On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, James Lick wrote:
Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
dd: /dev/rdiskette: open: No such file or directory
So, as far as Solaris is concerned, there is no floppy drive at all. It has
worked fine before switching to new ACPI architecture.
I see you've already fixed your problem,
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I'd like to start the ball rolling in getting an OpenSolaris Desktop
Community launched. Let's face it, there's an awful lot of FUD being
spread around OpenSolaris not being ready for the desktop - it's time to
prove them wrong ;)
I'd
Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about a KDE community as well ? :-)
lead-in: i am in the process of packaging and uploading KDE 3.4.1 for
Solaris 10, both of x86 and SPARC, at KDE. finally. :-) i will post
here when it's ready and sync'ed (very shortly).
Solaris 10 is not
Dana H. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
If I plug in a PS/2 mouse (even after the system is booted successfully)
the keyboard becomes non-functional until the system is rebooted.
That's odd. I'll have to forward this to the keyboard/mouse team;
it doesn't sound
On my machine anyway, a single power button press
induces shutdown.
A triple press induces panic+crashdump.
That's only if you've installed the experimental acpidrv (part of frkit)
Dana
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dana H. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 972481 kern.warning] WARNING: AcpiOsWritePort:
cf8 32 not permitted
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 815887 kern.notice] ACPI-0519: *** Error:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 441208 kern.notice]
Dana H. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570
What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
disable access control for those willing to experiment with it.
So you think of making
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dana H. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570
What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
disable access control for those willing to experiment with it.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about a KDE community as well ? :-)
lead-in: i am in the process of packaging and uploading KDE 3.4.1 for
Solaris 10, both of x86 and SPARC, at KDE. finally. :-) i will post
here when it's ready and sync'ed (very shortly).
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to lead a desktop community focused on JDS. There's absolutely
no reason that others can't jump in with proposals to lead KDE, XFCE, or
other variants - in fact, I'd totally encourage anyone to do so!
I did see recently
Jul 2 11:10:09 s11 genunix: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: The binding
file entry iprb 214 c
onflicts with a previous entry on line 201 of /etc/name_to_major
There's an issue here with corruption in the /etc/*_* files;
/etc/name_to_major has duplicate entries and these are also not
as they
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to lead a desktop community focused on JDS. There's absolutely
no reason that others can't jump in with proposals to lead KDE, XFCE, or
other variants - in fact, I'd totally
I am wondering if anyone would be interested in discussing Solaris_86 (10 and
later) vis-a-vis Linux?
I have been using Red Hat Linux since 4.2 and am very pleased, as far as
desktops are concerned, with Fedora Core 4. However, because of several
critical issues (e.g., inability to include
Nikolay Molchanov wrote:
I'd like to ask if there is a recommended Code Management System for
OpenSolaris.
Solaris is shipped with sccs (/usr/ccs/bin/sccs), and inside Sun all Solaris
sources
are under SCCS. We use Sun's CodeManager (also known as TeamWare) as primary
Code Management System
I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a search and found a
link to it on IBM's site... It actually looks at everything from
technical differences, legal/licensing, and ecosystems support. In the
end it comes
On 7/6/05, Sunil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I miss the most (from Gentoo system) is the ability to have access to
multiple vt's from console without having to login onto X. I know I can use
screen but its not quite as convenient as the vt's since I can't really
switch from X to console.
On 7/6/05, Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/linux/pdfs/LinuxVersusSolarisAnalysis24Feb2005.pdf
You might note who paid for that analysis. Like most such studies, it
ends up supporting its sugar daddy -- no real
I don't know if JDS sources have ever been under TW, or if JDS developers used
to use TW, but now decided to use CVS (which sounds strange to me :-).
Anyway, this is not a problem. We have created a TeamWare client for CVS.
This tool allows to use CVS repository as a parent workspace, so each
From a coding standpoint, this might almost qualify for oss-bite-size,
but since it changes the protocol and could involve bringing in new code
from BSD, it would also seem a good simple case for getting an introduction
to Sun's ARC and legal review processes.
-alan-
Original
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a search and found a
link to it on IBM's site... It actually looks at everything from
technical differences,
Ok, ok, poor form.. Someone else answer the original question then - I
retract mine..
Al Hopper wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a
Why is the default build trying to use gcc? I am following the directions given
in the dev. reference document. The only variable that affects the gcc usage is
__GNUC which I have set promptly to '#' but no go. If I set CC=cc then it spews
some cc warnings:
-
cd usr/src/uts
Hi Sunil,
By default we always build both i386 and amd64. If you would like to
build i386 only, you can modify the following files this way:
--- usr/src/uts/i86pc/Makefile.i86pc ---
Index: usr/src/uts/i86pc/Makefile.i86pc
28c28
# ident @(#)Makefile.i86pc 1.124 05/06/08
23 matches
Mail list logo
