On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:24, Mike Kupfer wrote:
So people who want to use crypto will want to use the signed binaries
that are provided in the closed-bins tarball.
Or if you are a distro builder you can #ifdef out the checking
code in krtld and libpkcs11, they you won't need it. That will
also
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am pleased to announce 1st Israel OpenSolaris User Group meeting
When: Thursday, December 1, 2005 at 17:00
Where: Sun office at Herzeliya (Manofim st. 9)
I'd like to ask every attendee to RSVP - we need to plan accommodation
accordingly.
Preliminary agenda:
1.
Hey mac, congratulations on your work.
Man, im loving it!
It is set as my desktop already.
Id like to give the distro some packages im preparing,
like mplayer, irssi, giftd*, etc etc.
Just a question,
If i get the sunstudio compiler.. do u think ill have any problems
trying to compile build 26,
Hello,
Several months ago, I got into building video drivers
for Xorg 6.8.2. I happen to have a few old desktops
using the Matrox Millenium cards I use for various
purposes.
Well, I decided to spin my wheels and port over the
Matrox 4.2 video driver with HAL support.
I need to check to see if
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joerg,
I believe all the crypto code should be open now... unless there's
something I missed?
Thank you, but what is e.g. with programs like /usr/bin/des?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will check on our status; I know that we have been through the
source files, and closing in on how to get the package tools published
(i.e. in one delivery or two, with binaries first).
Please do.
Note that I would like to create a
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joerg,
I believe all the crypto code should be open now... unless there's
something I missed?
Thank you, but what is e.g. with programs like /usr/bin/des?
Jörg
Hi Jörg,
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean? /usr/bin/des
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean? /usr/bin/des should be in the open
source code (usr/src/cmd/des).
Sorry for the confusion, I checked the path on a too old
system ,-)
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Hi Rafael,
Rafael Tinoco wrote:
Hello guys,
Im Rafael Tinoco from Brazil.
We have a brazilian community http://opensolaris-br.org.
Ive written to our mailing list so everybody there could test nexenta
here in Brazil
and give you guys feed backs.
Thanks!
We would like to contribute to
On 11/7/05, Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Conover wrote: I'm installing it now on my linux laptop with vmware and later I'll try it on one of my desktops running solaris express 24.Please note that network interface is currently not
working on VMware.We are working on the driver;it should
Hey mac, congratulations on your work.
Man, im loving it!
It is set as my desktop already.
Id like to give the distro some packages im preparing,
like mplayer, irssi, giftd*, etc etc.
Just a question,
If i get the sunstudio compiler.. do u think ill have any problems
trying to compile build 26,
On Mon 11/07/05 at 21:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2005 at 11:57AM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Dan,
I think the type of discussion and interest around BrandX is likely to
be orthogonal to that of Zones. Without completely spoiling the
surprise, BrandX hopes to publish
I don't see the problem with using the code name for a project as the community
name, knowing that later on you may need to rename the community when marketing
invents a new name for it. Try as we might, we're never going to guess that
name in advance.
Matt
--
Matt Simmons - [EMAIL
Rafael David Tinoco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question,
If i get the sunstudio compiler.. do u think ill have any problems
trying to compile build 26, 27 and so on on nexenta, i mean,
is there anything needed missing to make a full opensolaris-src
compilation ?
Cause in my opinion,
Hi all,
I was wondering when sata will be supported on sparc (it is supported on x86).
I have read somewhere on the site that the effort is ongoing, so I was
wondering if someone can tell me the status.
I have googled around with no luck...
Thank you.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
Hey mac, congratulations on your work.
Man, im loving it!
It is set as my desktop already.
Great!
Id like to give the distro some packages im preparing,
like mplayer, irssi, giftd*, etc etc.
Excellent; feel free to sign up on our developers
mailing list on our
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:15:54AM -0500, Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
Ok. I wasn't aware that BrandX was a feature name. Thanks for
clarifying that. I had seem some discussions which led me to be
confused on that point-- and that the name would be much more closely
associated with zones.
* Matthew Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 09:15]:
I don't see the problem with using the code name for a project as the
community name, knowing that later on you may need to rename the
community when marketing invents a new name for it. Try as we might,
we're never going to guess that
SH == Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SH As as additional comment, marketing names are associated with
SH distributions and not the source tree shared across the community.
So are we going to maintain a separate mapping somewhere so that users coming
to the OpenSolaris pages
* Matthew Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 09:53]:
SH == Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SH As as additional comment, marketing names are associated with
SH distributions and not the source tree shared across the community.
So are we going to maintain a separate
On 11/8/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael David Tinoco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did try to start this discussion many times now...
It is most unlikely that you will be able to do this.
Even a distribution like SchilliX that tries to be binary compatible
with Sun Solaris
so I would expect that www.gnusolaris.org would contain a
place where I could download the modified sources (similar
to what I do with: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/patches)
Did I miss the download location or are the sources missing?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg
Joerg Schilling wrote:
so I would expect that www.gnusolaris.org would contain a
place where I could download the modified sources (similar
to what I do with: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/patches)
Did I miss the download location or are the sources missing?
Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
so I would expect that www.gnusolaris.org would contain a
place where I could download the modified sources (similar
to what I do with: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/patches)
Did I miss the download location or are the sources
Joerg Schilling wrote:
So there is not yet source for e.g. the mods on the OpenSolaris libc?
Oh, for the ksh? (Our workaround is to use XPG4's sh.)
Give us a few more days to release the source; we're
currently re-organizing our code repository to make it
easier for the public to access.
--
Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
So there is not yet source for e.g. the mods on the OpenSolaris libc?
Oh, for the ksh? (Our workaround is to use XPG4's sh.)
Give us a few more days to release the source; we're
currently re-organizing our code repository to make it
Joerg Schilling wrote:
As you have /bin/sh linked to bash, I suspect that there are a lot
other places where the sources needed to be modified...
For this particular wordexp() in libc, we use /usr/bin/xpg4/sh.
It would be nice if Sun were to use the latest ksh93 instead
of the outdated one,
Notes:
1. Alienware Area-51 m5700 notebook
2. GNU/Solaris released
3. GNOME 2.12.1
4. ZFS
So much goes on in a day, moreso in a week...
My notes reflect a review of GNOME 2.12.1 in which
GNU/Solaris didn't have a full port of GNOME 2.12.1
yet but enough was there to give a nice impression of
28 matches
Mail list logo
