On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:46:40PM -0700, David McDaniel wrote:
> This might be better suited to another board, but if so I dont know
> which one. In any case the dialog might be valuable to the community
> at large. To wit:
> I dont fully grasp the semantics of umem_cache_alloc, et al. Some
>
Yep...i'm having the same issue.
However...try this url:
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b20-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[E
+1 from me too.
I installed opensolaris (build 19) and built a kernel from the 20050720
snapshot so I could have acpica.
I found and installed your acpidrv too.
All in all, the system (a Toshiba Satellite M30 1.7GHz centrino with nvidia
gfx) seems to work well.
On my wishlist are the following:
--- Begin Message ---
Would it be too much to kindly ask the FSF to consider amending the
GPL (in light of the forthcoming GPL V3) to allow compatibility with
other open source licenses which may not be GPL derivatives, but are
otherwise considered ethical ?
The GNU GPL is meant as
--- "James C. McPherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ken mays wrote:
> ...
> > I hope this GPL/CDDL thing doesn't kill off a nice
> > idea like OpenSolaris before it really gets out
> the
> > gate. I hope we can end this "I hate Linux"
> mindset
> > since Linux help launch the open source movem
> Brendan Gregg wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product
> Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
> >>Just been having a discussion with a memober of the
> community (you know
> >>who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who
> logged a bug, had it
> >>updated by a sun engineer, but now h
ken mays wrote:
...
I hope this GPL/CDDL thing doesn't kill off a nice
idea like OpenSolaris before it really gets out the
gate. I hope we can end this "I hate Linux" mindset
since Linux help launch the open source movement and
got GNU tools/source code to many people. Now that we
have more comme
--- "W. Wayne Liauh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard M. Stallman wrote:
>
> >*BSD and Linux don't belong in the same list,
> because *BSD are
> >operating systems. Linux, however, is just a
> kernel. If you're
> >thinking of the operating system in which Linux is
> used, then what
> >you'v
Richard M. Stallman wrote:
>*BSD and Linux don't belong in the same list, because *BSD are
>operating systems. Linux, however, is just a kernel. If you're
>thinking of the operating system in which Linux is used, then what
>you've said is an understatement. That system is not just cooperating
>wit
Brendan Gregg wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
Just been having a discussion with a memober of the community (you know
who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who logged a bug, had it
updated by a sun engineer, but now has a problem because
G'Day Folks,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
> Just been having a discussion with a memober of the community (you know
> who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who logged a bug, had it
> updated by a sun engineer, but now has a problem because of
Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
Just been having a discussion with a memober of the community (you know
who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who logged a bug, had it
updated by a sun engineer, but now has a problem because of a
combination of the following two fac
Just been having a discussion with a memober of the community (you know
who you are; but no names, no pack drill) who logged a bug, had it
updated by a sun engineer, but now has a problem because of a
combination of the following two facts:
1. the bugs interface does not allow update of an exi
Robert W. Fuller wrote:
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:42:34 -0400
To: "Robert W. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Robert W. Fuller wrote (I assume):
Yet, I seem to have missed
14 matches
Mail list logo
