
>
> I agree that the "File System Management" profile s
James Walker writes:
> 3.4.2 Authorization
> (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-intro/
> and
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/
> and
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profile
Phi Tran writes:
> >> Not sure if we're reviewing these bits here (isn't that for the later
> >> LSARC case?), but, as a nit, I wouldn't make package names
> >> "Committed," but rather Uncommitted.
>
> I thought package names should be Committed due to this document:
> http://sac.sfbay.sun.com/cgi
Those questions don't seem relevant to this fasttrack.
How a name in the file system came to contain a / would be an
issue for the local operating system and/or the local file system.
For the purpose of this fasttrack, if a file name returned by the
local file system contained a / it would be conv
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:38 -0800, Phi Tran wrote:
...
> 4.2.3. ntfsprogs
>
> Parted uses ntfsprogs [3] to resize, create or delete NTFS disk
> partitions and filesystems. ntfsprogs [3] is a collection of
> command-line utilities, one utility for each operation, e.g.
> ntfsresize and mkntfs.
>
dcragun wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:36:01 -0500 From: James Carlson
> >
> > Jordan Brown writes:
> > > > I am sponsoring the following for fast track approval. The timer
> > > > expires Wednesday 4 March 2009.
> >
> > You didn't specify a release binding or a stability level for the
Mark Logan writes:
> I only buried ntfsprogs because I thought it would be easier to make it
> through PSARC that way. I guess I miscalculated. I did not hack
> ntfsprogs at all, it was the easiest thing to port. I have no problem
> delivering ntfsprogs in its entirety and in /usr/bin, if that i
Mark Logan writes:
> I only buried ntfsprogs because I thought it would be easier to make it
> through PSARC that way. I guess I miscalculated. I did not hack
> ntfsprogs at all, it was the easiest thing to port. I have no problem
> delivering ntfsprogs in its entirety and in /usr/bin, if that i
Shawn,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were going to do an umbrella
clarifying this case.
Wyllys, I think this should be in "waiting needs spec" until then.
Thanks
--
On 02/04/09 12:16, Rick Matthews wrote:
> Shawn,
> I think there continues to be lack of understanding on this
> fast
+1
Rick Matthews wrote:
> Per last weeks meeting, I have modified the case materials as follows:
>-) Added the package name to the exported interfaces.
>-) Added the jar file to the exported interfaces.
>-) Deleted the interface table from the FOSS checklist, and
> referred to the
>
+1
Thanks
Margot
Rick Matthews wrote:
> Per last weeks meeting, I have modified the case materials as follows:
>-) Added the package name to the exported interfaces.
>-) Added the jar file to the exported interfaces.
>-) Deleted the interface table from the FOSS checklist, and
> ref
Garrett D'Amore writes:
> I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
> public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
> are less likely to find them by "accident" and infer (possibly false)
> things about their suitability for public use.
>
> That
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:06:45AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> That's not what the project team decided to do.
Project teams do get to make such decisions today. But it's worth
asking "why?" if asking causes them to re-think the matter.
> The project team hasn't committed to supporting ntfsp
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>
>> If it's not setuid, then it won't gain any privileges just because you
>> define these authorizations. You would want to include the command in an
>> RBAC profile so that users who have the profile can run it with the
>> necessary privileges. In that case, th
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> Mark Logan writes:
>>> I only buried ntfsprogs because I thought it would be easier to make it
>>> through PSARC that way. I guess I miscalculated. I did not hack
>>> ntfsprogs at all, it was the easiest thing to port. I have no problem
>>> delivering ntfsprogs in
[Thanks to Alan Coopersmith for forwarding the original message.]
Alan Burlison writes:
> Our investigations into the recent stability issues with OpenSolaris.org
> have identified the ARC case archive on the site as a potential problem
> area. As part of the analysis we will be making all pages u
Garrett D'Amore writes:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > Was there any consideration given to delivering ntfsprogs as public
> > utilities (rather than project private)?
> > I see that a limited sub-set of ntfsprogs is being delivered, no doubt
> > because thats the sub-set that gparted uses, but if ntfspr
Perhaps I said this before, but when you implement CCAPI, you also
need to make sure that Java is able to use CCAPI ccaches. (Apple
didn't do that. ;-)
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Rick Matthews wrote:
> Shawn,
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were going to do an
> umbrella cla
SUNWgparted Committed Package name (Phase 2)
/usr/share/man/man8/gparted.8 Volatile Manual page (Phase 2)
/usr/bin/gparted Volatile GParted application
(Phase 2)
>>
>> Not sure if we're reviewing t
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:13:00AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
> public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
> are less likely to find them by "accident" and infer (possibly false)
> things about the
>If it's not setuid, then it won't gain any privileges just because you
>define these authorizations. You would want to include the command in an
>RBAC profile so that users who have the profile can run it with the
>necessary privileges. In that case, there is probably no reason for the
>addi
>+1.
>
>Do we really need to introduce a new set of RBAC authorizations for
>this? I'd have guessed that low-level sys_devices or whatever access
>would have been sufficient.
You'll still need a profile and possible an exec_attr entry too.
But is there any reason not to add this to the "File
Margot,
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:30 -0800, Margot Miller wrote:
> The UNIQUE_BACKEND environment variable should be
> added to exported interface table.
Added in exported interface table.
Exported InterfacesClassificationComments
---
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:17 -0800, John Fischer wrote:
> +1 assuming that 64-bit versions of the library and pkg-config file.
John,
Added in exported interfaces.
Thanks,
Halton.
Thanks Jim, then I'll start to prepare the C-Team checklist.
Lizhong
Jim Walker wrote:
> Lizhong Li wrote:
>>> James Carlson wrote:
>>>
>>> Should probably say something about where passwords are stored, just
>>> for completeness.
>>>
>> Generally command 'cfgmaker' is used to introduce a conf
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:06:45AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> That's not what the project team decided to do.
>>
>
> Project teams do get to make such decisions today. But it's worth
> asking "why?" if asking causes them to re-think the matter.
>
>
>> T
James Carlson wrote:
> Phi Tran writes:
>
>>> GNU Partition Editor (Parted) [1] is a command-line application that allows
>>> you to resize, create or delete disk partitions and filesystems. The goal
>>> is to put it on the OpenSolaris Live CD. That way one could shrink the
>>> Vista or other
Mark Logan wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
>> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>>
>>> I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
>>> public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
>>> are less likely to find them by "accident" and infer (possibly false)
>>>
Jim Carlson wrote:
> [Thanks to Alan Coopersmith for forwarding the original message.]
Well, you should all be on opensolaris-announce, but while we discussed
autosubscribing all new accounts back when you were on the OGB, I don't
think we ever followed through to make it happen, so we know many p
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:13:00AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
>> public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
>> are less likely to find them by "accident" and infer (p
James Carlson wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>
>> I don't know about savings of effort, but if we're not making them
>> public interfaces, then I prefer them in /usr/lib/parted, where folks
>> are less likely to find them by "accident" and infer (possibly false)
>> things about their suitab
OpenSolaris ARC meeting today, 3/3 is canceled.
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 01:28 -0800, James Walker wrote:
>tcpdump 4.0.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of
>this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWtcpdump.
Doesn't tcpdump 4.0.0 require libpcap 1.0.0? SFW has 0.9.8.
As an aside, beware that 1.0.0 doesn't compile
James Carlson wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>
>> Mark Phalan wrote:
>>
>>> Was there any consideration given to delivering ntfsprogs as public
>>> utilities (rather than project private)?
>>> I see that a limited sub-set of ntfsprogs is being delivered, no doubt
>>> because thats the sub
Alan Burlison wrote:
> [Thanks to Alan Coopersmith for forwarding the original message.]
>
> Alan Burlison writes:
>
>> Our investigations into the recent stability issues with OpenSolaris.org
>> have identified the ARC case archive on the site as a potential problem
>> area. As part of the anal
James Walker writes:
>Tcpdump is a common packet sniffer that runs under the command line.
>It allows the user to intercept and display TCP/IP and other packets
>being transmitted or received over a network to which the computer is
>attached. Tcpdump works on most Unix-like OS, a
Phi Tran writes:
> > GNU Partition Editor (Parted) [1] is a command-line application that allows
> > you to resize, create or delete disk partitions and filesystems. The goal
> > is to put it on the OpenSolaris Live CD. That way one could shrink the
> > Vista or other NTFS partition and create s
Mark Phalan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:38 -0800, Phi Tran wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> 4.2.3. ntfsprogs
>>
>> Parted uses ntfsprogs [3] to resize, create or delete NTFS disk
>> partitions and filesystems. ntfsprogs [3] is a collection of
>> command-line utilities, one utility for each operation, e
>>>
>>> If I were to set a label using sharesmb that would cause zfs to share
>>> tank/photos, which I may not want shared.
>>
>> I do not understand that.
>
[..]
>
> The sharesmb syntax will not allow me to set sharesmb to off AND
> set other options.
Got it.
After thinking about it some more I
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Robin Guo. The requested
release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component W
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> +1.
>
> Do we really need to introduce a new set of RBAC authorizations for
> this? I'd have guessed that low-level sys_devices or whatever access
> would have been sufficient.
I agree with Garrett, auths here is the wrong model an exec_attr entry
with the relevant p
68 matches
Mail list logo
