On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Brett Wayne wrote:
> A second on Legato ...
I remember working with Legato a long time ago. Did they ever solve the
issue of creating _huge_ index/tracking files?
In some cases, the Legato "tracking" files were much larger than the size
of an incremental backup - and you nee
> Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How different is their "make" version (or better:
> What are the differences ?) ?
GNU makefiles and SUN makefiles have different syntax,
and this is the main difference between "gmake" and "dmake".
Sun Studio "dmake" (in serial mode) is compatible w
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> ALL :
>>
>>
>> I am certainly willing to talk. And listen. Make changes. Make peace.
>>
>>
> Here - Here, +1
I have waited a LOT of hours to see a reply.
Thank you .
--
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
Dennis Clarke wrote:
ALL :
I am certainly willing to talk. And listen. Make changes. Make peace.
Here - Here, +1
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 21:31, Yu-Hui Liu wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> Question is quite simple as subject. What's your prefer?
Tivoli Storage Manager is an enterprise-level backup solution from IBM,
much like Veritas Netbackup. It uses a client-server schema -- a server
manages the tape library, disk
A second on Legato ...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Given the progress you guys have made on getting it booted do you think these
fixes will make it into an Express build I can download sometime soon ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@op
Yeah,I'm a student too and I want to take part in some project
My main specialization is security,application porting and just developing
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
>I am a student developer and i would like to work on the following idea :
>
>the counterpart of powernow -> a speedstep driver for opensolaris
>- supporting frequency scaling for Pentium-M processors
>
>i have seen a threat in the laptop forum that anybody is working on this but
>nothing is
>rel
I am a student developer and i would like to work on the following idea :
the counterpart of powernow -> a speedstep driver for opensolaris
- supporting frequency scaling for Pentium-M processors
i have seen a threat in the laptop forum that anybody is working on this but
nothing is
released the
> With that said, I'll post to my blog about this "controversary article" in
> the next day or two.
>
I for one, love your blog. I will watch for that !
--
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ALL :
It has been nearly a year together here.
We are the greatest collection of Solaris people in the world and we are
divided on so many issues. I would love to see a grand unification.
Any great relationship is like a separate entity onto itself and while
soft pseudo-science may not
So far, three systems have come to pass which are
impressive for auto porting code to Solaris:
1. Portaris (Gentoo's Portage for Solaris)
2. Nexenta's Autobuilder
3. Blastwave's SVN/builder (maintained by Cory)
There are the others done by NetBSD, OpenPKG, and many
other people porting open softw
Gregory C. Ramos wrote:
What is the correct entry for /kernel/drv/st.conf
for an HP LTO-3 drive
Hi Gregory,
you can find the correct entries in this url:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/uts/common/io/scsi/targets/st_conf.c#1105
Yes, that's from the Nevada release, but a quic
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 07:28 am, jonathan schwartz wrote:
> Gentlefolk, y'all have blogs for a reason :)
Sure, but we need some guidance. Sometimes having someone like you to lead,
will allow us to follow!
This is one of the better pieces of bad press we've gotten, and it shows that
we're thr
On Monday 17 April 2006 08:05 pm, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > ...
> > everyone, the blastwaves, the nexentras, pkgsrc, et
> > all...or is this even possible? I think it would be
> > possible to give these folks an > option by having a
> > co
(moving to companion-discuss)
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 08:35 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> I'm not sure Nexenta's implementation is the way to go though. It seems
> to me that Phil's pkg-get -- being designed around Sun's implementation
> of the SVr4 packaging standard -- seems like the better can
17 matches
Mail list logo
